>>15091893 (lb)
>General Flynn could easily be a ninja.
I would be incredibly surprised if he isn't.
It's all one big show. Everyone flipped -the fuck- out over the Kyle/Lin stuff. That's when I started laughing. Just remove the personalities from the statements, and look for facts only. Trust yourself, and watch the plot unfold. Given enough time, the truth always floats to the top.
>We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Based remembrancer.
Also:
>INVISIBLE ENEMY.
Communism. We now know what Red October was really about.
Same to you, Swordanon!
>FOG O WAR ??
>I don't know who's jewing who anymore.jpg
They are both right, though, if you think about "Qanon people" being the wrong way to label it in the context of the drop. Anons need more covfefe? Like I said, remove the personalities, examine the statements, and go where the facts lead.
>QAnon
Wording matters. Optics matter.
>personalities are the basis of the fact pattern
That should never be the case. Anons should be trusting their own selves. Is if fun to banter with recognizable personalities? Yes. Do we base facts on sources, or explore their veracity regardless?
If I came on here and suddenly started dropping hints that I might be in some intel related field, how many anons would think it true? That's how shills work. Infiltrate, gain trust, and lead astray. Anons should know, by now, Flynn knows exactly where "Q" stands on things. Flynn also knows what Qanon is. Same for Lin. Remove the personalities, and rely on your fact-based and logical understanding of what's going on.
Trust Yourself.
>The fact that a famefag is stating something becomes just as equally important as what they're saying.
What's important is discernment, and trusting your own self. Take that as an opinionated statement, but it's not without some basis in truth given the many coincidences over the years. Anons still applying lessons learned, or letting division work its destructive means on their conscious?