Anonymous ID: 400338 Propose General Image & Anon Noms HERE Feb. 10, 2022, 12:32 a.m. No.15592217   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

CONTEST TO PICK A GENERAL IMAGE

 

Whatever the banner is, it should represent values upon which all or most anons can agree, like freedom, valor, honor, unity, and courage under fire.

 

 

>>15575312 Discussion of returning to single image for General Breads

>>15581152 more discussion

>>15591954 Announcement of contest

 

Let the contest begin!

 

 

How it works

 

1. PROPOSERS: Post a sharp copy of your proposed General Image along with the reasons why this image should be chosen (2-3 sentences minimum).

ONLY ONE IMAGE PER POST PLEASE

 

2. ANONS: You can NOM banners by either replying NOM or giving reasons.

 

3. PROPOSERS HAVE ALL FRIDAY AND SATURDAY TO POST BANNERS. Anons can reply at any time. Deadline for submission is Saturday midnight EST. Deadline for comments is Sunday noon.

 

4. Depending on the results, we'll either announce the winner on Monday โ€“ will be in Globals โ€“ or do a runoff in case of neck-and-neck results.

 

 

Where We Go One, We Go All.

File *

 

Note: Changing files

deletes all previous ones.

 

Embed

Existing post

 

Anonymous 02/10/22 (Thu) 08:25:36 8a0b0a No.15592194

 

File: 36019927cf5c278โ‹ฏ.png (671.85 KB, 1256x556, 314:139, triple_patriotic_image.png)

<p class="body-line ltr "><span class="heading">CONTEST TO PICK A GENERAL IMAGE</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>Whatever the banner is, it should represent values upon which all or most anons can agree, like freedom, valor, honor, unity, and courage under fire.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "<a onclick="highlightReply('15575312', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15575273.html#15575312">&gt;&gt;15575312</a> Discussion of returning to single image for General Breads </p><p class="body-line ltr "> <a onclick="highlightReply('15581152', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15581028.html#15581152">&gt;&gt;15581152</a> more discussion</p><p class="body-line ltr "> <a onclick="highlightReply('15591954', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15591449.html#15591954">&gt;&gt;15591954</a> Announcement of contest</p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><span class="small">Let the contest begin!</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><span class="heading">How it works</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>1. PROPOSERS: Post a sharp copy of your proposed General Image along with the reasons why this image should be chosen (2-3 sentences minimum).</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>2. ANONS: You can NOM banners by either replying NOM or giving reasons.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>3. PROPOSERS HAVE ALL FRIDAY AND SATURDAY TO POST BANNERS. Anons can reply at any time. Deadline for submission is <u>Saturday midnight EST</u>. Deadline for comments is <u>Sunday noon</u>.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>4. Depending on the results, we'll eitPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Post last edited at 02/10/22 (Thu) 08:04:53

 

  • Tinyboard + vichan + infinity + OpenIB -

Tinyboard Copyright ยฉ 2010-2014 Tinyboard Development Group

vichan Copyright ยฉ 2012-2014 vichan-devel

infinity Copyright ยฉ 2013-2022 N.T. Technology, Inc. based on sources from Fredrick Brennan's "Infinity Development Group"

OpenIB by Code Monkey โ˜…

 

All posts on 8kun are the responsibility of the individual poster and not the administration of 8kun, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. ยง 230.

 

We have not been served any secret court orders and are not under any gag orders.

 

To file a DMCA takedown notice, please email compliance@isitwetyet.com. In the interest of

transparency, notices of claimed infringement will be posted on >>>/delete/.

Is It Wet Yet Inc.

Anonymous ID: 9a86d8 Feb. 10, 2022, 1:10 a.m. No.15592371   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7574 >>8081 >>8093

Color photo of OG Banner with gradient lettering color to increase visibility.

Green for Mil/8Ch a salute to those that served in the physical and digital.

Color because truth is coming, and times have changed. Still shows respect to the original banner.

Anonymous ID: 4b4ec5 Feb. 10, 2022, 4:59 a.m. No.15592865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4293

NO! I think you are going TOO far with tidying the ship. Appreciate efforts overall, but there is no need to absolutely standardize the banner. I think it is enough to ask bakers to always use the Iwo Jima image centrally and respectfully. Bakers who deviate too much and make banners that are disrespectful do and will get called out. As long as the Iwo Jima image is used as stated, anons can easily find the current thread and there is continuity, both of which were the primary concerns expressed.

 

I really like the creativity of the banners and the energy they bring to the breads. The only times new banners are a problem for finding the thread is if they don't have the Iwo Jima image big enough or centrally located for easy visual recognition. And I don't think using anything silly is appropriate. Those would be the two pieces of guidance I would suggest.

 

Perhaps it could be stated that anons should flag/report any banner that is a problem, and you could edit the post to swap out that banner with a generic one if it has more than three reports on it.

Anonymous ID: 92b296 Feb. 10, 2022, 6:21 a.m. No.15593264   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4293

IMO, it doesn't have to be a single one/only one.

Some are harder to find than others. The Iwo Jima image not being centered or the center of focus is what makes it harder but not impossible to find.

Just my 2 cents.

Anonymous ID: d81f33 Feb. 10, 2022, 10:22 a.m. No.15594942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5217 >>1913 >>7574

>>15594795

>If that is what anons would prefer, can use that approach.

I'm REALLY not a big fan of how this is being pushed so hard, it was floated as an idea first

but it's almost forced now since it seemed the majority of anons (particularly autists) are against it,

having stated it's kind of a sacred function between anon and the bakers (anon creating artwork for baker to use).

There was also a push for Baker ID, as if we need some kind of vax passport, and now you want to take away our banners?

Why is it such an issue? Is this really the place for 'uniformity' and 'standardization'? I don't think so at all, the place runs itself.

But since you are very passionate about this for some reason, 3-4 banners (1 for each shift) would be my compromise

Here are a few that I guess I'll miss being able to use since I'm sure they won't be "picked" in this safe and fair anonymous electionโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: a06a77 Feb. 10, 2022, 12:51 p.m. No.15596053   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6126 >>8730

>>15594293

>We've made it past the debate stage

I don't think that's the general consensus.

I don't find this important enough to really take part in debating or arguing. I do see it as something that could easily become a source of division. I hope not. I care not what ends up happening with the banner. I just don't want needless division.

IF A BANNER IS AGREED ON.

My vote is for the classic OG banner.

Mainly for nostalgic reasons.

Anonymous ID: d81f33 Feb. 10, 2022, 1:18 p.m. No.15596259   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘ >>15596174

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ Second

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–€โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–€โ–‘โ–ˆโ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–€โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–€โ–ˆโ–‘โ–„โ–€โ–€โ–ˆโ–€โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–„โ–„โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆ

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–„โ–ˆ

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–„โ–€โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–€โ–€โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–‘โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–€โ–‘โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–„โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–„โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘

Anonymous ID: d9b8a2 Feb. 10, 2022, 3:42 p.m. No.15597128   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15594675

 

This.

 

If we're gonna do one OTHER than the original, it kinda doesn't make sense to have one that focuses on the American flag.

I'm as over-the-top an American exceptionalism proponent as one can possibly find, because the reality simply is that the United States is the world leader in nearly every facet of life.

 

That being said, it's just not an "American" movement. I'm not pushing some fagging globalist "it's an international movement" but the reality is that it just misses the mark to have a banner exclusively focused on the American flag.

 

It makes sense to have it, IF IT'S THE IWO JIMA PHOTO, because it's the legacy photo that was used originally before we knew what Q would become. Other than that, it kinda doesn't make sense, so I'd really try to keep the original in there. If you wanna super-impose something on top or underneath it, that would make sense. I've got a few ideas.

Anonymous ID: 6ac2f2 Feb. 10, 2022, 6:33 p.m. No.15598447   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15594675

>>15594675

here, here!

 

after the huge fight that was had when it first got changed just to have this come back up again, is?? idk, frustrating? it was sickening knowing the board had been hijacked. smh, and its clear the original cant be had, too bad, so sad. ive gotten over it. but "If you guys are really going through with this" then this one IS the one that makes the most sense. for me

 

ty

o7

Anonymous ID: 8cc5ff Feb. 10, 2022, 9:32 p.m. No.15599665   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9773

OG with the MAGA lion, to emphasize the donkey and elephant as relics of the past, even more so today than 4-5-6 years ago when the lion logo and /qr/ first came about. Axe the _ANON part if you want.

Anonymous ID: 49f1c6 Feb. 10, 2022, 10:50 p.m. No.15599974   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1157 >>1980

They changed up banners because bakers were under attack and bakers were showing their โ€œinsigniasโ€ for continuity of their bakes. It was decided the banner just had to have teh raising of the flag. Why does it need to be just one image? Imagine if all the flowers were same color, etc Seems so monotone and robotic. None of my business tho. I donโ€™t bake. I just know how to read where it says โ€œWelcome to QResearch General so and so edition.โ€ I think bakers should be free to follow their Human 1.0 creative hearts and choose whatever Iwo Jima version they love.

Anonymous ID: 7828a9 Feb. 11, 2022, 5:47 a.m. No.15601157   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15599974

>I think bakers should be free to follow their Human 1.0 creative hearts and choose whatever Iwo Jima version they love.

i agree.

but i think it was also nice when they were all the same though but i think that ship has sailed

Anonymous ID: c2e1d1 Feb. 11, 2022, 10:45 a.m. No.15602931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3050 >>3331

lots of good banners here

yeah I guess the bread should be about events and research not the baker but the catalog is way better looking with different banners than making us use the same one in every single thread. This would decrease the quality of the board IMO take the life out of it. I never minded the Papi Trump banner, it was fun, nobody will agree on everything.. how many anons actually think it's a good idea to standardize the image?

Anonymous ID: d81f33 Feb. 11, 2022, 11:25 a.m. No.15603331   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3472 >>3736

>>15602931

> This would decrease the quality of the board IMO take the life out of it

Second. It's not about the baker it's about freedom of expression which everyone here has, that's why anons share banners and bakers use them..

I honestly think this is just someone trying to remove the American flag from our image, but maybe it's just meโ€ฆ

 

>>15603026

>>15603050

Well it looks like No-name would be on the standardization bus then, as this would honestly be the way to go if images were to go down again. The tactifag approach. Also I'm sure the black borders would help blindfags find the general much easierโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: d81f33 Feb. 11, 2022, 1:05 p.m. No.15604150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15603857

>I remember when no-name followed anons over to Deepdigs to harrass, they were posting all the same stuff they attack QR with, all of it, and they split the bread with this very light bright image for their bake.

Yup, I was gonna post pepethrowup.jpg in response but figured it wasn't worth the energy

Anonymous ID: 75219c Feb. 11, 2022, 8:45 p.m. No.15607574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7640

Also, these 3 are ones some anon/s madeโ€ฆ

1) Anon made, I added text. Guy in back doesn't look weird like he does in this one >>15592371,

2) Great night shift choice

3) Shows unity and a swarm of US military

 

>>15596379, >>15596640 This looks like a good version. guy in back doesn't look as weird. Their choice of font and size on @USMCMuseum is a little curious.

>>15594942 I like #2

Anonymous ID: 39a5cf Feb. 12, 2022, 7:26 a.m. No.15609826   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

I nominate one of these photos because it represents what the Plan is about. It's about saving the children and the heroic actions our military is taking to accomplish the mission.

 

Of course, someone would need to add the Q Research to it. You're welcome.

Anonymous ID: d73e63 Feb. 12, 2022, 3:34 p.m. No.15613012   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15612785

there could be more

posted this in general

 

instead of specific images, seems like what makes sense is a set of criteria

mostly came from this thread

BIG TX ANONS

 

here -

Today is the last day to submit banners for banner contest

Ends at midnight EST.

 

THE CONTEST IDEA WAS FIRST SET INTO MOTION 16 MONTHS AGO.

  • On Nov 1 2020, Baker changed the General Image.

  • Many anons objected but baker would not revert. Try "change it back" in qresear.ch.

  • Baker's argument: ''"I am hoping meme fags will use the dough post image as a template to start with.''May the best banner win."#14543, 11-01-2020

MAY THE BEST BANNER WIN.

 

UPDATE:

When first discussed, many anons seemed to support one banner idea.

Later, some objected - proposed a POOL to select from.

We can do either.

If anons want a POOL, have some suggestions based on

  • iwo jima image (most anons use anyway โ€“ unifying theme newly commemorated)

  • findability in the catalog (should look different from side threads)

  • image size (it's SMALL- so simple is best)

 

SUGGESTIONS:

  1. Use either no text or just Q Research โ€“ with any additions being short phrases like "For God & Country" or other unifying themes (WWG1WGA?). MAGA lion can be included, optional.

  2. Use black and white, greyscale or subtle colors (this is to distinguish General Images from others)

  3. Use 16:9 or similar ratio (not too squarish)

 

Recent bakes happened to use images like this, anon capped it. Looks pretty good, threads easy to find.

reposted here, it's upthread too

 

Still looking for ideas and examples

Anonymous ID: bd246a Feb. 12, 2022, 9:58 p.m. No.15615499   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5506

>>15612735

Attached;

Pic one my favorite day shift

Pic 2 very nice perfect for night shift

>>15612474 Pic 3 Also a fav. I like the digital imagery on the left

Pic 4 Like #3 w/by anons added. Nice. Maybe for night

Pic 5 very nice wish I could see better, need a little bigger.

Sorry got in late from work.

Anonymous ID: 5a3639 Feb. 12, 2022, 10:22 p.m. No.15615574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5576 >>5620

>>15615573

banners

 

Have given opinion already that this is division fagging with small changes, but will add since this is still going. BO keeps going back to the arbitrary change of banner to justify the contest and all related noise around banners. Humbly suggest that the problem was the enforcement of a standard when there was none before. Yes it was shit that the banner was forced to be changed without enough discourse, but enforcing the reversal of that decision is itself another enforcement of a standard. The correct course of action here is not a more democratic enforcement of a standard, it is going back to not having a standard to enforce. This board is meant to be a hard unwelcoming tip of the spear. This talk of branding and representing the board to outsiders is nonsense. Time to re-read the welcome page, and if there are problems with it then start a democratic modification of the welcome page, instead of trying to fairly enforce rules that shouldn't exist at all.

Anonymous ID: 5a3639 Feb. 12, 2022, 10:24 p.m. No.15615576   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5585

>>15615574

To clarify there is a standard, it is similar picrel with lion replaceable with similar flair. More suggesting that this standard is enforced by anons on a bread by bread, case by case basis, depending on the feeling at the time. Suggesting that anything more stringent that than will cause more problems than it solves.

## Board Owner ID: 60dcc7 Feb. 12, 2022, 10:32 p.m. No.15615620   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15615574

This board has always had standards - from the start. 8bit had standards, he just didn't broadcast them. He set them forth and anons used em. Under 8bit, anons couldn't change General image. And they knew it.

 

The argument that "we have no standards" is simply not true. We've had all sorts of implicit standards, especially for baking. Just not CODIFIED.

 

Example - anon suggested bakers assist as a job for note-takers who couldn't or didn't want to bake. 8bit said no. End of discussion.

 

You re-read the Welcome page. Free speech doesn't mean no traditions, rules of thumb, or structure. We have structures - OSS kicked them in the pants. Result - anons banned, notes not collected, ebakes, and lots of spam. New standards - no anons banned, spam deleted, CP deleted promptly, same with bread numbers corrected, catalog cleaned. Because of STANDARDS.