TYB!
Anon needs some help with logic. I know one response already, "it's too big a problem to effectively deal with" and I don't disagree that it's a huge problem. I do disagree that it's "too big to fail" - and, I have loved ones who this will affect.
Please find holes in my logic? I can't. My construct is below; thank you anons.
Four key points:
A: There is no statute of limitations on murder.
B: Roe v Wade is about to be overturned. It was an unconstitutional temporary reprieve, for some murderers and accomplices.
C: Marbury v Madison was an earlier Supreme Court decision. It asserted: an unconstitutional law is unconstitutional FOR ALL TIME, and not merely after a court declares it such.
D = A+B+C: Those who murdered and had reprieve, are about to lose that reprieve.
When this protection is declared unconstitutional (B), it disappears completely as if it was never in effect (C). Every person who committed and assisted in the murders that were illegally said to be legal to commit, is guilty and may be brought to justice (D) – because that crime has no statute of limitations (A).