J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: 603828 July 27, 2018, 3:24 p.m. No.2316905   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2307312

Proof of the pudding:

"Please be advised that the FOIA case log subject was incorrectly transcribed due to a human error."

https://theconspiracylibrary.icyboards.net/showthread.php?tid=2059

 

Why didn't they deny? Did they get caught red handed?

 

No response on the 'why' or the casenotes that they mandatorily have to supply. What else was transcribed incorrectly? Why did they try to hide my FOIA from the FOIA log listing if 'nothing was found'?

 

>Some people, but not many (very few surprisingly) pick up the trigger

Figure out what the trigger words are.

Hijack them, use them for your own processes.

 

The left and right both have a lot in common, but only when you think about it in a way not filtered by the media.

 

Both sides don't like AIPAC/israel/zionists.

Both sides want humans to be treated well.

No-one wants to be 'wrong' or on the 'losing side'.

Both sides think the (other) side is corrupt, and wants to expose corruption.

 

Both sides are opposed to corruption.

 

The oldest trick in the book for someone wanting to retain power is divide and conquer. If you're too busy fighting along partisan lines, you're too busy to be exposing corruption.

 

How do they divide? Trigger words. You've noticed them. Others have. Two ways to defeat them - use them for your own goal, or keep reusing them until they become stale and meaningless (desensitisation).

 

Media Matters are fighting "outrage fatigue" because their abuse of trigger words is losing potency.

 

The key to an effective trigger is to always be right, so look before you leap. Have you seen the news lately? They have so-called 'comedy' shows trying to regurgitate propaganda. Why comedians? Comedians can't be sued for making false statements or defamation. Isn't it funny how it's always a comedian (or a 'celebrity') talking about climate change, and never a scientist. Why is that?

 

If you could artificially produce clouds using silver iodine, could you also hypothetically induce a drought or heatwave if you either stopped, or moved the clouds somewhere else?

 

What would you need in order to spray materials into the sky? Have you seen Operation LAC? How long did it last for? Why is no-one raving on about it in the media?

 

Does this have any overlap with Agent Orange? Who did they test it on? Willing participants? Who else does Monsanto produce besides 'pesticides'? Do you think they use willing participants in their 'tests'?

 

The advantage of a dumb populace means if you're smart, you can guide them to the right course of action.

 

>What's the virus?

 

It's a psychological virus called the Recursive Mind Virus. I designed it to exploit and combat what were reports of conditioned assassin sleeper cells (why is the old book Manchurian Candidate full of actual scientific references, but labelled fiction? Did no-one check the references, did someone try to drop a hint, or did someone try to mark it fiction to bury the truth?).

 

Harman is going batshit insane. Didn't he make the 'Rickhurian Mortydate'? What is that referencing to? The references are all in plain sight, for anyone who sees. Did you hear what the squirrels said in 'Morty's Mindblowers'? Just avoid sounding batshit insane - part of the purpose is to make it 'so obvious' that you sound like a crazy fucker if you talk about it.

 

Q is right, symbolism will be their downfall.

 

How does the virus work? All conditioned individuals are so abused and so broken they follow any command they are given without question. Sometimes handlers are promoted victims.

 

So as you're guessing, if you gave a command to one victim or handler to pass onto other victims or handlers as a command, the entire network will, over a period of time, be penetrated with a single, recursive command that forces them to continually rebroadcast that command.

 

The trick is to carry a secondary command in that piggyback.

 

Which is to leak information, publicly, to a suitable outlet.

 

Vault 7 demonstrates the CIA could pose as any other country when hacking. Do you think the CIA would ever try to overthrow a government? Don't answer that, it's rhetorical.

 

Regardless, interesting times we live in. I wish I could convey more, but there's a fine line between useful and sounding batshit insane. The FOIA should be sufficient proof, not many people get the CIA to admit error.

 

Want to forge your own 'viruses'? Learn the trigger words.

 

'Hit me baby one more time' - do you think that refers to physical abuse?

J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: 603828 July 27, 2018, 3:48 p.m. No.2317222   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>all on the same day, beginning a news story with the same phrase?

Trigger words.

Repetition reinforces. People genuinely believe if they hear it often enough, they believe it to be true.

 

Ever been bullied? It's like that: 'you're stupid, you're stupid, you're stupid, you're stupid', then your brain repeats and believes the same thing.

 

Coincidentially, what are they all calling Trump?

 

Would you call a man who has millions, his own massive jet, hotel chain, survived 4 bankruptcys to remain rich and went on to win an election without support from either Dems or Repubs (originally) or the media, as being 'stupid'?

 

It was humourous when the media berate Trump for speaking 'like a 4th grader'. Social studies show that people who use jargon or intellectual terms are, on average, seen either as more aloft or actually dumber (because it means they're unable to gauge their audience). Simple phrases means it's accessible to everyone, even an immigrant with pidgin English. The media are what I'd call 'pretend smart', hocking their own credentials but failing at basic tasks (such as fact checking, source attribution, not falling for 4chan hoaxes, not believeing everything the CIA says immediately, etc).

 

>they sometimes slightly change a word or two of the scrrpted intos

It's to try to give the false impression of difference, when there is none.

 

You'll find the outlets with the most similar talking points are owned by the same mega-corporate media parent company.

 

All reference from AP. Who checks AP's handiwork? Err, no-one does, apparently.

 

>We do need to find the thrapists though.

>Q said that they are changing their names and moving. So how do you spot them?

 

All therapists, must be on some level, accredited.

 

LinkedIn, CVs, resumes.

 

Due to constantly moving, they might find it to be easier to be self-employed, EG their own companies.

 

Some states have very good, what's called 'companies house' (it's a website that documents the owner and financial details of a person).

 

Most require an account. You can get yourself a fake '10 minute mail' and sign up using that.

 

Some will have practically no documentation (EG Delaware).

Some will have pretty good documentation (EG Kansas).

 

Washington DC corporate search:

https://corp.dcra.dc.gov/Account.aspx

 

You should find others for whichever state you're looking up. Not all states have them. There's no Federal level register.

 

Also, any name changes have to be, in theory, legally filed somewhere.

 

If they are changing their name but without a legal filing, what they are committing is fraud and deception (of the 'identity fraud/theft' variarty).

 

Hypnosis is likely to be part of their 'skillset'.