Anonymous ID: 11828b Nov. 9, 2021, 10:51 a.m. No.14960539   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0544 >>0619

>>14960509

Don't need Gootube to figure that out.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commander_in_chief_powers

 

Commander in Chief Powers

Primary tabs

 

Article II Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the Commander in Chief clause, states that "[t]he President shall be Commander

in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service

of the United States."

 

The questions of whether and to what extent the President has the authority to use the military absent a Congressional

declaration of war have proven to be sources of conflict and debate throughout American history. Some scholars believe

the Commander in Chief Clause confers expansive powers on the President, but others argue that even if that is the case,

the Constitution does not define precisely the extent of those powers. These scholars tend to construe the Clause narrowly,

asserting that the Founders gave the President the title to preserve civilian supremacy over the military, not to provide

additional powers outside of a Congressional authorization or declaration of war.

 

…moar at sauce…

Anonymous ID: 11828b Nov. 9, 2021, 11:03 a.m. No.14960630   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0680

>>14960544

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE6OEY4XqTk&t

 

This anons opinion is that it is of moar value to read, and know the law of the land versus, delving to deeply into the minefield of disinformation/misinformation from potential clowns.

 

98% of what is out there is ridiculous bullshit sprinkled with crumbs of truth. (including below possibly)

 

Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992

 

https://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/eustace-mullins-exposed-dr-john-coleman-1992

 

According to the late, great Eustace Mullins, Dr. John Coleman (the name he goes by, anyway) not only lifted the materials he used in his books and lectures from both Mullins and Lyndon Larouche publications, but he also may have lifted material from the Anti-Defamation League…while working as a Mossad agent-agitator against America!

 

Check out below what Mullins had to say about Coleman back in 1992, and see if what Mullins said holds any water. Given that it’s from Mullins, I’d say it holds a glass that is over half-full.

 

Some Illuminating Background On The Character “John Coleman”, Agent-Agitator Finally Exposed

 

(Editor’s note: Regular readers will recall that much space in the 9/8/92 LIBERATOR was devoted to explaining an insipid array of attacks from one “Dr. John Coleman” aka John Clarke and likely actually one Joseph Pavlonsky, of Russian Khazarian origin. It seems that some of the excellent sources “Coleman” “borrowed” material from have seen fit to discuss this colorful character and in so doing, provide an illuminating — if sadly destructive — pattern of activity we would share with our readers. The following is an extract from an article purportedly by Eustace Mullins in Lawrence Patterson’s publication Criminal Politics for July or August of 1992.)

 

A specter is haunting the American conservative movement — a specter using an alias (among others) of Dr. John Coleman. Coleman bills himself as “the World’s Greatest Intelligence Expert — with secret but highly placed ties to British Intelligence.” He appeared out of the blue at a Bob White, Sound Monetary Conference meeting in Costa Rica in 1984.