You want baker ID but are against Shill ID
WTF?
FILTERED
>makes baking easier as much of the reference info is ignored by anons (to be honest)
I tell ya whut I definitely could not have broken my land-speed-bake record earlier of just over 2 minutes when I realized I had lost track of time, and had to drop a fresh @730 posts!
>but should we still have it prominentally displayed in the dough each bread?
>IDK
Perhaps the reference info can go in the OP of these META threads now, as they seem pretty active (and it would be at the front of the catalog)
Big fan of the dough now
>We can not have this type of chaos
>when a baker request handoff, its first come first served
No it's not, you fucking loser
And keep pretending like you don't glow
I'm looking forward to the death of your bakerG persona, unless you really are just this retarded and indoctrinated by the DOAR that you practically emulate them
>we may say "anons must nom"
>but so far, it hasn't happened
>Don't let the IDEAL destroy the REAL.
>muy 2 cents worth
There isABSOLUTELY NO POINTin have a baker dictate "anon noms only"
This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.
And even if they actually did that, the end result would be no different than having anon go back and doing a scrape on an ebake.
>Baker id can be handled by bakers
Agree'd
>Shill id can ONLY be handled by admins
Disagree, by technicality, as [they] are very easy to ID, and filter.
>Should ALL of the power to decide who bakes be in the hands of admins?
Baker should be allowed to choose who they handoff to (unless they're an obvious DOAR baker occupying the position)
The power here will come from baker/admin cooperation, like it has so far.
Btw, great job.
o7
>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin
>The only baker I ever attack is DOGBERG
>and he always starts it by CALLING ME OSS
>DOGBERG
>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin
Wow, that"s crazy
>Good point re filtering but how do you know at top of bread handoff who is offering to bake?
My only ideas would be for Baker to plan ahead and make the request during the last bread they have time to bake, so it can be picked up in "top of next bread" fashion via basic comms to whoever called it.
And in the event the kitchen has to go ghost, I think we just need more comms to and from anon that we all need to be on top of our callouts.
Nothing wrong with an ebake IMO.
When I'm well rested I can go above and beyond when I scrape a pb (ctrl+f for other terms like @, sauce, proof, dasting, relevent topics, etc) when there's not many noms.
I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit
It's a slide
Why are you so AGAINST idea of a baker who isn't (you) having a say in who they handoff to,IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN AGENDA?
>DODGE STOP SELF NOTING, THATS ANONS WORK
Bakers are either anon, or shill.
THAT'S A FACT.
Retard.
Your divisionfagging is weak.
And obvious.
Are you saying now that bakers aren't allowed to submit their own notables?
Because it's against da rules to self nom?
Seriously, go fuck yourself, hall monitor faggot.
You were also the only baker OSS allowed after chasing everyone else out.
And here you are claiming to not be part of OSS.
CRINGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>I agree with G in principle. Doge is out of control
OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT
HERE WE GO
MANUFACTURED CONSENSUS
HEY ONION, YOU IN HERE?
PLEASE BREAK OUT YOUR SHILL HANDBOOK AND TELL US WHICH CHAPTER THIS IS FROM
Oh so now you're concerned about what's eating up the bread, while simultaneously advocating anon noms only so you don't have to look at the bread beyond a ctrl-f function.
I think I'm beginning to see why a faggot like you would be payrolled to post here,
YOU'RE LITERALLY TOO LAZY FOR A REAL JOB
LMFAO
>The doge breads are all about dog
Meant to reply to this BS
Not your other BS
>pissed off
Goddamn right
>i dunno who is posting and don't wanna know
I'm saying in terms of volition, they are either doing Gods work, or they are here to disrupt it.
Not talking about individual identities, it's an anonymous board, we are all anonymous (obviously)
bakerG is controlled opposition
i am prepared to die on this hill
>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.
>I've tried to get you explain this logic
>and consistently refuse.
First of all, who the fuck are you?
Second I just did several times in this thread, but I will again
Because in a situation where it was not just a ploy to keep notables anorexic and lacking
the end result would be no different than if an anon came back later to scrape
WHY "BAKE" IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA COLLECT NOTABLES?????
Because you want information to fall by the wayside, that's why
This goes beyond laziness, or MuH AnOn ColLeCtEd AlL tHe NoTes
It's censorship in disguise
>Your mom's a slide
Sauce?
>You apologized and said I was right.
Sauce?
Bakers should be eccentric schizo autists who see the scope of what we are doing here, and realize than in QR 22, where we are at a precipice of consciousness AND censorship, WE SHOULD BE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO ARCHIVE, AND SHARE AS MUCH RELEVENT INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.
Not a bunch of minimalist lazy faggots who want anons to do the job of a baker with such drive
I understand the scope of what we're doing, and the extent to which we're winning, and we still need to push. That's why I'm willing to literally abandon IRL responisbilities and hobbies to read and evaluate nearly every post in a bread as either dasting it not, all fuckn day. If you don't have the drive, don't bake. I don't see why you would want to, anyways. Unless of course you're a DOAR fag payrolled to infiltrate and disrupt our progress however possible - such as implimenting minimalist norms that enable complacency and a false sense of accomplishment.
>why did you say sorry to him, and thenin the same thread you were piling on with the OSS people?
Again, sauce?
Also, how is this relevent unless you're just here to be a contrarian?
What are you advocating exactly?
>sounds like DOGBERG
Besides MUH JOOing?
>If anons and a baker can't figure out a post is a shill post, or whatever paranoid thing anyone is worried about,and refuse it or request it be pulled, this board is worrhless
Yeah cuz it's all about the shills right?
Not the information, keep the focus on shills and division
Got it!
>Am I DOAR, bluntwrap? or just when I'm baking.
Since you're calling me by the name of my burner account to keeps tabs on you DOAR fags, yeah I'd say theres a good chance you're a DOAR fag!
>you want me to dig it up, kike? just say the word.
the word!
Oh look, moar gaslighting and literal projection.
JFC
Go spam the general with MuH JoOs, You're better at that
Adults are trying to have a discussion here
>I argue it's the opposite. Shills can easily flood notables with so much worthless content no one gives AF about them any more
Bullshit, WHY ARE YOU HERE IF YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT NOTABLES?
Seriously this has to be one of the funniest narratives you guys try to use.
Weird how yall were okay with two page notables for the past six months, but as we start having good breads again you want there to be less notables.
Very weird.
>Zero respect for differing opinions among bakers.
I have plenty of respect for people who aren't trying to smear me and hoodwink the operation.
But all the bakers in question wanna do is call me a nigger, or a jew, or a shill.
Very compelling.
>BO likes big notes and he and I are just fine
Exactly, 8kun isn't gonna run out of harddrive space.
Anons want substance.
Not censorship.
>I was not here for past 6 months.
>What did board look like when Q was here?
I was not here when Q was here, I've been here for the past 6 months.
Maybe that's why I don't see the logic in reverting to an old norm from a different setting when the game has changed!
>That's now somehow gatekeeping and if you disagree you must be a shill.
That or extremely gullible!
>The way things were when this place was at its best and most relevant and everyone went out their way to create tools to pump us out to the world…
I would also like to add, this place is now in the position to be at it's best again, we have the tools, we have the playbooks, we have the maps. We just need individuals who are willing to PRODUCE.
Not sit back and let fucking shills scrape for us because they convinced us it's somehow better that way
>(1)
So you're a baker who's opinion I didnt respect?
What's the opinion?
And which baker are you?
Nope, I think your meds are wearing off as you're becoming delusional
But thanks for reaffirming that I am a Kike, and Nigger, and that I'm part of the DOARfag /hivemind/ because I went there a few times to troll you
Very compelling
And what's your argument again?
That I'm just here to cause problems?
Or that I apologised to you for something?
What was the opinion?
>refuses to answer my questions
>gaslights me some more
You should have went with politics instead of forum sliding.
Similiar stuff, but it seems like you're all passion and no talant.
At the very least, very usual, due to being such an idiot
Bye bye! See ya next hop
I recall being rude to the baker I recieved handoff from, and waiting to do so until after I got the handoff, so that I could secure the dough from what I percieved to be a team of gatekeeping shills.
I do not remember apologising though, as I wouldnt be sorry for that
10/10 I get nothing but commendation from anon, and condemnation from shills.
The relationship is so great I posted links to /deepdigs/ as a joke and unintentionally started a momevent.
Next question please
>constantly fighting with every one of us muh joo shills
"Fighting" is too harsh a word, it's more like engaging and "trolling"
Which is especially fun to do with NPCs who can't detect irony, or humor, for that matter.
Go ahead, call me a jew again.
It's more compelling each time, I assure you
Out of respect for BO's thread, I humbly decline your offer to troll further.
I think I've said all that needs to be said.
Good day, DOAR fag
Oh yeah, I remember now, don't apologize!
cuz one of those replies should be me calling you both astroturfers
If so, take my apology now. Assuming you are indeed cool, and not a fag
(unless you're just a cool fag like freddie mercury)
>>15479791
Thanks for playing, DOAR faggot!
No need to announce your defeat, though
>REPORDED
>>15480905
Surely, this time it will shut us down!
>REPORDED
SOLID
>MAYBEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Maybe we (you) can stop trying to change shit and just FCUKING BAKE.
(you been here 4 years and suddenly you want IDs and strict rules?)
Also, I never once saw you sperg until we moved to /deepdigs/ "baqerG"
When you went out of your way to spam us calling me a nigger and virtue signalling
because we put a link in "your" pinned GMAX thread
I never even heard of you until OSS locked my bread for the first time and gave you the bake!
And this "noms only" conversation never existed until I started baking here again this week!
SUS
>(So as to get all the fam involved.)
<cat herding
>>15482841
Wow it's like you wait for me to post in here just to spam CP link,how wacky!
Such coincidences!
>REPORDED :D:D:D:D:D
This is a discussion thread, not hop on doge's dick thread, faggot
>Except for all those years before you got here. Just saying.
Qr is different nao, argument invalid, just saying (again)
>All I did was come back with interest and do what we've always done.
You came back? Where did you go?
Global Young Leaders program tell you to help us implement Baker Passports due to the pandemic of anons returning to the board?
KEK
If you're who I think you are, just stop.
Get a new persona.
And spam the CP link some moar while you're at it YA CUCKS
^^^^^^^^filtered for wasting precious 8kun harddrive space
>Doge's bullshit, which is clearly everything you think the jooslide is
>Doge's bullshit
First of all, that would be DOG SHIT, technically.
Second, what is it? And how is it "everything the Jewslide is"?
Sounds like another lame attempt to smear me with DOAR FAGGOTRY.
Which, if I was part of, wouldn't you think I'd visit there more often?
Seriously, if it's all about me let's start a Doge Complaint bread, where you can lay out your retarded thesis!
>All I did was come back
>You came back? Where did you go?
Oh my bad i thought you were BakerG, Or Gerbil, or whatever OSS is calling themselves today
>"noms only" idea comes up periodically but not for a long time.
>Not recommended because we cannot FORCE anons to nom
> "punishing" them with tiny "nommed only" buns just makes them mad.
>Therefore impractical.
>Thoughts?
Yes
>Share your preference for original (banner), whether "Qanon" or "Q".
>Any baker can use the original; may be better to use "Q" version to avoid needless headaches.
>Whether we should revert to that would be the question.
The closest thing we have to this proposed "Baker ID" already is the various banners bakers currently use,
which I have no preference over, happy to use the original if anon prefers bland uniformity…
> Butthurt bakers fuck things up. Grow up or get out.
I'm not butthurt, I'm defending myself from gangstalkers gaslighting me and trying to push new(old) norms on the kitchen so they can continue to nominate the same news stories endlessly in an echochamber and stifle any engaging research or progress
Sorry for shitting up your bread BO
Should just let you do the talking
Seem to be on the same page about everything
ThanQ
o7
If you fags wanna complain about Jim
(that's what you're doing, right?)
please take your discussion to the dedicated /hivemind/ board
This thread is for QR admin issues, not 8kun admin conspiracy theories
Please refer all 8kun admin/japanese conspiracy theories to /hivemind/
I hear they have all the good digs
second warning
>Warning of what?
>Off-topic posts in this thread may be deleted at BO/BV discretion.
Yeah idk what that's about, they also used "notable dig" as a description for a nom rather than my suggested title (MRNa in food)
Weren't they supposed to handoff?
Dough Fixed
https://controlc.com/681e59c3
Current Bread Title also has glaring format issues…
>Q Research General #19587:Arizona hires Kek to review router logs
>"Dragon Energy Baker"
For the record
>Won't tell anyone you were here.
KEK
Fog of war is thicc, many impostas amogus
Barker likes to bark sometimes
Sorry for misunderstandings
o7⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣿⣿⣷⣶⣄⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣾⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⡟⠁⣰⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠻⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⠏⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢻⣿⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣼⣿⣿⡏⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣸⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠁⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠛⠛⠉⢉⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣤⣤⡀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠉⠉⠻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠹⣿⣿⣇⣀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣤⣤⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠋⠉⠛⠋⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠁
Yeah so uhhh, how do I say this…
I think we have a bot baking for us.
>>15488597 qrg
Baker I handed off to fought me the whole bread about the fedpost notable
Then the nigga removed it completely in the 'updated' dough
LMFAO was it embarrassing or something?
I can determine whether you're a DOAR fag or not
It's very simple, can be discovered with one question:
Do you feel embarrassed right now?
>Why would you be arguing with a baker?
Because he removed my nom, after it was notable
and refused to link it properly
Are you guys actually reading my posts?
>It was his bun
And the notable was about feds panicking
Is that not notable?
Please explain why you feel this way
>I have Autism
you also have a thing for incorrect formatting
>get over yourself and think about the mission.
My mission is for QR to have real bakers anon can trust
Is that your mission?
Or are you just here to yell at me?
>Look, all I want is for it to stop.
Filter me then, if your desires are so fucking simple, retard
BO, I think this guy wants Baker ID
(You) are here to reply literally every time I post in this thread
Seriously, I don't know how you have the time to keep up with me
So if you don't like the way I bake or notable, why aren't you baking?
Where is the fruit of your works? Huh? Let's see it Churro.
Go ahead, offer to bake in general, I'll confirm it
>Have worked with same crew for years. They do not fuck around, namecall, or
>focus on petty garbage. NOT ONCE.
I can count the number of bakers I would consider "my crew" on one paw
and I am not familiar with anyone who'd been baking with since I returned to QR,
besides maybe my very first handoff, last week on nightshift when OSS fags were busy spamming instead of baking
For all I know it's been 100% Doarfags, and I will continue to troll them
and there's nothing anyone can do to change that.
This is my revenge
>BAKERS ARE NOT SPECIAL
APPARENTLY I AM SPECIAL CUZ IM THE ONLY BAKER I SEE ACTUALLY STANDING UP FOR NOTABLES
EVERY OTHER BAKER I'VE ENCOUNTERED THIS WEEK HAS BEEN A SUSSY BAKA GASLIGHTER
DONT @ ME B(R)O
o7
>>15490417
GET A FUCKING LIFE
Barker wanted to demonstrate how worthless "noms only" is once and for all.
Think I got about 2 noms total.
Anyways, all the notables were reposted next bread so it didn't make much of a difference!
Looks like things are running smoothly now
>it's worthless when no one likes the baker
Petty nonsense.
See:
>Always attack the baker
>When I bake, I feel I work for anons, I am only there to gather and organize what they are working on.
Zactly. All you DOAR fags trying to make it about baker or approval ratings can KISS MY ASS. Literally nobody cares, your bait is weak, AND YOUR PETTY DRAMA HAS NO EFFECT. Haven't [you] figured it out yet?
WWG1WGA
You wrote so much text.
Tell you what, since you can't stop posting drama in the meta bread, why don't you start your own thread on deep digs where we can dig on this topic and you can expose me for the shill I am? Since you obviously can't let it go
You too, please bring this exempelary dig into what you feel is obvious corruption to /deepdigs/.
Make a thread, expose us all with your findings.
You obviously have a passion for writing and "truth".
Come join the truth seekers on /deepdigs/!
We look forward to your presentation
Just saying, sounds sooper important, and we have a board dedicated to sooper important digs.
Shame, it's boring over there without shills spamming us, you're welcome to come back!
>I dont waste my time doing fake digs
Yeah, just our time. Hence, my 70+ responses to your weak bullshit. Kek!
They just can't let it go
CONFIRM HANDOFF