Anonymous ID: aa1854 Jan. 2, 2022, 4:35 p.m. No.15298145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8162 >>8322 >>8340

"qanon" getting some press on RAV right now.

 

You 'qanons" took the focus away from the real children that were being trafficked.

 

He just mentioned half chan too.

 

What a faggot.

Anonymous ID: aa1854 Jan. 2, 2022, 5:20 p.m. No.15298356   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8594

>>15298340

 

You completely missed the point, failed to notice the quotation marks. They were using the term "qanon". Kapeesh?

 

But if you actually think there is such a thing as 'qanon" and that there are qanons, or that that term reflects anybody on this board, you're way lost.

 

There is q.

There are anons.

There is NO qanon.

 

FFS.

Anonymous ID: aa1854 Jan. 2, 2022, 6:09 p.m. No.15298659   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15298634

 

Lately, I have been questioning the motives of many conservative media figures and podcasters.

 

The new cool thing is to be conservative. A lot of B and C list personalities are grabbing up the vacuum created by the demise of MSM platforms. Everybody is trying to sell something or has their hand out for donations to support their channel.

 

To me, it looks like a case of different suits, same old grifters.