Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 2, 2022, 2:51 p.m. No.15530576   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0731 >>0794 >>1329

>>15530491

nothing makes someone madder than their own fuckup causing them to lose a valuable asset to their worse enemies.

 

This is all in their heads, of course. To think of QR as their own is delusion. So is the idea that their main enemies are other anons. They create enemies to they don't have to look within. Why they lose.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 2, 2022, 6:35 p.m. No.15532469   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2493 >>2520

>>15532245

HM conversion - discussed last night on the board, not populr with most anons, and not much with me either. Just exploring options with anons. Try not to get caught up in intrigue, there are no problems that cannot be solved. As long as breads get baked and notes get out, we are in business.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 10:29 a.m. No.15537116   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7940

>>15535536

>200 hours

Staff is putting in a lot of hours, but this is typical during transitional period, especially one that was totally unanticipated. Not just about OSS. We have to get to know the board, comm with anons and bakers, clean the catalog, evaluate the bread situation, and look at resource situation. There is a lot to do on all fronts.

 

If you call something 'havoc', you are saying it causes complete disorder. This is not true, as you point out here -

>>15535744

 

My point is: don't let the PERFECT be the enemy of the GOOD.

Focus on the goal, mentally minimize the problems, and keep chipping away to create a more perfect situation. Nothing worthwhile happens overnight.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 11:10 a.m. No.15537408   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7946

>>15536273

"Night shift bakers" or Doge?

Doge definitely has problems.

Don't know whether it's anybody else.

 

Knowingly puts muh joos into notes. Has been warned not to, continues to do so.

 

The notes from bread #19643 had a lot of junk in them, including board politics - which should NEVER be part of notes.

posted in General, in response to

>>15536199

>>15536265

here:

>>15536864

>>15537138

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 12:48 p.m. No.15538020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8375 >>9024

>>15537667

>>15537757

qresear/ch is fine from an operational pov.

but sent these posts to ResignationAnon so he knows what's up.

 

>>15537862

>slowly but surely OSS is destroying all the functions of Q Research

'''please desist - that is NOT TRUE. And I mean objectively. Objectively not true, according to both site owner JW and qresear.ch owner RA. Not gonna post what they said but they're very glad for the change.

 

Working together, there is no problem we cannot address.

 

>>15537946

o7

 

  • BO

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 6:04 p.m. No.15540152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0171 >>0178 >>1588 >>1980 >>2313 >>6117

>>15538375

>why Jim glad for a change?

because qresearch has been a royal pain in the ass. FJ was a nasty, hostile jerk. doxxed private convo between JW and employee, etc. I had similar experiences with him early on. Gamer guy who never allowed anons to be staff.

 

>>15539084

OSS has been trying to wear anons down for 2 years. Hasn't worked. We are here, he is not. Long game is what matters.

 

>>15539864

The idea floated about word filtering is not mine, was proposed to me. Agreed to talk with anons about it. I'm more of the mind that anons can filter and staff can delete when possible. Not like spam is something new and exotic. kek.

Agree on #3.

 

Name-fagging controversy is big headache.

i liked being anon as digger, still am anon for that. when becoming a baker, liked having a name - convenient, helpful, made a tough job easier. learned about difs among bakers, handy to know. bakers i've worked with on a daily basis all had names. they are the most service oriented people i've ever known, even IRL. Here long hours, every day, for years. Some are now bvs here. Never woulda happened with complete anonymity - trust only comes with a track record.

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 10:57 p.m. No.15541916   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1986 >>2556 >>6339

>>15541588

not taking back one word said about FJ or OSS.

No regrets about deleting spam - OSS both spams and ignores temporary bans. It's his revenge for losing control of a board lost by BO thru sheer carelessness. OSS has been treated a lot more fairly than he previouslyl treated anons on this board. At this point, the spamming from /hivemind/ constitutes a RAID on another board, which kicks it up a big notch in seriousness.

 

>deleting half of every bread

Not accurate.

 

Agree about screaming toddler. Except you also restrain the toddler when they are pounding on others.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 4, 2022, 6:21 p.m. No.15548871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2876

>>15542878

>>15542857

think converting

to qresearch would cause a problem on qresear.ch, kek

 

>>15543483

now we're cooking w/gas

 

>>15544280

>ban lust

next Fauci plague?

 

>>15546104

admins watching pretty close atm, trying to keep board open but not PlayPlace for shills

 

>>15546117

will pass it along

 

>>15546201

>/cuteboys/

kek

 

>>15546263

/dev/null

hmmm

 

>>15546454

> If I wanted to go to hivemind, I wouldn't be on qresearch, I would go there

obviously they need more anons

how can they delete on such a small board?

 

>>15548050

>disgust not lust

more keks

 

>>15548425

>who let the jews in?

why asking about jews here on meta?

 

Tx for comments, espec the funny ones.

Survived another day. Better than survived.

Whatever happens with oss raids, he still LOST BIGLY -

and keeps losing every day.

We got nothing but time and energy to sort out options and keep building up this board.

 

Main job of admins is to keep board clear enough that anons can work and Q can potentially post. Everything else is gravy.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 12:14 a.m. No.15551041   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1631

>>15550157

tyvm.

that thread had completely deteriorated, so cut it loose. Also, it was oss's thread. Given to him by fj in order to kill baking, FJ always hated the bakers. Was way b4 oss became bv, maybe you know.

Original image was of a kitchen on fire. oss changed it (asked for fj to make new thread) - it revealed too much about the real reason the thread. Filled it with attacks. no info on baking, just "enemies."

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 12:24 a.m. No.15551072   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15550207

You did stay away.

Thank you.

You are welcome to post if you actually have something to say about baking, noting or board police. No arguing or name calling.

 

You know the problem with notables the other night, too smart not to.

You wanna bake? You have the ability.

But no more muh joos, muh mason, other slides just coz it's your opinion.

No board politics - what happens in the gulch stays in the gulch.

No shitposting, half-baked "news" or entries that say "needs sauce" in final bun. If it's really good, put a question mark on the note and call for a dig. if it's not good enough for that, drop it.

You're not in kindergarten. We can use good bakers but nobody's irreplaceable.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 7:38 a.m. No.15552387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3292

>>15551490

Noted - but that was not a proposal, just mentioned it as an idea, anons were not exactly enthusiastic. And "bloatables" are really only that when full of unnecessary junk. But agree - somewhat shorter is better.

 

More concerned about baker. Late night shifts are hard on baker, espec the last 200 posts. Sometimes bakers request anons to fill the bread to speed things up. Is that really better than finishing up and request a bread lock if BV is around?