They REALLY hate RRN.
Almost as much as they hated - Before It's News.
Playing football on astroturf causes chaffing.
It's almost like you can tell what to pay attention too by what they push and what they shill against. Strange how that happens.
>QR 2018 would have laughed RRN off the board in a heartbeat the minute it wasn't treated as satire.
>QR 2018 would have laughed BeforeItNews off the board in a heartbeat the minute it wasn't treated as satire.
>QR 2018 would have laughed Neon Revolt off the board in a heartbeat the minute it wasn't treated as satire.
>QR 2019 would have laughed Syncretic Studies off the board in a heartbeat the minute it wasn't treated as satire.
Not a they, but needed to IP hop to tell me so.
>RRN being hated by the usual suspects in addition to the usual Anons talking against it doesn't explain away all the Gitmo'd clowns still out there running their mouths.
>
>Nor, explain the B movie dialog they pass of as being legit convos before killing those that everyone here wants to see ded.
Maybe, maybe it is real, or maybe it is bullshit. There is bullshit in ALL THE TIME. Why is RRN the only thing that gets Shills and "Non-shills" alike so panty twisted?
>Maybe, maybe it is real, or maybe it is bullshit. There is bullshit in ALL THE TIME. Why is RRN the only thing that gets Shills and "Non-shills" alike so panty twisted?
Let's go a step further.
RRN is PROBABLY bullshit. But you don't know, anymore than I know if that is the case. Either way, our job is to catalog and decode information related to Q research. Explain how the RRN stories being posted here are NOT related to things Q talked about and I will agree we shouldn't add it.
>Because it's pushed as real when we can clearly see it's not, and you always defend it.
No, I defend what we are supposed to be doing, archiving and redpilling. How can you "clearly see" that it is not.
>Because they keep trying to pass it off as real non-stop and won't adequately respond to the obvious is obvious provable it's F&G because all the Gitmo'd ded are still alive points.
So you think we should mark it all as satire, or just completely ignore the info?
>Some REALLY hate the criticisms of RRN, kek.
Wrong, I just think it is hilarious how you attack it EXACTLY the way you have other alt-news outlets that have proven to be true after the fact in the past. You know "Future Proves Past", there used to be a poster that talked about this all the time, he was most likely satire as well. Enjoy your day, literal kike.
>We just need to read RRN's own website disclaimer. They admit they're PARODY.
>
>Like the Babylon Bee, only less funny and less insightful.
Which shields them from lawsuits. Yea we covered this, and it is your fallback as to why it should never be added, except if it says it is satire it kinda BTFO of your argument saying people are pushing it as real.
NEW RULE
''NOTHING MOVING FORWARD CAN EVER BE ADDED TO NOTABLES UNLESS YOU HAVE 100% PROOF IT IS REAL AND NOT SATIRE. ONLY THE BOARD JEWS ARE ALLOWED TO DECIDE WHAT IS REAL AND NOT. CHECK WITH ba5a13 FOR FACEBOOK FACT-CHECK APPROVAL.==
> no banhammers for posting it.
Why would you even imply someone would be banned for "posting it"
Hard to breathe in masks?
>Uh oh. Babygerbildogefister returns
"If GB is attacking RRN anons should pay extra close attention."
Rules to live by.
>>15273550 (you)
>Nah, you're not 'laughing', you're particularly upset that there are criticisms of RRN.
>It's almost like you can tell what to pay attention too by what they push and what they shill against. Strange how that happens.
>Maybe, maybe it is real, or maybe it is bullshit.
>Let's go a step further.
>
>RRN is PROBABLY bullshit
I do an excellent job defending RRN, right?
>Because they keep trying to pass it off as real non-stop and won't adequately respond to the obvious is obvious provable it's F&G because all the Gitmo'd ded are still alive points.
Prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt current Joe Bidan is the Original Joe Bidan and I will agree. Until then you are as in the dark as everyone else.
They are never "Them".
>If somebody posts something spoopily 'dasting about Fake Brandon then it gets Notabled.
Kek, I don't care if it is notable or not. I care about the shills going absolute apeshit whenever it is posted.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend, board jews see RRN as their enemy. The people TASKED with hiding information from the public seems to see RRN as their enemy.
Explain why, or what this appears to mean to you.
>[pO2zXe02]
>ONE of those posts is mine. What is your fucking point?
All of those posts are yours. Try harder kike.
> [pO2zXe02] 12/29/21 (Wed) 14:42:23 cb7391 No.15273623
>It's called a VPN
Weird how you "anons" always end up sharing the EXACT same VPN with the EXACT same IP addresses, over and over and over again.
Almost mathematically impossibru
>yes, it's possible when it's a free vpn that still has a limited number of IPs that you haven't banned. Seriously, no one is buying your "IP hash history" bullshit anymore.
Right. You guys are just really really unlucky.
ProtonVPN which is what you faggots claim to use have over 1500 servers and millions of IP addresses, yet you faggots always land on the same 50
>>>15273565, >>15273574 GHISLAINE [32] YEARS! 211229 Marked
OMG THIS IS NOT VERIFIED. IT MUST BE REMOVED UNTIL BOARD JEWS GIVE CLEARANCE FOR ANONS TO READ IT!
>I use Windscribe. fuck off.
480 SERVERS. MILLIONS OF IP ADDRESSES, 2 UNLUCKY JEWS GOT THE SAME ONE TO SHILL ON QRESEARCH IN A WEEK! MIRACLES DO HAPPEN!
>no one is buying your bullshit anymore. ONE post was mine. The other 3 were not. Maybe IP hashes don't work like you think they do. Perhaps you need to take a class.
Hi fake Q. You tried this argument 6 months ago "Hurr durr, pay no attention to the IP HASHES anons! I am the real Q"
My work here is done.
>I am not nor have ever been Q, fake Q or anyone else. You are delusional.
Yes, yes, I know… I should "Take my meds, schizo." Right?