>>15555296

>hard to argue that you know why Pence really had the power to do what you claim while also showing you don't understand the rules at all.

Q has checkmate.

By Trump merely REFERRING to what Democrats and RINOs are RIGHT NOW TRYING TO DO: Implement NEW legislation to PREVENT the VP from having the Constitutional authority to RESPNOND to state level grievances of election fraud, Trump doesn't need to display academic prowess expected of a constitutional lawyer.

Trump built towers then became POTUS.

All he needs to 'know', and thus give those who report to the DULY elected POTUS the authority to give go ahead, that he knows the VP has the authority which must also logically be true if it is also true that D's and RINOs are trying to make NEW laws to prevent future VPs rrom having the authority.

The awesome thing is that NOBODY needs to know constitutional law but everyone can SEE what it is by SEEING D's and RINOs trying to change the legislation to prevent future VPs from doing what Pence did. and what VPs had the authority to do: listen to ANY state grievance.

Don't you remember that Pence APPROVED Arizona to SPEAK their grievances on Jan 6?

That was a Constitutionally justified way Pence could BOTH abstain from claiming to be an INDIVIDUAL person deciding who becomes President (thank you Pence for revealing that in code), AND he could RESPOND TO THE STATE TO HEAR WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY! HEAR AND DEBATE AND THUS SET NEW PATH of states 'debating' what happened, to investigate, to research, to find TRUTH of what happened.

EVIDENCE needed "IN" public mind, that the world has all seen already at this point, no more pretending inversion talking point of 'big lie' is the case with the statement election cheating happened 2020, rather than what is a big lie, that there wasn't election cheating.

Ballot harvesting? Seriously?

The entire NYT has zero credibility.

The wizards and warlocks may have just 'declassified' to some folks that the last year has been both a 'test' and a court proceeding by other means, the states NEEDED the public awakening because the highest levels of STATE power had been infiltrated by politicians who have proven themselves to not only be turning a blind eye to the election corruption, but to use the powers of the state to legislate and control the people of that state and continually SPEAK against vote protection!

With 6 states with massive fraud, there were that many paths to victory because there only had to be ONE state to announce they want to debate the results on Jan 6.

How can anyone say that it would be wrong for the VP to NOT SILENCE voices of who the people elected?

There is nothing wrong with agreeing with the motion made by Arizona to debate the results.

NOTHING.

Nobody can blame Pence for refusing to even LISTEN to ANY state electors for a federal election!

I'm not even close to being a 'real' constitutional lawyer but I don't have to be to see a contradiction in plain sight.

You can't argue VP doesn't have the right when you're busy helping those currently trying to change the law to stop future VPs from having the right.

Win.

BOOM.

>>15556018

As soon as the fraudsters knew what was happening when Pence gave the green light, they needed to STOP IT right away!

Panic!

So, in a panic, Pelosi's Capitol Police OPENED THE DOORS TO THE CAPITOL BLDG.

Pence and every white hat knew it was checkmate.

VP laws are right now being researched and drafts written, bills, on implementing NEW legislation to PREVENT the VP from having this authority.

It's hard to keep arguing that you know why Pence allegedly didn't have the power to do what he did while also claiming it makes sense that news laws will be needed to do what you claim the law already has.

kek, that's a checkmate.

Pence did in fact sent the 'decision' back to the states, the Jan 6 'riots' wrap up smear isn't going to stop the awareness that there has been no certification yet, oh yeah by the way welcome to the reality of states debating what has happened since Jan 6!

We are all IN the court of public opinion, which just so happens to also show the debates never LEGALLY ended.

SCOTUS ruled to send pleas back to the state supreme courts.

Still being litigated now!

Biden after a whole year of being illegal President…

Yeah good luck with however this is supposed to be countered.

All the 'shit' had to flow through the anus of the 'narrative' to finally 'allow' the UNharmed introduction of evidence into the (re)public court of law.

Cycle of information of public knowing and THEN becoming a self-reflective self-discovery of truths that are important.

I think the 'feud' between Pence and Trump was designed to 'assist' in a narrative to 'counter' what was predicted as going to happen.

Public court of information -Information produced is internalized and truths go forward while bugs in the code get resolved by first 'seeing' the contractions as deliberately sent in the narrative.

(Re)public.

World doesn't want or need any informational tyrants who praise or implement destruction of information by controlling 'the business rules' in the development of humanity!

>>15556021

Anyone claiming to have 'special insight' to enable them to commit acts in the name of praising contradictions and using 'laws' defending information firewalls to hide illegal activities, none of us have to create much new to see that the (re)public set of rules was just legally used to expose a massive contradiction from anyone trying to 'refute' the authority Pence really had and what he didn't have.

When Pence said "Trump is wrong, I do not have and it's unAmerican for any one person to decide who is President"…

Pence was speaking in code on what Pelosi was doing/allowing: Capitol Doors OPeN bOrDeRs and National Guard REFUSAL, trying the use the powers of Speaker to unilaterally decide to STOP a sacred constitutional process?

How dare Pelosi!

What Pence said about what Trump said in fact wasn't what Trump said. Pence was responding to a different question of one person allegedly having the authority to decide?

Pelosi used her powers to try to ram Biden into the role of President by risking the safety of the elected Congress to stop the debates on Jan 6.

Jan 6 wasn't a day where the 'riots' were supporters of Trump or the law.

The 'riots' were a 'real world documentary movie production narrative' experiment.

Pence as VP legally put decision back to the states to legally research!, RESEARCH should not stopped by Pelosi, never had the right to decide. But why decide to stop debates by being apparently ok with the Capital Police allowing people through open doors to make Congress have to evacuate?

Was that an order or did they just all happen to decide against better judgment ESPECIALLY SINCE the entire fake news partners were the loudest and have been about how bad and dangerous it was?

Yeah good luck with that contradiction.

Pence OPENED A DOOR FOR WORLD TO SEE.

Hey NYT, would you think it wrong if you were a state, I was VP, and you wanted to express a grievance about the results, because you have very strong evidence of election fraud, say this was 2016 and you're larping about muhrussia collusion.

Would you think it wrong if I did not at least motion to accept HEARING it as even existing in the first place before it was spoken in the 'official'/'approved' information/communication?!?!?!

Imagine how allies of [NYT] would react if they saw me saying no, the congress shall not hear your grievance that doesn't really exist to me.

How would anyone view me other than a tyrant?

So, what, if 'all' a person did was make decisions that led to the need to evacuate Congress from 'riots', that's supposed to be very different from me just refusing to hear you and pushing through potus as potus, Rubber stamp like?

Previous VPs 'exposed'?

Ooooohhhhhh baby.