Tyb
kek
nik'd tyvm
Upside down it looks like a comic book villain's mask
Filtered for being annoying
was being playful, nevermind.
Upside down, it looks like a comic book villain's mask
Tell me that's a movie and not real
agreed
filtered
Gateway Pundit, [28.10.21 22:07]
"Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied, [and In This Case It's] a Probable Death Sentence" - Dissenting Wisconsin Supreme Court Judges After Majority Refuses Man Ivermectin
The Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to allow a family to provide Ivermectin to their dying relative in a hospital with COVID pneumonia.
We’ve reported on the Wisconsin Supreme Court before after the 2020 Election when they refused to address concerns that the state allowed ballot drop boxes which were unconstitutional according to the state’s laws and regulations. We saw one judge outrageously label President Trump as a conservative’s ‘king’.
We know another judge was backed with evil George Soros money.
With judges like these, it’s no wonder the state of Wisconsin’s Supreme Court ends up with insane and anti-American judgments. And that’s what we have again this past week. The three liberal judges were joined again by the man who claimed he was a conservative when running but whose verdicts have been anything but.
Karen Mueller at the Amos Center for Justice and Liberty writes:
The Amos Center for Justice & Liberty announces the decisions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from October 21, 2021 and then again on October 25, 2021 which together denied John Zingsheim, the father of two young adults who lost their mother a year ago, the chance to try to recover from the ravages of lung inflammation caused by Covid-19 pneumonia. The opinions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court were 4 to 3 decisions and in both cases with scathing dissents towards the actions of not only the Court of Appeals members but also towards fellow Supreme Court Justices by Justice Rebecca Bradley when she wrote the following, with Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and Justice Patience Roggensack joining:
“Wisconsin judges are rarely asked to make life-or-death decisions. This case presents one of those rare circumstances. The circuit court made a decision on the side of life. The appellate courts chose the irrevocable and irreversible alternative. But nothing in the law compelled it.”
In the October 21 decision, Judge Bradley was joined with Judges Ziegler and Roggensack in the following statement:
In the October 25 decision, Judge Bradley again dissented and again shared on the utter seriousness of the decision:
Between Soros-backed judges and liberal judges, Mr. Zingsheim doesn’t have a chance.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/justice-delayed-justice-denied-case-probable-death-sentence-dissenting-wisconsin-supreme-court-judges-majority-refuses-man-ivermectin/
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/7715
‘One Less Rino To Worry About’ Wendy Rogers Celebrates News That Adam Kinzinger Won’T Seek Re-Election
By: David Caron On: October 29, 2021 In: Campaigns, Tweet, Video
It was reported this morning that U.S. House Rep and Trump critic Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) won’t seek re-election in next year’s midterms.
The Congressman, who currently is a part of the Jan. 6 Select Committee, will mark the end of his 12-year House career.
GOP Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers celebrated the news in a tweet where she declared, “One less RINO to worry about. Bye Felicia!”
One less RINO to worry about. Bye Felicia!https://t.co/sAFQT8r7iV
— Wendy Rogers (@WendyRogersAZ) October 29, 2021
The announcement comes on the heels of Illinois lawmakers giving the final approval in the early hours this morning to a new congressional redistricting plan that divides the state into 17 districts.
It was the fourth draft plan that legislative Democrats had proposed over the previous two weeks, and it was introduced to the public after 7 p.m, according to Capitol News Illinois.
The map would have put him in a district with fellow GOP House Rep Darin LaHood.
In a video where he made the announcement, Kinzinger looked back on his initial victory in 2010 after returning from the Iraq war.
“This isn’t the end of my political future, but just the beginning,” Kinzinger insisted after condemning the current political climate.
Looking forward to the next chapter! pic.twitter.com/SvdFCVtrlE
— Adam Kinzinger (@AdamKinzinger) October 29, 2021
https://t.me/wendyrogersaz/1968
https://mediarightnews.com/one-less-rino-to-worry-about-wendy-rogers-celebrates-news-that-adam-kinzinger-wont-seek-re-election/
@RealGenFlynn, [29.10.21 11:56]
Can’t say it any better…
@RealGenFlynn, [29.10.21 11:56]
[ Photo ]
https://t.me/RealGenFlynn/1113
Alleged COVID Mistreatment Leads to Civil Criminal Complaint Against Mayo
A civil criminal complaint has been filed against The Mayo Clinic in Arizona, alleging “False Imprisonment, Assault, Aggravated Assault, Medical Battery, Endangerment, and Crimes against Humanity.” The complaint, filed on Oct. 18, was filed by Ali Shultz, JD, founder of Hands for Health and Freedom, on behalf of her father-in-law Chuck Shultz.
Ali alleges that her father-in-law spent “24 days of seclusion, surviving six days without adequate nourishment and hydration.” Staff at Mayo told her the nutrition treatment plan that was starving him was “the standard of care” because of the risk of aspiration due to his condition.
Additionally, there was allegedly almost no effort to provide hydration via IV—for six days—except for “one bag of D5 water,” according to audio between Ali and the hospital administrator. IV hydration would have posed zero risk of aspiration to the patient. Ali was often prevented from being able to adequately advocate for Chuck because of the hospital’s policies. It was only because of her tenacity that she was able to secure the release of her father-in-law, who is now recovering at home.
Ali struggled to get the hospital to cooperate with her regarding both parents’ care. Her input about medications, treatments, protocols were all but ignored on multiple occasions with, at times, inadequate explanations given for the treatment plans or blatant disregard for her wishes. Egregiously, her parents-in-law were subjected to life-threatening isolation and seclusion, and were unable to properly advocate for themselves. The Hands For Health and Freedom press release states:
“Seclusion is the most concerning aspect of what we’re seeing across the board. When loved ones are not around to advocate on behalf of impaired patients, nefarious things can happen.
Ali became privy to the treatment in critical care units, while she served as Medical Power of Attorney for both of her Parents-in-law, who were hospitalized at Mayo Hospital Phoenix and Banner Thunderbird Medical Center throughout August and September. Sadly, her Mother-in-law, Christi Shultz died. Banner Hospital attempted to coerce the family to consent to extubate Christi, while restricting the family physical access to assess her condition prior to extubating. The family refused, and moved Christi to her home while on a ventilator, where she eventually died, but in the presence of her beloved horses and family.
Bodily sovereignty and voluntary consent were violated, per the press statement. For example, Chuck “was experimented on without knowledge or consent, by way of investigational drug, Baricinitib.” Ali’s suggestions about COVID lung care for her mother-in-law, Christi, were also rejected by the physician. Ali added in the press release:
“It’s troubling to see a hospital show any hesitation in their resolve to recognize and protect each person’s sovereignty over their own body. Voluntary consent to receive medications is black letter law (since Nuremberg), and it must not be discarded in favor of attempts to bring socialized medicine into America, through the veil of “evidence-based medicine.” Hands for Health and Freedom relentlessly supports equal justice for all victims of these crimes, in which policy and political agendas are positioned above the doctor-patient relationship and life-affirming measures.”
In another audio file supplied in the footnotes of the press release, someone is stating the Chief Medical Officers from hospitals in the state meet three times a week to discuss visitation policies that allegedly deny family visitation for COVID-positive patients. Ali was told she was not allowed to visit Chuck in the hospital “as long as he is here,” per audio captured with staff. The Arizona Health Department’s “Release From Isolation and Quarantine Guidance” outlines the policies for isolation.
Another audio file included conversations with a doctor who refused to administer Ivermectin—an “NIH neutral drug” for her mother-in-law, who had an existing prescription for the drug from her primary care doctor. The doctor is heard telling Ali that the hospital is “throwing the kitchen sink at her” to help Christi get better and, yet, when Ali begs him to give Christi Ivermectin, he refuses based on hospital policy. Adding insult to injury, he asks for the name of the prescribing physician “so he can report him to the board.” The refusal of requested treatment when no other medical treatment options are available clearly violates the Federal Right to Try Act (Public Law 115-176).
Director of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Arizona, Randy Miller, explains the right to file criminal charges against the hospital:
“It is imperative that public officials and those in law enforcement investigate crimes that have occurred, regardless if that crime is occurring behind a critical care door or with the assistance of public officials. The participant of the crime and the situation of the crime doesn’t change the impact on victims. Nobody is immune from prosecution for their part in a crime. We all have an obligation to our fellow citizens, that their rights are protected, and their safety not jeopardized by those in positions of authority. In order to maintain peace and harmony, justice must be served on those responsible for harm on the people.”
Cases are being won in the U.S. with regard to patients demanding hospitals be open to the use of Ivermectin and other life-saving treatments, despite policies that deny them access. The Harvard Law School publication Bill of Health reports an Ohio judge ruled in early September “that a hospital in the region must administer Ivermectin to a patient very sick with COVID-19 in their ICU, despite the decision by the medical staff, in agreement with recent statements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), that Ivermectin is not an appropriate treatment, as it has been shown not to work against COVID.”
The prescription, the publication reports, “came from a doctor who has no authority to treat patients at this particular hospital, although he is licensed to prescribe medicine in Ohio.” Ivermectin, a medication with few side effects, has been shown to work in places like India for the prevention of death from COVID-19, and yet, here in the U.S., it continues to be exceedingly difficult to obtain—even outside of the hospitals.
An Oct. 1 Dark to Light episode featuring Dr. Zev Zelenko, whose experience with thousands of patients in his small, rural community of Monroe, New York, discusses the unnecessary deaths to lack of early treatment with drugs like Ivermectin and HCQ and nutraceuticals like Quercetin, Zinc and vitamin-D, among others. He says this has been a “global takeover” by a few—like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization (WHO), the pharmaceutical industry and governmental institutions causing crimes of humanity that have been completely unnecessary.
He and other doctors, like Dr. Peter McCullough, have developed effective, safe protocols that help patients avoid hospitals and prevent viral loads that lead to death—death that is preventable for 99+percent of those who contract the virus. UncoverDC has written extensively on the subjects related to the pandemic, including treatments and the jab, in its comprehensive compilation of articles entitled UncoverCOVID.
Ali Shultz’s mission to advocate for health freedom started with the requirement in schools to force masks on her children, according to her website. Her background in the medical field, combined with her legal experience, furthered her ability to properly advocate for individuals fighting for agency over their health choices. She “served as Legal Director for America’s Frontline Doctors, ran point on all the strategic litigation and wrote letters for the public to use in their local communities” and also serves “as a member of the Legal Advisory Council for the Truth for Health Foundation.”
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/29/alleged-covid-mistreatment-leads-to-civil-criminal-complaint-against-mayo/
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America
2 down, 8 to go!
TheStormHasArrived17, [29.10.21 10:42]
[ Photo ]
“Any person making statements that they will not be seeking re-election was put in submission.”
Funny that Adam Kinziger just announced that he is retiring 3 days before the 4-year delta of this drop 👀
https://t.me/TheStormHasArrived17/6167
Ice Cube will no longer star in “Oh Hell No” after refusing to get the jab.
https://twitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1454130216473878533
Turns Out Alexander Vindman Is The Dopey Hack We All Thought sHe Was
The man behind the failed Ukraine impeachment saga has no idea what free speech is or why it's protected by the U.S. Constitution.
John Daniel DavidsonBy John Daniel Davidson
OCTOBER 29, 2021
Alexander Vindman, the retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel who helped plot the botched impeachment of former President Donald Trump in what amounted to a failed coup attempt, thinks Tucker Carlson should be “censured” for saying things Vindman doesn’t like about the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
In a tweet Thursday responding to a trailer Carlson posted for his new documentary, “Patriot Purge,” Vindman asked, idiotically, “How is this different than yelling fire in a crowded theater? Carlson is attempting to incite a riotous mob. He should be censured. I’d like to hear the arguments for/against this being protected speech.”
Well since you asked, the argument for Carlson’s documentary being protected speech is right there in the Bill of Rights, on the first page, where it says Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. That includes reporting and commentary that some people, even disgraced former Army officers who try to remove duly elected presidents, disagree with.
He is an anarchist; an arsonist of American democracy. How is this different than yelling fire in a crowded theater? Carlson is attempting to incite a riotous mob. He should be censured. I’d like to hear the arguments for/against this being protected speech. https://t.co/xHTaxXo2p2
— Alexander S. Vindman (@AVindman) October 28, 2021
It’s embarrassing for Vindman that this needs to be spelled out for him, but “protected speech” under the First Amendment includes pretty much everything except a handful of specific situations, none of which remotely have to do with Carlson’s documentary.
For example, you can’t call for imminent lawless action (or incitement). You also can’t issue what’s called a “true threat,” which the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003 defined as “those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals.” Fighting words is another, quite limited category of unprotected speech that’s restricted to face-to-face interactions meant to provoke a violent reaction from the person being addressed. Not covered in any of these categories is, say, political reporting and commentary that Vindman doesn’t like.
Vindman, the man who broke the chain of command and illegally leaked the contents of a phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to a “whistleblower” in order to jump-start the Ukraine impeachment circus, is also confused about what “yelling fire in a crowded theater” means. People like Vindman always invoke the fire-in-a-crowded-theater line every time they want to justify censorship, and every time they reveal their bone-crushing ignorance.
The line comes from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who in a 1919 opinion in Schenck v. United States wrote, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” But Schenck was one of the most loathsome free speech decisions in the court’s history, and it was overturned 50 years ago.
In Schenck, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether Charles Schenck, the secretary of the Socialist Party of America, could be convicted under the Espionage Act for distributing a pamphlet that opposed the draft during World War I. The pamphlet didn’t call for violence or even civil disobedience, but merely urged Americans to petition for a repeal of the draft and to “assert your rights.”
Holmes’ crowded theater line was simply his way of saying the First Amendment isn’t absolute. But it had no legal authority and wasn’t part of the actual ruling, which was that Schenck’s pamphlet posed a “clear and present danger” to the country. This absurd ruling was one of a trio of odious free speech decisions the Supreme Court issued in 1919 that landed peaceful anti-war protesters in prison.
But Schenck was overturned in the landmark 1969 case Brandenburg v. Ohio, which held that inflammatory speech, even speech that advocates violence — even, say, if the speaker is at a Ku Klux Klan rally where klansmen are burning crosses and carrying firearms — is protected by the First Amendment unless it is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”
In other words, the First Amendment is expansive, and by trotting out the crowded theater line about a political documentary he doesn’t like, Vindman is putting himself on the side of the worst censorship decision ever handed down by the Supreme Court, a decision that has since been discredited, disgraced, and thrown into the dustbin of history.
But then Vindman should be well familiar with that.
https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/29/turns-out-alexander-vindman-is-the-dopey-hack-we-all-thought-he-was/#.YXwCmI5lUak.twitter
We The Media, [29.10.21 18:06]
[ Photo ]
RED PILL NEWS FOR 10/28/21 Ep. 1 AVAILABLE NOW
Sen. Sonny Borelli - Inside The Maricopa Audit Investigation with RedPill78
Web: https://redpill78news.com/sen-sonny-borelli-inside-the-maricopa-audit-investigation-with-redpill78/
Rumble: https://rumble.com/vofok3-sen.-sonny-borelli-inside-the-maricopa-audit-investigation-with-redpill78.html
Odysee: https://odysee.com/Sen.-Sonny-Borelli—Inside-The-Maricopa-Audit-Investigation:a143f7844f4ac4a52b225a96a30bb9eb3fa04a49
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CwEZ4ryxxMmK/
Audio Podcast: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-2qyeh-1119ebb
PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL:
Donate: http://www.redpill78news.com/donate
NEW LINK FOR Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/joinchat/WRzNRkDAeg1hUkVP
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/38696
KanekoaTheGreat, [29.10.21 13:29]
[Forwarded from Vote Liz Harris]
WI Sheriff: AG Refused Election Crime Evidence in March
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/29/wi-sheriff-ag-refused-election-crime-evidence-in-march/
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/2316
WI Sheriff: AG Refused Election Crime Evidence in March
A Thursday press conference by the Racine County Sheriff’s Office accused the government officials in charge of administering Wisconsin’s election laws of breaking those election laws. The Sheriff and his lead investigator said that the state Attorney General’s office has known about the case since March but decided there is “nothing to see here.”
Sheriff Christopher Schmaling and the lead investigator Sergeant Michael Luell answered questions and presented documentation which is hosted for the public in a dropbox folder called ‘Election Integrity.’ That link was posted to Facebook along with the Livestream video of the conference. The documentation includes a complete timeline of the potentially criminal events and a slideshow presentation of the facts of the investigation.
The crimes relate to absentee votes by nursing home residents whose family members say they lacked the cognitive ability to cast them. Sgt. Luell investigated and found 8 such votes at that facility. “It’s already done,” Luell said, “They have committed crime after crime after crime.”
“It doesn’t matter who you vote for or how you voted or what side of the party line you are; this is a problem,” said Schmaling. “This is a law that was broken.”
The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) had given guidance to loosen requirements on absentee ballots coming from nursing homes during the pandemic. According to the Sheriff’s slideshow presentation, letters sent out by WEC stated, “Municipalities shall not use the Special Voting Deputy process,” a process in place to prevent vulnerable registered voters from having absentee ballots cast in their names without consent.
Staff at the residential care facility that Luell investigated are said to have asked residents what party they voted for in the past and filled out ballots along party lines based on the answer.
Luell gave nearly 40 minutes of explanation of the documentation provided, followed by the question and answer session. At one point, he stated:
“I think we all embrace the idea that voting is good, but manipulating people, taking advantage of people, preying on people who are in cognitive decline—I think that’s some of the concerns that the families have, some of the concerns that I have, and frankly I think it’s some of the concerns that the public will have.
At the end of our interviews, they provided me with copies of the applications for absentee ballots, and they provided me with the ballot envelopes; we will never see the ballots; we’ll never know how the ballots voted. We don’t care. We’re not trying to change one vote; we’re not trying to change one election. We’re trying to hold our government accountable and force them to follow the laws that they pass.“
Schmaling stated that he and Luell are the factfinders; the decision of bringing charges is left up to the District Attorneys’ office. No one has been taken into custody.
“Where do we go from here? We’re just one of 72 counties. Ridgewood is one of 11 type facilities within our county. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of these facilities throughout the entire state of Wisconsin. We would be foolish [to think this] violation of a statute occurred to just a small group of people at one care facility, in one county in the entire state. I would submit to you that the Attorney General should launch an immediate investigation into the Wisconsin Elections Commission and restore some level of integrity and trust back into our elections system. At the end of the day, we all want to have fair elections. We all want to make certain that our vote counts, and when people break the law, we all want them held accountable.“
Its a female, Vindman is female.
>>14817796, >>14817839, >>14817987, >>14817991, >>14817820, >>14817933, >>14817831 PB,, >>14812341 pb , >>14812630 pb, >>14812672 pb, >>14812674 pb, Three Ukraine's: vindman, female name Sanya is short for Alexander
Racine County is the 5th most populous county in Wisconsin. It is located on Lake Michigan in the far southeastern corner, just south of Milwaukee and an hour north of suburban Chicago.
The officers indicated that the laws found to be broken might not be best handled within their jurisdiction, but as a statewide investigation by Attorney General Josh Kaul. Schmaling stated, “We need to start at the top where this occurred. That is not my decision,” followed by Luell’s statement that, “This is, quite frankly, a state-level case. People above my pay grade ultimately make those decisions.”
In explanation, Luell said:
“The unfortunate consequence of not following the law is having people victimized, but the crime is not necessarily having these people victimized. The crime according to the statute is the Wisconsin Elections Commission telling other officials of the vote to not follow the law.“
Luell explained that there might be a bottleneck at the state level on taking on the case, however, and added that they first notified the Attorney General sometime around March:
“We’re not kicking the can down the road, but we have a criminal justice system. There’s police officers, there’s prosecutors, there’s judges, there’s prisons. Everyone has a part to this system. We’re asking for the people next in line to take their part and to do their job. The Sheriff has called for a statewide investigation. The Sheriff has offered my documents, my reports, to the Attorney General’s office. They chose not to accept those reports. That was earlier in the year, say Marchish. We’re extending our offer again.“
And Schmaling added:
“We spoke with them on a conference line, and we explained the investigation that was unfolding. I felt as we are probably all thinking today that this is going to turn into a statewide investigation, so I wanted to bring them on board early on. I’ve offered all of our investigative reports; we have nothing to hide. I think everyone in this room would agree that Sargeant Luell certainly has some talents here and is sort of an expert. I offered to send him to Madison to assist their investigators. That offer was declined. They decided that there was nothing to see here.“
Executive Director of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin called the press conference a “publicity stunt” and “waste of taxpayer money” that may have revealed evidence that the Sheriff’s department itself broke the law “during their own farce of an investigation.”
Gillian Drummond, Director of Communications for the Wisconsin Department of Justice, is quoted by multiple sources as saying:
“DOJ was previously in contact with Sheriff Schmaling, and DOJ advised that certain interviews be conducted that had not been at that time. Significantly, no charges have been filed in this case by the Racine County DA’s office. DOJ is also currently not aware of similar allegations anywhere else in Wisconsin.“
Representative Janel Brandtjen, who has called for a full forensic audit in Wisconsin, called WEC’s conduct “felony election fraud.” Senator Ron Johnson said it may “only be [the] tip of the iceberg” and remarked, “If Democrats will stoop this low to impact elections, one can only imagine what else they’re willing to do.“
Following the LAB report, what Sheriff Schmaling has uncovered + disclosed might only be tip of the iceberg of fraud in the 2020 election.
The Legislature must be given the time, resources, and cooperation of election officials to conduct a complete investigation of allegations. https://t.co/GNLBNwSJ6n
— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) October 28, 2021
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, who created and funded an office of Special Counsel to investigate election crimes in Wisconsin, called WEC guidance “clear violations and law-breaking” and “severe mismanagement,” calling for administrator Meagan Wolfe’s resignation. Wolfe is quoted in multiple outlets as saying that the discussion among Commission members as to whether to provide pandemic guidance for absentee voting in nursing homes was public all along and is not new information.
Representative Joe Sanfelippo, who less than a week after the 2020 election wanted to “hold off on certifying the election results until the investigation is complete,” pending a “complete and in-depth investigative audit,” says now:
“I am calling for the immediate dismissal of Meagan Wolfe as the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) Administrator as well as the WEC staff who gave advice to break the law and members of the Elections Commission who voted to break the law. Those actions are the very definition of malfeasance in office. And if the Wisconsin Attorney General continues to refuse to uphold the law, then he should resign, too. It has become abundantly clear that a statewide investigation similar to what was done in Racine is necessary. All Wisconsinites, Republicans and Democrats alike, deserve to know which state laws were broken and who should be held accountable.“
In addition to this local Racine investigation, Wisconsin’s State Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) completed an elections administration audit on Oct. 22 that found illegal ballots and potentially unlawful conduct by the WEC beyond the nursing homes guidance. Directives on absentee voters, indefinitely confined voters, dropboxes, relocating polling places, and adjourning on election night were all cited as potentially against the statute. Inconsistent voter roll procedure and failure to audit electronic voting equipment accuracy by the WEC were also noted.
The LAB report found illegal ballots and anomalies on far more ballots than the ~20,000 vote margin that gave the state’s electoral votes to Joe Biden, lending credence to an independent analysis by Look Ahead America released in July.
Other ongoing election integrity efforts in Wisconsin include the investigation by a former Supreme Court Justice acting as Special Counsel and pending legislation to reform state election law.
KanekoaTheGreat, [29.10.21 18:45]
[ Photo ]
It seems pretty obvious that the Lincoln Project is falling on the sword for McAuliffe's campaign.
The actors seem to all work for the Virginia Democratic Party and McAuliffe staffers tweeted statements almost in unison promoting #TikiGate after it was initially reported.
Regardless, everyone involved in faking racial hoaxes is disgusting and immoral.
@KanekoaTheGreat
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/2324
Pepe Lives Matter 🐸, [29.10.21 12:25]
[ Photo ]
Morning News Update 🐸
Panic in Wisconsin:
https://t.me/praying_medic/6272
https://t.me/praying_medic/6273
Trump says that you might not have to wait till 2024 😉
https://t.me/MistyG17/19353
https://t.me/TheStormHasArrived17/6165
Drama queen Adam Kinzinger is retiring:
https://t.me/patelpatriot/1259
https://t.me/TheStormHasArrived17/6168
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/49041
Biden visits the Vatican…speaks gibberish as per usual:
https://t.me/Nurse_Deplorable/426
https://t.me/Qtah_17/8666
DeSantis stays winning:
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/38658
Let's go Brandon in all top 5 hip hop charts on ITunes:
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/2312
Meme of the morning:
https://t.me/krakenartsfarm/9769
https://t.me/PepeMatter/5217
If had a man that was crazy about me, as much as you are over Olga, I would be.
AGB1776, [29.10.21 08:20]
[Forwarded from RT News]
[ Photo ]
"Spray Attack:" BILLIONS of passwords HACKED - Warns Microsoft
The tech giant has sent a chilling warning about evolving techniques used by hackers to breach multiple accounts - in what's known as a “password spray” attack.
"This threat is a moving target with techniques and tools always changing," Microsoft researchers wrote in a blog post, with Google estimating 4 BILLION username/password combinations have been leaked in recent years.
Password spray attacks attempt to use the same combinations once they’ve breached one account to access others, exploiting people who have multiple identical login details.
Two Techniques Revealed:
▪️Matching already known usernames to common passwords like "123456" or… "password"
▪️Using previous usernames and passwords leaked online by cyber criminals - in 2012, 6.5MN logins were leaked from LinkedIn
You can use tools like Have I Been Pwned or Password Checkup to find out whether your accounts have been compromised.
Subscribe to RT News t.me/rtnews
https://t.me/DNN1776/9817
HEY!
>>14881903, >>14881931, >>14881933 WI Sheriff: AG Refused Election Crime Evidence in March / RACINE COUNTY ELECTION FRAUD SHERIFF UPDATE