Anonymous ID: 677f93 July 25, 2018, 11:21 p.m. No.2293093   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3150

>>2288406

So you are butt hurt her too your women,

 

The rest of us don't have any problems getting our fair share.

 

Are you one if the infamous InCels who don't know why they can't get laid?

 

I have a pretty good guess

Anonymous ID: 677f93 Aug. 9, 2018, 10:30 p.m. No.2535299   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

The puzzling thing is I had fluorides, vaccines, and the same GMO foods and chemtrails but it hasn't had any affect on me.

 

The only real difference are in education and the culture. I suspect that is were the disabilities come from

Anonymous ID: 677f93 Aug. 10, 2018, 2:29 a.m. No.2536618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9357

>>2535750

Why would the clowns care what you write here?

 

Are you giving up any secrets they could get from reading Q's posts:

 

I doubt if they would expend and professional resources here when it would be easier to coax some 4 chan geeks or soybois from Media Matters

 

Both would probably work for free just to get the lulz.

 

Occam's Razor - which would you use of you were tasked to shit post and shill?

 

I would expect any self-respecting C_A operative to think is was beneath his dignity to just shit post & shill.

 

Logical arguments are rare so no intelligence is necessary

 

Based on the ex-C_A people I have observed in public, none seem the type to degrade themselves in that manner, when progressive autists we effective and free.

 

Just wind them up and tell them we are shit posting about Obama. They'll come running

Anonymous ID: 677f93 Aug. 21, 2018, 1:50 p.m. No.2691918   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8927

>>2691759

 

Totalitarianism is a mode of government that prohibits opposition parties, restricts individual opposition to the state and its claims, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is regarded as the most extreme form of authoritarianism. Political power in totalitarian states has often involved rule by one leader and an all-encompassing propaganda campaign, which is disseminated through the state-controlled mass media and are often marked by political repression, personality cultism, control over the economy and restriction of speech, mass surveillance and widespread use of terror. Historian Robert Conquest describes "totalitarian" states as recognizing no limits to their authority in any sphere of public or private life and extending that authority wherever feasible.[1]

 

The concept was first developed in the 1920s by the Weimar jurist and later Nazi academic Carl Schmitt as well as Italian fascists. Italian fascist Benito Mussolini said "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state". Schmitt used the term Totalstaat in his influential 1927 work on the legal basis of an all-powerful state, The Concept of the Political.[2] Later, the concept was used extensively to compare Nazism and Stalinism. The Economist has described China's recently developed social credit system to screen and rank its citizens based on their personal behavior as "totalitarian".[3][4][5]

 

Totalitarian regimes are different from other authoritarian ones. The latter denotes a state in which the single power holder โ€“ an individual "dictator", a committee or a junta or an otherwise small group of political elite โ€“ monopolizes political power. "[The] authoritarian state [โ€ฆ] is only concerned with political power and as long as that is not contested it gives society a certain degree of liberty".[6] Authoritarianism "does not attempt to change the world and human nature".[6] In contrast, a totalitarian regime attempts to control virtually all aspects of the social life, including the economy, education, art, science, private life and morals of citizens. Some totalitarian governments may promote an "elaborate ideology, a set of ideas that gives meaning and direction to the whole society".[7][unreliable source?]"The officially proclaimed ideology penetrates into the deepest reaches of societal structure and the totalitarian government seeks to completely control the thoughts and actions of its citizens".[8] It also mobilizes the whole population in pursuit of its goals. Carl Joachim Friedrich writes that "a totalist ideology, a party reinforced by a secret police, and monopoly control of [โ€ฆ] industrial mass society" are the three features of totalitarian regimes that distinguish them from other autocracies.[6]

 

The notion of totalitarianism as a "total" political power by the state was formulated in 1923 by Giovanni Amendola, who described Italian Fascism as a system fundamentally different from conventional dictatorships.[8] The term was later assigned a positive meaning in the writings of Giovanni Gentile, Italyโ€™s most prominent philosopher and leading theorist of fascism. He used the term totalitario to refer to the structure and goals of the new state, which were to provide the "total representation of the nation and total guidance of national goals".[9] He described totalitarianism as a society in which the ideology of the state had influence, if not power, over most of its citizens.[10] According to Benito Mussolini, this system politicizes everything spiritual and human: "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state".[8] [11]

 

The label "totalitarian" was twice affixed to the Hitler regime during Winston Churchill's speech of October 5, 1938[13] before the House of Commons in opposition to the Munich Agreement, by which France and Great Britain consented to Nazi Germany's annexation of the Sudetenland. Churchill was then a backbencher MP representing the Epping constituency. In a radio address two weeks later, Churchill again employed the term, this time applying the concept to "a Communist or a Nazi tyranny".[14]

 

George Orwell made frequent use of the word totalitarian and its cognates in multiple essays published in 1940, 1941 and 1942. In his essay Why I Write, he wrote: "The Spanish war and other events in 1936-37 turned the scale and thereafter I knew where I stood. Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it".[17]