>>15327313

>They gave no ruling on vaxx mandates

Should have taken SCOTUS no more than 2 minutes to rule that mandates are not law and violated the people's Constitutional protection of their unalienable rights.

Only Congress can make law and even then…

"A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individuals rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (SCOTUS 1803)

It's super simple.

Mandates are not law and violate the people's unalienable rights and the Constitution.

"An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment." Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (SCOTUS 1879)

"An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (SCOTUS 1886)

>>15327480

^^^^^^^^^

THIS

Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:
"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."