>>2535344

>>>2462356

>I thought it seemed to have a more Italian style.

>That means either Pope or Mafia or both.

>If you disagree you must be a shill

Want you to know that when you said it sounded more Italian, you got my attention.

I thought well maybe let's go back and look at common syntax and pronoun errors you often find with foreign speaker using English.

I did go back and have a look but I fall back on my original position which, by the way, is still no confirmation.

Would like to just reiterate here that the "voice" and tone I was getting from this was a kind of combination of Charlie Chan, from the old black and white movies from the 30's and 40's and, though not mentioned by myself in the first analysis, a kind of Chinese version of Tokyo Rose.

Okay that was my grammar and tone reason. Now, lets talk about mission capabilities of the Chinese Cyberwarfare program.

The Chinese CW program may be second only to the US and is the USA's most capsble foe. While we were eyes on Russia, we should have the whole time kept our eyes on Chima.

As far as the country of Italy is concerned, their mission capabilities can be safely approximated as relative to their national budget. Their capabilities in cyber are limited to mostly their NATO military/strategic role. Remember whi gives them their NATO budget.

Vatican/ Cabal capabilities? I avoid what I can't see or infer from an appropriations bill or tactical assessment. That is just my choice and should not be considered a closed door to discussion.

Also, now that I may elaborate, I mentioned our poor shill virtue signalling that he basically had not had any prior familiarity with Q drops. (But here he is telling us what's up). Remember, China's internet is still a Bamboo Curtain. There would be severe penalties for a person to have access to the outside internet. Our friends GOGGLE had to go over there and set up a closed system with blocked search words, name it.

Use the wrong word to search and you might get a knock on the door over there. Hence, the virtue signalling, throwing it in there tgat he is a good Communist whi would never have outside/unapproved prior knowledge of Q posts.

If you look at the phrase, it is a throwaway, completely unnecessary and almost a non-sequiter. (I don't have the actual text before me due to me phonefagging this, but..)He says something like "As one who has not read Q Anon, find it odd."

I still smell Asian cooking.

PS Welcome to Clowns thread.

I wish our learned friend and AnonJT was here to comment. I am sure he is busy doing important stuff.

>>2536618

Not to speak for everyone on this thread am posting the reason this thread is here. i.e. discussion.

"Know your enemy. - Discussion of clowns, bots and shills.

While a shortlist of how to spot shills is often shared in the general, it will be helpful to make a more in-depth discussion. Toward the end of Q's duty station on halfchan, the board was overrun with clowns and shills pushing bump limits so it became impossible to read let alone bake. Not only since Q, but many have long experience on the chans and other platforms; some anons have become expert marksman veterans at shill spotting and sniping - share what you've learned.

If you find a good example of a clown, bot, shill, etc trying to slide or disrupt the general, post it here for posterity. How to filter, what to filter, why to filter (or why not), tactics and strategies. The attacks will only get worse."

I will say this though: Some Anons here do more than discuss shills, bots,etc. These TechAnons are typically of choice and few words and do their work behind the scenes.

This thread is set up for mostly them, but can be helpful to those who like to go toe-to-toe with shills on the Research thread as well.

Not sure if you were commenting on the quietness of this thread but I can say that we are, because of that, able to have calm conversations.

Some of the most intelligent people are here. Unfortunately, they are all currently not posting.

;)

>>2536720

Seen the news this week of Chinese cyber attacks in the US?

Do I look like the cat that ate the canary since I had just posted a possible PRC shill here?

As regards the people of that country, they are many.

Can't quote it, but didn't Q quote someone who said that people will be reluctant to throw off the yoke if their oppressors and willing to suffer much under a regime as long as trains run on time.

But when they feel the family's very existence is threatened, then we all may see a change, not inspired by convenience but the instinct to survive.

>>2539368

Now that you mention it, I was wondering about that. That explains it.

Makes sense. The main battle is for public opinion on the social media platforms. To prejudice folks before they have even seen a Q post.

Need based Anons out there inviting people to see for themselves.