Chiro here checking in. What I saw in the little bit I skimmed was someone else offering right after you and him accepting their offer. Not sure if he missed yours or what. Glad I'm not the only one catching hell out there. Kek.
there was another doc before me and I don't know what happened to him, so I guess I'll use chiro, but I don't mind if you call me doc, as long as you know you can associate chiro with my id. I prefer not to change my tag like you do. I'd rather just say it when necessary so people who need to know who I am know who I am.
already reported above
>>15475193 (OB)
I prefer not to namefag. To me, changing your name from anonymous to anything else is namefagging. I'm willing to let other bakers, BO, BV know who I am, but I prefer they follow me by my posting style, ID, chat thread after I ID myself once. If BO isn't ok with this he needs to let me know.
I baked a decent amount the month leading up to 1/6. At the time there was drama over a baker named Grvl. I didn't really have an opininon, but I conflicted with a baker that might have been Grvl. Honestly I try not to decipher the bullshit so I don't really know and my memory isn't 100% on all of it. All I know is there was conflict then like there is now and 'grvl' was involved. If that's you, and the people bitching at me weren't pretending to be you (that is, if it was really you) then this isn't the first time we met.
it's bullshit when a baker does this. He's not the only baker I've seen doing it, but IMO anyone accusing other bakers of being some named negative thing on the main boards should be punished by BO. all that drama could just as easily be required to take place here and only here where it doesn't add to the bullshit bakers need to decipher.
>main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.
I don't even know what this means
>member that time OSS banned me for replacing the missing Warfare content back into the dough… anon does.
no. sorry. this is an example of the drama I try to avoid, and when there's drama a lot of times I won't even look at the attached images, especially if it in any way resembles some of the complex nonsense drama-lovers like to post. To me they seem like slides intended to take valuable time away from bakers/others. Maybe I'm too quick to throw what may be legit material proving a point by the way side, but it's the only way I can stay sane.
I'd like to think I'm nice to anyone who's nice or neutral. I will filter anyone who insists on pissing me off, even if they're a baker. I'm also likely to tell constant complainers to go fuck themselves, even when I'm baking. I try to use logic and reasoning first because it's good manners, it's what anons do, and it exposes those who don't.
I have no hard feelings to you or doge or anyone else for that matter. Doge apologized to me yesterday and, for now, I'll assume he meant it.
Friendly fire isn't. War is hell. Adapt or die. Godspeed.
Again, drama I avoid, so I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO OSS IS
I do like tools for diggers.
is he baker now?
>>15475486
reported
Are we reporting these links to cp AS cp?
how does one know who OSS is? Is that part of the drama?
>u can tell who OSS is by his MO
>Jew Bashing and Baker Bashing
Why does this seem like 10% of the UIDs when I'm baking?
I don't agree with the sentiment but Idoagree with the notion there are a chunk of these anons who were here long before I was. BV already knows this about me by now though.
G, notice Doge didn't handoff to me either, after offering to hand off. It's not just you. I'm ok with that, but it didn't go unnoticed.
bakers don't always have that kind of time.
I've done that from time to time when something recommended for notable looks familiar though.
scenario:
baker who scrapes own notes and posts war-and-peace buns offers bake to someone he approves of if they'll first notetake.
baker who does anon-nom notables posts 2-3 notes at 300.
What are the chances this baker has proven himself worthy to baker war-and-peace by doing this?
let me guess: only one way to find out
…
what if anon-nom baker uses war-and-peace baker scrape style, gets bake and then reverts to anon-nom baker style. Is war-and-peace baker upset? Betrayed? What's the message for the boards?
Just throwing it out there.
Also talking too much right now so I'll back out for awhile.
BV, BO, and bakers alike are much appreciated by this baker.
I assumed you were BO
will give it a shot tomorrow if he does it again and see if it's an exercise in humility or futility…
or both.
> Most like the baker to pick up 'currents events' articles that are timely and relevent but not 'special' enough to be called out as notable
is this how the practice of screencapping articles so anons didn't have to leave the boards to read went by the wayside?
>There isABSOLUTELY NO POINTin have a baker dictate "anon noms only"
>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.
I've tried to get you explain this logic and consistently refuse. IMO that's nonsense: 'anon-only' = gatekeeping but baker only = the right way. on what planet is this a logical assessment?
>(here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.
me either honestly, but that goes back to the same freedom of choice. Bakers have it, signed in or out, imo, as long as the chain of custody is properly maintained. When it's broken, that's bad. When it's broken by a baker over personal preference/ baker conflict, that's blasphemy, imo.
>even good notetakers might not like the prospect of having their decisions dissected in public.
>I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit
>It's a slide
Your mom's a slide. I do good work. You apologized and said I was right. Was that BS? imo, that's a rhetorical question.
had to stop here. Will read the rest when I get back from IRL.
It wasn't doge unless he was able to keep it together for an entire bread and IP hoppped.
Whoever it was did put out a nice bread, other than telling BO no when asked to add to globals. Thing is, he says he gave me shit but that id isn't on the previous bread at all.
Sorry doge, looks like you may have been right and I was wrong thinking someone willing to compromise with other bakers was you. Won't happen again!
>>14841908 OB
A LOT of spam here, fyi
this is a HORRIBLE idea imo.
>And this "noms only" conversation never existed until I started baking here again this week!
Except for all those years before you got here. Just saying. All I did was come back with interest and do what we've always done. If you weren't here complaining about it, it wouldn't be any issue at all. Shit… I said I was done with you. Fuck. Dammit.
I just grab whatever banner was used last. I see some bakers have personalized. I may have memories of ree over dis.
Dis still issue for bakers?
someone have the OG Q Research banner handy that can share?
Personally, I prefer things the way they were. Easier to spot. Consistent.
Don't care what others bakers do though.
>Keep it to yourself if you want to be part of the discussion.
just my 2 cents… will say it once and try not to say it ever again.
This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.
Maybe it's because I read the statement about the JQ that was posted in a side thread and linked to notables when I first showed up in late 2018…
Maybe it's because I trained myself to look past it when trying to find relevant information on these boards…
Again, i don't agree with the sentiment
I will say it's fucking weird how untouchable that topic is…
Regardless, here's my biggest beef:
How can you ask us to put up with Doge's bullshit, which is clearly everything you think the jooslide is, and not be willing to put up with an otherwise seemingly great baker just because he won't shut up about the jews?
That's not fair, imo.
If we have to put up with doge's bullshit, you should put up with differing opinions from good help.
Thank you for considering this opinion.
didnotmean to add that link.
>>15483754 OB
>>15483817 OB
Baker's choice.
Just wondering… y no planefag reports?
I'm an anon-nom only baker, but even I always add PF Reports.
o7
disagree but you already know that. Dead horse imo to reiterate why (nom-only w/ baker final say good).
Seems stupid to argue about it. If you want to write a fucking novel an publish it in notables instead of Amazon, be my guest. I'm not going to slow up the kitchen complaining about it.
Can't argue with any of this.
I meant untouchable in society. It's just fucking weird. Like if you even think about asking about it, you're bashed harder than Trump, Q, anons, far-right, or anything else I've ever seen. Having not been there when it happened and knowing all the other things I was fed, I'm still firm in my belief that Lucifer comped EVERYTHING… I just can't help but wonder if Hitler wasn't created by the Luciferians so folks like me couldn't ask questions 80 years later.
That's all
anon-noms:
1) encourage participation
2) filter out useless info
3) this style seems to bring OGs out of the woodwork. I could be wrong about that, but that's what I think I'm witnessing.
I know you and doge disagree, but for the life of me I can't understand how this doesn't IMPROVE the quality of work.
NO ONE is forcing anyone to do anything. I don't get this argument either. if anons want to do it they'll do it. If baker wants to do it he'll do it.
Honestly both styles can live harmoniously.
If you force anon-nom out, IMO you're at risk of the board being comped by a select few bakers. An active BO can prevent this w/ micromanaging, but some day you're going to want this machine to operate well without much involvement and, when that time comes, you'll pay the price.
I dunno what happened while I was gone (jan-jan) but you make it sound like I'm better off for it.
I'm not at all versed on the topic, but that notion is bullshit and dangerous. Only 1 was perfect.
God uses the broken, the insecure, and the unlikely.
This leaves out "you'll know them by the fruits of their labor" High IQ anon I disagree with.
you can't dismiss everyone who makes a mistake or you'll have nothing left. This is more obvious than watching the left cancel themselves into obvlivion.
You'll never convince me this is an ok thing to do.
I don't know about the comma thing, but the man's kept his mouth shut and done his job. If it interferes with whatever was explained to me earlier (about aggregators) I could see getting onto him, but if not… sure keep an eye on it, but damn: he's almost invisible and the buns are beautiful, imo. If I'm over my paygrade here, sorry. Just seemed worth sticking up for.
well that shit's above my paygrade right now.
you're saying adding a comma after the link before the headline fucks up the archives?
I'm not trying to start a fight. I don't know. I'm asking.
acknowledged. Will work hard to make sure I don't do that.
Thank you for the info and your service.
Still, the last few bakes have been outstanding, imo.
>>15486198 BO
>https://controlc.com/6f0cc6a0
this is the wrong dough.
1st under globals should be 19586
FYI
It's all good. Only noticed because I was going to clean up the commas for and offer to baker to use if he wishes.
Speaking of…
>>15486308 OB
Baker I removed all commas after last link and before headlines in all current notables. Not your boss. Just trying to help. Use if you would like.
https://controlc.com/index.php?act=submit
If you could keep your snarkyness down to this level for any significant length of time, I would have no issues with you at all. I might even stop calling you shortbus when we argue.
We are different people with different styles.
Just saying: I'm cool withthis doge
figured you might have been bv. regardless, you're here for a reason.
Why would you be arguing with a baker?
Wait,
Nevermind.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367027/
It washis bun
This is bullshit division
It's not ok
STOP
it doesn't matter what I think of the notable. You shouldn't be arguing with a signed in baker. get over yourself and think about the mission.
not falling for it. I've demonstrated proper behavior towards you when you earn it. I've extended olive branches. The issue is you arguing with other bakers on main. it's divisive and counter to everything BO is trying to do. don't pretend you only did it because you care about unity.fake and ghey
Look, all I want is for it to stop.
BO, keep this mutt on a shorter leash please
>APPARENTLY I AM SPECIAL CUZ IM THE ONLY BAKER I SEE ACTUALLY STANDING UP FOR NOTABLES
FTR
>>15491975 OB
who dis?
TY BO
>>15492827 OB
Anyone work with this notetaker before?
Anon feels naked out there letting someone else do the work. Willing to give it a shot (really just there to keep the board from ghosting) but reassurance from other bakers would be a +
replied in QR but can here too
already fixed dough
I am baker
willing to hand off just don't want ghost
He writes novels and uses long headlines but is otherwise on top of things. I'll deal.
Thanks for the input everyone
and you think putting baker in the drama in the notes is acceptable….EVER?!
-asking for a fren
*baker drama
ANY BVS AROUND?
>super spammy bread
>>15501607 OB
BO/BV
I fucked up and handed off to 2 bakers
I think it's sorted out but keep an eye on it please
bullshit
>>15488597 OB
>>15489306 OB
Aren't notables w/ intentionally not notable insertions exactly what BO doesn't want?
Is there not a lot of QR BO/BV drama around this?
Define >go getter muddafucka
AT BEST, imo, he's doing it for job security not realizing how horrific it is for QR division
>runs off other good bakers
>muh good baker can handle high intensity likeno one else
Again, I just want it to stop
Baker drama belongs in Kitchen
adding it to notables should be a firable offense
Norealkitchen would tolerate FOH outbursts
the best server, busser, host, FOH manager, etc. would be shitcanned on the spot for it.
That's my experience after 20 years in restaurants
>chiro's gotta pay his bills while chirotraining somehow
I know this isn't IRL
I know he bakes well under stress
I know BV/BO like him
Keep him
Will deal
Just want BOH drama BOH for the good of QR
I'm a baker, imbicile.
o7
I've been trying to do that with convoy stuff.
Since we're on the subject, I think that's where PF Reports should be as well.
keep it up!
>>15546077 OB
Maybe I should know all the baker ids but I don't.
Handed off to 878a74
keep eye plz BV
chiro needs cool meme/banner
Are GO VR notable?
I mean…
They're pretty damn funny.
Sorry for your loss anon
My grandma was always distancing herself from me and my older brother.
my oldest brother (RIP) grew with her as my 'uncle'- it was a big family secret until I was 13.
I have one memory of her as a real grandma. She chased me down once and tackled me and tickled my belly. I'll never forget that.
F
anon very green with tor
have used in the past to keep up with things when the boards were under attack.
is there a way to bake w/ tor?
Are there protocols in place for this?