J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: ac37f2 July 24, 2018, 4:13 p.m. No.2270136   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1656 >>2554

>>2260085

Yes.

 

Here's the part everyone forgets about shootings:

 

1) You need a familiarity with a gun. How to aim, how to handle recoil, how to reload. The Orlando shooter, for example, clearly had practice, former G4S. Who taught him?

 

2) Mentally ill people don't think straight. Anyone with PTSD wouldn't really be able to handle a gun. To coordinate, plan, and execute an attack requires a clear mind with enough cognitive ability to factor in contingencies, building layout (how'd they get blueprints or access in the first place when it comes to secured or unusual locations EG YouTube building? Does YouTube's building not have biometric security or even simple locks?).

 

3) Being able to focus in a scene of chaos is not something a lot of introverts can do. Most introverts shun any sort of noise. Saying 'autistic' and 'handgun' is an oxymoron because autistics shun loud noises. Anyone with a mental sensibility is not going to like the loud sound or smell of gunpowder. That takes practice. How do they suddenly overcome what is literally titled a disability? Hypnosis?

 

4) Former veterans or prior security work makes more sense because it removes the need for training. Fort Hood comes to mind - do they need counselling if the Microwave Auditory Effect ('voice of god' tech) works?

 

5) Weapons need money. How do broke-ass disabled people with no job always have backpacks worth of ammo? That shit costs thousands. Who has ammo to spare? The army. Who has weapons to spare (EG 10+ AKA Las Vegas shooting)? The army.

 

6) The mentally ill person is never seen down any gun ranges practicing. They also never have their own home, and no-one ever comments about seeing them practice. See point 1. How did the Las Vegas shooter know how to aim a weapon over long distance from a raised building? Urban warfare is only taught in the army, civilians don't know jackshit on it.

 

7) If a mentally ill person is flagged up to an agency, and continuous surveillance is an easy thing to achieve, why do agencies never somehow notice the shit ton of weapons and ammo being prepared? Or indeed, any of the always public, NSA metadata searchable manifestos?

 

8) Why do the majority of the shooters have indirect ties to the military? Orlando: G4S. Ronald Reagan attempt: US navy. Fort hood: US navy. John Lennon: USAF. Aurora: DARPA. JFK: USAF/CIA. MLKJ: FBI.

J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: ac37f2 July 25, 2018, 1:43 p.m. No.2284670   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2490 >>2696 >>3045 >>3141

>>2271656

Penecostal, and as you said, no accreditation, lawsuit by students over lack of credits, GAO admonished for fraud, deception, etc.

 

Argos being a play on the word Argus meaning 'many eyed creature', from Greek mythology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Panoptes

 

Often used by intel firms to signal they work in intel.

https://www.cyberint.com/product/argos-threat-intelligence-platform/

https://argosintel.com/wp/

https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/,-w-,

 

In your case, you refer to the ship Argo:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo

 

But generally intel-stuff nearly always refers to the many eyed creature.

 

>>2272554

>So you can't be convinced that a person could be conditioned to go, without a moment's notice, to his "quiet place" where he thinks he is just trimming the hedges and thinking of ice-cold lemonade?

 

Fight club reference, if I ever saw one.

 

But to the contrary, I already subscribe to the conditioning theory (you've miscaught my writings - I'm arguing why the individual is not 'mentally ill' as advocated - and why they must be calm when doing whatever it is they do). Only two things induce that: training, or hypnosis. And for intents and purposes, I consider them the same thing.

 

Say, don't they use sleep deprivation in Guantanamo Bay?

 

Isn't it always strange how the inmates go in innocent (1 out of 5 according to the CIA's report, are innocent) and then go on to become hardened terrorists with deep level infiltration of terrorist networks?

 

I wonder what messages they contain in those songs that they play continuously?

 

Didn't some crazy Canadian hack under MK-Ultra force an unconscious, comatose girl to listen to his taped ravings on repetitive loop?

 

Seems remarkably similar.

 

The real golden key to own is the activation and deactivation phrases are, though. I'd like to think one could simply intercept a broadcasted message carrying a coded message within it for conditioned individuals, rewire the message to say something else, and then rebroadcast it. Something like REEEEEEE you will actively dismantle corrupt DUN DUN DUN but I always found the EAS broadcasts to be pretty harsh in tone. A better question to ask is do orders override or work in parallel?

J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: ac37f2 July 25, 2018, 1:56 p.m. No.2284892   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q's remarks about R confirm my earlier statements, and fundamental serves as the final nail in the coffin about the claims that I'm a shill:

 

>Forgot to ask, what's the plan regarding the R stuff?

 

>It's admittedly a hard read, what with Q not posting, but it strikes me it's an attempt at a 'counter-current' within the Q boards by first trying to pull parallel and then, eventually, forking off.

 

>My thoughts is if R is as legitimate as is claimed, R should surely have a separate board? My concern is it's an attempt to distract or divide baker resources between R threads and Q breads, and now that its on it's 6th thread.

 

>If left too long and it spreads further, the idea of shuffling R to it's own board might be highly opposed, at which point Q resources must compete with R resources in a domain where attention, visibility and time is a precious resource.

 

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1667382.html#q2223186

 

It also serves as proof that I'm highly familiar with identifying shill tactics, like I earlier said. Basically called R a resource sapping, board dividing red herring and sure enough, confirmed by Q.

J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: ac37f2 July 26, 2018, 4:06 p.m. No.2302334   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2293045

>Could we be talking of a "trigger" phrase?

>A phrase broadcast across the entire country by network news affiliates? Maybe only for a specific target individual?

 

Individuals.

 

What is the unique property of an EAS broadcast?

Who must legally be obligated to broadcast it?

Over what communication mediums does it broadcast?

What does it do to, say, a current broadcast?

Can it be made nationwide or regional?

If regional, how specific?

 

What if I told you the FOIA request the CIA sat on involved a request involving whether or not the CIA had advised on specific movies and TV shows? What if I told you they misfiled it? And they admitted to misfiling it, but have not provided the casenotes or the reasoning why?

 

Does the CIA advise on movies?

What was the inspiration for the Jason Bourne movies?

Are they accurate?

How accurate?

How does Hollywood know that?

 

How do you transmit a coded message to a sleeper cell in another country with oppressive censorship laws?

Who does the movies?

Who does the abuse? More than one perpetrator.

Can abuse result in MPD?

Does Jason Bourne show signs of MPD?

What is popular, entertainment wise, in China right now?

Who makes those?

 

What is a numbers station?

What do they broadcast over?

Why is the numbers station not jammed?

Did the BBC ever broadcast anything over the radio in regards to Iran?

Operation Midnight.

Do you believe their story?

 

Who controls the media?

Operation Mockingbird?

Why does Q say that the media is the greatest threat to the American public right now?

Does Darren Brown validate Sirhan Sirhan's account?

How does he validate it?

Why does he do it publicly on TV for all to see?

 

Does the CIA advise on Guantanamo Bay torture?

'Enhanced interrogation'

Who else? The American Psychiatic Association?

Did they have a hand in MK-Ultra?

Do they approve of Guantanamo Bay?

If the CIA knows 1 out of 5 detainees at Guantanamo Bay are innocent, why haven't they been released?

Why must the inmates sign forms saying they will never disclose what went on in there?

Who are the terrorists, really?

Who arms them? CIA?

Why did several assassins have a book written by a former OSS member?

What phrase does Catcher in the Rye contain?

Hint: involves a hat.

What's another word for someone who changes their thinking?

Putting their ___ hat on?

Shooting interchangeable with thinking?

Why books? Movies less prominent?

Who promoted Catcher in the Rye? New York Times?

Who did the CIA originally work with and still work with in terms of the Media?

Who did Glenn Grenwald expose?

 

Once you realise what is going on, you will freak. Q is showing you the tip of the iceberg, the stuff you can handle.

 

It's a very war for your mind, if not your soul.

J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs ID: ac37f2 July 26, 2018, 4:24 p.m. No.2302536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7312 >>8160

>Sorry, can you explain?

 

Certainly. When issuing orders to conditioned individuals, do they override (a pre-existing order), or do they run parallel (they try to execute both orders simultaneously wherein possible)?

 

What would happen, if say, you intercepted public activation/deactivation phrases - involving hats - being broadcast publicly to sleeper cells of conditioned individuals, and issued a new command?

 

And that command involved leaking information publicly. And rewiring the individual such that control could never be restored.

 

And no agency could make a move, because the entire sleeper cell comprises of trained assassins, hitmen, terrorists and more, that they personally trained, and they knew if they made any attempt they would see reprisals, potentially across the globe?

 

Do you think the government ever thinks about security when installing 'backdoors' into people's minds? Do you think, once they perfected the technique, they wouldn't just standardise it?

 

Synchronised messages are important if you want to ensure someone somewhere hears it. Have you noticed how the media's commands appear to be falling on deaf ears? They scream for specific things to happen, but then it doesn't happen.

 

Why is that?

 

Remember the calls for violence? That appears to have been entirely ignored. What did they want to happen to Trump originally? It happened to Ronald Reagan and JFK. They even caught a few people who look like they were drafted in from Britain (why so far away?) armed with weapons attending rallies.

 

But no-one is heeding their call.

 

How do you break a system? With a virus that spreads.

 

All you need is one conditioned individual to spread the word to the rest and suddenly the CIA no longer have a sleeper army at their disposal.

 

The shows the CIA 'misfiled' were:

Source Code

Suspect Zero

ALPHAS

 

For Source Code, strongly advise reading the original movie script.