>there are many anons who hate jews, like me
Q is not against jews
if you are, that's your business.
Keep it to yourself if you want to be part of the discussion.
if you have a beef with a baker, work it out or stay apart. Think of the bigger goal.
proposed rules of thumb for baking
may eliminate some squabbling over what is right
thoughts? anything left out?
Some Rules of Thumb for Baking and Note-taking
Biggest rule is USE COMMON SENSE.
RETURNING BAKERS
QR needs more bakers. But if you haven't been here in a while, plz LURQ MOAR to get familiar with changes since you left.
Board has gone thru a lot, anons too. Those who stuck it out deserve some respect.
Some things need to change, but not everything and not everything at once.
"Don't push the river."
ALL BAKERS
Shill bakes are pretty easy to peg: baker leaves, no notables, bad notables, anon protests ignored by baker, baker making unauthorized dough changes
Good bakes are harder bc every bakers has a different idea about what's best.
Key points:
-
Be as tolerant as you can manage - focus on Q goals, not the lousy personalities of your fellow bakers (KEK)
-
Make it REAL CLEAR who has the bread (tie to dough, use FORMATTING, etc.)
-
If you have to leave early, say so and seek a replacement; try to avoid leaving after @500-550.
-
When leaving wo/replacement, post GHOST BAKE – avoid when possible since shills may pick it up
-
Don't split bakes except in emergencies - BVs will usually lock stolen bakes
NOTABLES
Goal: to highlight material that is especially key for defeating the DS, "we are the news"
Specifically:
-
recent news articles or other relevant posts that are dated, well-sauced, and easy to find
-
videos with titles, dates, and a short description
-
insightful anon analyses espec. when tied to Q posts but relevance if the main thing
-
reports on military and other traffice (boats, planes, etc.)
-
on point satire or cartoons
"GOOD" NOTABLE BUNS
-
Each baker has a different style; try to avoid style wars (your style is not the "best" or "only")
-
Ideally, go for a balance between 'kitchen sink' and 'anon noms only' - be flexible
-
Use concise descriptors (helps with "wall of text" problem)
-
If time permits, read pb notables and use qresear.ch to check for dup posts
-
Stick to one format on notables dough page so aggregators can pick up
you're way too fast for me, kek
tripcodes have been discussed, but they make BO/BVs complete gatekeepers, would be better to be adjunct not primary
g'nite, tx for feedback
Does this clarify?
How do scrapers know which bun to pick up for notables?
-
By looking for CONSISTENT MARKERS that identify it.
For example -
-
Each notable bun is recognized as a bun by the WHITE SPACE that delimits it on the top and bottom.
-
The number at the top = number of each bun
-
The number at the bottom = LINK to location of each bun
-
The CURRENT bun is identified by its location directly after "Notables are not Endorsements"
-
It should consistently have one line of WHITE SPACE after it but bakers keep changing this - which may be a problem (breaks the "white space space surrounds each bun" rule)
see CAP
This sounds very fussy.
It''s fussy because consistency is essential when coding is involved.
Although each aggregator may use a slightly different algorithm, they all look for CONSISTENCY.
When it's not there, the algorithm can BREAK - which often happened with "we are the news" when bakers would vary the formatting (leaving off the "#" for example or inserting the wrong number - etc.).
The CAP shows white space around ALL buns - which is correct.
But it has gotten DROPPED recently.
Please bakers - do not vary the matrix for this page.
Make sure you are using the CURRENT DOUGH (not your own).
will put a guide in the baking thread
>Trips for bakers
Agree - not the way to go
"noms only" idea comes up periodically but not for a long time. Not recommended because we cannot FORCE anons to nom - "punishing" them with tiny "nommed only" buns just makes them mad. Therefore impractical.
Thoughts?
>banner changed
First change was to "Qanon" part of banner in response to OSS campaign re "Qanon is not Q". Banner radically changed by Barkeep one night over anon protests, he simply did it because he could. From there, bakers varied the banner. Some versions pretty good, others (imo) were a complete mockery. Once an artist anon tried to restore original banner on the basis of its dignity and aethetics, but didn't happen.
Share your preference for original, whether "Qanon" or "Q". Any baker can use the original; may be better to use "Q" version to avoid needless headaches. Whether we should revert to that would be the question.
Thoughts, bakers?
>This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.
Abusive speech is not free speech. Personal attacks is not free speech. The topic is not untouchable, we can discuss - and you are doing now.
>he won't shut up about the jews
hence my request for him or anyone to focus on baking and board issues here. Goes for everyone. When someone can't shut up about something, that's their problem. It shouldn't be ours.
Let me be blunt: STOP FIGHTING with other bakers. Butthurt bakers fuck things up. Grow up or get out.
not sure what u are disagreeing with.
>noms only until more participation
Would ask, why must anons nom? They already participate. They willingly dig, meme and pray. But most just don't like the "meta" type stuff like nomming, noting and baking, only crazy bakers. kek.
Imo, efforts to force what one considers virtuous behavior tends to create resistance or reluctant compliance, not transformation.
Who usually noms? Is it anons or off-duty bakers, noters and a handful of oldfags?
>if anon prefers bland uniformity
kekking….
Bakers get attacked all the time. Goes with the territory. Most of us learn how to deal with attacks wo/lashing out. Too much emotion, use reason instead. Develop self-control and patience. Work with what is possible and teach by example.
>gerbs stay outta the dough
pray (kek)
obviously old married couple
>if no one eggs me on
ah c'mon baker
we all gotta try to get along
it's a fam
ha ha ha ha…..
if anons don't like what's in the notes, you will know. if they don't complain, you must be a pretty good baker.
yes, there is tolerance for many styles. no mandate against "nom only", just a "plea" for flexibility. Bakers in a bread are to anons and Admins on a board are to bakers. They have the final say. Want to involve them more? Ask their opinion, convo w/them when it's slow. They will speak if we will listen.
BAKERS
tx for your contributions
Don't have to agree on everything, just have to convo wo/personal crap getting in the way. Got a real opportunity now, let's take it.
WE IN HERE.
WE ARE THE NEWS.
Shadilay, fellow bakers.
WE WILL MAKE QR GREAT AGAIN.
-
OUT
commas are for separating links
got a cap? saw a bread with commas after the links, that should be a space:
>>574943585 Notable description
Sounds serious. Think you guise better get off this platfrom immediately so you don't get in trouble. Won't tell anyone you were here.
been out, just back
u gotta be more specific, provide a CAP
yep, excellent comma use - kek
(bakers really asking BO about how to use commas? werd…)
if u want feedback, better provide details
i can't hangout out everywhere at once
same comment as above - what are they pissed about? you don't even provide a link or bread number
>Attention to detail key
absolutely correct, espec on notable bun formatting. generall not futzing around with dough, other bakers will call that out.
>archiving important
Yes.
plz just use std formatting, no commas at the end
>bakers coming back, will be misunderstandings
yep
kudos to BVs for sorting things out
they been around the block a few times
>globals gone
there's always something
bet they're not far off….
BTW, i will look at globals and recommend a consolidation
Have to look at where things go now that we are not using 3rd and 4th dough posts
that is new to me, this was not my decision, was here for a while (except for gerbil's doughs)
need to look at where to put those resources from those posts - restore to dough or put in a resource thread?
We will get all these questions answered and problems straightened out
It will take time
Very glad to have bakers back but yes, will be rocky as we work out the kinks
hang in there guise
TY BAKERS
fixed.
located the Bread Resources file and stickied it, had slipped down the catalog. That is where info linked on OP post is currently stored.
Can put globals in there if they need archiving, will go through and see.
try real hard & you get a cooperation trophy
Not here to wrangle out of control bakers. You are not children.
> get over yourself and think about the mission
notable comment
good advice all around.
Have worked with same crew for years. They do not fuck around, namecall, or
focus on petty garbage. NOT ONCE.
BAKERS ARE NOT SPECIAL
IT'S A PRIVILEGE TO SERVE
IT'S A PRIVILEGE TO BAKE
If that's not enough for you, you're in the wrong place.
Announcement
BO spent a lotta time here that last coupla days, you all have a pretty good idea of where i stand.
Tired of the fighting, enough is enough.
You all know how to bake. SO BAKE.
If you have a SPECIFIC CONCERN about BAKING or the BOARD (not other bakers), contact me here: F4AL@protonmail.com.
Best of luck to you all.
-
BO
just posted in QR
TYB
BAKERS
Please check the bread numbers after baking.
CAP
Refresh to see update.
NEXT BAKER
Please use Corrected Dough:
https://controlc.com/95172f87
SINCE THERE IS NO BAKER YET, ANONS PLEASE ALERT NEXT BAKER ABOUT THIS CORRECTION.
That's a decent note-taker.
Current bread needs a baker.
Baking instructions and e-bake instructions are now on BAKING THREAD:
i did edit and dropped a note linked to dough
> it's worthless when no one likes the baker
bingo. bakers who are frenly draw people out, those who are crabby…..