>>15594795

>If that is what anons would prefer, can use that approach.

I'm REALLY not a big fan of how this is being pushed so hard, it was floated as an idea first

but it's almost forced now since it seemed the majority of anons (particularly autists) are against it,

having stated it's kind of a sacred function between anon and the bakers (anon creating artwork for baker to use).

There was also a push for Baker ID, as if we need some kind of vax passport, and now you want to take away our banners?

Why is it such an issue? Is this really the place for 'uniformity' and 'standardization'? I don't think so at all, the place runs itself.

But since you are very passionate about this for some reason, 3-4 banners (1 for each shift) would be my compromise

Here are a few that I guess I'll miss being able to use since I'm sure they won't be "picked" in this safe and fair anonymous election…

>>15595087

second, if we're really gonna do this, scrap the contest

The winner is clearly going to the most bland B&W 'classic' thing there is, so in that case let's lose the text, and maybe colorize the flag

(please)

>>15595217

Chekt, so was this about uniformity or a proposal to completely overhaul the banner?

I still feel weird about the entire thing..

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄████████░░░░░░░░░ >>15596174

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████████░░░░▄███ Second

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████████████████▄▄████▀░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀████████████████████▀░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███████████████▀░█▀░░░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄▄▀██▀█░▄▀▀█▀█░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░░░▄▀░░▀▄▄▄▀░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░░███▄▄▄▄░░░█▄░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄█▄░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▀▀▀▀░░▀▄░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

░░░░░░░░░░░░░████░░░░░█░░▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█

░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░░░░▄█░░░░░░

░░░░░░▄█████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█░░░░░░░░

░░░▄▄███████████▀▀▄▄▄░░░░░▄███▄░░░░░░░░

░▄██████████████░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░████▄░░░░░░

▄███████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░█████▄░░░░░

█████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▄░░░░

>>15596379

Okay.

In this case,

I'm for the original photo.

Un-edited. Crisp. Clean. Send it.

>>15596640

o7

>>15596943

nice

>>15596987

Relax nigga, I'm a cool faggot, like Freddie Mercury

Except I don't have AIDS

>>15597086

This

Final answer

>>15601858

>It IS broken!

>Fucking catalog looks like a low class, cheap carnival.

>I like the original banner, it's a signature, not an ego booster for insecure anons.

>>15602931

> This would decrease the quality of the board IMO take the life out of it

Second. It's not about the baker it's about freedom of expression which everyone here has, that's why anons share banners and bakers use them..

I honestly think this is just someone trying to remove the American flag from our image, but maybe it's just me…

>>15603026

>>15603050

Well it looks like No-name would be on the standardization bus then, as this would honestly be the way to go if images were to go down again. The tactifag approach. Also I'm sure the black borders would help blindfags find the general much easier…

>>15603331

>smear

<implying

>>15603884

Play what straight up?

Identity politics are over

Plus there's an entire bread dedicated to

arguing with me, if that's all you're trying to do

>>15603857

>I remember when no-name followed anons over to Deepdigs to harrass, they were posting all the same stuff they attack QR with, all of it, and they split the bread with this very light bright image for their bake.

Yup, I was gonna post pepethrowup.jpg in response but figured it wasn't worth the energy

As far as muh uniformity, or a pool of banners

I think this looks good, great even

>>15606714

muh fav

>>15606836 qrg

>>15616588

Reeeeee

>>15616117

Oh god, I made those.

Please delete all but the first 🤣

So bad…