Anonymous ID: e3e654 /qresearch/ Meta Thread 2020-Jan-27 Jan. 26, 2022, 10:57 p.m. No.15472645   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0850 >>5519 >>8125 >>0488

Board Admin Issues

 

Off-topic posts in this thread may be deleted at BO/BV discretion.

.

.

https://youtu.be/vFKjp3nAtpE

.

.

.

 

 

.Announcement

BO spent a lotta time here that last coupla days, you all have a pretty good idea of where i stand.

Tired of the fighting, enough is enough.

You all know how to bake. SO BAKE.

If you have a SPECIFIC CONCERN about BAKING or the BOARD (not other bakers), contact me here: F4AL@protonmail.com.

 

Best of luck to you all.

  • BO

.

.

..

.

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 26, 2022, 11:10 p.m. No.15472697   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

https://archive.ph/wip/cL6sk /web/20220127070723/https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13699736.html

A'''rchive of previous Meta thread

'''Saved due to change in board ownership, interesting discussions.

Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 6:16 a.m. No.15473921   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4098 >>8105 >>8222

Im ok with baker names. it lets anons know who is baking, and that there is a baker on duty.

 

A baker is not ANON

A baker is part of the admin imo

so yeah should have a nametag to see who is in the kitchen.

just my 23 cents worth

 

>also rare picture of me getting ready to bake.

Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 7:13 a.m. No.15474307   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4553 >>5166 >>7114 >>7566 >>0505

BO/BV

 

Had an issue arise today

Baker in kitchen requested handoff.

I accepted, but after i accepted the baker gave me slack, thinking i was OSS or what?

 

He rescinded the offer after i took confirmation.

We can not have this type of chaos

when a baker request handoff, its first come first served, no retracting less a 911 emergency situation was reason for the handoff.

 

>>15474057

>>15474057

>>15474057

 

Please advise.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 7:56 a.m. No.15474598   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4640

>>15473931

there was another doc before me and I don't know what happened to him, so I guess I'll use chiro, but I don't mind if you call me doc, as long as you know you can associate chiro with my id. I prefer not to change my tag like you do. I'd rather just say it when necessary so people who need to know who I am know who I am.

Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 8:50 a.m. No.15475000   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15474364

>Rino's is your Target (Anons Know)

 

So was thinking of creating a thread for that. main concern is self destructing material.

content has a life span of what 4-5 days before its deleted. we need some long haul operations running and this does not work for that.

thoughts?

 

muh thread on rinos; already content is gone

This thread has been archived? why is that?

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15416833.html

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:18 a.m. No.15475279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5329 >>7188 >>7191

>>15474571

>>15475193 (OB)

I prefer not to namefag. To me, changing your name from anonymous to anything else is namefagging. I'm willing to let other bakers, BO, BV know who I am, but I prefer they follow me by my posting style, ID, chat thread after I ID myself once. If BO isn't ok with this he needs to let me know.

 

I baked a decent amount the month leading up to 1/6. At the time there was drama over a baker named Grvl. I didn't really have an opininon, but I conflicted with a baker that might have been Grvl. Honestly I try not to decipher the bullshit so I don't really know and my memory isn't 100% on all of it. All I know is there was conflict then like there is now and 'grvl' was involved. If that's you, and the people bitching at me weren't pretending to be you (that is, if it was really you) then this isn't the first time we met.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:22 a.m. No.15475313   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5362 >>5550 >>7251

>>15475166

it's bullshit when a baker does this. He's not the only baker I've seen doing it, but IMO anyone accusing other bakers of being some named negative thing on the main boards should be punished by BO. all that drama could just as easily be required to take place here and only here where it doesn't add to the bullshit bakers need to decipher.

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:24 a.m. No.15475329   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5460 >>5514

>>15475279

yes, this is grvl.

yes i have fought many a war.

main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.

 

if you helped with this then we may have fought. if you did not, then you may have against "them"

 

We are Here to Dig =Meme => Pray

ant be having bakers hiding the Memeng part?

 

member that time OSS banned me for replacing the missing Warfare content back into the doughโ€ฆ anon does.

 

but yeah old water, move on CHIMIRO

have to adapt or we die?

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:28 a.m. No.15475362   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5463 >>5550 >>7251

>>15475313

let OSS Bake, just watch his notables and Dough Fuckery.

 

You will know an anon by their work.

I know he is upset, wouldnt you be.

he is good with graphics and lines, Q noted that

 

He is Chaos good imo.

still a dick tho. definitely power went to head?

>if u take meds, make sure you do.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:39 a.m. No.15475460   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5535

>>15475329

>main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.

I don't even know what this means

>member that time OSS banned me for replacing the missing Warfare content back into the doughโ€ฆ anon does.

no. sorry. this is an example of the drama I try to avoid, and when there's drama a lot of times I won't even look at the attached images, especially if it in any way resembles some of the complex nonsense drama-lovers like to post. To me they seem like slides intended to take valuable time away from bakers/others. Maybe I'm too quick to throw what may be legit material proving a point by the way side, but it's the only way I can stay sane.

 

I'd like to think I'm nice to anyone who's nice or neutral. I will filter anyone who insists on pissing me off, even if they're a baker. I'm also likely to tell constant complainers to go fuck themselves, even when I'm baking. I try to use logic and reasoning first because it's good manners, it's what anons do, and it exposes those who don't.

I have no hard feelings to you or doge or anyone else for that matter. Doge apologized to me yesterday and, for now, I'll assume he meant it.

 

Friendly fire isn't. War is hell. Adapt or die. Godspeed.

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:47 a.m. No.15475535   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7330

>>15475460

>>main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.

 

>I don't even know what this means

 

The main dough war was keeping the section "Information Warfare" in the dough.

 

OSS and Genesis Anon took it out of the dough long ago. I have been fighting with them till this day. or since NEW BO took over.

 

"They" were hiding the Information warfare section from the dough, this caused anons to create new threads just for it [DIVISION], I created board /warroom/ just for them.

tryin not to lose frens in the many threads of the catalog.

 

>hope this helps C

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:50 a.m. No.15475561   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5589 >>6194

>>15475521

No OSS is currently SPAM HATTING the board.

look for all the jewish rhetoric in red, or the beat downs against bakers.

 

kek, hes got targets, ill give him that one.

how to keep focus on JOO DS not bakers?

 

I mean watch the bakers too, dont get me wrong. but yeah too much resources for his IQ to be set on bakers. imo

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:52 a.m. No.15475580   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5589 >>5625 >>7400

>>15475550

>DOGE

 

nah i dont think doge is sabotaging the board either,

dodge took upon himself to vet bakers o short notice.

should have stated that prior to looking for a handoff (ANON DONT LIKE SURPRISES)

 

Im ok with vetting, but a GREAT WAY TO DO THAT DODGE IS ASK FOR PRIOR ID AND CHECK THEIR POSTINGS

 

or use Baker Name fagging.

thinks im oss, dafuQ!

Anonymous ID: 7a8335 Jan. 27, 2022, 9:59 a.m. No.15475625   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5640

>>15475580

I've been watching him for a while and I'm quite sure he is, that nigger is constantly trying to start fires.

One namefaggot is starting drama every time he bakes, and the solution is to give him more leverage? No, that is a terrible idea.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 10:04 a.m. No.15475660   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5682 >>7400

>>15475617

>u can tell who OSS is by his MO

 

>Jew Bashing and Baker Bashing

Why does this seem like 10% of the UIDs when I'm baking?

 

>>15475638

I don't agree with the sentiment but Idoagree with the notion there are a chunk of these anons who were here long before I was. BV already knows this about me by now though.

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 10:11 a.m. No.15475707   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15475669

again dodge has his reason, just this anon dont like surprise and doge is like

 

doge - baker, handoff

me - ok i got you

doge - (Surprises I want this, this and this.)

 

MF^&(^&^^&

Dont waste my time.

this is not a game.

so yeah a bit upset, but move forward.

plenty of shit to do besides bake.

Anonymous ID: 37f94c Jan. 27, 2022, 11:31 a.m. No.15476401   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7400

>>15476341

>kek yeah yeahโ€ฆ

It was just sitting there and wouldn't go away.

Serious question, though; is there an established procedure to have past bans reviewed? I've several BS bans from OSS,

and one from Yoga Pig that I would like to contest.

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 12:59 p.m. No.15477111   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7114 >>7823

>>15474057

this is doge trying to protect the bake i assume. but not too popular with other bakers, right? don't know him much but a bit of a character to be sureโ€ฆ..

 

TBH, if it were me, i would just do as he asked: do notes for a couple hundred. Then ask for the bake again. why not? (hard if he's not your cup of tea but important to at least try to cooperate)

 

interesting that this tactic - whether liked or not - has the effect of making anons think about how shills like oss get in there: because they will never had the patience to do this.

 

if it were me, i would just do as he asked: do notes for a couple hundred. Then ask for the bake again. why not?

 

what is interesting is that this tactic - whether liked or not: it has the effect of making anons think about how shills like oss get in there: because they will never had the patience to do this.

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:04 p.m. No.15477146   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7823

>>15474568

>name tags

useful for discussions, bc when it comes to baking, each baker has unique ideas about how it should be. some want long notes, some want short. this and that. helps get to the crux of various disagreements so we can pinpoint the core of someone's objections and find solutions.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:05 p.m. No.15477156   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7170 >>7464

scenario:

baker who scrapes own notes and posts war-and-peace buns offers bake to someone he approves of if they'll first notetake.

baker who does anon-nom notables posts 2-3 notes at 300.

What are the chances this baker has proven himself worthy to baker war-and-peace by doing this?

let me guess: only one way to find out

โ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:17 p.m. No.15477251   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15475166

>>15475166

>>15475313

dunno bakers well enough to judge, bakers had to go underground on QR unless they wanted to get picked off by oss. so are now just 'resurfacing' a little.

over time, it becomes clear whether someone is a "character" (quirky), a lone wolf, or a shill. Time will tell.

 

>>15475362

the problem with oss baking is that his notables are shit, and not wanted by anyone. Hence, banned. He may bake, but his notes if crappy, can be thrown out if anons next bread don't like them. Next baker is free to edit or grab the dough from oss (if BVs are there, they can help pin him down). "Bad notes" include board politics, muh joos, other nasties, irrelevant filler, unsauced stuff, non-news.

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:26 p.m. No.15477330   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7523 >>7823

>>15475535

is Baqer G gerbil?

 

this speaks to a larger issue about the dough

it's "slimmed down" at the moment

not my doing or admin's, happened months ago

 

makes baking easier as much of the reference info is ignored by anons (to be honest)

but should we still have it prominentally displayed in the dough each bread?

IDK

but not a simple question, not black and white

can be discussed more but can't do everything at once

 

meanwhile, important that we have ONE DOUGH

no bread splits

anons hate them, bakers hate them, often it just the one splitting who wants the split

officially, any split (except to avoid oss bake) won't be supported by BVs

signed in baker is authorized baker

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:37 p.m. No.15477400   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7550 >>7585 >>7823

>>15475580

>vetting on short notice

short notice can be a problem, nobody likes sudden change, kek

 

>>15475617

>talk it out with oss?

could fill a book - a fat one - with baker efforts to talk it out with oss

just look at baker meta thread on comms

time for talk ended long ago

 

>>15475657

whatever your beliefs about jews or anybody, when they are bashed on this board, it reflects on Q.

that's why it's discouraged and if spammed, is deleted.

 

>>15475660

10% of iuds are jew bashing

yep - could delete the individual jabs but it's like dandelions in the grass

 

>>15475813

there have always been bakers who don't get along

but if there is a core group who CAN get along, this will help

espec if these are the ones who bake daily or close to it

 

>>15476401

go to /tech/

 

>>15476982

>>15476982

think it's already been pinned, dunno about locked

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:46 p.m. No.15477464   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7537

>>15477067

>>15477015

>bakers sometimes have no time to check qresear.ch or read thru pb notables

daytime breads were always a problem when Q posted

breads are much slower now, it's good for bakers to at least PERUSE pb notables

i always have except when grabbing a bread @200 or more - then all bets are off!

Can also ask when posting notes if anons see dups

lotta eyez out thereโ€ฆ.

 

>>15477156

>baker who does anon-nom notables posts 2-3 notes at 300

>is he worthy?

this "anon nommed notables" thing has been goin on forever

much like the "anons should learn to bake" thing

 

short answer to your question is PROBABLY NO-unless baker is also a fan of "anon-nommed notables only"

 

Whatever anyone thinks anons OUGHT to do -

anons will do what they WANT to do, and there will be a general "sense" of what the group as a whole wants and is capable of.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 1:54 p.m. No.15477523   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7627

>>15477330

>makes baking easier as much of the reference info is ignored by anons (to be honest)

I tell ya whut I definitely could not have broken my land-speed-bake record earlier of just over 2 minutes when I realized I had lost track of time, and had to drop a fresh @730 posts!

 

>but should we still have it prominentally displayed in the dough each bread?

>IDK

Perhaps the reference info can go in the OP of these META threads now, as they seem pretty active (and it would be at the front of the catalog)

Big fan of the dough now

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 1:56 p.m. No.15477537   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7660 >>8361

>>15477464

con't.

 

GENERALLY (imo):

  • Anons are VERY GOOD at finding news from alt-news sources

  • Anons are VERY GOOD at calling out poor or non existent sauce

  • Autist anons can be VERY GOOD at linking current events to Q posts or to @45 actions/EOs/etc.

  • Analytical anons can be VERY GOOD at bringing together info from diverse sources and looking at its implications. This is deep level research, and is often discussed by anons in illuminating ways - ironically often OVERLOOKED by bakers because it's harder to evaluate (espec if it's not baker's area of expertise).

 

BUT

 

  • Anons are not particularly interested in board politics except as it affects their ability to dig or meme.

  • Most do not want to bake - they are smart enough to know how to stay outta harm's way.

  • Many lack the skill to note bc schools are so shitty at teaching objective writing now (it's all "journaling"). Can help that by providing info on how to note (and for anons, on how to post) - forthcoming.

  • Most like the baker to pick up 'currents events' articles that are timely and relevent but not 'special' enough to be called out as notable (it's TEDIOUS to call out meat-and-potatoes fare that way, it's still decent news that needs to get out)

 

SO

 

we may say "anons must nom"

but so far, it hasn't happened

 

Don't let the IDEAL destroy the REAL.

muy 2 cents worth

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2 p.m. No.15477566   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7823

>>15474307

>We can not have this type of chaos

>when a baker request handoff, its first come first served

No it's not, you fucking loser

And keep pretending like you don't glow

I'm looking forward to the death of your bakerG persona, unless you really are just this retarded and indoctrinated by the DOAR that you practically emulate them

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:07 p.m. No.15477627   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15477523

>reference material

One way or another, there will DEFINITELY be a place for reference material - and anons will be consulted about it

 

I tried a coupla times as anon to get bakers to put back pages 3 and 4 in Dec when i noticed they were "missing"

Still don't know who made the decision and how it was made

I like reference material but i am a digger

Also spend a coupla weeks once going thru the dough, so i know what's there

but for a long time, for over a year, it was just a huge mass of data to me - so i see the problem with "wall of reference data" - but also like to have certain things at hand. For example, HOW TO BAKE AND EBAKE.

 

The priority when arriving was to develop a uniform dough upon which most could agree. The comments i saw indicated overall agreement but needs to be revisited, that was in the first few days of new admin. Things like this are done in stages. So we could consider the present dough to be conditional.

 

What i like or what bakers like has to be looked at from anon pov too. Anon-centered approach, helps to unify the work. (i mean really anon centered not just the rhetoric.)

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:12 p.m. No.15477660   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7751 >>7825 >>8361

>>15477537

>we may say "anons must nom"

>but so far, it hasn't happened

>Don't let the IDEAL destroy the REAL.

>muy 2 cents worth

There isABSOLUTELY NO POINTin have a baker dictate "anon noms only"

This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.

And even if they actually did that, the end result would be no different than having anon go back and doing a scrape on an ebake.

 

>>15477547

>Baker id can be handled by bakers

Agree'd

>Shill id can ONLY be handled by admins

Disagree, by technicality, as [they] are very easy to ID, and filter.

 

>Should ALL of the power to decide who bakes be in the hands of admins?

Baker should be allowed to choose who they handoff to (unless they're an obvious DOAR baker occupying the position)

The power here will come from baker/admin cooperation, like it has so far.

 

Btw, great job.

o7

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:17 p.m. No.15477709   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15477585

ha ha

looks like that was literally one of the last - but there were MANY straws before

 

OSS was a respected baker in winter 2020. A little rigid but competant and accepted by other bakers. Then he started criticizing in weird ways (no evidence) - going after several bakers using his recopied posts ("muh graphics"). Then a frontal attack with red text - beaten back by facts and so defeated.

 

At start of May, he "apologizes" and claims nervous breakdown, oh so sorry to have stabbed 4 of 5 bakers in the back, just tired. KEK. Then comes back two months later for the coup de gras. Snake like, cannot negotiate with that.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:19 p.m. No.15477712   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15475813

>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin

>The only baker I ever attack is DOGBERG

>and he always starts it by CALLING ME OSS

>DOGBERG

>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin

Wow, that"s crazy

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:26 p.m. No.15477751   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7823 >>7843

>>15477660

Good point re filtering but how do you know at top of bread handoff who is offering to bake?

 

>Baker should be allowed to choose who they handoff to

always

Yup.

Why we need coverage - bc otherwise, baker must eventually GHOST. And anyone can pick it up. There have been many interesting graveyard bakes as a result. KEK.

 

Admins can support good baking but it would be good to see a kitchen that can mostly support itself. Kitch used to be a counterpoint to admin, which is why FJ admins always talked about "bakers union" - to weaken the kitch so admins could control completely.

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:35 p.m. No.15477823   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7843 >>7850 >>8361

>>15477111 if it was me, i would rqst last bread id /s

>>15477146 nametags/banners same difference imo

>>15477191 keks in gerbil

>>15477330 is Baqer G gerbil? YES [G]rvl

>>15477400 -o7

>>15477566 [DOAR? i just dont get this one]

 

>>15477751 Baker should be allowed to choose who they handoff toโ€ฆ

great, now we waste another 1/4 bread trying to find out who the baker is? (here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.

 

Banners and Name Fagging is the only quick way i know of atm.

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:35 p.m. No.15477825   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7840 >>8361

>>15477660

One thing we need: a bin that has info on baker's work, on recent bakes, etc. Pastebin and Q-bin had that and i used it to track my own work. Used Q-bin to get info on coverage, when bakers are needed, etc.

 

The apps currently used (controlc and fullchan) are basic, need coder(s) who could flesh out fullchan (it's open source and in house, so that's a start).

 

Did you see what i said about your asking anons to post notes? I would just post notes. But i have to say, since bakers all have different approaches to notes, even good notetakers might not like the prospect of having their decisions dissected in public.

 

It made people think tho. Dunno what u wanna do in the future, we haven't yet got a way worked out yet to make it easier to see 'sup. And wont for a while. But it is much better than even a week ago. Getting better all the time.

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:38 p.m. No.15477840   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7885 >>7896 >>7945

>>15477825

The problem is Trust.

How are you going to work together if you dont trust one another. DODGE, OSS

 

I trust when i handoff to whomever they are doing gods work, we have a BO and many BVS that can be called upon if they are not doing gods work.

 

What as the downfall of the LA drug cartels.

They dint trust one another.

 

DODGE STOP SELF NOTING, THATS ANONS WORK

OSS STFU ABOUT BO AND BAKERS AND TAKE IT TO TWITTER

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:38 p.m. No.15477843   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7866 >>8361

>>15477751

>Good point re filtering but how do you know at top of bread handoff who is offering to bake?

My only ideas would be for Baker to plan ahead and make the request during the last bread they have time to bake, so it can be picked up in "top of next bread" fashion via basic comms to whoever called it.

And in the event the kitchen has to go ghost, I think we just need more comms to and from anon that we all need to be on top of our callouts.

Nothing wrong with an ebake IMO.

When I'm well rested I can go above and beyond when I scrape a pb (ctrl+f for other terms like @, sauce, proof, dasting, relevent topics, etc) when there's not many noms.

 

I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit

It's a slide

 

>>15477823

Why are you so AGAINST idea of a baker who isn't (you) having a say in who they handoff to,IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN AGENDA?

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:40 p.m. No.15477850   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7876

>>15477823

Den of Absolute Ritards = DOAR

i had to ask, too

 

>if it was me, i would rqst last bread id /s

how does the baker know it's yours?

(probably in your case, bc of the 'special dough'! but dough is spozed to be uniform, ha ha - so SHOULDN'T work, right?)

 

Support for namefagging -

not the first time for that discussion is it?

(your cue to laugh)

 

 

>>15477823

Suppose i say we are moving in the right direction but need some time.

Whaddya say?

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:41 p.m. No.15477866   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7950

>>15477843

>great, now we waste another 1/4 bread trying to find out who the baker is? (here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.

 

i pretty much just spelled it out for you anon, are you paying attention?

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:43 p.m. No.15477876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15477850

>Den of Absolute Ritards = DOAR

ah gotcha tyvm

 

>>15477850

Suppose i say we are moving in the right direction but need some time.

I see we are, jsut a few hiccups along the way.

i have np vetting, np dough changes.

short notice and surprises not so much

 

>standing by

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:45 p.m. No.15477896   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7918 >>7971

>>15477840

>DODGE STOP SELF NOTING, THATS ANONS WORK

Bakers are either anon, or shill.

THAT'S A FACT.

Retard.

Your divisionfagging is weak.

And obvious.

Are you saying now that bakers aren't allowed to submit their own notables?

Because it's against da rules to self nom?

Seriously, go fuck yourself, hall monitor faggot.

You were also the only baker OSS allowed after chasing everyone else out.

And here you are claiming to not be part of OSS.

CRINGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:50 p.m. No.15477945   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2080

>>15477840

Trust develops over time.

When bakers cooperate to work out differences, trust grows.

Tolerance is necessary as well because bakers are by nature independent thinkers (so are BOs).

Strong opinions mean tolerance is a challenge.

You had strong opinions about namefagging, but your opinion changed due to experience. To understand that our present opinion may not be โ€ฆ.hmmmโ€ฆoptimal - that's helps us to cooperate with others with different opinions.

 

Another example - you mentioned BAKERS SELF NOTING

On big boards like QR, competition for space in notables is high. Since bakers have a 'competitive advantage' self noting is discouraged.

On smaller boards, the diggers ARE the bakers. Digger collects the notes and bakes them, maybe with help, maybe not.

So really depends on the situation i think.

Saw a baker ask anons if ok to self-nom yesterday - looked at his post, seemed good so i nommed.

Like the idea of RULES OF THUMB rather than just RULES (at least for most things).

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:51 p.m. No.15477950   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7981 >>2080

>>15477866

Oh so now you're concerned about what's eating up the bread, while simultaneously advocating anon noms only so you don't have to look at the bread beyond a ctrl-f function.

I think I'm beginning to see why a faggot like you would be payrolled to post here,

YOU'RE LITERALLY TOO LAZY FOR A REAL JOB

LMFAO

Anonymous ID: e3e654 Jan. 27, 2022, 2:57 p.m. No.15477995   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Gotta go, company soon.

if i come back and find a big fight, not gonna make anybody's day.

 

look at the thread above -

good discussions

that's what we're about

WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL.

  • OUT

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 2:58 p.m. No.15477999   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1559

>>15477971

>pissed off

Goddamn right

>i dunno who is posting and don't wanna know

I'm saying in terms of volition, they are either doing Gods work, or they are here to disrupt it.

Not talking about individual identities, it's an anonymous board, we are all anonymous (obviously)

 

bakerG is controlled opposition

i am prepared to die on this hill

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 3:53 p.m. No.15478361   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8486 >>8616 >>2080

>>15477537

> Most like the baker to pick up 'currents events' articles that are timely and relevent but not 'special' enough to be called out as notable

 

is this how the practice of screencapping articles so anons didn't have to leave the boards to read went by the wayside?

>>15477660

>There isABSOLUTELY NO POINTin have a baker dictate "anon noms only"

 

>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.

I've tried to get you explain this logic and consistently refuse. IMO that's nonsense: 'anon-only' = gatekeeping but baker only = the right way. on what planet is this a logical assessment?

 

>>15477823

 

>(here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.

me either honestly, but that goes back to the same freedom of choice. Bakers have it, signed in or out, imo, as long as the chain of custody is properly maintained. When it's broken, that's bad. When it's broken by a baker over personal preference/ baker conflict, that's blasphemy, imo.

 

>>15477825

>even good notetakers might not like the prospect of having their decisions dissected in public.

 

>>15477843

>I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit

 

>It's a slide

Your mom's a slide. I do good work. You apologized and said I was right. Was that BS? imo, that's a rhetorical question.

 

had to stop here. Will read the rest when I get back from IRL.

Anonymous ID: 7a8335 Jan. 27, 2022, 4:08 p.m. No.15478486   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8643

>>15478361

what the jew is saying is other jews could nom themselves with sockpuppet IDs and contest anon noms

 

but then, if a baker is stopping this, what if the baker is one of the shills too, he could put all the secret shil notables

this is retarded and makes people not want to bake

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 4:21 p.m. No.15478616   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8688 >>2080

>>15478361

>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.

>I've tried to get you explain this logic

>and consistently refuse.

First of all, who the fuck are you?

Second I just did several times in this thread, but I will again

Because in a situation where it was not just a ploy to keep notables anorexic and lacking

the end result would be no different than if an anon came back later to scrape

WHY "BAKE" IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA COLLECT NOTABLES?????

Because you want information to fall by the wayside, that's why

This goes beyond laziness, or MuH AnOn ColLeCtEd AlL tHe NoTes

It's censorship in disguise

>Your mom's a slide

Sauce?

>You apologized and said I was right.

Sauce?

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 4:37 p.m. No.15478726   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8747

Bakers should be eccentric schizo autists who see the scope of what we are doing here, and realize than in QR 22, where we are at a precipice of consciousness AND censorship, WE SHOULD BE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO ARCHIVE, AND SHARE AS MUCH RELEVENT INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.

Not a bunch of minimalist lazy faggots who want anons to do the job of a baker with such drive

 

I understand the scope of what we're doing, and the extent to which we're winning, and we still need to push. That's why I'm willing to literally abandon IRL responisbilities and hobbies to read and evaluate nearly every post in a bread as either dasting it not, all fuckn day. If you don't have the drive, don't bake. I don't see why you would want to, anyways. Unless of course you're a DOAR fag payrolled to infiltrate and disrupt our progress however possible - such as implimenting minimalist norms that enable complacency and a false sense of accomplishment.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 4:38 p.m. No.15478739   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8753

>>15478688

>why did you say sorry to him, and thenin the same thread you were piling on with the OSS people?

Again, sauce?

Also, how is this relevent unless you're just here to be a contrarian?

What are you advocating exactly?

>sounds like DOGBERG

Besides MUH JOOing?

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 4:40 p.m. No.15478768   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8779 >>8795 >>9003

>>15478643

>If anons and a baker can't figure out a post is a shill post, or whatever paranoid thing anyone is worried about,and refuse it or request it be pulled, this board is worrhless

Yeah cuz it's all about the shills right?

Not the information, keep the focus on shills and division

Got it!

 

>>15478747

>Am I DOAR, bluntwrap? or just when I'm baking.

Since you're calling me by the name of my burner account to keeps tabs on you DOAR fags, yeah I'd say theres a good chance you're a DOAR fag!

 

>>15478753

>you want me to dig it up, kike? just say the word.

the word!

Anonymous ID: 2de9c7 Jan. 27, 2022, 4:44 p.m. No.15478795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8813

>>15478768

A wall of links to news articles with no real filter or thought is NOT information. There are 5 or so decent non-Q aggregators folks can go to for that bullshit. I argue it's the opposite. Shills can easily flood notables with so much worthless content no one gives AF about them any more. I'd take the other side of this coin more seriously if doge wasn't making the argument as he's doing a lousy job trying.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 4:46 p.m. No.15478813   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8873 >>9003

>>15478779

Oh look, moar gaslighting and literal projection.

JFC

Go spam the general with MuH JoOs, You're better at that

Adults are trying to have a discussion here

 

>>15478795

>I argue it's the opposite. Shills can easily flood notables with so much worthless content no one gives AF about them any more

Bullshit, WHY ARE YOU HERE IF YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT NOTABLES?

Seriously this has to be one of the funniest narratives you guys try to use.

Anonymous ID: d1f384 Jan. 27, 2022, 5 p.m. No.15478923   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8933 >>8954

>>15478886

Think about itโ€ฆ

The way things were when this place was at its best and most relevant and everyone went out their way to create tools to pump us out to the worldโ€ฆ

That's now somehow gatekeeping and if you disagree you must be a shill.

Really?

REALLY?!

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 5:01 p.m. No.15478933   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8971

>>15478873

>Zero respect for differing opinions among bakers.

I have plenty of respect for people who aren't trying to smear me and hoodwink the operation.

But all the bakers in question wanna do is call me a nigger, or a jew, or a shill.

Very compelling.

>BO likes big notes and he and I are just fine

Exactly, 8kun isn't gonna run out of harddrive space.

Anons want substance.

Not censorship.

>I was not here for past 6 months.

>What did board look like when Q was here?

I was not here when Q was here, I've been here for the past 6 months.

Maybe that's why I don't see the logic in reverting to an old norm from a different setting when the game has changed!

>>15478923

>That's now somehow gatekeeping and if you disagree you must be a shill.

That or extremely gullible!

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 5:05 p.m. No.15478954   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15478923

>The way things were when this place was at its best and most relevant and everyone went out their way to create tools to pump us out to the worldโ€ฆ

I would also like to add, this place is now in the position to be at it's best again, we have the tools, we have the playbooks, we have the maps. We just need individuals who are willing to PRODUCE.

Not sit back and let fucking shills scrape for us because they convinced us it's somehow better that way

Anonymous ID: 7a8335 Jan. 27, 2022, 5:13 p.m. No.15479003   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9017

>>15478753

I mixed up the ID's there, kek. I gave the wrong guy shit because I thought he was you. >>15478813

>Oh look, moar gaslighting and literal projection.

here you are saying you were on DOAR a few posts ago: >>15478768

You posted screengrabs in /qr/ when you were doing your kyafabe with OSSBERG,you were in DOARnot anyone else here, and you're the one always calling everyone DOARFAG. That's what projecting is and you're the one who does it,that's why they call you jew.I dont even have a discord, stupid nigger.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 5:15 p.m. No.15479017   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15479003

Nope, I think your meds are wearing off as you're becoming delusional

But thanks for reaffirming that I am a Kike, and Nigger, and that I'm part of the DOARfag /hivemind/ because I went there a few times to troll you

Very compelling

Anonymous ID: d6486e Jan. 27, 2022, 5:23 p.m. No.15479066   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9114

>>15479040

Same bread or just before BO asked baker to add to globals and was told no rudelyโ€ฆ you knowโ€ฆ right after I handed off to youโ€ฆ it was before the handoff you suddenly got reasonable and one thing you said was I was right and you were wrong and you were sorry.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 5:30 p.m. No.15479114   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9120

>>15479072

>refuses to answer my questions

>gaslights me some more

You should have went with politics instead of forum sliding.

Similiar stuff, but it seems like you're all passion and no talant.

At the very least, very usual, due to being such an idiot

Bye bye! See ya next hop

>>15479066

I recall being rude to the baker I recieved handoff from, and waiting to do so until after I got the handoff, so that I could secure the dough from what I percieved to be a team of gatekeeping shills.

I do not remember apologising though, as I wouldnt be sorry for that

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 5:40 p.m. No.15479184   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9204

>>15479159

>constantly fighting with every one of us muh joo shills

"Fighting" is too harsh a word, it's more like engaging and "trolling"

>>15479164

Which is especially fun to do with NPCs who can't detect irony, or humor, for that matter.

Go ahead, call me a jew again.

It's more compelling each time, I assure you

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 27, 2022, 5:59 p.m. No.15479408   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9445

It wasn't doge unless he was able to keep it together for an entire bread and IP hoppped.

Whoever it was did put out a nice bread, other than telling BO no when asked to add to globals. Thing is, he says he gave me shit but that id isn't on the previous bread at all.

 

Sorry doge, looks like you may have been right and I was wrong thinking someone willing to compromise with other bakers was you. Won't happen again!

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 27, 2022, 6:04 p.m. No.15479445   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15479408

Oh yeah, I remember now, don't apologize!

cuz one of those replies should be me calling you both astroturfers

If so, take my apology now. Assuming you are indeed cool, and not a fag

(unless you're just a cool fag like freddie mercury)

Anonymous ID: a8308a Jan. 28, 2022, 12:46 a.m. No.15481559   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1742

>>15477999

Suppose you're right. Not saying you are.

But this is true: Unless you have evidence, all accusing others does is to create confusion and disunity. Don't like someone and can't prove anything? Stay away from them. Others have done. Nobody's special.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 28, 2022, 3:24 a.m. No.15482005   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

"Let's make baker admin without considering critical viewpoints of the admin especially on court record!"

 

>This is what is going on right now. We should be digging on what comes from this, and BO is triggered by the idea of truth.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=829ZZFxvMUw

 

If you cannot stand to hear a view that is contrary to that one that has been accepted by you, then I feel bad for you, son. Surely you would agree that this kind of digging must take place upon the suggestion of integration into the process, right?

 

Should we never question the new hire? I know what BO thinks about it. >>15468518

 

Does this really make sense?

 

Hell, he even uses the wrong meme to imply I'm talking about hotwheels and not 2ch, he can't even consider the critical viewpoint, when it matters most.

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 3:52 a.m. No.15482076   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2081 >>2092 >>2695 >>2903 >>3282

proposed rules of thumb for baking

may eliminate some squabbling over what is right

thoughts? anything left out?

 

Some Rules of Thumb for Baking and Note-taking

 

Biggest rule is USE COMMON SENSE.

 

RETURNING BAKERS

QR needs more bakers. But if you haven't been here in a while, plz LURQ MOAR to get familiar with changes since you left.

Board has gone thru a lot, anons too. Those who stuck it out deserve some respect.

Some things need to change, but not everything and not everything at once.

"Don't push the river."

 

ALL BAKERS

Shill bakes are pretty easy to peg: baker leaves, no notables, bad notables, anon protests ignored by baker, baker making unauthorized dough changes

Good bakes are harder bc every bakers has a different idea about what's best.

Key points:

  • Be as tolerant as you can manage - focus on Q goals, not the lousy personalities of your fellow bakers (KEK)

  • Make it REAL CLEAR who has the bread (tie to dough, use FORMATTING, etc.)

  • If you have to leave early, say so and seek a replacement; try to avoid leaving after @500-550.

  • When leaving wo/replacement, post GHOST BAKE โ€“ avoid when possible since shills may pick it up

  • Don't split bakes except in emergencies - BVs will usually lock stolen bakes

 

NOTABLES

Goal: to highlight material that is especially key for defeating the DS, "we are the news"

Specifically:

  • recent news articles or other relevant posts that are dated, well-sauced, and easy to find

  • videos with titles, dates, and a short description

  • insightful anon analyses espec. when tied to Q posts but relevance if the main thing

  • reports on military and other traffice (boats, planes, etc.)

  • on point satire or cartoons

 

"GOOD" NOTABLE BUNS

  • Each baker has a different style; try to avoid style wars (your style is not the "best" or "only")

  • Ideally, go for a balance between 'kitchen sink' and 'anon noms only' - be flexible

  • Use concise descriptors (helps with "wall of text" problem)

  • If time permits, read pb notables and use qresear.ch to check for dup posts

  • Stick to one format on notables dough page so aggregators can pick up

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 28, 2022, 3:53 a.m. No.15482080   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2695

>>15477885 i dont agree with my sperging either, its a knee jerk reaction i have. working on it.

>>15477945 That was me, i was trying to get more people to call out notables, so i asked if one should be noted. I think you gave me the idea earlier last thread. ask for not nom

>>15477950 funny i have been running notables for almost 4 years, now im trying to really get anons involved and you got shit post about. comms closed (knew jerk reaction)

>>15478361 personal preference/ baker conflict, (calling for handoff then rescinded when accepted, yeah thats FOOBAR imo)

>>15478616

 

>WHY "BAKE" IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA COLLECT NOTABLES????? (So as to get all the fam involved.)

>>15478643 <- hes got a good point (Trust one another)

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 28, 2022, 4:04 a.m. No.15482113   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2695

>>15482092

 

MAYBEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

you could go to another board,

have bakers meet you there and setup tripcodes for them.

then when a baker seeks handoff all they have to do is review the baker thread to see who is tripping?

maybe this could work?

 

Does 8kun allow trips without giving people access to admin/bv rights?

 

again i think the easiest way for now to identif patriot bakers is to ask for the last bread id and review their postings, assuming they did post lb.

 

just some thoughts BO

-Baqer G ID: ba5203 Jan. 28, 2022, 4:13 a.m. No.15482137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15482120

try being in my head for an hour. kek.

clocking in at 500 images a sec.

 

but yeah bo all good man, great work you are doing and tyvm for stepping up and working hard for GOD.

-o7

 

have a good night

DAYSHIFT IN DA THREAD

 

idk why this pic makes me kek.

sorry sirs dont dox me o7

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 6:15 a.m. No.15482695   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3212 >>3364

>>15482076

SOLID

 

>>15482080

>>15482092

>>15482113

>MAYBEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Maybe we (you) can stop trying to change shit and just FCUKING BAKE.

(you been here 4 years and suddenly you want IDs and strict rules?)

Also, I never once saw you sperg until we moved to /deepdigs/ "baqerG"

When you went out of your way to spam us calling me a nigger and virtue signalling

because we put a link in "your" pinned GMAX thread

I never even heard of you until OSS locked my bread for the first time and gave you the bake!

And this "noms only" conversation never existed until I started baking here again this week!

SUS

>>15482080

>(So as to get all the fam involved.)

<cat herding

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 7:55 a.m. No.15483364   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3474 >>4217 >>4324

>>15482695

>>15482695

>And this "noms only" conversation never existed until I started baking here again this week!

Except for all those years before you got here. Just saying. All I did was come back with interest and do what we've always done. If you weren't here complaining about it, it wouldn't be any issue at all. Shitโ€ฆ I said I was done with you. Fuck. Dammit.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 8:02 a.m. No.15483434   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4324 >>0567

I just grab whatever banner was used last. I see some bakers have personalized. I may have memories of ree over dis.

Dis still issue for bakers?

someone have the OG Q Research banner handy that can share?

Personally, I prefer things the way they were. Easier to spot. Consistent.

Don't care what others bakers do though.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 8:08 a.m. No.15483474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4217

>>15483364

>Except for all those years before you got here. Just saying.

Qr is different nao, argument invalid, just saying (again)

>All I did was come back with interest and do what we've always done.

You came back? Where did you go?

Global Young Leaders program tell you to help us implement Baker Passports due to the pandemic of anons returning to the board?

KEK

If you're who I think you are, just stop.

Get a new persona.

And spam the CP link some moar while you're at it YA CUCKS

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 8:56 a.m. No.15483795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3800 >>3854 >>4448

>>15481718

>Keep it to yourself if you want to be part of the discussion.

just my 2 centsโ€ฆ will say it once and try not to say it ever again.

This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.

Maybe it's because I read the statement about the JQ that was posted in a side thread and linked to notables when I first showed up in late 2018โ€ฆ

Maybe it's because I trained myself to look past it when trying to find relevant information on these boardsโ€ฆ

Again, i don't agree with the sentiment

I will say it's fucking weird how untouchable that topic isโ€ฆ

Regardless, here's my biggest beef:

How can you ask us to put up with Doge's bullshit, which is clearly everything you think the jooslide is, and not be willing to put up with an otherwise seemingly great baker just because he won't shut up about the jews?

That's not fair, imo.

If we have to put up with doge's bullshit, you should put up with differing opinions from good help.

Thank you for considering this opinion.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 9:03 a.m. No.15483854   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4437 >>4448

>>15483795

>Doge's bullshit, which is clearly everything you think the jooslide is

>Doge's bullshit

First of all, that would be DOG SHIT, technically.

Second, what is it? And how is it "everything the Jewslide is"?

Sounds like another lame attempt to smear me with DOAR FAGGOTRY.

Which, if I was part of, wouldn't you think I'd visit there more often?

Seriously, if it's all about me let's start a Doge Complaint bread, where you can lay out your retarded thesis!

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 9:52 a.m. No.15484193   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4339 >>6065 >>0606

>>15483282

Does this clarify?

 

How do scrapers know which bun to pick up for notables?

  • By looking for CONSISTENT MARKERS that identify it.

 

For example -

  • Each notable bun is recognized as a bun by the WHITE SPACE that delimits it on the top and bottom.

  • The number at the top = number of each bun

  • The number at the bottom = LINK to location of each bun

  • The CURRENT bun is identified by its location directly after "Notables are not Endorsements"

  • It should consistently have one line of WHITE SPACE after it but bakers keep changing this - which may be a problem (breaks the "white space space surrounds each bun" rule)

see CAP

 

This sounds very fussy.

It''s fussy because consistency is essential when coding is involved.

Although each aggregator may use a slightly different algorithm, they all look for CONSISTENCY.

When it's not there, the algorithm can BREAK - which often happened with "we are the news" when bakers would vary the formatting (leaving off the "#" for example or inserting the wrong number - etc.).

 

The CAP shows white space around ALL buns - which is correct.

But it has gotten DROPPED recently.

Please bakers - do not vary the matrix for this page.

Make sure you are using the CURRENT DOUGH (not your own).

 

will put a guide in the baking thread

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:10 a.m. No.15484324   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4425 >>4437 >>4472 >>0606

>>15483298

>>15483405

>Trips for bakers

Agree - not the way to go

 

>>15483364

"noms only" idea comes up periodically but not for a long time. Not recommended because we cannot FORCE anons to nom - "punishing" them with tiny "nommed only" buns just makes them mad. Therefore impractical.

Thoughts?

 

>>15483434

>banner changed

First change was to "Qanon" part of banner in response to OSS campaign re "Qanon is not Q". Banner radically changed by Barkeep one night over anon protests, he simply did it because he could. From there, bakers varied the banner. Some versions pretty good, others (imo) were a complete mockery. Once an artist anon tried to restore original banner on the basis of its dignity and aethetics, but didn't happen.

 

Share your preference for original, whether "Qanon" or "Q". Any baker can use the original; may be better to use "Q" version to avoid needless headaches. Whether we should revert to that would be the question.

 

Thoughts, bakers?

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:24 a.m. No.15484425   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4638

>>15484324

disagree but you already know that. Dead horse imo to reiterate why (nom-only w/ baker final say good).

Seems stupid to argue about it. If you want to write a fucking novel an publish it in notables instead of Amazon, be my guest. I'm not going to slow up the kitchen complaining about it.

Anonymous ID: 8de1b9 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:25 a.m. No.15484437   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4638

>>15483854

endless pilpul

if anyone was foolish enough to answer these questions, they would instantly be turned into other questions, and those into others, and those into others, days would turn into weeks, and then DOGBERG would say you're OSS.

>>15484324

>Thoughts, bakers?

noms only was effective, it got more anons to call out notes, I think it IS practical for the time being until there is more participation.

baker should choose w/e banner he likes IMO.

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:27 a.m. No.15484448   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4472 >>4474 >>4588

>>15483795

>This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.

Abusive speech is not free speech. Personal attacks is not free speech. The topic is not untouchable, we can discuss - and you are doing now.

 

>he won't shut up about the jews

hence my request for him or anyone to focus on baking and board issues here. Goes for everyone. When someone can't shut up about something, that's their problem. It shouldn't be ours.

 

>>15483854

Let me be blunt: STOP FIGHTING with other bakers. Butthurt bakers fuck things up. Grow up or get out.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 10:30 a.m. No.15484472   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4494 >>4718

>>15484324

>"noms only" idea comes up periodically but not for a long time.

>Not recommended because we cannot FORCE anons to nom

> "punishing" them with tiny "nommed only" buns just makes them mad.

>Therefore impractical.

>Thoughts?

Yes

 

>Share your preference for original (banner), whether "Qanon" or "Q".

>Any baker can use the original; may be better to use "Q" version to avoid needless headaches.

>Whether we should revert to that would be the question.

The closest thing we have to this proposed "Baker ID" already is the various banners bakers currently use,

which I have no preference over, happy to use the original if anon prefers bland uniformityโ€ฆ

 

>>15484448

> Butthurt bakers fuck things up. Grow up or get out.

I'm not butthurt, I'm defending myself from gangstalkers gaslighting me and trying to push new(old) norms on the kitchen so they can continue to nominate the same news stories endlessly in an echochamber and stifle any engaging research or progress

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:30 a.m. No.15484474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15484448

Can't argue with any of this.

 

I meant untouchable in society. It's just fucking weird. Like if you even think about asking about it, you're bashed harder than Trump, Q, anons, far-right, or anything else I've ever seen. Having not been there when it happened and knowing all the other things I was fed, I'm still firm in my belief that Lucifer comped EVERYTHINGโ€ฆ I just can't help but wonder if Hitler wasn't created by the Luciferians so folks like me couldn't ask questions 80 years later.

That's all

Anonymous ID: fbaae0 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:31 a.m. No.15484477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4980 >>0606

wut up BO

BV here

like the rules of thumb

trip problem should be taken care of when fullbin up and ready

 

OSS has nothing to do with free speech whatsoever!

 

Doge is a good baker, maybe tone down the doge stuffs in his bread but otherwise good, no problems, gerbil is a good baker too, just stay out of the dough we all good

Anonymous ID: 8de1b9 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:47 a.m. No.15484588   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4980

>>15484448

>hence my request for him or anyone to focus on baking and board issues here.

ok, I will avoid the topic while signed in to bake

if no one eggs me on

 

however I will note there is a disclaimer at the bottom of every post that my views are not the views of 8kun, what is the purpose of this disclaimer if not to allow free speech? Does it not say explicitly, under every one of my posts, that this is my opinion?

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 10:55 a.m. No.15484638   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4651 >>4673 >>4699

>>15484425

not sure what u are disagreeing with.

 

>>15484437

>noms only until more participation

Would ask, why must anons nom? They already participate. They willingly dig, meme and pray. But most just don't like the "meta" type stuff like nomming, noting and baking, only crazy bakers. kek.

Imo, efforts to force what one considers virtuous behavior tends to create resistance or reluctant compliance, not transformation.

Who usually noms? Is it anons or off-duty bakers, noters and a handful of oldfags?

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 11:05 a.m. No.15484699   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4980

>>15484638

anon-noms:

1) encourage participation

2) filter out useless info

3) this style seems to bring OGs out of the woodwork. I could be wrong about that, but that's what I think I'm witnessing.

I know you and doge disagree, but for the life of me I can't understand how this doesn't IMPROVE the quality of work.

NO ONE is forcing anyone to do anything. I don't get this argument either. if anons want to do it they'll do it. If baker wants to do it he'll do it.

Honestly both styles can live harmoniously.

If you force anon-nom out, IMO you're at risk of the board being comped by a select few bakers. An active BO can prevent this w/ micromanaging, but some day you're going to want this machine to operate well without much involvement and, when that time comes, you'll pay the price.

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 11:08 a.m. No.15484718   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4925 >>5136

>>15484472

>if anon prefers bland uniformity

kekkingโ€ฆ.

 

>>15484472

Bakers get attacked all the time. Goes with the territory. Most of us learn how to deal with attacks wo/lashing out. Too much emotion, use reason instead. Develop self-control and patience. Work with what is possible and teach by example.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Jan. 28, 2022, 11:44 a.m. No.15484925   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4973 >>4989

>>15484718

5 days straight notables and bakes. Baker id's need to be put on the back burner. BO policies are working. Long term - agree with Baker ID's after we get rid of OSS threat. OSS team will use baker id's to harass bakers at this time. I say we go with BO policies, get the board strong again and get a solid cast of bakers first. my 2 cents. BO is a steady hand on the till.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Jan. 28, 2022, 11:53 a.m. No.15484973   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4989

>>15484925

Let me make clearer the baker id thing - I've seen enough of BO to have confidence BO is making the right calls for the good of the board. If BO makes the call for Baker Id's tomorrow I'm 100% supporting BO decision. Since that hasn't happened yet I'm giving the BO the advice that it's too early to uniquely identify the bakers because it the current environment it would be used against them.

 

BO call and I'll go whichever way BO decides.

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 11:53 a.m. No.15484980   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15484477

>gerbs stay outta the dough

pray (kek)

 

>>15484494

>>15484563

obviously old married couple

 

>>15484588

>if no one eggs me on

ah c'mon baker

we all gotta try to get along

it's a fam

ha ha ha haโ€ฆ..

 

>>15484673

if anons don't like what's in the notes, you will know. if they don't complain, you must be a pretty good baker.

 

>>15484699

yes, there is tolerance for many styles. no mandate against "nom only", just a "plea" for flexibility. Bakers in a bread are to anons and Admins on a board are to bakers. They have the final say. Want to involve them more? Ask their opinion, convo w/them when it's slow. They will speak if we will listen.

 

BAKERS

tx for your contributions

Don't have to agree on everything, just have to convo wo/personal crap getting in the way. Got a real opportunity now, let's take it.

WE IN HERE.

WE ARE THE NEWS.

 

Shadilay, fellow bakers.

WE WILL MAKE QR GREAT AGAIN.

 

  • OUT

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 28, 2022, 12:14 p.m. No.15485136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5241 >>6354

>>15484718

 

"I am performing timing analysis, critical voice occurs at the same time as other problems we have, therefore ignore facts and evidence voice raises and call voice negative and ignore."

 

It's a simulacrum in simula of reasoned thought. I agree with you that you desperately require work on temporarily suspending your emotional core lest you erroneously fail to hear evidence and truth. Let me know when you want to address the points with counterpoints or refutations, but until that, it stands that you're acting ridiculous in truth.

 

Furthermore, the longer it goes on with NO ONE considering the evidence, the more likely I consider staff dupes of a con, of one form or another. Do you not know Anon is more important than any 'falling inline' staff position?

 

The more triggered by the notion that is proven by japan's court records that Jim stole 2ch and stole the money for the subcontractor hosting, the more suspect it appears that he has just pulled off another theft of a movement. Make sure you do not bite the hand that feeds you, but we Anon are watching closely.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 28, 2022, 12:29 p.m. No.15485269   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5300 >>5325 >>5439

>>15485241

Think about what that means for a second. You're willing to excuse his behavior because the possibility that CIA style behavior is behind it? You realize how silly that is to excuse even granting the possibility?

 

Not only that, but the notion falls apart that Japan stole it from us by nature of us stealing from them first. Are you aware of chan history at all?

Anonymous ID: 4cba30 Jan. 28, 2022, 12:35 p.m. No.15485325   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5376 >>5439 >>6354

>>15485269

no, I'm saying he's just a figurehead for something we have no real insight.

 

Where did Japan get their computers? Who gave them access to the internet? Who gave the electricity? Have you ever driven a Toyota or used a Honda generator? Their entire car industry was built by coming into our factories, taking photos and replicating them in Japan. They made some deals with the tribe and then came over and stole everything, just like China is doing now. I dont give a rats ass if we stole 2 chan from them, who cares?

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 28, 2022, 12:41 p.m. No.15485376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5386 >>5459 >>6354

>>15485325

It's because it has parallels to current day actions is why, and not the only time either, not the only staff either. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to leekspin on it again. If you take up the position of apathy to any misbehavior is to fall prey to it. Again, though, you're willing to excuse theft? Leave 10% for the Big Guy.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 28, 2022, 12:58 p.m. No.15485501   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5540

>>15485459

The mistake you're making is assuming that it is solitary and a mistake. Firstly it in itself is two actions, and I haven't mentioned the supporting facts because I assumed that investigators would dig into the links provided. FYI:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=829ZZFxvMUw

 

Don't get triggered, just the facts.

Anonymous ID: 4cba30 Jan. 28, 2022, 1:06 p.m. No.15485540   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15485501

look faggot

my country's been getting robbed blind for 100 years and counting, I'm out of fucks to give. Japan fought on the right side in WWII so good on them. Then they robbed us blind.

If the US stole 2chan, which was built on the shoulders of American giants with the rest of Japan's tech, I don't care.

Anonymous ID: 58b929 Jan. 28, 2022, 1:36 p.m. No.15485718   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5733 >>5753 >>6354

>>15485661

>What are they doing?

>Care to elaborate?

 

Adding unnecessary characters to the buns/dough (comma after every post link, colons after post links, extra spacesโ€ฆ)

Sloppy af and intentional

Probably trying to make a point, push an agenda

Might be moar saw an anon complain about inaccurate titles on links

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Jan. 28, 2022, 1:46 p.m. No.15485766   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5778

The more I see this crew in action the more hope I have. Don't get too full of yourselves and remember - serve anons. You are the least and that's what gives you the credibility and the honor in all realms. BO has assembled a good crew.

Anonymous ID: 58b929 Jan. 28, 2022, 1:49 p.m. No.15485787   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15485770

>Strange, Didn't see any glowies

>You have the link to the Post?

Was a few breads back, don't think they used "glowies"

Shouldn't need to, if there is an error in the dough baker should be listening to even just anon pointing them out

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 2:03 p.m. No.15485883   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5887 >>5892

I don't know about the comma thing, but the man's kept his mouth shut and done his job. If it interferes with whatever was explained to me earlier (about aggregators) I could see getting onto him, but if notโ€ฆ sure keep an eye on it, but damn: he's almost invisible and the buns are beautiful, imo. If I'm over my paygrade here, sorry. Just seemed worth sticking up for.

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 3:09 p.m. No.15486316   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0606

>>15486293

It's all good. Only noticed because I was going to clean up the commas for and offer to baker to use if he wishes.

 

Speaking ofโ€ฆ

>>15486308 OB

Baker I removed all commas after last link and before headlines in all current notables. Not your boss. Just trying to help. Use if you would like.

https://controlc.com/index.php?act=submit

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 28, 2022, 3:17 p.m. No.15486354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6384 >>6420 >>6492 >>1819

>>15485149

>>15485715

commas are for separating links

got a cap? saw a bread with commas after the links, that should be a space:

>>574943585 Notable description

 

>>15485718

 

>>15485136

>>15485241

>>15485325

>>15485376

>>15485429

>>15485459

Sounds serious. Think you guise better get off this platfrom immediately so you don't get in trouble. Won't tell anyone you were here.

 

>>15485745

been out, just back

u gotta be more specific, provide a CAP

>>15485753

>>15485764

>>15485764

yep, excellent comma use - kek

(bakers really asking BO about how to use commas? werdโ€ฆ)

 

>>15485798

if u want feedback, better provide details

i can't hangout out everywhere at once

 

>>15485805

same comment as above - what are they pissed about? you don't even provide a link or bread number

 

>>15485808

>Attention to detail key

absolutely correct, espec on notable bun formatting. generall not futzing around with dough, other bakers will call that out.

>>15485892

>archiving important

Yes.

>>15485907

plz just use std formatting, no commas at the end

 

>>15486036

>bakers coming back, will be misunderstandings

yep

kudos to BVs for sorting things out

they been around the block a few times

 

>>15486128

>globals gone

there's always something

bet they're not far offโ€ฆ.

 

BTW, i will look at globals and recommend a consolidation

Have to look at where things go now that we are not using 3rd and 4th dough posts

that is new to me, this was not my decision, was here for a while (except for gerbil's doughs)

 

need to look at where to put those resources from those posts - restore to dough or put in a resource thread?

 

We will get all these questions answered and problems straightened out

It will take time

Very glad to have bakers back but yes, will be rocky as we work out the kinks

hang in there guise

TY BAKERS

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 3:27 p.m. No.15486420   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15486354

>Won't tell anyone you were here.

KEK

 

>>15486393

Fog of war is thicc, many impostas amogus

Barker likes to bark sometimes

Sorry for misunderstandings

o7โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃ โฃดโฃถโฃฟโฃฟโฃทโฃถโฃ„โฃ€โฃ€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃฐโฃพโฃฟโฃฟโกฟโขฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃทโฃฆโก€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃพโฃฟโฃฟโกŸโ โฃฐโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกฟโ ฟโ ปโ ฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃงโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃพโฃฟโฃฟโ โ €โฃดโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ ‰โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโขปโฃฟโฃฟโฃ‡โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃ โฃผโฃฟโฃฟโกโ €โข โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ ‡โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃฐโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โขธโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โ €โ €โ €โขฐโฃฟโฃฟโกฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โ ˜โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃงโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃธโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โ €โ ปโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃทโฃถโฃถโฃถโฃถโฃถโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ ƒโ €โ €โ €โ €โขฐโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโ ปโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ Ÿโ โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โขธโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ‰โ ›โ ›โ ›โ ‰โข‰โฃฟโฃฟโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โขธโฃฟโฃฟโฃ‡โ €โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃคโฃคโฃคโก€โ €โ €โขธโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃทโฃฆโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โขปโฃฟโฃฟโฃถโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโ ปโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฆโก€โ €โ ‰โ ‰โ ปโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ›โ ฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃทโฃคโก€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโ นโฃฟโฃฟโฃ‡โฃ€โ €โฃ โฃพโฃฟโฃฟโก‡โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ นโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฆโฃคโฃคโฃคโฃคโฃพโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกŸโ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ‰โ ปโขฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโ ฟโ ‹โ ‰โ ›โ ‹โ ‰โ ‰โ โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโ ‰โ ‰โ ‰โ 

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 8:10 p.m. No.15488734   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8753

>>15488721

>Why would you be arguing with a baker?

Because he removed my nom, after it was notable

and refused to link it properly

Are you guys actually reading my posts?

>It was his bun

And the notable was about feds panicking

Is that not notable?

Please explain why you feel this way

 

>>15488727

>I have Autism

you also have a thing for incorrect formatting

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 28, 2022, 8:18 p.m. No.15488790   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8795

>>15488760

not falling for it. I've demonstrated proper behavior towards you when you earn it. I've extended olive branches. The issue is you arguing with other bakers on main. it's divisive and counter to everything BO is trying to do. don't pretend you only did it because you care about unity.fake and ghey

Look, all I want is for it to stop.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 28, 2022, 8:31 p.m. No.15488884   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8921

>>15488742

(You) are here to reply literally every time I post in this thread

Seriously, I don't know how you have the time to keep up with me

So if you don't like the way I bake or notable, why aren't you baking?

Where is the fruit of your works? Huh? Let's see it Churro.

Go ahead, offer to bake in general, I'll confirm it

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 29, 2022, 1:02 a.m. No.15490104   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0211

>>15488812

>>15488802

Not here to wrangle out of control bakers. You are not children.

 

>>15488753

> get over yourself and think about the mission

notable comment

good advice all around.

 

Have worked with same crew for years. They do not fuck around, namecall, or

focus on petty garbage. NOT ONCE.

 

BAKERS ARE NOT SPECIAL

IT'S A PRIVILEGE TO SERVE

IT'S A PRIVILEGE TO BAKE

If that's not enough for you, you're in the wrong place.

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 29, 2022, 1:35 a.m. No.15490211   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0606 >>0644 >>1939

>>15490104

>Have worked with same crew for years. They do not fuck around, namecall, or

>focus on petty garbage. NOT ONCE.

I can count the number of bakers I would consider "my crew" on one paw

and I am not familiar with anyone who'd been baking with since I returned to QR,

besides maybe my very first handoff, last week on nightshift when OSS fags were busy spamming instead of baking

For all I know it's been 100% Doarfags, and I will continue to troll them

and there's nothing anyone can do to change that.

This is my revenge

>BAKERS ARE NOT SPECIAL

APPARENTLY I AM SPECIAL CUZ IM THE ONLY BAKER I SEE ACTUALLY STANDING UP FOR NOTABLES

EVERY OTHER BAKER I'VE ENCOUNTERED THIS WEEK HAS BEEN A SUSSY BAKA GASLIGHTER

DONT @ ME B(R)O

o7

Anonymous ID: e3e591 Jan. 29, 2022, 3 a.m. No.15490413   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0488 >>0505 >>0570 >>9570

Announcement

 

BO spent a lotta time here that last coupla days, you all have a pretty good idea of where i stand.

 

Tired of the fighting, enough is enough.

You all know how to bake. SO BAKE.

 

If you have a SPECIFIC CONCERN about BAKING or the BOARD (not other bakers), contact me here: F4AL@protonmail.com.

 

Best of luck to you all.

 

  • BO

Anonymous ID: be8485 Jan. 29, 2022, 4:11 a.m. No.15490570   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9435

>>15490413

Patience is invaluable as a leader.

I think that this post is a good tone, in that you

seem to understand that all problems cannot be tweaked into oblivion.

FJ really learned this lesson well during the battle of notables creek.

 

Less is more when it comes to moving the levers.

 

One question if I may: How many of the BVs that were present before the change of ownership are still BVs and active?

Anonymous ID: 78b162 Jan. 29, 2022, 8:07 a.m. No.15491532   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1624 >>8022 >>8973

>>15490622

I didn't like the banner changes at first, but have become a real fan. I have mostly used all the world's a stage, but recently used a couple of the new ones some talented anon made. Someone used 'mine' all the world's a stage, about a week or so ago, nobody really ever used it much but me, that I remember. I also used one of the new ones recently, trying to be more anonymous, right after the BO change, and one of the bakers yoinked it and been using it a lot. I still wanna use it also. You can't really judge who is baking by banner, for that reason. Also it's too easy to impersonate, especially for someone like me who isn't around/afk a lot for wk. But I do love the different banners and hope that doesn't change. Also, I won't be requiring anons to nom only notable. Anons are far too distracted to keep up with admin stuff. When I bake, I feel I work for anons, I am only there to gather and organize what they are working on. Anons do the work, I just organize and gather. This makes baking harder yes, it requires a lot more attention/time. Some long note buns can be better organized, linking connected stories on one line rather than multiples. IJS, when I ain't workin' I be lurkin' and I see where this could often be done better. So there's room for improvement in this regard on bakers part. Thank you BO, BV's and Bakers. I appreciate you all, even tho sometimes there are conflicts/squabbles. I only bake part-time, cuz I wkfag a lot, but there's my 2ยข.

Anonymous ID: fbaae0 Jan. 29, 2022, 12:26 p.m. No.15493365   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3375

>>15493221

seent

 

>>15493258

it's always bakers call and choice with notetakers

I had a super collectah and defended him to the hilt but it was still my choice and my call, remember that, you don't have to accept and if they post anyhow just take the post number and include as anon bun, if they protest you have your answer for future dealings

Anonymous ID: 2adc44 Jan. 29, 2022, 8:25 p.m. No.15497987   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8022

>>15493189

Awww man. Sorry 'bout that BO/Anons. I cked the bread # like 4Xs and then proceeded to # my notes bun w/the same damn #. So now I ck both 4Xs. kek. Thanks for fixing. That bread was flyin', so I was scrambling, trying to catch every last note. I be best next time. frfr

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 30, 2022, 12:52 a.m. No.15498973   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9570 >>0658

>>15491532

>When I bake, I feel I work for anons, I am only there to gather and organize what they are working on.

Zactly. All you DOAR fags trying to make it about baker or approval ratings can KISS MY ASS. Literally nobody cares, your bait is weak, AND YOUR PETTY DRAMA HAS NO EFFECT. Haven't [you] figured it out yet?

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: 2adc44 Jan. 30, 2022, 4:30 a.m. No.15499570   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5156

>>15498973

Ayyy, when you fight doarfags long enough, been gangstalked by them consistently enough, you're on high alert system. You can sniff 'em out b4 anyone realizes they're even in the room. (rare pic related of doge's face, when he gets that first hint of scent). I can relate. kek

>>15490413

Love the steady hand of BO in the mix so far tho. Makes it harder to divide. Comes in handy, those doarfags are retarded, yet kings of chaos. Their best weapon wielded against anons thus far is dividing the kitchen. IJS not tryin' to chat up the place or nuthing. Bake muddafuckahs bake!

Anonymous ID: 473aa1 Jan. 30, 2022, 8:11 a.m. No.15500658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0979 >>1972

>>15498973

>more psychological tricks

kek every single post you make is a psyop. It feels like I'm surrounded by midwits on fullchan.

 

You say you work for anons, then in the same line you dont give a shit about their approval and call them DOAR just because you say they are, then you say it'susmaking the drama when there was none till you came back.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 30, 2022, 10:13 a.m. No.15501819   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2011

>>15486354

>Sounds serious. Think you guise better get off this platfrom immediately so you don't get in trouble. Won't tell anyone you were here.

 

Ridicule, as if my purpose was to warn you off the boards. My only purpose is illustrating your and by extension BV crew's reaction to hearing truth. It is plain to everyone witnessing.

 

Compromised and no one made a counterpoint other than "'We' should accept it because fuck japs", which is a pitiful argument on the likes of which would allow compromised USA sale to highest bidder, or greatest criminal.

 

Claim the moral high ground? When reality proves it out that you are yourself compromised? Operating under the pretense that the current formation is the only way in which work is to get done. No one came up with a solution, or an alternative, because everyone treats this problem as if it's above their pay grade, even you BO. You think you are powerless to change your superiors, therefore to even question his intentions with evidence that is factually true is beyond your sight lines.

 

You have more to say about this than you know, and that goes with with every BV too. Because in order to assert a moral good, no matter how hard it is, or how many disagree on emotional basis, sometimes you have to upend the established order who are willingly blind to their participation in a corrupt enterprise that has been subverted.

 

Is your unquestionable faith in an erroneous human or to principles that are philosophically true and good? You cannot say that I am lying, not a single one even tried. Why is that?

 

Do you think it's not at issue as a meta about this board to talk about the takeover of this board? Sure is a lot of talk in the negative sense elsewhere, so why not? Do you think it's off topic when I have kept an order on a directly on-topic topic? I was prepared to leave it at that, but you responded to claimed filtered, BO. Why have you not yet responded to claims? Are you aware that that is tacit admissal? Is it wrong to reply to you now, on topic?

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 30, 2022, 10:30 a.m. No.15501972   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2078

>>15500658

You wrote so much text.

Tell you what, since you can't stop posting drama in the meta bread, why don't you start your own thread on deep digs where we can dig on this topic and you can expose me for the shill I am? Since you obviously can't let it go

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 30, 2022, 10:33 a.m. No.15502011   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2032

>>15501819

You too, please bring this exempelary dig into what you feel is obvious corruption to /deepdigs/.

Make a thread, expose us all with your findings.

You obviously have a passion for writing and "truth".

Come join the truth seekers on /deepdigs/!

We look forward to your presentation

Anonymous ID: b19bfe Jan. 30, 2022, 10:46 a.m. No.15502152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2168 >>2184

>>15502032

Just saying, sounds sooper important, and we have a board dedicated to sooper important digs.

Shame, it's boring over there without shills spamming us, you're welcome to come back!

 

>>15502078

>I dont waste my time doing fake digs

Yeah, just our time. Hence, my 70+ responses to your weak bullshit. Kek!

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Jan. 30, 2022, 10:48 a.m. No.15502174   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2185 >>2228 >>3664 >>8949

>>15494490

bullshit

 

>>15488597 OB

>>15489306 OB

Aren't notables w/ intentionally not notable insertions exactly what BO doesn't want?

Is there not a lot of QR BO/BV drama around this?

 

>>15498011

Define >go getter muddafucka

 

AT BEST, imo, he's doing it for job security not realizing how horrific it is for QR division

>runs off other good bakers

>muh good baker can handle high intensity likeno one else

 

Again, I just want it to stop

Baker drama belongs in Kitchen

adding it to notables should be a firable offense

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 30, 2022, 10:49 a.m. No.15502184   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15502152

I'd like you to read back in this thread and the previous meta thread in order to receive the evidence I have already supplied multiple times. I appreciate your offer to go and supply proof yet again but I do not appreciate the insinuation that I have not yet done so already multiple times. My ID is plain, seek and ye shall find.

Anonymous ID: 1f05d9 Jan. 30, 2022, 1:36 p.m. No.15504010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15503957

>>15503980

>>15503987

Why'd you stop spamming general?

Is the party over here now that you guys are baking again?

Don't worry. We'll keep calling them outโ€ฆ

Kek

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Jan. 30, 2022, 2:09 p.m. No.15504391   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4439

Have truckers earned anon megaphone? I think they have.

 

24/7/365 Trucker Central - BO - you got this?

 

BO we need max visibility on truckers imho - best awakening front at the moment. What can we do? What should we do? Truckers obviously tuned in here.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Jan. 30, 2022, 2:14 p.m. No.15504450   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

ANON CHALLENGE

 

It is not answers but questions that drive good investigators. Anons. Do the research. Ask the questions. Ask the questions that answers would build a direction to dig in. We are navigating a sea of lies dropped by our enemies and forging narratives built from truth.

 

Ask questions and the answers will come. The true kernel of humanity lies in it's curiosity that leads to the light and to the truth that sets us free.

Anonymous ID: 4b5f09 Jan. 31, 2022, 4:18 a.m. No.15508949   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9860 >>0129

>>15502174

AGREE.

Board politics has no place in notables. No exceptions. OSS started it and now that he's gone, good riddance to bad rubbish.

 

>>15505716

get the anti-jew crap off this thread and do not post it again. You have been warned. You do not listen.

You are ruining discussion here with your SPAM and BS comments - 78 posts..

Do not want to see any more posts from this poster for a week. I have had enough.

  • BO

 

anons

Aside for idiotic baker drama and usual problems with shills in Generals, things are going well.

 

QR is doing much better with keeping up on notable buns and numbers are up. We need bakers and noters who wanna focus on the work: cleaning up the ship and ensuring "we are the news."

 

Just finished first beta version of baking part of Baking Thread. Anons who want to learn on their own or bakers looking for a review now have some up-to-date resources to work with.

 

Despite all OSS' ranting about /comms/, it is and has always been intended as a board for anons to do practice bakes. Try out the updated instructions for e-bakes and regular bakes there.

 

Baking thread - >>15443568

https://8kun.top/comms/catalog.html

 

Grateful thanks to all the new and returning bakers (and everybody else) who is helping this board get thisback on its feet.

  • OUT

Anonymous ID: a92814 Jan. 31, 2022, 9:33 a.m. No.15510845   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15510129

Furthermore, my warnings were apropos and timely. Now that Jim has directly intervened in board politics, this is directly relevant to admin issues. Now I am for sure not spamming. See how this works? BO's spam claims are null and void wrt my posts.

 

What was the term used? Don't bite the hand that feeds?

Anonymous ID: b35b0f Jan. 31, 2022, 10:21 p.m. No.15516953   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6957 >>8342 >>9899 >>1020

Is there a feature where you can filter to one ID and just see all of their posts? I know about the highlight, but I'm thinking of not having to scroll the whole bread to see all of and ID's posts in a bread. I would think that could be helpful for anons and bakers. Maybe I'm just not aware of it and its already an available feature. Could help to verify a shill who posts a couple seemingly organic posts for bait, but has been shilling whole bread otherwise.

Anonymous ID: b35b0f Jan. 31, 2022, 11:13 p.m. No.15517128   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8342 >>8612 >>1020

In the baking and noting thread maybe add some of the tips and guidelines on acceptable sources for sauce.

What are known unacceptable sources? (realrawnews, etc.)

What are shaky sources that baker should ask for second source before noting?

What are more accepted sources?

What should typically not be noted? (reddit post?, etc.)

Anonymous ID: 2d9eb9 Feb. 1, 2022, 6:20 a.m. No.15518342   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15516953

You can cntrl+F their ID to scoll the thread to thier posts only.

 

>>15517128

>tips and guidelines on acceptable sources for sauce.

I don't think this is a good idea, and is ironically a very Reddit way of thinkng. Any source is acceptable to post, just use discernment.

Anonymous ID: 588935 Feb. 1, 2022, 12:32 p.m. No.15521020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1074

>>15516953

not except thru ip system.

but search on baker tools in qresear.ch, don't know what's been incorporated.

 

>>15517128

it's not a bad idea although context matters too. We do use WAPO and NYT, for example, even tho they are DS. In fact, sometimes BECAUSE of it.

 

Rags like realrawnews are never good for obvious reasons, almost anything else might be appropriate under some circumstances. anons can help bakers learn about sauce and often do. sorcha faal prime example, ha ha

Anonymous ID: 588935 Feb. 1, 2022, 12:36 p.m. No.15521049   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1074

>>15520182

>get rid of comms baker, they're gatekeepers

ok anon

what exactly is a gatekeeper?

sounds like it could be someone who guards the gate so that shills can't cause problems?

>it'll be shown to Jim

shakin' in my books, friend.

 

who would you like to see bake?

please be specific.

Anonymous ID: b35b0f Feb. 1, 2022, 7:20 p.m. No.15524040   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

How about this? Scroll to new posts. After update it scrolls down slowly (perhaps selectable in settings) so reader has time to read the new posts instead of just snapping to the bottom?

Anonymous ID: 91afec Feb. 2, 2022, 3:45 a.m. No.15526122   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9354

>>15521074

>>15526091

Lets not forget we are talking about a human in the end, executing these proposals will give them a feeling of power and will drive them to continue fucking with the board. The have already removed any worth from their name, burning it is only doing them a favor in the end.

Anonymous ID: addd37 Feb. 2, 2022, 4:22 a.m. No.15526237   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6250 >>6914 >>8574

For a comfy bread, filter 'distraction' words that are designed to distract and waste your time

 

This technique of filtering shill words, rids your bread of time wasting 'posts'

 

Click open [Options] in the top right hand corner

 

Click on [Filters]

 

Click on [Name] scroll down and click [Comments]

 

Then type the word, click [Add] after each word.

 

JIDFResearch

OH SHIT

/hivemind/

hivemind

HIVEMIND

Hivemind

oss

Oss

OSS

0ss

o55

O55

oh ess ess

Jew

Jondoodle

Twatter

twatter

TWATTER

twat

TWAT

Twat

GOYIM

goyim

Goyim

cunt

Cunt

CUNT

kunt

Kunt

KUNT

Kikes

kikes

KIKES

kike

Kike

KIKE

boomer

Boomer

boomers

Boomers

Jewish

jewish

JEWISH

jew

Jew

JEW

jews

Jews

JEWS

joo

joos

Joo

Joos

JOO

JOOS

muhjoos

Muhjoos

MUHJOOS

muhjoo

Muhjoo

MUHJOO

Lin Wood

lin wood

lin

LIN

 

And you can Block 'ID+' to wipe out all the assholes responding to one post.

 

At any time, unblock by using [Remove] for individual words or [Clear all Filters] to remove all the filters you've put in place.

Anonymous ID: 7c8a66 Feb. 2, 2022, 4:22 a.m. No.15526238   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9482

>>15521059

How to confirm notables.

its a craps game imo.

 

one anon can post something, then i notable and 10 minutes later another anon has the counter. so i post both.

 

most of the time i try to look at the souce presented. if its some random url source i usually pass UNLESS A GREAT NOTABLE IMO

 

What are Great sources?

thats up to anons i guess.

what each anon likes.

I like RRN for KEKS but some anons dont.

 

Could make a list of reputable sources to keep eyes on. but those are far and few between.

 

if baker unsure about a notable, it does not hurt to ask other anons for thoughts.

 

YEAH NOTABLES.

Anonymous ID: b3e632 Feb. 2, 2022, 9:29 a.m. No.15528105   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8222 >>9307 >>9446

>>15473921

I disagree. Bakers should be able to be anon. Seems that eventually regular bakers make themselves somewhat identifiable by their style of notes and banners used, and that is usually enough for anons to recognize legitimate bakers and follow to correct next thread in cases of multiple bakes. I jump in and bake very occasionally.

Anonymous ID: b3e632 Feb. 2, 2022, 9:40 a.m. No.15528185   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8283

>>15526078 ob

PLEASE do NOT make these changes. Isn't this board supposed to be all about protecting free speech and encouraging personal discernment? Anons call out suspicious and questionable posts all the time, and people learn what they want to filter. Board level censorship just seems very wrong.

Anonymous ID: f90bb7 Feb. 2, 2022, 9:44 a.m. No.15528222   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9446

>>15528105

>I disagree. Bakers should be able to be anon.

^^This

 

>>15473921

>~~A baker is not ANON~~

>~~A baker is part of the admin imo~~

Bakers have always been anons that stepped up to bake

namefags are namefags

don't need names for baking

never used one in all the bakes this anon has done

Not going to start.

Anonymous ID: a3bb06 Feb. 2, 2022, 11:44 a.m. No.15529307   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9446 >>9542

>>15527331

If it's spam, it is illegal - JW made that clear in a recent email. So can be deleted.

 

>>15528105

>bakers should be able to be anon

 

Understand. The problem comes when an anon baker turns out to be a shill. Since we have a custom of allowing bakers to be final arbiters of what gets in notables, what do we do when a shill puts in Protocols of Zion, spam, realrawnews stuff, miscellaneous anon comments he likes, and other material to which anons object? When baker completely ignores anon objections and bakes them in anyway?

 

If it's OSS, we can take it out - because he is usually recognizable and banned from baking. What about other shill bakers?

 

When public officials abuse the trust of voters, we can impeach them. Do we need a process to "impeach" bakers who grossly abuse the trust of anons? Who refuse to listen to reasonable anon requests to remove material that obviously shouldn't be notabled?

 

What about a list of obviously unacceptable acts? Not one or two but as a pattern:

 

  • notabling non-notable posts

a. without sauce

b. with very poor sauce (realrawnews etc)

c. completely irrelevant or wo/value (misc anon comments etc)

d. "muh joos" and other stuff that discrminates on the basis of race, sex, religion

e. spam

f. defamatory to Q, 8kun or Qresearch

g. old news or many duplicates

 

  • changing stuff in the dough wo/notification

 

  • refusal to listen to anons or treating anons with obvious disregard

 

  • refusal to give up the dough to reasonable requests for handoff

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: a3bb06 Feb. 2, 2022, 12:01 p.m. No.15529446   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9577 >>9692 >>0335

>>15528105

>bakers eventually make themselves identifiable

not any more - because of hostile admins targeting any baker they could identify

just doge and gerbil are the main ones who are easy to id

 

>>15529036

the posts were from last night, links are in Globals

>>15526073 QR Admin Statement on spam NEW

>>15526078 AUTO-CONVERT /HIVEMIND/ to /HM/? Anons, plz weigh in on Meta NEW

 

>>15528430

Have you been censored, anon? Or are we having a discussion here?

 

>>15528222

What are your thoughts about this alternative?

>>15529307

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 12:13 p.m. No.15529542   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15529307

>JW made that clear in a recent email. So can be deleted.

 

So I'm right that you and JW have a compromising relationship. The only word you can argue on is whether it's compromising. Who gave the order for the code red?

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 12:17 p.m. No.15529577   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15529446

>have you been censored, anon? Or are we having a discussion here?

 

I do not require personal experience to call out censorship as was under discussion in the post I linked. Click on through for the invite to discuss in meta, and you'll see what I think of censorship.

Anonymous ID: c63771 Feb. 2, 2022, 12:37 p.m. No.15529692   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0163

>>15529446

>What are your thoughts about this alternative?

There is no way to identify by a name or ID with the board mechanics without some further features.

Anyone can use a dif ip on vpn and not be who they appear.

 

Here are my thoughts on breads and baking ranked by importance:

 

1. Make sure there is a fresh bread ~700-720

2. Keep notables clean and accurate[sauced or opinion] (handle with care per Q)

  1. Have some fun, add humor

  2. Realize the responsibility of the baker is to collect notes, bake the breads and listen to anons using discernment (avoiding shillery)

  3. Keep it simple

 

That was what anon learned way back in the beginning.

 

Additional things bakers can do to add value to their service to anons;

Verify no dead links (clean up dough)

Provide feedback to admins via Meta

 

1&2 are most important part

All the other shit is over complicating a simple process adding more potential point of failure/vulnerabilities

Additionally I would add cross board links to all research boards so the spam isn't necessary

possibly do this by using the resource bread to list them all and a single line link to resources in the dough

keep it simple

Anonymous ID: 3d4e5f Feb. 2, 2022, 1:03 p.m. No.15529883   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0062 >>0214 >>0342

Not sure where else to put this, but here it goes. Seems like a new type ofโ€ฆ something going on. We've seen the "fake twitter screenshots" from shills (and oldfags fucking with newfags) before, but this is different.

 

Anon posts a screenshot of a supposed tweet that is loosely based on the original tweet's actual message, but the message is "inverted" in a way that would obviously get anons'/autists' attention. Example:

>>15529723

When called out on it, here:

>>15529762

They respond with another one:

>>15529784

So anon posts a reply with the actual one:

>>15529856

 

Anybody else picking up on this? I'm sorry, I know this isn't "meta" stuff, but I wanted to get anons' attention as this might affect baking/notables in the future. Could be something, could be nothing.

Anonymous ID: c63771 Feb. 2, 2022, 1:25 p.m. No.15530062   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0214

>>15529883

>Anybody else picking up on this?

Saw that right off the first time it was posted.

Definitely something to keep eyes on, Might be worth making a thread of fakery to keep a tally for anons to post fake /verified fake in.

Not a sticky, should be enough fake stuff daily to keep it neck and neck with general breads

Good point of reference for all visitors

Anonymous ID: a3bb06 Feb. 2, 2022, 1:48 p.m. No.15530214   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15529883

>>15530062

>inversion/distortion of symbolism,

Actually IS a meta issue because affects the way we perceive posts and decide whether to notable them. Equating the mountain goat of the NRO with the goat that symbolizes the devil is an obvious attempt to muddle things up as always.

Anonymous ID: c63771 Feb. 2, 2022, 2:36 p.m. No.15530491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0576 >>1163 >>1190

>>15530163

>One board is not looking for cooperation.

>It is attacking QResearch.

Agreed and now it has a home base to launch and coordinate attacks from

Plus discord and other means

"They can say come to discord it is open".

Sure except private messages and other joint servers, irc or whatever other comms they might be using at the same time.

Dirty little tricksters, glow.

Noticed the \W4hivemind[regex] screen caps were showing virtual box desktop

FastJack = Shadowrun = Decker (hacker/cyberjacked in to net) old tabletop RolePlaying Game/ Books [late 80's]

They sure mad tho

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 2, 2022, 2:51 p.m. No.15530576   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0731 >>0794 >>1329

>>15530491

nothing makes someone madder than their own fuckup causing them to lose a valuable asset to their worse enemies.

 

This is all in their heads, of course. To think of QR as their own is delusion. So is the idea that their main enemies are other anons. They create enemies to they don't have to look within. Why they lose.

Anonymous ID: c63771 Feb. 2, 2022, 3:22 p.m. No.15530794   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1456 >>2198

>>15530731

>>15530576

>They create enemies to they don't have to look within.

 

Servant vs. Ego

We all have Ego to a degree, it is knowing when to set it aside and serve others first.

Yes they did a lot through the years.

Yes the good deeds will be remembered.

As will their final choices.

They treat it as a game, even making a score card.

Pathetic really, sad even.

They had one job, serve.

Mistakes were made and rather than take personal accountability they choose to make enemies of their fellow anons.

Blindly, and inaccurately.

History may not forget.

https://historyofyesterday.com/10-of-the-biggest-traitors-in-the-history-of-the-united-states-687bb4fa2eaf

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 4:08 p.m. No.15531190   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1469 >>2198

>>15530491

>except private messages and other joint servers, irc or whatever other comms they might be using at the same time.

 

Did you forget that you are talking offsite with JW? He got your email? Emailed you back huh?

WHY are you EMAILING JW and THEN TALKING ABOUT PRIVATE COMMS IF THAT MEANS YOU GLOW? You think you're exempt from it!? YOU ADMITTED IT! Yet you would rather theorize that actually no, your victims are the ones what do it?

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 4:31 p.m. No.15531393   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

I would like to report yet again that BO and JW are talking privately about offboard members and coordinating an attack on them, as I attested to before that they have a compromising relationship that directly affects the meta of this site.

 

The fact that he is theorizing as if this is a glow activity means that even he thinks his own actions as BO makes himself glow. Do you guys not see this yet? Are you not blinded by hate to understand why I am reporting this is an issue that must be handled? Think mirror.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 4:47 p.m. No.15531506   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1542

>>15531469

Ah so I directed my message to the wrong Anon, I suppose I should say BO when talking about BO about activities that concern BO and is proven to happen in this very thread to Anon, and hope to God Anon realizes what he's talking about is far more accurately BO.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 2, 2022, 5:06 p.m. No.15531662   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2198

>>15531337

 

Why are the BV's leaving the OSS spam in the breads now? I'm not sure that's such a good idea. As I detailed above it's starting to corrupt Qresear.ch searches. Jim, does the hivemind board really need to be there? OSS again is getting way out of hand.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 5:16 p.m. No.15531764   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1874 >>2198

I'd like to report an increasing number of anons asking JW to obliterate a board on this board and because of the BO/JW relationship yet again JW might do it even though it will not solve anything but to disperse loud refugees into other boards.

 

Hilarious because they think destroying claims for the sake of a token crossboard warfare gesture is worth doing when it doesn't solve what they think.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 5:40 p.m. No.15531940   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2100 >>2198

>>15531874

This is where we are, you think because you have problems that it justifies any solution you can reach other than Jim learning to program a solution himself, and that's why I am sure JW might follow the fool's route. Do you not see the future paths from now?

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 2, 2022, 6:15 p.m. No.15532245   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2413 >>2469 >>4355 >>4955

Proposal #1: that "/HIVEMIND/" be auto-converted to "/HM/" , so that links to that board would be DEAD.

 

BO I agree this would be the best short term fix. I hope we can do it soon. He's starting to really ramp it up with posting the hivemind links and they don't seem to be getting removed anymore.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 2, 2022, 6:35 p.m. No.15532469   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2493 >>2520

>>15532245

HM conversion - discussed last night on the board, not populr with most anons, and not much with me either. Just exploring options with anons. Try not to get caught up in intrigue, there are no problems that cannot be solved. As long as breads get baked and notes get out, we are in business.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 2, 2022, 6:44 p.m. No.15532549   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4955

>>15532493

 

I'm not sure I'm making my point here. Day by day OSS is trashing the Qresear.ch function more and more. It's needs to be fixed sooner rather than later or all we're going to be doing is searching through a bunch of spam on Qresear.ch

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 6:55 p.m. No.15532630   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2641

"Any contrary opinion is a psyop, now come discuss the ways I'm going to do exactly what you think and accept it plebian"

 

If I were to want this board to end, I would tell you to do exactly what I am warning against. BO, you are a simpleton who cannot apply logic. You do not see that I'm telling you exactly what will happen if you continue to resort to JW to solve the problem in the only way you have all thought of currently.

 

If I wanted QR gone, I would be in here telling you to do the worst thing for longevity. You can't see it, so you're going to do it and I will yet again have predicted and forewarned you not to do it.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 7:07 p.m. No.15532704   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2720

>>15532658

No, actually, being you made an argument on authority, as opposed to reasoning with facts. I know you wish they were equal, but consider how stupid I would be required to accept equality of argumentation upon that premise. You may be a sock puppet even, not that I'm saying that you are, but that must be considered in totality. What happened to counter arguments based on reason?

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 7:32 p.m. No.15532870   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2890

>>15532848

No, actually, the argument is based on what enforcement can be brought to bear upon your ideological bent. You already have globally banned him and yet he is there. I understand the notion of talking about ideology, but apply the same results to the previous and future proposed action and guess what? Similar results. This is logical, before even bringing up streisand effects.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 2, 2022, 7:38 p.m. No.15532907   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15532890

You have a hard time of proving your simple argument given that it already is not how reality is. Don't blame me, that's just how it goes. Methinks you need to work on your argument some more since what is actually being argued is what enforcement to bring to bear to the situation by BO and apparently JW. It isn't my fault that the situation is a hairy mess, either.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 12:12 a.m. No.15534389   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4955 >>2321

>>15534179

Ah, yes, that was the intent than rather a solution that finally solves whereas solutions attempted haven't worked and neither would proposed solutions that are under consideration. No, really, I'm talking about a political meme and not anything real (sarcasm here, just so the autistic know). Don't get distracted by tangential ideas or you'll end up discussing murder about real people through no fault of mine. NOTE: This would be a welcome distraction to denigrate this board, if that were my goal. Never was.

 

Don't let BO automatically (without thought, see) cast aspersions on my character. The only argument he raised was his initial question "If JW is bad, why are you here?" as if people cannot change over time with new inputs into their system. Nor can they discover irrefutable proofs which the best responder merely relied on a shared frame of context of racism to excuse theft in an "it's complicated maybe". I have been here for days and as far as I can tell there have been no attempts to explain behaviors, nor yet anyone who has confronted with the evidence and wanted truth. BO will hate it but you will see that I was absolutely right in my estimations, but will he then consider it not a psyop if so? Will he do the opposite only if he is so opposed to my words? Why is he so opposed to begin with? It's because I happened at the same time and I maligned his feeder. But why has no one called me a liar?

 

Two meta pages, and not a single one? Why is that?

Anonymous ID: 7c8a66 Feb. 3, 2022, 4:13 a.m. No.15534911   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4915 >>4998

Dayshift reporting. good reads anon

had a talk with oss yesterday, lets see how it goes today.

 

looks like OSS decided to create a word filter as well just for me. kek.

 

if we word filter the /hivemind/ hten we are no better than OSS.

 

the asshole is digging his own grave everyday.

anons see, anons know.

 

it will be just a matter of time till he gives up.

OSS is not a fighter.

A liar - Yes

An egotistic - probably

a lost sheep - becoming that way.

 

OSS - U NEED TO MAN THE FUCK UP PUSSY.

 

THE FIGHT IS WITH (((THEM)))

NOT ANONS

NOT BAKERS

NOT BO

 

 

*If you take Meds, make sure you do

Anonymous ID: 81d20b Feb. 3, 2022, 4:26 a.m. No.15534955   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5236 >>5667 >>5755 >>6273

>>15532549

Have a general inquiry into ResignationAnon. Q: what does it means to have the qresear.ch funciton trashed? What problems are you encountering? If i have missed any previous info on this, please give a link.

 

>>15532581

Do not know whether spamming another board is grounds for deletion but will inquire.

 

>>15532245

In what way are the scrapers being ruined? Again, plz provide a link if i've missed something.

 

>>15532707

>can other boards invade other boards with unwanted content?

that is a very good question - one worth looking into.

 

>>15534355

Namecalling on meta not ok. This is a thread for discussion. Stop now.

 

>>15534389

Your inquiries are tiresome and will not be responded to. Go find someone else to annoy.

Anonymous ID: 81d20b Feb. 3, 2022, 4:40 a.m. No.15534998   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5254

>>15534911

good morning, mornin shift.

agree that getting into a word filter war is not really the focus.

whether or not oss gives up, all he can accomplish is the same as any other shill - to annoy anons with spam until it is deleted or filtered. that is all.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 3, 2022, 5:49 a.m. No.15535236   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7667

>>15534955

Here is a cap of a search in QResear.ch for 'truckers'. Since OSS is slamming so much spam into the breads from hivemind now the results are starting to become filled with hivemind results.

 

As far as the scrapers, since none of it is making it into the notables yet, the scrapers are unaffected as far as I know.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 3, 2022, 6:53 a.m. No.15535536   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5713 >>7116

>>15535495

No worries. I see it as havoc. Anons and board staff are having to put in probably over 200 hours a week just to deal with OSS. That's not good. And now the QR data store is getting trashed because OSS has worn down the staff so far that they don't delete the spam anymore.

 

I'm not badmouthing anybody. This OSS thing is getting worse and worse not better and better.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 7:15 a.m. No.15535667   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15535254

It's called kvetching, and when BO does it to Jim hard enough, Jim will likely follow through without a thought, so Jim would have you believe.

 

>>15534955

>Your inquiries are tiresome and will not be responded to. Go find someone else to annoy.

 

I expected no less, BO. Tiresome truths get in the way a lot. How is it tiresome to immediately be filtered though? Are you that sensitive that you never want to hear a critical viewpoint? Especially criticisms that are true? Is it tiresome to have someone below you in hierarchy who sees errors and gives you opportunity after opportunity to correct those errors? Someone who you are forced to agree with in time by speaking sense?

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 3, 2022, 7:29 a.m. No.15535744   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7116

Notetaking so thinking while working. Yes BO - You and your staff are to be commended on the work you've done to stabilize the board. It's running 1000000000000000 times better now. We've had straight notables every bread for 10 days now. I know I bitch a lot about the trashing of the board that OSS is attempting and I forget to call out what is good.

 

You folks are doing a hell of a job. o7

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 7:30 a.m. No.15535755   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5800

>>15535713

Regarding this

 

>>15534955

BO, see the post above, what are you going to do about the way you have handled the transition thus far? A definite plan of action will let BV's know what the long term goal is and what to expect for the future. Or do you want people not knowing what to expect complaining and not being heard?

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 10:29 a.m. No.15537116   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7940

>>15535536

>200 hours

Staff is putting in a lot of hours, but this is typical during transitional period, especially one that was totally unanticipated. Not just about OSS. We have to get to know the board, comm with anons and bakers, clean the catalog, evaluate the bread situation, and look at resource situation. There is a lot to do on all fronts.

 

If you call something 'havoc', you are saying it causes complete disorder. This is not true, as you point out here -

>>15535744

 

My point is: don't let the PERFECT be the enemy of the GOOD.

Focus on the goal, mentally minimize the problems, and keep chipping away to create a more perfect situation. Nothing worthwhile happens overnight.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 11:10 a.m. No.15537408   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7946

>>15536273

"Night shift bakers" or Doge?

Doge definitely has problems.

Don't know whether it's anybody else.

 

Knowingly puts muh joos into notes. Has been warned not to, continues to do so.

 

The notes from bread #19643 had a lot of junk in them, including board politics - which should NEVER be part of notes.

posted in General, in response to

>>15536199

>>15536265

here:

>>15536864

>>15537138

Anonymous ID: dddc7a Feb. 3, 2022, 12:08 p.m. No.15537757   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8020 >>8031

HiveMind General #3

>>>/HIVEMIND/2873, >>>/HIVEMIND/2875, >>>/HIVEMIND/2882, >>>/HIVEMIND/2886, >>>/HIVEMIND/2913, @PapiTrumpo/DJTJr/Truth Social discussion

>>>/HIVEMIND/2662, >>>/HIVEMIND/2664, >>>/HIVEMIND/2671,DOWN THEY GO -ANOTHER (((MOSSAD))) MEDIA ASSET REMOVED. SO LONG JEFF. -THAT'S THE 37TH (((ISRAELI MEDIA ASSET))) REMOVED SINCE (((GM))) TRIAL START DATE

>>>/HIVEMIND/2677, >>>/HIVEMIND/2679, >>>/HIVEMIND/2685,Sexual misconduct is the 'public shelter' to accept resignation. Q POST 2219, 2337โ€ฆ Tell me again it ain't the Jews.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2767, >>>/HIVEMIND/2789,Why have all the Q Research Board Admins disappeared since the Zucker news broke?

>>>/HIVEMIND/2864, >>>/HIVEMIND/2869 I think we are watching in real-time as Israeli intel assets being removed from the media.

>>>/HIVEMIND/3011, >>>/HIVEMIND/3012, America's $30 Trillion Debt In One Stunning Visualization

>>>/HIVEMIND/2687,So (((Jeff Zucker's))) alleged paramour at CNN was (((Allison Gollust))), CNN's executive vice president. Her job before that? Gov. (((Andrew Cuomo's))) comms director.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2860 DID WE JUST GET CONFIRMATION THAT JEFF ZUCKER WAS A MOS COMMANDER?

>>>/HIVEMIND/2715,PDJT weighs in on (((Jeff Zucker))) perversions

>>>/HIVEMIND/2772 Sauce QR admins are banning/deleting posts and claiming it was porn. These people are fucking stupid.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2536 Man in Ottawa melts down over the honking from the freedom convoy.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2544 Freedom Intensifying

>>>/HIVEMIND/2549,17 percent see path to reinstate Trump before next election: poll

>>>/HIVEMIND/2817,PayPal shares plunge 17% as bleak forecast stokes growth fears

>>>/HIVEMIND/2552 Trudeau is the gift that keeps on giving.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2553 JUST IN - U.S. private payrolls fell by 301,000 for January vs. the estimate for a 200,000 gain, ADP reports.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2562 GOYIM KNOWING REACHING LEVELS NEVER BEFORE THOUGHT POSSIBLE

>>>/HIVEMIND/2563 Team USA Warns Athletes About Using Personal Tech At The Beijing Olympics

>>>/HIVEMIND/2565 U.S. to move 3,000 troops closer to Ukraine as Russia crisis escalates

>>>/HIVEMIND/2568 Russia-Ukraine conflict: Satellite images reveal extent of Moscowโ€™s military buildup

>>>/HIVEMIND/2571 With Sen. Lujรกn in the hospital after a stroke, Democrats have no Senate majority and can't pass anything without GOP help

>>>/HIVEMIND/2572 Losing The War On Wokeness: Washington Football Team Officially Changes Its Name To "Commanders"

>>>/HIVEMIND/2573 Congressional Republicans back Canada 'Freedom Convoy' protest: 'Not some fringe minority'

>>>/HIVEMIND/2574 2 suspects in custody after Minnesota school shooting leaves 1 student dead, 1 injured

>>>/HIVEMIND/2577 Steny Hoyer (D) Tests Positive for COVID-19

>>>/HIVEMIND/2579 PayPal shares dive 25% after company blames inflation for weak guidance

>>>/HIVEMIND/2582 (((Jan. 6 committee))) member says Trump 'said the criminal part out loud' when he said Pence could have overturned the election

>>>/HIVEMIND/2588 50 RNC members are co-sponsoring a resolution to expel Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger from the House GOP, report says

>>>/HIVEMIND/2592 VaxTax Rollback! Quebec Abandons Policy of Taxation on the Unvax'd - Freedom Intensifying

>>>/HIVEMIND/2594 US to deploy warship & 5th generation fighter jets to UAE

>>>/HIVEMIND/2599 FBI Director Wray: Scale of Chinese Spying in the U.S. 'Blew Me Away'

>>>/HIVEMIND/2601 BASED - South Dakota Legislature Passes Ban on Boys Competing in Girlsโ€™ Sports

>>>/HIVEMIND/2605 Explosion fears remain as N. Carolina fertilizer plant burns

>>>/HIVEMIND/2614 Trump calls Lindsey Graham a "RINO"

>>>/HIVEMIND/2618 RCMP Adds More Officers as it Attempts to Clear Blockade at US-Canada Border

>>>/HIVEMIND/2621 Lockdowns virtually useless in curbing Covid-19 deaths, study claims

>>>/HIVEMIND/2622 Today in Supreme Court History: February 2, 1790 - 2/2/1790: Justice William Cushing takes oath.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2626 Leaked documents raise new questions about Biden admin's preparation for Afghanistan withdrawal: report

>>>/HIVEMIND/2630 SpaceX rolls outs 'premium' Starlink satellite internet tier at $500 per month

>>>/HIVEMIND/2681 "Russia-Ukraine escalation: Thousands of US troops deployed"

>>>/HIVEMIND/2678 A few folks close to the former (((CNN president))) should be very nervous right now.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2690 Lyin' Ted fails to name (((them)))

>>>/HIVEMIND/2691 (((ISRAEL'S))) APARTHEID AGAINST PALESTINIANS

>>>/HIVEMIND/2705 JUST IN - U.S. Army: Soldiers who refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine will be immediately discharged, Reuters reports.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2743 CNN Quietly Resets 'Days Since An Employee Committed A Sex Crime' Counter Back To Zero

>>>/HIVEMIND/2721 A Dominion Voting Systems Rep is Sponsoring a Republican Senate Campaign Fundraiser.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2731 Aussie state lawmakers call to scrap all COVID restrictions in Victoria

>>>/HIVEMIND/2732 Biden Officials Signal US and Iran Close to Reaching Deal in Vienna

>>>/HIVEMIND/2733 The (((ADL))) just minutes ago changed its definition of "racism" as a response to the Whoopie situation.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2734 Lt. Col. (((Vindman))) sues Trump Jr., Scavino, Giuliani and Julia Hahn for attacks he faced during the 2019 impeachment proceedings related to Trump and Ukraine.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2736 REDDITORS ARE LOSING THEIR SHIT & CALLING FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST TRUCKER PROTEST

>>>/HIVEMIND/2737 FBI confirms purchasing Pegasus spyware, but denies using it - connects to >>>/HIVEMIND/2345

>>>/HIVEMIND/2742 Q Research General #19637: JEFF ZUCKER RESIGNS FROM [CP]NN!!! Edition - Completed @ 1:45pm EST with 751 posts

>>>/HIVEMIND/2757 I'm naming the Jews, Inauthentic Anon hates that.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2773 Together, anons form the mightiest faggot, one they'll never be able to cope and seethe away.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2779 Archbishop Vigano: โ€œTime Willโ€ฆ Make the Masks Fall from Those Whoโ€ฆ Disguised Themselves as Saviors of Humanityโ€ฆ"

>>>/HIVEMIND/2780 House Oversight Republicans give HHS a Feb. 16 deadline to turn over docs on funding for Wuhan lab and Fauci emails

>>>/HIVEMIND/2797 Hidden Pfizer trial data shows that ALL โ€œvaccinatedโ€ women in pregnancy lost their unborn babies

>>>/HIVEMIND/2813 (((Q Research))) General #19638: ITS HABBENING!!! Edition - FINISHED WITH 751 @3:23 est

>>>/HIVEMIND/2811 (((Facebook))) has banned the rapidly growing โ€œConvoy to DC 2022โ€ group from its platform after it gained some 137,000 members.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2813 (((Q Research))) General #19638: ITS HABBENING!!! Edition - FINISHED WITH 751 @3:23

>>>/HIVEMIND/2822 Defense Sec. Austin tells GOP governors their National Guardsmen must receive COVID-19 vaccine

>>>/HIVEMIND/2823 The Dominoes are Falling!

>>>/HIVEMIND/2827 Controversial NYC Judge Denis Boyle no longer handling youth cases

>>>/HIVEMIND/2838 (((Q Research))) General #19639: We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore Edition - FINISHED WITH 751 @5:22 pm EST

>>>/HIVEMIND/2848 Volume up, enjoy.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2851 As (((Israeli))) spyware dealer NSO Group is facing renewed scrutiny over the abuse of its WhatsApp hacking tools, an American startup could also reportedly bypass the messaging appโ€™s security. That startup was secretly backed by the millions of billionaire Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel. Connects to >>>/HIVEMIND/2737, >>>/HIVEMIND/2345

>>>/HIVEMIND/2852 Ottawa police chief Sloly says it is not in his mandate to negotiate end of a protest, which is global and national in nature. He reiterates once again that there may not be a policing solution to end this protest.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2856,Operation Black Rake

>>>/HIVEMIND/2857,Black Lives Matter shut down all its online fundraising streams late Wednesday afternoon, just days after California threatened to hold the charity's leaders personally liable over its lack of financial transparency.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2862 Company says itโ€™s developing a system that generates your face from DNA

>>>/HIVEMIND/2898 ALBERTA TRUCKERS BLOCKADING COUTTS BORDER CROSSING WILL NOT BACK DOWN

>>>/HIVEMIND/2911 17th state out of 34 needed states joins the convention of states

>>>/HIVEMIND/2920 Ottawa's top cop: Police likely can't end vaccine protests

>>>/HIVEMIND/2922 URGENT NOTICE! National Butterfly Center CLOSED Jan 28-30 due to credible threats.

>>>/HIVEMIND/2982 How Hugh Hefner's friends ran their own Playboy 'mini mansions' with 'reject' Playmates promised fake modeling contracts before they were 'traded like cattle'

>>>/HIVEMIND/2992 Breaking: The White House announces that the U.S. has killed the current leader of ISIS

>>>/HIVEMIND/2996 According to the (((ADL's))) new definition, the CCP sending 1 million Uyghurs to concentration camps is not "systemic racism"

>>>/HIVEMIND/2999 Still laughing about (((Chris Wallace))) being stuck now at CNN.

>>>/HIVEMIND/3002 BREAKING Shares of (((Facebook))) parent Meta plunged 24 percent in opening trading

>>>/HIVEMIND/3003 CNN insiders suspect (((Chris Cuomo))) flagged Jeff Zucker's workplace relationship as revenge for firing him, reports say

>>>/HIVEMIND/3004 Mysterious 'Havana Syndrome' may be attacks caused by targeted electromagnetic pulses, US intel report says

>>>/HIVEMIND/3006 Judge Blocks Military From Punishing Two Troops Seeking Religious Exemptions to Vaccine Mandate

>>>/HIVEMIND/3008,Democratic Rep. (((Jamie Raskin))) failed to properly report a massive stock payout for his wife โ€” a Biden banking regulator nominee

>>>/HIVEMIND/3009 'FNCโ€™s Carlson: โ€˜(((Jeff Zucker))) Did Not Get Canned for His Sex Life โ€” New Management Wanted Him Out of CNNโ€™ Sexual misconduct will be the cover - Q

>>>/HIVEMIND/3014 State Department validates leaked documents responding to Russian demands, US holds firm on blanket NATO ban.

>>>/HIVEMIND/3015 State Department validates leaked documents responding to Russian demands, US holds firm on blanket NATO ban.

>>>/HIVEMIND/3066 Ottawa Police Threatens to Call In Military to Stop Trucker Protest

>>>/HIVEMIND/3069, Russia launches 'provocation' missions against Ukraine soldiers to start war

>>>/HIVEMIND/3075 โ€œThe Sons and Daughters of America Are Not Foot Soldiers for Your Partyโ€™s Inept Geriatric Despot" โ€“ Rep. Madison Cawthorne

>>>/HIVEMIND/3076 21-Year-Old Greek Football Player Dies on the Pitch Following Cardiac Arrest

>>>/HIVEMIND/3079 German researchers to start breeding pigs for human heart transplants

>>>/HIVEMIND/3080 Be Blessed

>>>/HIVEMIND/3081 President Trump: Why Isnโ€™t Unselect Committee Investigating the Massive Ballot Harvesting Operation that Has Just Been Irrefutably Reported?

>>>/HIVEMIND/3082 Durham Filing Rebuts Inspector General Horowitzโ€™s Claims on Missing Cellphones, Hints at Growing Rift

>>>/HIVEMIND/3083 J&J and Drug Distributors to Pay $589 Million Settlement to Native American Tribes Over Opioid Crisis

>>>/HIVEMIND/3084 @mikepompeo

>>>/HIVEMIND/3088 (((JonDoodle))) setting up a new kayfabe excuse for baker tripcodes

>>>/HIVEMIND/3095,Police in Canada order truckers to remove their vehIckes, or they will seize them, and take them all to jail.

>>>/HIVEMIND/3101 Freedom Convoy Demonised โ€“ CIA-colour revolutions celebrated

Anonymous ID: 124773 Feb. 3, 2022, 12:24 p.m. No.15537823   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7862 >>8644

"In computing, a denial-of-service attack is a cyber-attack in which the perpetrator seeks to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a host connected to a network."

 

What is it called when an entity does this to a platform intending the same disruption?

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 12:48 p.m. No.15538020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8375 >>9024

>>15537667

>>15537757

qresear/ch is fine from an operational pov.

but sent these posts to ResignationAnon so he knows what's up.

 

>>15537862

>slowly but surely OSS is destroying all the functions of Q Research

'''please desist - that is NOT TRUE. And I mean objectively. Objectively not true, according to both site owner JW and qresear.ch owner RA. Not gonna post what they said but they're very glad for the change.

 

Working together, there is no problem we cannot address.

 

>>15537946

o7

 

  • BO

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 3, 2022, 3:35 p.m. No.15539084   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9112 >>0152

>>15539024

Let me finish this off (because I've done all I can do to illuminate this clown) with this and then I'll get back to work, because I can't solve the problem I'm about to detail.

 

The OSS strategy is to run you down, wear you out, make important things less important, force corners to be cut and force the degradation of service with relentless attacks on the board, the staff, the anons and on the data store. OSS will run you and run you till you finally acquiesce and give him whatever he wants so he'll go away. That's when he'll double the misery. I've seen this a hundred times. OSS is driven to destroy for whatever the motivation is.

 

That's what he's done for 2 years and that's what he's doing now.

 

You've already accepted the spam and you've accepted that you can't stop it. You'll end up just making new lines in the sand until you have nowhere else to draw one. That's what is happening here.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 3:35 p.m. No.15539085   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15538785

Nope, because spamming does not deny anyone else the service. So it isn't a form of a denial of service. Spamming is a distinction that has more to do with the mindset of administration, which if you went back and looked at what started it all it might surprise you what's happening now.

 

If you want to talk of a denial of service, deleting old bread posts and backfilling with anything different is an actual denial of service attack against anon.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 3:48 p.m. No.15539185   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15539163

You're gonna need more proof than 'he did a coup', considering he acted with the blessing of the two previous BO's. Do you understand that to argue against that is to argue against this current BO's behaviors as well?

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 3:54 p.m. No.15539217   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15539123

The only way I see Jim's potential future actions is to attempt to set up a situation wherein he can attempt litigation. He's used that path before, but not in US courts. Discovery would be really interesting if so, in US courts. This is why the keyword "commercial spam" was used at the time erroneously. BO's plan seems to not extend beyond comms with Jim and occasionally sperging out on hivemind.

 

It's been a long time, and I wonder if you've done your research on these personas. Have you talked to previous employees? Usually I wouldn't bother discussing in detail other than raising my suspicions, but since then they have been confirmed and I consider Jim doubly directly relevant to this board's meta.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 4:04 p.m. No.15539294   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15539163

Also, have you looked at the definition of the term you used? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

 

It's interesting because it is much more applicable to recent history than where you said. Isn't that curious that you would invert the meaning of the word itself?

Anonymous ID: b97d92 Feb. 3, 2022, 5:26 p.m. No.15539864   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0045 >>0102 >>0152

>>15526078

Since you asked, I will opine for a sec. By the way BO, love what you have done so far:

 

  1. In my opinion the last BO made a huge mistake by creating pinned crusades, such as the Ingersol / Larpwood nonsense. The premise of "so and so is trying to take over the board" seemed like paranoia, or deception.

 

  1. The existence of subversive boards is inevitable. While your HM suggestion may be smart or workable, I'm not sure it is necessary. I can't speak for other anons, but I just filter out shit like those HIvemind posts, and move on.

 

  1. The OSS / No-Name conversion is interesting. But if you reserve it for just OSS you risk drawing more attention to it, rather than just deleting or ignoring it. What if this idea applied to ALL name-fagging? Just auto convert every single name fag to No-Name. Or delete the naming function entirely.

 

This is the first and only anon board I have ever been part of, since its early days. IMO the biggest problem it has is the name-fagging. That sets up endless, needless controversyโ€ฆliterally years worth of arguing nowโ€ฆall about who said this or who did that. FUCKK ALL THAT. No one cares. These personalities may have migrated from other forums, and this elite 'clique' of online faggots may think they own internet thought and discussionโ€ฆbut that can stop right here. I say nuke 'em all by making us all the same.

 

IMO the board needs to stay truly and comletely anonymous.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 3, 2022, 5:48 p.m. No.15540045   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15539864

This post is EXCELLENT BO - The only thing I'd change is #2 - We need to find a way to keep the hivemind spam out of the QResear.ch function. Does Archive Anon have any ideas? If HM wasn't being rendered in the searches the HM spam would really matter anymore. Can Archive Anon 'exclude' the HM in searches or would that be too process intensive?

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 6:04 p.m. No.15540152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0171 >>0178 >>1588 >>1980 >>2313 >>6117

>>15538375

>why Jim glad for a change?

because qresearch has been a royal pain in the ass. FJ was a nasty, hostile jerk. doxxed private convo between JW and employee, etc. I had similar experiences with him early on. Gamer guy who never allowed anons to be staff.

 

>>15539084

OSS has been trying to wear anons down for 2 years. Hasn't worked. We are here, he is not. Long game is what matters.

 

>>15539864

The idea floated about word filtering is not mine, was proposed to me. Agreed to talk with anons about it. I'm more of the mind that anons can filter and staff can delete when possible. Not like spam is something new and exotic. kek.

Agree on #3.

 

Name-fagging controversy is big headache.

i liked being anon as digger, still am anon for that. when becoming a baker, liked having a name - convenient, helpful, made a tough job easier. learned about difs among bakers, handy to know. bakers i've worked with on a daily basis all had names. they are the most service oriented people i've ever known, even IRL. Here long hours, every day, for years. Some are now bvs here. Never woulda happened with complete anonymity - trust only comes with a track record.

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: c29326 Feb. 3, 2022, 7:30 p.m. No.15540836   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

So, raid = ban

I guess that happens for some days and repeated offenses result in more days, what X2?

Then permanent ban leading to deletion of hm?

Correct me if I'm wrong of course.

Anonymous ID: 608327 Feb. 3, 2022, 8:58 p.m. No.15541421   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15526078 (sum other bred)

Proposal #2: that "OSS" be auto-converted to "No-Name" - anons will understand the implication.

 

YES PLEASE!!โ† Lots of this for about 6 months, 1 week and 3 days which is how long it took my IP's to be unbanned. Instead of "No Name" though, let it be Cum Stain In Asshole of Society.

Anonymous ID: b35b0f Feb. 3, 2022, 9:27 p.m. No.15541583   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Would be a little cooler if in the final notes post, it was standard to put the bread title & # in the top, so when you hover over previous notes links you could see the bread title.

Anonymous ID: d2b237 Feb. 3, 2022, 9:27 p.m. No.15541588   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1711 >>1916 >>6339

>>15540152

>because qresearch has been a royal pain in the ass. FJ was a nasty, hostile jerk. doxxed private convo between JW and employee, etc. I had similar experiences with him early on. Gamer guy who never allowed anons to be staff.

 

I don't know if any of you are "Anons." I don't know any of you. I didn't know any of the other internet people who call themselves fj or whoever either. I don't care if someone is a jerk, or a gamer, or even a Jew. Because I'm an Anon. Only the info matters, not the ego that its desperation projects.

 

The changes are now board admin deletes spam from OSS or anyone who might seem to be OSS, and OSS continues to claim current board admin is subversive and hides information from Anons. At this point, it looks like both sides are right.

 

It is not user friendly to have someone posting one in four posts with a scroll fest of red text. It is less than functional to delete half of every bread. People can still post, but some may think why bother? Especially if they think it's just going to be censored after the fact by who even knows who?

 

Anons don't like information removed, it breeds distrust. No one knows what another Anon's motives are. They can only judge by actions and posts. The actions of both sides of these board wars have always looked like girls screaming to me, I didn't pay attention to all the namefaggotry, but I can't NOT pay attention to this shit. I could filter, but why bother if I'm in a bread that isn't ever finished, because delete, refresh, delete, refresh? At some point you're going to have to choose. Board war forever or ignore. The opposing side will never die. They seem to be a host of bots or a team with an endless supply of cocaine.

 

Speaking of toddlers. When a toddler throws a fit, you ignore them to get them to understand that no one will pay attention to them until they stop crying and act right.

Anonymous ID: 608327 Feb. 3, 2022, 9:53 p.m. No.15541711   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1742

>>15541588

Consider it a time out then. These fukstiks stifled untold numbers of anons voices. Fuck them! They should get as good as they give for a similar time period then they can be allowed back in the sandbox until they misbehave again. In the meantime they have their own board(s) where anyone can go and read their pearls of wisdom. You really have to be a colossal fuck up to earn the ire of anons on QR. And FapJack was the fucking cunt Board Owner of QR who allowed it all to happen.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 10:04 p.m. No.15541742   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1775

>>15541711

Until another bright idea comes along like "hey lets not have a transition plan in place for the second board in as many weeks."

 

You're all acted like jilted wives after years of not controlling the board, you experience a taste of it, and you reign supreme with the most power you can imagine in your mind. Does anyone consider any fault on their own actions? BO had to get ok'd by Jim to start this coup, but you'd rather be faultless in it, taking for granted reality because you think you're spotless without sin? You were just waiting to coup, and that's a fact. But why is there no transition plan to deal with this? I mean, you knew this was going to happen, right?

Anonymous ID: 608327 Feb. 3, 2022, 10:15 p.m. No.15541775   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1967 >>1986

>>15541742

I had no idea the board was up for grabs otherwise it might be mine now. Never sought it. Don't want it but it has fucking improved tremendously since the new BO took over. Nothing wrong with letting the problem "toddlers" cool their heels for awhile. No need for it to be permanent unless they prove to be permanent assholes. Anytime anons get lonesome for their input they know where to find them.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 3, 2022, 10:57 p.m. No.15541916   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1986 >>2556 >>6339

>>15541588

not taking back one word said about FJ or OSS.

No regrets about deleting spam - OSS both spams and ignores temporary bans. It's his revenge for losing control of a board lost by BO thru sheer carelessness. OSS has been treated a lot more fairly than he previouslyl treated anons on this board. At this point, the spamming from /hivemind/ constitutes a RAID on another board, which kicks it up a big notch in seriousness.

 

>deleting half of every bread

Not accurate.

 

Agree about screaming toddler. Except you also restrain the toddler when they are pounding on others.

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 3, 2022, 11:23 p.m. No.15541986   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2034

>>15541916

>>15541775

Unspoken in all of this is the assumption that you have divine right as conferred by JW. This is why I started discussing JW, because we were going to get to this point. What you all have ignored in posts I have made is an absolute morality judgement. No one calls me a liar when I make those arguments, but what does that make you? Complicit in his schemes. Seriously, that's a large view of what's happening. Hierarchy is established and no one questions upward. There has been multiple chances but still no one has been honest with themselves for the sake of the newly acquired positioning.

 

You'll also not that I have ignored arguments that will not bear fruit. I cannot count how many times you have all used the words "but OSS is spamming" because I do not care to argue against or for the point because that is handled, supposedly now but even before it was a waste of time. Are you so trusting in the tools Jim didn't make? Did you know that Jim has not solved a critical problem that makes this entire argument chain a giant waste of time until he decides to change the operation of the site or finds a creative problem to circumvent. Oldfags know where it's going to go with regard to capabilities. Which among you is the new engineer hire? Watch your back, because there's a reason you is no other one, friend.

 

When considering the problem of what to do, repeating the mantra will assuredly accomplish assuaging anxieties until reality destroys the validity. "We're here, he's not" is the latest incarnation. Do you actually believe that? You'd be a fool to.

Anonymous ID: 608327 Feb. 3, 2022, 11:44 p.m. No.15542034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15541986

Anons were asked for input. I gave mine. I'm not in charge of shit but very happy that the new BO has improved the QR experience for all except perhaps twoโ€ฆ..not a bad record so far!

 

Perhaps citizens of the world should agree to give the deep state a seat at the table in perpetuity? No different really than letting FJ and No Name continue to shit up the place with impunity. Jails and gallows exist out of necessity because some assholes have no self control and become tyrants. We'll have to agree to disagree and move on.

Don't know much about JW either except that he owns 8Kun and provides this forum. I'm the anon who asked JW to provide a snail mail address for donations and he did. He's kind enough to send a handwritten note when I do make donations despite the ongoing BS that FJ and No Name cause. I have no "divine right as conferred by JW". IMO, my participation here is purely a privilege provided my JW.

Have a nice day anon.

Anonymous ID: 8c85f2 Feb. 4, 2022, 3:27 a.m. No.15542556   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3430

>>15541916

By all means, continue to get back at OSS for banning you. Continue to ban their every IP. Delete all their posts (not half the bread, you're right, only 5 to 20%). Write programs and filters for all the words OSS might use. Maybe next we could all have profiles and sign ins.

 

Censorship becomes an easy way to avoid anyone questioning you. Whoever you are.

 

I've been telling OSS they were banned, and that they are a selfish asshole spammer. They don't care. I'm telling you this war of yours is a failure, and it's making OSS appear to be right about you. You don't care. The common theme here is that it appears that neither side cares more about other Anons than they do about the appearance of themselves.

 

Do what you want with your absolute power. This place isn't my hill to die on. I'll likely be spending more time on Truth Social in the future anyhow.

Anonymous ID: 7c8a66 Feb. 4, 2022, 4:58 a.m. No.15542857   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2878 >>4942 >>6201 >>8871

what if we convert all

>>>/HIVEMIND/ =/QRESEARCH/

 

its not that his postings are a bunch of shit.

i have reviewed his notable spam posts

for the most part the data is legit. fucking whacked out format, but legit.

 

my problem is him not dropping the OG post and instead dropping a backlink to his board

 

his content does enter the aggregators, just thinking we should block the link back.

imo.

Anonymous ID: bda199 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:41 a.m. No.15543387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

OSS is spoilering links to /HM/. Anon has seen enough; the SOB needs the banhammer from 8kun.top.

This runs against my grain to ask for a ban but OSS has gone beyond free speech and is now treading into treachery.

Cyber-lynch the nigger. thank you.

Anonymous ID: bda199 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:46 a.m. No.15543430   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5857

>>15542556

This is a righteous battle that QR needs to learn to fight righteously. Kill OSS backlinks to HM however it needs to be done.

A LOGIN PROCESS STRIPS ANONYMITY AND INVITES EGO HENCE THE BANNERS ANONS USE

The cure cannot be worse than the disease. Kill text spoilers hell anon is spitballin now.

Anonymous ID: 32272e Feb. 4, 2022, 6:53 a.m. No.15543468   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3479 >>5297

I hate any/all censorship, but redirecting hivemind to a broken link is based and will work until they start a HM board. Perhaps send it to 127.0.0.1 instead? I don't suppose they'll ever be able to make a board with that name.

Anonymous ID: f92a7f Feb. 4, 2022, 1:11 p.m. No.15546339   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6454 >>6549

>>15541588

>I don't know if any of you are "Anons." I don't know any of you. I didn't know any of the other internet people who call themselves fj or whoever either. I don't care if someone is a jerk, or a gamer, or even a Jew. Because I'm an Anon. Only the info matters, not the ego that its desperation projects.

Stopped reading after that

<Look at what's being deleted

 

>>15541916

Concur

Anonymous ID: a99ac6 Feb. 4, 2022, 1:38 p.m. No.15546549   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6563

>>15546339

><Look at what's being deleted

>>15546454

>If I wanted to go to hivemind, I wouldn't be on qresearch, I would go there.

Right if it was simply once a week or link to specific item only and not knowingly raiding another boardโ€ฆ

it might have been tolerable.

Tolerance has been passed, long way, passed.

Anonymous ID: a99ac6 Feb. 4, 2022, 3:49 p.m. No.15547574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7777

>>15544280

>>15544280

 

>Plenty of "I hate bans but I'm quivering right now in ban lust" posts.

Don't recall the tyrant no-name giving any discussion, just insane ban rampage on everyone

Completely without any accuracy

Spray and pray approach

Mostly because No-Name is a gamer who thought he had god mode

oops

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 4:56 p.m. No.15548101   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8146

>>15548050

Yet again, emotion takes people away from considering what would happen if their advice was taken. It's just another bad choice. You do not need to convince me your actions are justified when I'm describing what they are matter of factly. It doesn't make my words untrue. Think about the arguments and what you're saying "Yeah but we have reasons for it". I never claimed you didn't! What I claimed instead is that it is a bad choice because what will happen is a streisand effect. "leave no quarter" results in close proximity. Really? Bad choice.

Anonymous ID: 359e8f Feb. 4, 2022, 5:01 p.m. No.15548146   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8214 >>2876

>>15548101

>You do not need to convince me your actions are justified when I'm describing what they are matter of factly

not any actions on this anons part

simply stating the facts

/hm has organized an coordinated raids on the board even after getting their own board rather than just going and doing work there

regardless past action the current actions are not those of patriots

Benedict Arnold was the same

>"leave no quarter"

They had every opportunity to cease and desist their childish behavior

more than ample chances

There is no emotion involved in this

This is a decision that has been brought to anons to discuss

opinion is noted

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:10 p.m. No.15548214   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8292

>>15548146

So much us vs them. "We good, they bad, we patriots, they losers". So much "our board, go find your own" when bo/bv changed in a coup less than a week or so ago when did 'go find your own board' apply then? For two years? More than two years? It seems to me that it's unequal in application. But that is to be expected because heaven forbid you find out there are patriots there with a more expounded system of morality. Boy that would be shocking, wouldn't it?

Anonymous ID: ef73ef Feb. 4, 2022, 5:17 p.m. No.15548292   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8579

>>15548214

>more expounded system of morality. Boy that would be shocking, wouldn't it?

anons get it

anons were sick of NoNames behavior long before this event.

ever consider the owner of the business whose services anons use for freeโ€ฆ

might have had a tremendous amount of unecessary work generated by noname banning thousands of IPS

think maybe that generated a lot of reports (churn) (speaking from past experience in support queue)

so while you may have some sense of a greater purpose and "morality" that those anons have/had

current actions and going back to 2020 don't bear that out.

may be true they are still patriots, their actions tho speak louder than any evidence you might have to provide

if they are patriots and continue this it just proves they are some of the stupidest of all anons this anons has met

pls show me one crumb where Q said 'make sure you divide patriots'

ridiculous bullshit

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:49 p.m. No.15548579   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8642 >>8645

>>15548292

Have you ever digged into his past? I have. 2ch came from where? Public records? He is now applicable as a meta topic since he is directly involved in BO's administrative duties and email comms.

 

Are you suggesting that his servers cannot handle 10,000-100,000 database entries and ip filters? Are we running on a hamster wheel that cannot keep up? Boy that sob story sounds like bullshit and the only way it would be true is lack of programming directly in the implementation of that. I don't think that is true, but it may have originated from someone seeking excuses.

 

The problem is his choice in freedom of speech directly results in it. So the problem is that by limiting himself to an anonymous board he will have this catch-22. So what then is he to do? I cannot wait to see, personally. I know if I have a problem optimizing my own site, that's on my shoulders and no user would be expected to be at fault. That's a shitty design if so.

 

You must've missed the posts where Q clued us in when CIA joined the board and said to expect that the attacks would ramp up.

Anonymous ID: c36cd3 Feb. 4, 2022, 5:56 p.m. No.15548642   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8672

>>15548579

>Have you ever digged into his past?

yes dug into him long ago

>Are you suggesting that his servers cannot handle 10,000-100,000 database entries and ip filters?

Wut? No fairly sure that mashed potato comment is nothing at all like what anon said

>You must've missed the posts where Q clued us in when CIA joined the board and said to expect that the attacks would ramp up.

You must have missed when noname stated only the deep state knew who he was

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 6 p.m. No.15548672   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8719

>>15548642

"might have had a tremendous amount of unecessary work generated by noname banning thousands of IPS

 

think maybe that generated a lot of reports (churn) (speaking from past experience in support queue)"

 

>>15548642

"Wut? No fairly sure that mashed potato comment is nothing at all like what anon said"

 

Have you looked at OpenIB? It's open source. Guess what, the reports amounts to what I said. Try again.

Anonymous ID: 041a1a Feb. 4, 2022, 6:06 p.m. No.15548719   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8837

>>15548672

>Have you looked at OpenIB? It's open source. Guess what, the reports amounts to what I said. Try again

 

Not talking about what servers or db can handle

anon was talking about the work generated by reports issued for bans and undoing them.

Go back

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:17 p.m. No.15548837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8885

>>15548719

>anon was talking about the work generated by reports issued for bans and undoing them

 

Reports for bans are automated. Don't be silly. Another DB row for revocation requests? And a flunkie at a keyboard that can one a weekday fly through the revocation requests if any? The horror. So much work. 'My pinky hurts.' Such a sad life. How dare he use functionality on the board he was blessed to handle.

 

Is this the best you can do to conjure up pity for JW? You are aware he stole 1.5 million dollars to host a site he then stole the domain and thus ownership of, right? This is on public court documents in Japan. Are you sure that you wish to continue attempting to make me feel pity for the struggles an admin has even when it is plain to see not a problem for anyone competent to administrate or program themselves out of it even excusing thievery and conning?

 

You see that I again and provoking a response using the truth to yet again attempt to reach on a moral basis lest hierarchy captures you. Yet again none have said I am wrong. What does that make the BO's, BV's? It at first was considered duped, but maybe it is time to assuredly say complicit.

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 4, 2022, 6:21 p.m. No.15548871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2876

>>15542878

>>15542857

think converting

to qresearch would cause a problem on qresear.ch, kek

 

>>15543483

now we're cooking w/gas

 

>>15544280

>ban lust

next Fauci plague?

 

>>15546104

admins watching pretty close atm, trying to keep board open but not PlayPlace for shills

 

>>15546117

will pass it along

 

>>15546201

>/cuteboys/

kek

 

>>15546263

/dev/null

hmmm

 

>>15546454

> If I wanted to go to hivemind, I wouldn't be on qresearch, I would go there

obviously they need more anons

how can they delete on such a small board?

 

>>15548050

>disgust not lust

more keks

 

>>15548425

>who let the jews in?

why asking about jews here on meta?

 

Tx for comments, espec the funny ones.

Survived another day. Better than survived.

Whatever happens with oss raids, he still LOST BIGLY -

and keeps losing every day.

We got nothing but time and energy to sort out options and keep building up this board.

 

Main job of admins is to keep board clear enough that anons can work and Q can potentially post. Everything else is gravy.

Anonymous ID: bb52ec Feb. 4, 2022, 6:22 p.m. No.15548885   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8997

>>15548837

>Reports for bans are automated. Don't be silly. Another DB row for revocation requests? And a flunkie at a keyboard that can one a weekday fly through the revocation requests if any? The horror. So much work. 'My pinky hurts.' Such a sad life. How dare he use functionality on the board he was blessed to handle.

 

it's the fact it was completely unnecessary and wasteful

>Is this the best you can do to conjure up pity for JW?

There you go again conflating what was said to fit your narrative glownigger

As you like to say phil turd

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:33 p.m. No.15548997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9094

>>15548885

No, let me refresh you:

 

"might have had a tremendous amount of unecessary work generated by noname banning thousands of IPS

 

think maybe that generated a lot of reports (churn) (speaking from past experience in support queue)"

 

Tremendous amount of unnecessary work was the claim. I do not think it was tremendous. Unnecessary is debatable, and if it were unnecessary, why is it allowed by the admin who has programmer resources, right? Wasteful is your claim but I can see why you might say that. If it's wasteful, why don't the banned for years just stay banned and not fill revocation requests? Is that what you mean, or is that just more accurate than you intended to imply? You see that the frame of context assumes that you are right, but it cannot be assumed to be so in every case, right? So where do we draw a line? Nowhere because if JW has an issue with the usage of his tool, then he should (by proxy or not) alter the rules finally through programmed limits or implementation of policy within code. Because that is the arbiter of what is allowed.

Anonymous ID: 517d00 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:42 p.m. No.15549094   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9122 >>9162 >>9177

>>15548997

>might

Suggests it is a possible cause

You have an agenda

No longer interested in your opinion

Only agenda this anon has is to work in peace without being attacked by fellow "patriots"

They can go back to the Flat earth narrative.

That is at least funny

Almost like the Quantum Syntax garbage, funny.

or the civil flag garbage

Anonymous ID: a92814 Feb. 4, 2022, 6:51 p.m. No.15549177   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15549094

Ah, I see what you mean. You mean that I should discount all the evidence I know of and have expressed about this possibility and instead live in your context where things "might" be true and thus feel that the free services someone who provides and definitely can handle users onto his server should have pity from me. I understand now. Because I have an agenda which is truth and in this case firsthand knowledge of his website code?

 

I disagree, you might want to live in maybe, or you may not.

Anonymous ID: 99201c Feb. 4, 2022, 7:19 p.m. No.15549455   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9582 >>9708

>>15549223

>#STWT Show 197: Who is Q? 17 Anon Origins Exposed CIA SpyCraft Redacted Information Warfare

>On this 197th Episode of #STWT on the Winter Solstice 12/21 the infamous Q of "17" Anon, is going to be exposed once and for all. I will be discussing the findings of a team of pirate researchers and cicada 3301 puzzle solvers, who were able to decipher the true origins of Q anon; was it all for a larp? Or something else? How is Wikileaks involved? Who is Spycraft Entertainment? Who is Redacted? What is psychological warfare? The mystery guest I will be interviewing is the world renowned Music Composer Thomas Schoenberger about his role, and the role of Cicada 3301 in any of the above as well. Intro video: https://youtu.be/q042ASgn_pU Show Notes:

>https://rokfin.com/stream/12282/STWT-Show-197-Who-is-Q-17-Anon-Origins-Exposed-CIA-SpyCraft-Redacted-Information-Warfare

Anonymous ID: c36cd3 Feb. 4, 2022, 7:33 p.m. No.15549582   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15549455

>https://rokfin.com/stream/12282/STWT-Show-197-Who-is-Q-17-Anon-Origins-Exposed-CIA-SpyCraft-Redacted-Information-Warfare

<^^4 hours long

<^^first proof is Hillary wasn't arrested. Done in 3mins

<<yt vid is 404

Thanks for nothing

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 12:14 a.m. No.15551041   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1631

>>15550157

tyvm.

that thread had completely deteriorated, so cut it loose. Also, it was oss's thread. Given to him by fj in order to kill baking, FJ always hated the bakers. Was way b4 oss became bv, maybe you know.

Original image was of a kitchen on fire. oss changed it (asked for fj to make new thread) - it revealed too much about the real reason the thread. Filled it with attacks. no info on baking, just "enemies."

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 12:24 a.m. No.15551072   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15550207

You did stay away.

Thank you.

You are welcome to post if you actually have something to say about baking, noting or board police. No arguing or name calling.

 

You know the problem with notables the other night, too smart not to.

You wanna bake? You have the ability.

But no more muh joos, muh mason, other slides just coz it's your opinion.

No board politics - what happens in the gulch stays in the gulch.

No shitposting, half-baked "news" or entries that say "needs sauce" in final bun. If it's really good, put a question mark on the note and call for a dig. if it's not good enough for that, drop it.

You're not in kindergarten. We can use good bakers but nobody's irreplaceable.

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 5, 2022, 4:12 a.m. No.15551490   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2387

BO whenever you think the time is right I think it's time to shrink the breads down to about 450. The anons are becoming much more focused and the notables are the 'bloatables' only because the bread is at 751.

 

I wasn't for it when the board was in transition but now that I see the level of output from the anons I believe it's inevitable that the bread will have to shrink or the text input size for a post will have to increase. Thanks for all you do.

Anonymous ID: 82db54 Feb. 5, 2022, 4:22 a.m. No.15551531   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1619 >>2406 >>3880

BO if you can forward to someone in globals:

 

I've been global-reporting pedobear on other boards, and some GV is 404ing the image but leaving up the link in the text for hours or even days.This is condoning illegal activity and needs to be brought to their attention.

 

404ING THE IMAGE = NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Anonymous ID: 1774db Feb. 5, 2022, 7:38 a.m. No.15552387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3292

>>15551490

Noted - but that was not a proposal, just mentioned it as an idea, anons were not exactly enthusiastic. And "bloatables" are really only that when full of unnecessary junk. But agree - somewhat shorter is better.

 

More concerned about baker. Late night shifts are hard on baker, espec the last 200 posts. Sometimes bakers request anons to fill the bread to speed things up. Is that really better than finishing up and request a bread lock if BV is around?

Anonymous ID: 7c8a66 Feb. 5, 2022, 8:54 a.m. No.15552876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3031 >>3052

>>15544942, >>15548871 correct, convert hm to an empty string and just leave it blank, nomoe backlinks

>>15546201 /OSSHOLE/

>>15548146 :cease-and-stop

 

be advised, earlier post with UID count is off, thread was being spammed with oss iphop

 

TYVM PATRIOTS -o7

#GODBLESS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF (YOU)

 

>seriously u gusy dont know what [Kunโ€ฆ] is for? ask Da Lini. *Think Energyโ€ฆ sda1/yours/

Anonymous ID: 6aa2c6 Feb. 5, 2022, 8:59 p.m. No.15558363   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15557572

does deleting illegal spam = gatekeeping?

don't categorize bakers by anything other than baking ability, integrity and if they play well with others

you're just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticksโ€ฆ.all talk, no value

kek

Anonymous ID: 880b53 Feb. 6, 2022, 4:39 a.m. No.15559764   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15557572

You spam the board non stop, talk down to anons, sabotage bakers, harass the BV's and BO's, make scurrilous baseless charges, raid the board, post even though you are banned.

 

Now what was that you were saying?

Anonymous ID: d33a58 Feb. 6, 2022, 9:03 a.m. No.15561026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1874

>>15560946

Sorry for your loss anon

My grandma was always distancing herself from me and my older brother.

my oldest brother (RIP) grew with her as my 'uncle'- it was a big family secret until I was 13.

I have one memory of her as a real grandma. She chased me down once and tackled me and tickled my belly. I'll never forget that.

F

Archi ID: 8b04a1 Feb. 6, 2022, 11:25 a.m. No.15561874   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15561026

Sorry for your loss

it's Sad for the family not me

I am no longer human I guess

My demon tells me to take advantage of the situation and fix the problem with your wife

 

Since her brother and grandmother are dead

 

Enter with this door

 

I will enter with this door

Anonymous ID: 7c8a66 Feb. 6, 2022, 2:42 p.m. No.15563221   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

What is Tor?

What is TOR really

A portal?

For where?

For who?

Who is Buried at Glastonbury TOR?

Who was he buried with a led shield beneath him?

Why was he buried with the led shield beneath him?

#BeBest #BeGolden [AU]men/[OM]en/Amen

 

Hoping u guys are going to handle the great awakening better than i did. when i informed, it put me down for almost a month.

 

[Find the Book of Lock and Key]

>ask the navy's library, they know.

https://torpedo.nrl.navy.mil/tu/ps/authenticate/authenticate.html