Department of Defense confirms:
Virus created at Wuhan Institute of Virology with funding from EcoHealth Alliance.
Details have been CONCEALED since the pandemic began.
Masks and mRNA vaccines don't work.
Early treatment protocols (therapeutics like HCQ, Ivermectin) are CURES.
Twitter banned Project Veritas = OVER THE TARGET.
The Cabal is fucked.
Fake News is fucked.
Now it makes sense why 'suddenly' in the last few weeks Trump made a few comments here and there 'promoting' the vaccines.
The military likely asked him to do this, to DISTANCE (narrative) POTUS from the Military.
Twitter is a CESSPOOL of cabal bots, trolls and fake accounts.
>It has never been isolated.
You're conflating your lack of knowing this with an actual declaration that your ignorance must be a reflection of the truth.
It is not impossible for it to have been isolated and you don't know about it because it hasn't been made 'public' for you to see it.
At any rate, you'll need more to prove something doesn't exist than your lack of knowing whether it has or has not been isolated.
You won't succeed in covering this up, 'anon'.
DARPA docs
I think Sagat's death is being used a distraction.
The narrative sars-cov-2 'doesn't exist' is what has been 'pushed to death', anon.
"Not debatable at this point" = deceptive attempt to SILENCE questions and research, an attempt to merely compel blind belief.
>Slight of hand
You're projecting, anon.
>It is illogical to insist that people have to disprove an unproven assertion ‘otherwise’ the unproven assertion gets to remain ‘upheld’ as if true.
You're really describing the opposite position to mine.
It is illogical to assert that a person who has not observed an entity is by virtue of NOT having personally seen it that the person has thereby proved the entity does not exist.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
You didn't know 80% of what was REALLY happening in the 'silent war' for most of your entire life, prior to the Q drops and the great awakening.
By your illogical approach, what we now know as true, would have been declared by you as 'proved wrong' on the fallacious basis that you personally haven't seen what was not public.
When you see me say that sars-cov-2 exists, I am not doing so on the basis you are imputing to me, nor am I demanding that you prove to me it exists.
All I am saying are two things:
sars-cov-2 exists
It is not valid to assert that because you personally have no knowledge of it being 'isolated' that this is sufficient proof it does not exist.
You want to take about illogical assertions? Look no further than the totally fallacious assertion logic behind your assertion, that if you aren't looking at the dark side of the moon and have never seen it, that this is sufficient proof it doesn't exist.