Anonymous ID: e31679 Feb. 6, 2022, 9:52 p.m. No.15565936   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15565726 (PB)

Believe that half of those were faux loyalists and/or faux employee plants. Don't know how to convince people that faux is half our battle.

Also glaring, anon, was when faux stuck up for Acosta at those WH pressers, but not for OAN when they banned Chanel Rion over some stupid chynaflu garbage.

Anonymous ID: e31679 Feb. 6, 2022, 10:11 p.m. No.15566006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6008 >>6019 >>6105

>>15565954

Love, appreciation, and no disrespect to Q, but perhaps Anons could focus on what messages Our President, himself, continues to put out. No timestamps at present, but anons may find that common words - even phrases! (continue to) line up to specific subjects of posts here.

 

Something anons have to to see for themselves.