CONTEST TO PICK A GENERAL IMAGE

Whatever the banner is, it should represent values upon which all or most anons can agree, like freedom, valor, honor, unity, and courage under fire.

>>15575312 Discussion of returning to single image for General Breads

>>15581152 more discussion

>>15591954 Announcement of contest

Let the contest begin!

How it works

1. PROPOSERS: Post a sharp copy of your proposed General Image along with the reasons why this image should be chosen (2-3 sentences minimum).

ONLY ONE IMAGE PER POST PLEASE

2. ANONS: You can NOM banners by either replying NOM or giving reasons.

3. PROPOSERS HAVE ALL FRIDAY AND SATURDAY TO POST BANNERS. Anons can reply at any time. Deadline for submission is Saturday midnight EST. Deadline for comments is Sunday noon.

4. Depending on the results, we'll either announce the winner on Monday – will be in Globals – or do a runoff in case of neck-and-neck results.

Where We Go One, We Go All.

File *

Note: Changing files

deletes all previous ones.

Embed

Existing post

Anonymous 02/10/22 (Thu) 08:25:36 8a0b0a No.15592194

File: 36019927cf5c278⋯.png (671.85 KB, 1256x556, 314:139, triple_patriotic_image.png)

<p class="body-line ltr "><span class="heading">CONTEST TO PICK A GENERAL IMAGE</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>Whatever the banner is, it should represent values upon which all or most anons can agree, like freedom, valor, honor, unity, and courage under fire.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "<a onclick="highlightReply('15575312', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15575273.html#15575312">&gt;&gt;15575312</a> Discussion of returning to single image for General Breads </p><p class="body-line ltr "> <a onclick="highlightReply('15581152', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15581028.html#15581152">&gt;&gt;15581152</a> more discussion</p><p class="body-line ltr "> <a onclick="highlightReply('15591954', event);" href="/qresearch/res/15591449.html#15591954">&gt;&gt;15591954</a> Announcement of contest</p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><span class="small">Let the contest begin!</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><span class="heading">How it works</span></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>1. PROPOSERS: Post a sharp copy of your proposed General Image along with the reasons why this image should be chosen (2-3 sentences minimum).</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>2. ANONS: You can NOM banners by either replying NOM or giving reasons.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>3. PROPOSERS HAVE ALL FRIDAY AND SATURDAY TO POST BANNERS. Anons can reply at any time. Deadline for submission is <u>Saturday midnight EST</u>. Deadline for comments is <u>Sunday noon</u>.</strong></p><p class="body-line empty "></p><p class="body-line ltr "><strong>4. Depending on the results, we'll eitPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Post last edited at 02/10/22 (Thu) 08:04:53

• Tinyboard + vichan + infinity + OpenIB -

Tinyboard Copyright © 2010-2014 Tinyboard Development Group

vichan Copyright © 2012-2014 vichan-devel

infinity Copyright © 2013-2022 N.T. Technology, Inc. based on sources from Fredrick Brennan's "Infinity Development Group"

OpenIB by Code Monkey ★

All posts on 8kun are the responsibility of the individual poster and not the administration of 8kun, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 230.

We have not been served any secret court orders and are not under any gag orders.

To file a DMCA takedown notice, please email compliance@isitwetyet.com. In the interest of

transparency, notices of claimed infringement will be posted on >>>/delete/.

Is It Wet Yet Inc.

Color photo of OG Banner with gradient lettering color to increase visibility.

Green for Mil/8Ch a salute to those that served in the physical and digital.

Color because truth is coming, and times have changed. Still shows respect to the original banner.

what did i miss Last year's

God Magic ✨

NO! I think you are going TOO far with tidying the ship. Appreciate efforts overall, but there is no need to absolutely standardize the banner. I think it is enough to ask bakers to always use the Iwo Jima image centrally and respectfully. Bakers who deviate too much and make banners that are disrespectful do and will get called out. As long as the Iwo Jima image is used as stated, anons can easily find the current thread and there is continuity, both of which were the primary concerns expressed.

I really like the creativity of the banners and the energy they bring to the breads. The only times new banners are a problem for finding the thread is if they don't have the Iwo Jima image big enough or centrally located for easy visual recognition. And I don't think using anything silly is appropriate. Those would be the two pieces of guidance I would suggest.

Perhaps it could be stated that anons should flag/report any banner that is a problem, and you could edit the post to swap out that banner with a generic one if it has more than three reports on it.

IMO, it doesn't have to be a single one/only one.

Some are harder to find than others. The Iwo Jima image not being centered or the center of focus is what makes it harder but not impossible to find.

Just my 2 cents.

>>15592865

>>15593264

We've made it past the debate stage. This is the contest.

Many of the reasons you have listed support the very reason for returning to a single banner. Bakers can post their banner in the dough post if they feel the need to personalize their portion of our bread.

Please post your image for consideration.

>>15594293

From what I've seen you're trying to fix something that isn't broken. I support you in every way and that's why it brings me no joy to tell you this. Just my 2 cents.

>>15594293

>We've made it past the debate stage.

kek

And the Baker Disobedience stage next week is going to be lit.

If you guys are really going through with this (I don't see why anymore after the comments) here is the only one that makes sense to me.

A pool of approved banners (gives meme fags a chance to add to pool and continue to display their wares) makes way more sense.

>>15594561

please say why you favor each banner - what it represents and why it is the best choice.

>>15594561

Dart here

was setting an example of pics rather than text

I have no opinion otherwise

kek

ran out of crayons

I have deleted the posts that are about the content but not part of it - CAPPED.

The comment about having a pool of banners is NOTED. Not a bad suggestion. If that is what anons would prefer, can use that approach.

BUT FIRST, WE NEED SUBMISSIONS.

refresh plz

>>15594795

Thanks BO. 100% support.

>>15594675

I submitted the Q Research banner because it most reflects the long running Q_Anon banner and the black and white stands out from the other board assets. That's why I like it.

>>15594795

>If that is what anons would prefer, can use that approach.

I'm REALLY not a big fan of how this is being pushed so hard, it was floated as an idea first

but it's almost forced now since it seemed the majority of anons (particularly autists) are against it,

having stated it's kind of a sacred function between anon and the bakers (anon creating artwork for baker to use).

There was also a push for Baker ID, as if we need some kind of vax passport, and now you want to take away our banners?

Why is it such an issue? Is this really the place for 'uniformity' and 'standardization'? I don't think so at all, the place runs itself.

But since you are very passionate about this for some reason, 3-4 banners (1 for each shift) would be my compromise

Here are a few that I guess I'll miss being able to use since I'm sure they won't be "picked" in this safe and fair anonymous election…

i nom on the original banner minus all the things that make the cry babies cry

• maybe a little color in the flag which i felt too lazy to do

>>15595087

second, if we're really gonna do this, scrap the contest

The winner is clearly going to the most bland B&W 'classic' thing there is, so in that case let's lose the text, and maybe colorize the flag

(please)

FYIif there's an increase in shill activity now because they're using the banner file to direct their botscript attacks, this was your idea, BO

>>15594942

see response here - >>15595067

id also like to nom on this pretty clean cut out of the original boys from original banner slapped on a nicer background

(cut out included in case someone wants to put it on another bg)

>>15595217

Chekt, so was this about uniformity or a proposal to completely overhaul the banner?

I still feel weird about the entire thing..

>>15594293

>We've made it past the debate stage

I don't think that's the general consensus.

I don't find this important enough to really take part in debating or arguing. I do see it as something that could easily become a source of division. I hope not. I care not what ends up happening with the banner. I just don't want needless division.

IF A BANNER IS AGREED ON.

My vote is for the classic OG banner.

Mainly for nostalgic reasons.

>>15596053

hard to get an extended discussion about anything, this is always the problem - half say "hurry up" the other half "not done"

>>15595615

rather a nice banner

i like the "classic" but this is well done colored update that's distinctive but not too busy

>>15595678

>what is this about?

what it says above. a banner embodying

values upon which all or most anons can agree, like freedom, valor, honor, unity, and courage under fire

>>15596126

Indeed.

My only advise is that it is dropped if it becomes more of a divisive issue.

BO has done well and I believe will continue to do so.

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄████████░░░░░░░░░ >>15596174

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████████░░░░▄███ Second

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████████████████▄▄████▀░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀████████████████████▀░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████████████▀░█▀░░░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄▄▀██▀█░▄▀▀█▀█░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░░░▄▀░░▀▄▄▄▀░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░░███▄▄▄▄░░░█▄░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄█▄░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▀▀▀▀░░▀▄░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

░░░░░░░░░░░░░████░░░░░█░░▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█

░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░░░░▄█░░░░░░

░░░░░░▄█████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█░░░░░░░░

░░░▄▄███████████▀▀▄▄▄░░░░░▄███▄░░░░░░░░

░▄██████████████░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░████▄░░░░░░

▄███████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░█████▄░░░░░

█████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▄░░░░

>>15595087

>>15595118

nom

>>15596379

Okay.

In this case,

I'm for the original photo.

Un-edited. Crisp. Clean. Send it.

>>15596513

oop meant this

>>15596640

o7

og triple og

back in my day us bakers had to get "permission" from 8bit to "change the banner" for the 1 year anniversary

-V

>>15594795

let the spice flow

i cool with this too

i have since

>>15596867

gotten accustomed to "finding" the current bread after a while of missing it because of the banner

>>15596867

THE PARTY HATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>15595087

>>15596943

nice

>>15596956

faggot

>>15595087

>>15595118

>>15596943

Nomable

>>15596640

Also

nomable

>>15597062

>>15596956

>>15596943

>>15595087

Better aspect ratio

Color Iwo Jima

Alternate to B&W

>>15596987

Relax nigga, I'm a cool faggot, like Freddie Mercury

Except I don't have AIDS

>>15597086

This

Final answer

>>15597092

>Final answer

Gray scale

Same Iwo Jima image/aspect ration

In case variety desired

>>15595087

NOM

pays the most respect to the board and to the fallen soldiers of iwo jima IMO.

Anything that enhances it without disrespecting it is ok too (natural color enhancement)

>>15594675

This.

If we're gonna do one OTHER than the original, it kinda doesn't make sense to have one that focuses on the American flag.

I'm as over-the-top an American exceptionalism proponent as one can possibly find, because the reality simply is that the United States is the world leader in nearly every facet of life.

That being said, it's just not an "American" movement. I'm not pushing some fagging globalist "it's an international movement" but the reality is that it just misses the mark to have a banner exclusively focused on the American flag.

It makes sense to have it, IF IT'S THE IWO JIMA PHOTO, because it's the legacy photo that was used originally before we knew what Q would become. Other than that, it kinda doesn't make sense, so I'd really try to keep the original in there. If you wanna super-impose something on top or underneath it, that would make sense. I've got a few ideas.

>>15597086

image is well done

but poor contrast to

Yotsuba B background

needs a edge?

>>15597581

innovative

first one is simple, high contrast

maga lion well done but busier

>>15597086

>better aspect ratio

yes - could still use an edge, espec on right

refresh

>>15598020

>>15598090

>>15598020

>>15598090

On a bad monitor BO/BV pls delete >>15598318

>>15594675

>>15594675

here, here!

after the huge fight that was had when it first got changed just to have this come back up again, is?? idk, frustrating? it was sickening knowing the board had been hijacked. smh, and its clear the original cant be had, too bad, so sad. ive gotten over it. but "If you guys are really going through with this" then this one IS the one that makes the most sense. for me

ty

o7

>>15596053

>My vote is for the classic OG banner.

#meToo but I am willing to consider other options.

I

>>15594675

I'm down with that, except that it has a block of graphics missing on the right side. Fix it or find the original and re do it.

>>15594675

OG QR banner - "Qanon" & fixed blank space.

Cuz the flag has been re-captured.

>>15598804

fuck

>>15594795

>a pool of banners

Nom

>>15595087

The only one that it should be.

>>15596379

Yep, that about seals it.

OG with the MAGA lion, to emphasize the donkey and elephant as relics of the past, even more so today than 4-5-6 years ago when the lion logo and /qr/ first came about. Axe the _ANON part if you want.

>>15599665

idk what they told you but the lion has nothing to do with the uniparty, it's the lion of Judah, who were uironically white. not Pharisees.

>>15599773

>https://twitter.com/lionsoftrump

They changed up banners because bakers were under attack and bakers were showing their “insignias” for continuity of their bakes. It was decided the banner just had to have teh raising of the flag. Why does it need to be just one image? Imagine if all the flowers were same color, etc Seems so monotone and robotic. None of my business tho. I don’t bake. I just know how to read where it says “Welcome to QResearch General so and so edition.” I think bakers should be free to follow their Human 1.0 creative hearts and choose whatever Iwo Jima version they love.

hubris

not mine

but a very sharp rendition of iwo jima memorial with subtle coloring and classic letters. captures the spirit of the original but with a little more flair.

>>15599974

>I think bakers should be free to follow their Human 1.0 creative hearts and choose whatever Iwo Jima version they love.

i agree.

but i think it was also nice when they were all the same though but i think that ship has sailed

sdsdg

video pic girl :

>>15598804

>Cuz the flag has been re-captured.

>>15596910

>>15594352

>fix something that isn't broken

It IS broken!

Fucking catalog looks like a low class, cheap carnival.

I like the original banner, it's a signature, not an ego booster for insecure anons.

>>15594561

All 3, ugly af!

>>15594675

If not this, or the original, as close to this as possible is my vote

mornin V

guud to see ya

lots rootin for OG

hopin

>>15594942

to take away our banners?

there were no bannerS

It's like a brand, it shouldn't change for recognition purposes. It should remain as when Q started posting.

>>15595087

nom

>>15595615

nom

>>15600544

I nominate this one.

Like the original but better looking and with FG&C.

>>15596943

the best so far

NOM

>>15600544

Nom

>>15598730

kek

pic related

>>15599974

>if all the flowers were same color,

It's not a thing, it's the board's signature and it should a single one.

>>15600544

nom

>>15601908

sgffddf

video pic girl :

http://ogw.ru/mkf

>>15601858

I'm changing my vote to quit trying to fix what isn't broken.

>>15601858

>It IS broken!

>Fucking catalog looks like a low class, cheap carnival.

>I like the original banner, it's a signature, not an ego booster for insecure anons.

>>15600544

nom

lots of good banners here

yeah I guess the bread should be about events and research not the baker but the catalog is way better looking with different banners than making us use the same one in every single thread. This would decrease the quality of the board IMO take the life out of it. I never minded the Papi Trump banner, it was fun, nobody will agree on everything.. how many anons actually think it's a good idea to standardize the image?

nom nom nom

>>15602931

I vote no on the standardize image and hell no on any OSS image

>>15602931

> This would decrease the quality of the board IMO take the life out of it

Second. It's not about the baker it's about freedom of expression which everyone here has, that's why anons share banners and bakers use them..

I honestly think this is just someone trying to remove the American flag from our image, but maybe it's just me…

>>15603026

>>15603050

Well it looks like No-name would be on the standardization bus then, as this would honestly be the way to go if images were to go down again. The tactifag approach. Also I'm sure the black borders would help blindfags find the general much easier…

>>15603331

The wrap up smear didn't work did it fuckknuckle?

>>15603331

>smear

<implying

>>15597581

I remember when no-name followed anons over to Deepdigs to harrass, they were posting all the same stuff they attack QR with, all of it, and they split the bread with this very light bright image for their bake.

>>15603736

Just play it straight up

>>15603884

Play what straight up?

Identity politics are over

Plus there's an entire bread dedicated to

arguing with me, if that's all you're trying to do

>>15604137

ok

>>15603857

>I remember when no-name followed anons over to Deepdigs to harrass, they were posting all the same stuff they attack QR with, all of it, and they split the bread with this very light bright image for their bake.

Yup, I was gonna post pepethrowup.jpg in response but figured it wasn't worth the energy

As far as muh uniformity, or a pool of banners

I think this looks good, great even

>>15596640

>>15597086

must be IWO JIMA

dunna care beyond that

and no words is fine with me

honestly, I have zero issue if bakers want to customize the IWO JIMA banner, some of them are awesome

pics rel

>>15606714

muh fav

>>15600544

nom

>>15606836 qrg

Here bannerfags, since you can't be deterred and I don't care for >>15600544 . This mp4 is boom, but ya gotta figure out how to make mp4 wk as main pic. IJS Also, pic is my fav, that I most often use.

Also, these 3 are ones some anon/s made…

1) Anon made, I added text. Guy in back doesn't look weird like he does in this one >>15592371,

2) Great night shift choice

3) Shows unity and a swarm of US military

>>15596379, >>15596640 This looks like a good version. guy in back doesn't look as weird. Their choice of font and size on @USMCMuseum is a little curious.

>>15594942 I like #2

>>15607574

>>>15594942 I like #2

The one where the Q is dripping water.

>>15603857

that wasn't oss, it was me and I was the signed-in baker so it's not possible that I split that bread.

That banner is just something someone else posted and I saved it because I liked it.

>>15601791

only once a year, kek.

>>15601781

eye-catching but can't use that for general image. kek.

this neither >>15602482

>>15606674

interdasting - can still test the Generals apart from others, even tho different.

>>15592371

Can u submit a version of this that is also without lettering? Excellent photo.

>>15592371

>>15608081

never mind, see one below

tx.

hubris

how long are we gonna do this for BO

Q4018

fdgdfh

video pic girl :

https://0rz.tw/yWy6X

>>15608201

did u read the instructions? OP post.

refresh

I nominate one of these photos because it represents what the Plan is about. It's about saving the children and the heroic actions our military is taking to accomplish the mission.

Of course, someone would need to add the Q Research to it. You're welcome.

asfsf

video pic girl :

https://minifi.ca/58wJb

>>15596943

OK, I'm breaking down and adding this here because it will drive me freaking batty if everyone uses the stripy version of this otherwise beautiful image. I still completely oppose this whole contest thing.

>>15612311

I do like this one.

>>15612311

>>15612474

nom

adding a few in case they aren't in yet. I'm thinking one Dan banner would be appropriate for the pool.

Prefer the pool idea.

>>15612735

Nom 10 banners in pool. Pool controlled/approved by BO

>>15612785

nomming 14ish least fav being the maybe

>>15594561

1 gif

>>15594675 maybe

>>15612474

>>15606714

pic 2 36d4644f44708eda3acb

pic 5 Q_Research_Banner_FGC_w_P

>>15607502

pic1

>>15608917

night shift

>>15608918

pic 2

durham boat

>>15608920

pic 5

>>15612735

all 4

>>15612817

and I guess pic 1 4 and 5

>>15608919

and did I now the lightning strike one? that's a good one

>>15612828

>and I guess pic 1 4 and 5 meant for >>15608920

>>15612817

Whatever decision is made I'm sure it will be a good one.

>>15612785

there could be more

posted this in general

instead of specific images, seems like what makes sense is a set of criteria

mostly came from this thread

BIG TX ANONS

here -

Today is the last day to submit banners for banner contest

Ends at midnight EST.

THE CONTEST IDEA WAS FIRST SET INTO MOTION 16 MONTHS AGO.

• On Nov 1 2020, Baker changed the General Image.

• Many anons objected but baker would not revert. Try "change it back" in qresear.ch.

• Baker's argument: ''"I am hoping meme fags will use the dough post image as a template to start with.''May the best banner win."#14543, 11-01-2020

MAY THE BEST BANNER WIN.

UPDATE:

When first discussed, many anons seemed to support one banner idea.

Later, some objected - proposed a POOL to select from.

We can do either.

If anons want a POOL, have some suggestions based on

• iwo jima image (most anons use anyway – unifying theme newly commemorated)

• findability in the catalog (should look different from side threads)

• image size (it's SMALL- so simple is best)

SUGGESTIONS:

1. Use either no text or just Q Research – with any additions being short phrases like "For God & Country" or other unifying themes (WWG1WGA?). MAGA lion can be included, optional.

2. Use black and white, greyscale or subtle colors (this is to distinguish General Images from others)

3. Use 16:9 or similar ratio (not too squarish)

Recent bakes happened to use images like this, anon capped it. Looks pretty good, threads easy to find.

reposted here, it's upthread too

Still looking for ideas and examples

>>15612311

nom

A nod to the original design.

>>15614263

A variation to the original design to include more image at bottom.

Getting fancy.

>>15614263

Fancy with different text and note the digital looking columns at the sides which illustrates the digital part of DIGITAL SOLDIERS.

>>15614263

Moar.

Moved hero to right and revealed a bit of the vertical columns.

>>15614263

Just happened to have this in the file with these images so had a play

Mmph.

>>15595087

https://www.freedomstream.tv/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bergy_Affidavit_Exhibits_Notarized_20201207.pdf

>>15612735

Attached;

Pic one my favorite day shift

Pic 2 very nice perfect for night shift

>>15612474 Pic 3 Also a fav. I like the digital imagery on the left

Pic 4 Like #3 w/by anons added. Nice. Maybe for night

Pic 5 very nice wish I could see better, need a little bigger.

Sorry got in late from work.

>>15615499

>>15612474 This one's ok, a little bland but nice.

>>15597417 ob

>>15599040 ob

>>15599065 ob

Was asked to add thoughts on this from meta thread. Sorry for the delay, was camping with a couple hundred thousand fam.

Will (you) myself with a copy of those posts for you phone fags.

>>15615573

banners

Have given opinion already that this is division fagging with small changes, but will add since this is still going. BO keeps going back to the arbitrary change of banner to justify the contest and all related noise around banners. Humbly suggest that the problem was the enforcement of a standard when there was none before. Yes it was shit that the banner was forced to be changed without enough discourse, but enforcing the reversal of that decision is itself another enforcement of a standard. The correct course of action here is not a more democratic enforcement of a standard, it is going back to not having a standard to enforce. This board is meant to be a hard unwelcoming tip of the spear. This talk of branding and representing the board to outsiders is nonsense. Time to re-read the welcome page, and if there are problems with it then start a democratic modification of the welcome page, instead of trying to fairly enforce rules that shouldn't exist at all.

>>15615574

To clarify there is a standard, it is similar picrel with lion replaceable with similar flair. More suggesting that this standard is enforced by anons on a bread by bread, case by case basis, depending on the feeling at the time. Suggesting that anything more stringent that than will cause more problems than it solves.

refresh

>>15615576

All picrels should be acceptable enough variants to use and respond to anon feedback in that specific bread for that specific baker for the next specific bread.

>>15615585

>(Drag and drop works even with gifs between different breads, props CM and / or htwls)

>>15615574

This board has always had standards - from the start. 8bit had standards, he just didn't broadcast them. He set them forth and anons used em. Under 8bit, anons couldn't change General image. And they knew it.

The argument that "we have no standards" is simply not true. We've had all sorts of implicit standards, especially for baking. Just not CODIFIED.

Example - anon suggested bakers assist as a job for note-takers who couldn't or didn't want to bake. 8bit said no. End of discussion.

You re-read the Welcome page. Free speech doesn't mean no traditions, rules of thumb, or structure. We have structures - OSS kicked them in the pants. Result - anons banned, notes not collected, ebakes, and lots of spam. New standards - no anons banned, spam deleted, CP deleted promptly, same with bread numbers corrected, catalog cleaned. Because of STANDARDS.

hubris

dfgdh

video pic girl :

https://sh4re.be/19276

>>15616125

nom this one

pic rel

>>15607502

Seconding this. But anons vote is against prescribed banners. Would like to see these survive as well. And a few others.

Think mirror

2 Dead

2 step down

>>15616588

Reeeeee

>>15616117

Oh god, I made those.

Please delete all but the first 🤣

So bad…

CONTEST RESULTS HERE -

https://sys.8kun.top/mod.php?/qresearch/res/15620144.html#q15620260

>>15620357

A contest with no winner, hmmm.

>>15618577

delete function isn't that fancy

don't worry, no demerits given

o7

>>15620990

or with many winners