>You guys are losing the crowd.
>I tried to warn you.
>The comms radicalism is back. Great
listen divisionfag (us vs them vs WWG1WGA)
pic related is from bread #4 Q Research Confirmed Edition
it was used for thousands of breads until division shills came in and started a fight
Was never an issue before
OSS et al are the worms that started the 'bakers choice' idea
ur starting to glow
>Humbly suggest that the problem was the enforcement of a standard when there was none before.
That is absolutely false
See >>15596867 (ob)
Can confirm, was there.
>rules that shouldn't exist at all.
Anon will side with DJT on this, Law & Order
Not the Demonrat Chaos & Anarchy, that you suggest
>WAKE THE FUCK UP
Are you bipolar anon?
"100% Support BO" in contest thread.
>Meta starting arguments
Kinda creepy
>>15599111 (ob)
Just like OSS?
This sounds like you're projecting.
See bans happening?
> stalking anons
Preventing troublemakers from stirring up shit.
>Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
Not nearly.
Childish outlook tho