>>15353619

>>15353603

>>15353373

>>15353412

>>15353494

>>15353453

Dr. Christina Lin is a California-based foreign policy analyst. She has extensive US government experience working on national security policy planning, including at DoD, State, and NSC, and was a research consultant at Jane’s Information Group’s Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear Assessments Intelligence Centre.

Dr. Christina Lin is a former visiting fellow at The Washington Institute. … worked in the private sector at Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs in London.

Christina Lin | The Washington Institute

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org › experts › christin…

Dr. Christina Lin is a former visiting fellow at The Washington Institute. … worked in the private sector at Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs in London.

Christina Lin - Global Taiwan Institute

https://globaltaiwan.org › team › christina-lin

Christina Lin is an adjunct fellow at GTI and research consultant for Janes … worked in the private sector at Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs in London.

Christina Lin - Center for Transatlantic Relations

https://archive.transatlanticrelations.org › Fellows

Christina Lin is a Fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations at SAIS-Johns Hopkins University, focusing on China-Mediterranean and NATO relations.

https://reschenthaler.house.gov/media/press-releases/reschenthaler-uncovers-11-million-taxpayer-funding-sent-wuhan-institute

https://www.ispsw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/689_Lin.pdf

Last year, Ernst helped expose $600,000 of U.S. taxpayer money was funneled to Communist China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) by way of a non-profit.

In April 2020, Ernst called on Congressional leadership to ensure no COVID stimulus funds went to WIV after it was exposed that the lab was funded by NIH.

In May 2020, Ernst called to defund the Wuhan Institute and China’s dangerous wet markets.

In March 2021, Ernst called on the Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General to find out why the agency is refusing to comply with a law and disclose how many taxpayer dollars are spent on specific research projects, like those being conducted with the WIV. She also introduced the Cost Openness and Spending Transparency (COST) Act which requires every project – from all federal agencies – supported with federal funds to include a price tag with the cost.

Also in March of this year, Ernst shed “sunlight” on the dangerous Wuhan Institute where she noted, “In the months just prior to the first case of the new pathogen being publicly identified, researchers at this state-run lab reportedly became sick with COVID-like symptoms.”

In April 2021, Ernst penned an op-ed writing in part, “The NIH needs to answer questions about why it allowed funds to go to this lab and what it knew about the reported problems there. It also needs to explain why it broke federal spending transparency law that would have given Congress, and most importantly the American people, a heads up that tax dollars were shipped to a virus lab run by the CCP.”

https://www.ernst.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2021/5/new-ernst-successful-in-banning-taxpayer-funding-to-china-s-wuhan-institute-of-virology

>>15353784

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler on Twitter: "https://t.co/Bfq3C6CkQz" / Twitter

https://twitter.com › greschenthaler › status

BREAKING NEWS: I recently uncovered $1.1M in Obama-era taxpayer funding funneled to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth Alliance.

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler questions U.S. research funding to …

https://www.post-gazette.com › 2021/05/14 › stories

May 14, 2021 — At the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Ms. Jadallah-Redding wrote, USAID funded activities “for the purpose of advancing research on critical …

The NIH research consisted of two parts. The first part began in 2014 and involved surveillance of bat coronaviruses, and had a budget of $3.7 million. The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. This part of the project was completed in 2019./

Trump ended the funding!

Obama only put a moratorium on 21 studies/which Obama's NIH under Fauci

December 19, 2017

NIH Lifts Funding Pause on Gain-of-Function Research

Today, the National Institutes of Health announced that it is lifting a funding pause dating back to October 2014 on gain-of-function (GOF) experiments involving influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses.

*Mentions only SARS/MERS virus***was the Obama 21 studies ban for the in the USA only? Who gave the communist China Military the basics for the Research…Fauci & Obama!

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research

*****

A second phase of the project, beginning that year, included additional surveillance work but also gain-of-function research for the purpose of understanding how bat coronaviruses could mutate to attack humans. The project was run by EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit research group, under the direction of President Peter Daszak, an expert on disease ecology. NIH canceled the project just this past Friday, April 24th, Politico reported. Daszak did not immediately respond to Newsweek requests for comment.

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741

U.S. government gave $3.7million grant to Wuhan lab that …

[Search domain dailymail.co.uk] https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-8211291 › U-S-government-gave-3-7million-grant-Wuhan-lab-experimented-coronavirus-source-bats.html

The Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook coronavirus experiments on mammals captured more than 1,000 miles away in Yunnan which were funded by a $3.7 million grant from the US government.

The Pentagon funneled $39million to a charity that funded …

[Search domain dailymail.co.uk] https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-9652287 › The-Pentagon-funneled-39million-charity-funded-Wuhan-lab.html

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is accused of being the source of Covid-19…EHA also received $64.7 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID)…In 2014 the Obama…

>>15353971

Who gave the communist China Military the basics and funding for the Research…Fauci & Obama!

Trump Ended All The Funding!!!

WE'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THE BS CONGRESSIONAL POLITICAL THEATER!

IT'S TIME TO ARREST, CHARGE AND PROSECUTE THESE BASTARDS FOR TREASON AND MASS MURDER!

If the Republicans want to win in the midterms, they need to get off their asses, grow a pair, use their brains and get a freaking backbone and do it!

New documents published by Project Veritas claim that White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci directly funded controversial research into bat coronaviruses in China. Fauci has previously denied this.

Fauci has testified under oath that the National Institutes of Health did not fund so-called “gain-of-function” research into bat-borne coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. Fauci’s testimony was called into question when it was revealed that the NIH did pay grants to a private research firm, EcoHealth Alliance, to conduct this research, and research papers revealed that scientists at the Wuhan institute were indeed studying the potential for these viruses to infect humans.

These academic papers do not conclusively prove that Covid-19 originated in a lab, but documents published on Monday by Project Veritas, a conservative investigative outlet, apparently show that the US military was aware of this research, and passed over the opportunity to fund it due to its inherent danger.

According to the documents, EcoHealth Alliance approached the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018 seeking $14 million for a program it called ‘Project Defuse’. The program sought to sample bat coronaviruses from caves in Yunnan, China, modify them to more easily infect humans,

https://www.rt.com/news/545737-veritas-fauci-funded-covid/

HIV ‘Created by Scientist’ for Biological Warfare, Nobel Peace Prize Winner Says

Kenyan ecologist Wangari Maathai who on Friday became the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize on Saturday repeated her previous claims that HIV was "created by a scientist for biological warfare," AFP/Yahoo! News reports. In August, Kenya's East African Standard quoted Maathai as saying that HIV/AIDS was created by scientists "for the purpose of mass extermination,"

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/dr00026171/

>>15354349

https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Urgent_Action/AIDS_Contract.html

The theory that AIDS originated in the laboratory has been circulating

in Europe, particularly in West Germany, since late 1986.

The theory hinges on the claim that the AIDS virus (HIV) is virtually

identical to two other viruses: Visna, which causes a fatal disease in

sheep but does not infect humans, and HTLV-I (Human T-Cell Leukemia

Virus), which infects humans but is seldom fatal.

Prof. Jakob Segal, the author of the theory, says that structural

analysis using genome mapping proves that HIV is more similar to Visna

than to any other retrovirus. The portion (about three percent) of the

HIV genome which does not correspond structurally to Visna corresponds

exactly to part of the HTLV-I genome.

This similarity, says Segal, cannot be explained by a natural process of

evolution and mutation. It can only have resulted from an artificial

combination of the two viruses.

He notes that the symptoms of AIDS are consistent with the complementary

effects of two different viruses. AIDS patients who do not die of the

consequences of immune deficiency show the same damage to the brain,

lungs, intestines, and kidneys that occurs in sheep affected with Visna.

Combining Visna with HTLV-I would allow the virus to enter not only the

macrophages of the inner organs but also the T4 lymphocytes and thus

cause immune deficiency, which is exactly what AIDS does.

As further evidence that HIV is a construct of Visna and HTLV- I, Segal

cites studies which show that the reverse transcription process in HIV

has two discrete points of peak activity which correspond, respectively,

to those of Visna and HTLV-I.

AIDS is thus, according to Segal, essentially a variety of Visna. This

has important implications for research, since a cure or vaccine might

be found sooner by studying Visna in sheep than by concentrating, as at

present, on monkeys.

The theory of the African origin of AIDS, that it developed in African

monkeys and was transferred to man, has been abandoned by most

researchers. All of the known varieties of SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency

Virus) are structurally so dissimilar to HIV (much less similar than HIV

and Visna) that a common origin is out of the question. Furthermore,

even if such a development by natural mutation were possible, it would

not explain the sudden outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s, since

monkeys and men have been living together in Africa since the beginning

of human history.

The "Africa Legend," as it is called in a 1988 West German

(Westdeutscher Rundfunk) television documentary, is further debunked by

the epidemiological history of AIDS. There is no solid evidence of AIDS

in Africa before 1983. The earliest documented cases of AIDS date from

1979 in New York.

In addition to the WDR documentary and occasional mention in magazines

like Stern and Spiegel, Segal's work has been published in West Germany

(AIDS-Erreger aus dem Gen-Labor? [AIDS-Virus from the Gene Laboratory?],

Kuno Kruse, ed., Berlin: Simon & Leutner, 1987) and India (with Lilli

Segal, The Origin of AIDS, Trichur, India: Kerala Sastra Sahitya

Parishad, 1989). He has also been conducting lecture tours in West

Germany.

Scientific journals, Segal says, have refused to publish or discuss his

theory. This is difficult to understand. If he is wrong, he should

certainly be refuted. The cornerstone of the theory is that HIV is a

combination of Visna and HTLV-I. Segal claims that any trained

laboratory technician could produce AIDS from these components, today,

in less than two weeks. If this is true, it should be demonstrable by

experiment.

The next question is, if it is possible to produce HIV from Visna and

HTLV-I now, was it also possible in 1977, when

>>15354349

>>15354359

Segal claims the AIDS

virus was created? He says it was, by use of the less precise "shotgun"

method of gene manipulation available then, though it would have taken

longer–about six months. If this is true, it should also be

demonstrable.

The final question would be: Was it produced in a laboratory? Segal

believes he has shown that it was, but he goes further than that. He

also believes he knows who produced it and why. Segal quotes from a

document presented by a Pentagon official named Donald MacArthur on June

9, 1969, to a Congressional committee, in which $10 million is requested

to develop, over the next 5 to 10 years, a new, contagious micro-

organism which would destroy the human immune system.

Whether such research is categorized as "offensive" or "defensive"is

immaterial: in order to defend oneself against apossible new virus, so

the reasoning goes, one must first develop the virus.

Since the Visna virus was already well known, Segal continues, the

problem was to find a human retrovirus that would enable it to infect

humans. Scrutiny of the technical literature, Segal says, reveals that

Dr. Robert Gallo isolated such a virus, HTLV-I, by 1975, though it was

not given this name until later.

1975 was also the year the virus section of Fort Detrick (the US Army's

center for biological warfare research in Frederick, Maryland) was

renamed the Frederick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the

supervision of the National Cancer Institute, Gallo's employer.

It was there, in the P4 (high-security) laboratory at Fort Detrick,

according to Segal, where the AIDS virus was actually created, between

the fall of 1977 and spring of 1978. Six months is precisely the time it

would have taken, using the techniques available then, to create the

AIDS virus from Visna and HTLV-I.

Segal claims that the new virus was then tested on convicts who

volunteered for the experiment in return for their release from prison.

Failing to show any early symptoms of disease, the prisoners were

released after six months. Some were homosexual, and went to New York,

where the disease was first attested in 1979.

The researchers had not counted on creating a disease with such a long

incubation period. (One year is relatively short for AIDS, but would not

be unusual if the infection was induced by high- dosage injections.) If

the researchers had kept their human guinea pigs under observation for a

longer time, they would have detected the disease and been able to

contain it.

In other words, Segal claims that AIDS is the result of a germ warfare

research experiment gone awry.

In an interview on April 18, 1987, published in the Dutch newspaper De

Volkskrant, Dr. Gallo describes Segal's theory as KGB propaganda.

Segal, who is Russian (Lithuanian Jewish) but has been a professor of

biology (now emeritus) at Humboldt University in East Berlin since 1953,

is a bit old (78) to be starting a career as a propagandist. Soviet and

East German officials, for their part, have maintained a discreet

silence on the matter, for reasons of realpolitik, Segal believes.

The question of whether AIDS is man-made or not cannot be answered by

dismissing it as propaganda.

Segal believes he has answered the question. We do not have to believe

him, but we do have to believe that the following questions are

answerable:

1) Can HIV be produced by combining Visna and HTLV-I in the laboratory

now?

2) Can it be produced using the techniques available in 1977?

3) What did go on at Ft. Detrick between 1969 and 1978? What were the

results of the $10 million Pentagon research project announced on June

9, 1969?

https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Urgent_Action/AIDS_Contract.html

>>15354359

>>15354365

>>15354349

George H. W. Bush & Fauci creators/origins of AIDS?

On January 30, 1976, George H.W. Bush was sworn in Director of Central Intelligence.

Carter accepted Bush’s resignation on January 10, 1977, the day of the Presidential Inauguration. A video has reemerged of former president George HW Bush hailing the doctor leading the current administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic as an inspiring national figure. Fauci already a researcher at NIH, became it's youngest NIH's Director in 1984.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/george-hw-bush-trump-anthony-fauci-coronavirus-aids-deep-state-twitter-a9416786.html

https://www.aaas.org/news/anthony-fauci-view-maelstrom-hivaids-research-and-policy