Anonymous ID: 70520c Dec. 8, 2021, 5:40 a.m. No.15157565   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7574

>>15157327

> 1 in 44 8-year-olds diagnosed

 

>>15157349

>"Increased autism diagnoses"

>We know that we have eyes

>From what cause?

>What population?

>Increased from what previous figures?

 

1 in 44 Amish.

oh wait, sorry

that's 0

CDC are retards

 

>https://sharylattkisson.com/2014/07/where-are-the-autistic-amish/

Where are the Autistic Amish?

 

Dated: July 20, 2014 by Sharyl Attkisson 7 Comments

 

1.4K

 

This is an interesting article written several years ago by UPI investigative journalist Dan Olmsted. It asks "Where are the autistic Amish?"

 

After the article was published, back when more reporters were covering the scientific links between vaccines and autism, I asked an official from the __Centers for Disease Control (CDC) __about the supposed lack of autism in the unvaccinated Amish. She said that there could be many other reasons besides the community's aversion to vaccines. For example, "They don't use electricity, right?" she told me. In other words, she seemed to put lack of electricity on equal footing with lack of vaccinations when it comes to what could be responsible for the apparent lower than average autism rate in the unvaccinated Amish.

 

>http://www.whale.to/vaccine/olmsted.html

The Age of Autism: The Amish anomaly

 

By Dan Olmsted

 

UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL

 

Lancaster, PA, Apr. 18 (UPI) – Part 1 of 2.

 

Where are the autistic Amish? Here in Lancaster County, heart of Pennsylvania Dutch country, there should be well over 100 with some form of the disorder.

 

I have come here to find them, but so far my mission has failed, and the very few I have identified raise some very interesting questions about some widely held views on autism.

 

The mainstream scientific consensus says autism is a complex genetic disorder, one that has been around for millennia at roughly the same prevalence. That prevalence is now considered to be 1 in every 166 children born in the United States.

 

Applying that model to Lancaster County, there ought to be 130 Amish men, women and children here with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

 

Well over 100, in rough terms.

 

Typically, half would harbor milder variants such as Asperger's Disorder or the catch-all Pervasive Development Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified – PDD-NOS for short.

 

So let's drop those from our calculation, even though "mild" is a relative term when it comes to autism.

 

That means upwards of 50 Amish people of all ages should be living in Lancaster County with full-syndrome autism, the "classic autism" first described in 1943 by child psychiatrist Leo Kanner at Johns Hopkins University. The full-syndrome disorder is hard to miss, characterized by "markedly abnormal or impaired development in social interaction and communication and a markedly restricted repertoire of activities and interests," according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

 

Why bother looking for them among the Amish? Because they could hold clues to the cause of autism.

 

The first half-dozen articles in this ongoing series on the roots and rise of autism examined the initial studies and early accounts of the disorder, first identified by Kanner among 11 U.S. children born starting in 1931.

 

Kanner wrote that his 1938 encounter with a child from Mississippi, identified as Donald T., "made me aware of a behavior pattern not known to me or anyone else theretofore." Kanner literally wrote the book on "Child Psychiatry," published in 1934.

 

If Kanner was correct if autism was new and increasingly prevalent something must have happened in the 1930s to trigger those first autistic cases. Genetic disorders do not begin suddenly or increase dramatically in prevalence in a short period of time.

 

That is why it is worth looking for autistic Amish – to test reasoning against reality. Largely cut off for hundreds of years from American culture and scientific progress, the Amish might have had less exposure to some new factor triggering autism in the rest of population.

 

Surprising, but no one seems to have looked.

Anonymous ID: 70520c Dec. 8, 2021, 6:02 a.m. No.15157643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7655 >>7660 >>7749

>>15157606

>Reminder: Epstein Considered Himself a BREEDER

 

>guessing he wasn't breeding cows

 

>or suing them

egg shaped master race

 

NYT: Jeffrey Epstein ‘hoped to seed the human race with his DNA’

 

August 01, 2019

By Kaiser Jeffrey Epstein

 

Embed from Getty Images

 

The more we learn about Jeffrey Epstein, the more mysterious he seems, right? Like, we still don’t know how he got all that money. We still don’t know how he wormed his way into royal, celebrity and academic society. We don’t know how many girls he abused, molested and raped over the course of decades. With each new article about Epstein these days, I find myself gasping in horror. This is another one: the New York Times probably started investigating how Epstein ingratiated himself into scientific and academic circles. But then they learned that Epstein actually wanted to create some kind of master race with his own “seed.” And so that became the lede.

 

Jeffrey E. Epstein, the wealthy financier who is accused of sex trafficking, had an unusual dream: He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his vast New Mexico ranch. Mr. Epstein over the years confided to scientists and others about his scheme, according to four people familiar with his thinking, although there is no evidence that it ever came to fruition.

 

Mr. Epstein’s vision reflected his longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Critics have likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding.

 

Mr. Epstein attracted a glittering array of prominent scientists. They included the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, who discovered the quark; the theoretical physicist and best-selling author Stephen Hawking; the paleontologist and evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould; Oliver Sacks, the neurologist and best-selling author; George M. Church, a molecular engineer who has worked to identify genes that could be altered to create superior humans; and the M.I.T. theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek, a Nobel laureate. The lure for some of the scientists was Mr. Epstein’s money. He dangled financing for their pet projects. Some of the scientists said that the prospect of financing blinded them to the seriousness of his sexual transgressions, and even led them to give credence to some of Mr. Epstein’s half-baked scientific musings.

 

Scientists gathered at dinner parties at Mr. Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Dom Pérignon and expensive wines flowed freely, even though Mr. Epstein did not drink. He hosted buffet lunches at Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, which he had helped start with a $6.5 million donation.

 

[From The New York Times]

 

The most deplorable people in history share a fascination with eugenics and populating the earth with their own seed. I imagine Epstein’s fantasy was that he would populate his ranch with girls aged 13-16 and they would all live as sister-wives as he raped them and impregnated them until they all “aged out.” Like Warren Jeffs without the Mormonism. Just a cult, really. I wonder if… this New York Times article would have been written differently if Epstein hadn’t insinuated himself into the highest levels of scientific academia.