Pelosi tells U.S. Olympic athletes not to "speak out" against the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing lest they risk "incurring the anger" of the Chinese government.
In other words, Pelosi demands that US athletes do not speak negatively about Pelosi's BOSSES.
"Welcome to the [D][People's Republic of China] party"- Q
https://gab.com/disclosetv/posts/107736339544333649
Was that before or after he sold his soul to the defil?
I HAD to transcribe this because it MUST be seen word for word by as many people as possible.
Wow.
I mean….
Wow.
OK, here goes:
Reporter (R): "Ok so that was a mouthful there. So you said 'actions such as these suggest otherwise', … "suggest": meaning they suggest they're not interested in talks and they're going to go ahead with some kind of [unintelligible statement here, but it sounded like the reporter was referring to 'some kind of provocation or steps that occur when talks fail]. What actions are you referring to here?"
State Dept Spokesperson (SD): "One, the actions I just pointed to."
R: "What actions?"
SD: "The fact that Russia continues to engage in DiSiNfOrMaTiOn."
R: "You made an allegation that they 'might' do that. Have they actually done it?"
SD: "What we know, Matt, is what I just said. That they have engaged in this activity…"
R: "Hold on hold on, what activity?"
SD: "Lemme" / R: "What activity?" (crosstalk)
SD: "This is not the first time we've made these reports public."
R: "I'm sorry, made WHAT report public?"
SD: "If you let me finish I will tell you what report we made public. We told you a few weeks ago that we have information that indicated Russia has also prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct a false flag operation in eastern Ukraine, so that Matt, to your question, is an action that Russia has already taken."
R: "It is an action that YOU SAY they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to confirm that. [At this point SD is clearly getting frustrated that his BS isn't working] And I'm going to get to the next question here, which is what evidence, I mean, this is like crisis actors? Really? This is like Alex Jones territory you're getting into now. Um, what evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the making?"
SD: "This is derived from information known to the US government. Intelligence information that we have declassified. I think you know…"
R: "Ok so where is it? Where is this information?"
SD: "It is intelligence information that we have declassified."
R: "Well where is it? Where is the declassified information?"
SD: "I just delivered it."
R: "No, you made a series of allegations."
SD: "Would like us to print out the topper because you will see a transcript of this briefing that you can print out yourself."
[At this moment I almost spit out my drink. The SD idiot is engaging in circular logic. "We have evidence, we have intelligence information, it's been declassified"…where is it?…"It's what I am saying right now" ahahahahaha]
R: "That's not evidence, Ned, that's you saying it. That's not evidence, I'm sorry."
SD: "…..ehh…huh…well….what would you like, Matt?"
(Lots of crosstalk)
SD: "I'm not going to get into sources and methods"
R: "Where is the declassified information, other than you coming out here and saying it?"
SD: "Matt, I'm sorry if you don't like the format."
R: "IT'S NOT THE FORMAT! IT'S THE CONTENT!"
SD: "I'm sorry you don't like the content."
(Crosstalk)
R: "What is your evidence? You just come out and expect us to believe it without showing a shred of evidence that it's actually true, other than, when I ask, or when anyone else asks, 'what's the information', you say 'well it's what I just gave to you', which is just you making a statement!"
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha! BTFO!
I can't wait for when reporters and WH correspondents start asking "Sauce?"
THAT will be a good day. It will set a precedence.
SHOW THE SAUCE MUTHUFUCKAH!