Anonymous ID: 881674 Nov. 28, 2021, 9:14 p.m. No.15098048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8093 >>8228 >>8259 >>8286 >>8329 >>8459 >>8537 >>8685 >>8719 >>8737 >>8741

>>15097618 (lb)

 

Synthetic Biology? Omicron? Jabs changing DNA?

 

Naw, they wouldn't do that…

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/11/28/report-world-economic-forum-sees-synthetic-biology-as-force-to-reset-living-systems/

 

Redesigning organisms for other purposes is a new field of scientific endeavor known as synthetic biology. According to a report by the World Economic Forum, expect to see (and hear) more about it as scientists look to reset humanity’s future and the “bio-economy” on the back of coronavirus vaccine research.

 

The study was released Thursday by the Switzerland-based WEF, and proclaims a scientific human reset is near because “Synthetic biology lies at the intersection of an ageing population, climate change and environmental degradation.”

 

It sets out what it calls the “bioeconomy” that covers all sectors and systems that rely on biological resources (animals, plants, microorganisms, and derived biomass, including organic waste) as well as their functions and principles.

 

The study points to synthetic biology interlinks between economic and industrial sectors such as food, health, chemicals, materials, energy and services that use biological resources and processes – pretty much everything that sustains and underlines human endeavour.

 

DNA has its role as well.

 

Harnessing that scientific variety for the future of humanity is needed, the WEF report argues. The report cautions:

 

It is anticipated that the world will face increased competition for limited and finite natural resources given a growing population, increasing pressure on our food and health systems, and climate change and associated environmental degradation decimating our primary production systems.

 

That challenge is met by modifying science to “efficiently produce high performance, sustainable products.”

 

Put more simply, that is where synthetic biology comes in.

 

Synthetic biology, proponents say, holds the promise of reprogramming biology to be more powerful and then mass-producing the turbocharged cells to increase food production, fight disease, generate energy, purify water and devour carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as the New York Times points out.

 

The aim is to follow computing, using biological information as coded in DNA, so it can be programmed — with the goal of redesigning organisms for what the WEF deems useful purposes.

Anonymous ID: 881674 Nov. 28, 2021, 9:18 p.m. No.15098063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8336

>>15098047

 

If the unvaxed cannot enter the US then it is only the vaxed which can bring it here, however I'm sure the MSM will be screaming at the top of their lungs that the Unvaxed are to blame…

Anonymous ID: 881674 Nov. 28, 2021, 9:20 p.m. No.15098072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8082

Christmas on the naughty list this year…

 

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/11/28/uk-bureaucrats-ban-word-christmas-for-fear-it-will-offend-minorities/

 

UK Civil servants have axed the word ‘Christmas’ from a proposed government campaign, for fear the term will offend minorities.

 

British civil servants have apparently embraced their inner Scrooge, vetoing the use of the word ‘Christmas’ from being used in a coronavirus testing drive aimed at students, arguing that the use of the term runs the risk of offending minorities within the country.

 

The campaign, which reportedly would have revolved around ministers using the slogan “Don’t take COVID home for Christmas,” is part of a larger government effort to limit the spread of the Chinese coronavirus after two cases of the Omicron variant were discovered on-shore.

 

‘We have been advised by Cabinet Office that we should not use the word Christmas – as the Government campaign needs to be inclusive and some religions don’t celebrate Christmas,” an email seen by The Mail on Sunday read. “The other option was ‘festive season’ which keeps the emotional motivation.”

 

“We have gone with ‘Don’t take COVID-19 home for the holidays’ – as it links to school and university Christmas holidays,” the email continued. “The alliteration with ‘home’ and ‘holidays’ scans well and is memorable.”

 

Despite the politically correct alliteration, this suggestion was also shot down in a follow-up email sent by a different British bureaucrat.

 

“We don’t refer to Christmas as the holidays (that’s an Americanism),” the email read. “Please can we say, ‘Don’t take Covid-19 home’.”

 

moar…