Was lurking and shitposting on Research and came across this sample of a shill.:
08/05/18 (Sun) 02:10:24 1751f6 (2) No.2461929>>2461976 >>2462055
Have anons figured out the Mockingbird "explaining/debunking Q" article template yet?
An attempt to summarize them all:
Having never investigated Q drops, it seems odd.
There's no DC swamp draining progress being made that is not announced in plain view.
Trump doesn't have any non-public intel or data.
Trump also has no power or brains.
The military has no authority to stop grave national security threats to Constitutional stability.
Hillary and Dems are innocent of all spy felonies.
Pedos & sex traffickers are imaginary criminals.
There is no such thing as the deep state either.
The deep state isn't trying to stop/remove Trump because he has total control over them.
Resistance media would never lie to cover it up.
You need only trust Mockingbird media and must avoid dangerous bakers and crumbs, or else.
We have six ways til Sunday to get back at you."
Kept smelling Asian food in the kitchen here. I know I have read the posts of an acknowledged poster here that on can mimick a kind of personality,and,
therefore a foreign stereotype.
But this poster seems to be "on the outside looking in". My gut feeling comes from a kind of literary perspective.
An attemp to summariaze them all:Sounds too Chatlie Chan!)
Followed by a non-sequiter phrase, "Having never investigated Q drops it seems odd." Then they begin a seies of critcizing Trump for NOT draining the swamp in secret but rather out in public(in a transparent way?).
Sorry, going back to the beginning, it confusedly refers to a Mockingbird article( fwhich is our Chan nickname for them implying clown involvement, 4oclock drops etc).
Of note: At the beginning of the "lecture", the speaker takes pains to mention(as someone who has been forbidden access to "outside" communications) to tell us(why?) that he is speaking "as someone who has "never investigated Q drops". Is that a Freudian slip from YEARS of inserting little virtue-signalling hints into EVERY single conversation he has ever had, that he is a good communist, over the dinner table, at the store, at work etc. ? Just a theory. But lean to China.
Just one question, were we expecting any Chinese "on the wires" here ?
The attempt is very confused. As if they were given a list of things to say in different posts but included some that were contradictory.
And remember,GI there is no deepstate. But if you do not cease your effotrts, (the deepstate has six ways from Sunday…etc etc.
I wil conque you with my supewio intewect!