BUSTED! UK Gov FUCKS up and puts out real stats, but changes the per 100,000 rate for Covaids.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1025358/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-41.pdf
>Source
I guess they either think that people are THAT retarded…forgot to do the ACTUAL math…or can not into mathz.
THE VACCINES ARE BOTH PROPAGATING AND KILLING 'MORE' PEOPLE!
THEY FUCKED UP!
Okay, so let's see how accurate their mathz is. Page 13.
Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 2021
>This is the cases broken down between vaxxed and unvaxxed
Under 18 is the biggest piece. And under 18 are NOT effected by covaids. You will see that later.
Next up is where the mathz gets funky.
There were 60,057 TOTAL cases among 18-29 year olds.
We'll actually be 'polite' and add the Unlinked cases to the *Not vaccinated cases.
If you add 7,683 (unlinked) to 20,547 (unvaxxed) you get 28,230.
>We'll be quick and just subtract the unvaxxed and unlinked combined from the total instead of adding the vaxxed cases up.
If you subtract 28,230 from the total 60,057 you get 31,827 remaining cases among the vaxxed.
28,230 unlinked and unvaxxed cases is less than 31,827 cases among the vaxxed.
Yet, in the categories for TOTAL rates per 100,000 vaxxed and unvaxxed…the numbers are skewed.
The have the rates per 100,000 at 402.6 vaxxed and 605.0 unvaxxed -_-
>Aren't there more cases among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed?
>Why would the unvaxxed have more cases per 100,000 than the vaxxed if there were more cases among the vaxxed?
It's the same for EVERY category. They know that people are lazy and simply TOO FUCKING STUPID to do the math for themselves. And will just focus on their final tally.
Ages 30-39 Total cases 83,007 | Unlinked cases 7,138 | unvaxxed cases 20,532 | = 27,670.
Subtract total among the unvaxxed and the unlinked (27,670) from total cases (83,007) = 55,337 remaining cases among the vaxxed.
Which is 'more than double' the cases among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed.
>Means you're 2x more likely to get covaids if you're vaxxed than unvaxxed.
YET, they have the cases per 100,000 at 823.9 for the unvaxxed and 709.8 for the vaxxed.
Odd, isn't it? Odd that the vaxxed are more than 2x succeptable to covaids…yet in the per 100,000 cases…they are less than the unvaxxed.
Ages 80+ is where it is worst in ALL categories.
Ages 80+: 10,770 TOTAL cases 839 Unlinked cases 375 unvaxxed cases.
>We're being REAL NOICE right now by giving them *unlinked cases as they are more than DOUBLE unvaxxed.
839+375 = 1,254 TOTAL cases among the unlinked and unvaxxed. Subtract 1,254 from 10,770 = 9,516 remaining cases among the vaxxed.
9,516 divided by 1,254 = 7.588! You are 7.5x more likely to get covaids if you are 80+ vaxxed than unvaxxed or unlinked.
YET, in the 'rates per 100,000 vaccinated and unvaccinated' category…the totals are 364.6 unvaxxed/unlinked and 298.5 vaxxed.
Odd, how when people 80+ are 7.5x more likely to get covaids…the per 100,000 totals are stating that you're more likely to get it if you're unvaxxed
You can see the pattern. The final per 100,000 cases was modified to make the unvaxxed appear as if they were the problem.
Putting the math into words takes up too much time to stay in 1 section.