I have a question that kind of relates to slides.
When one takes some time to research something and they are ready to present their contribution to Research, they may make the mistake of posting it in the middle of a shill cluster storm and also, because the topic of the day has changed, be accused of sliding the boards.
Their perfectly honest and serious invitation for discussion is either completely ignored or derided as a slide to the "important" discussion going in about the chicken or the egg.
The BO/BV should have some serious discussion about separate threads which approach known Q requests for digging.
Unfortunately, when some do create their own threads, some if them a good idea, they are criticized for doing so.
I think that by allowing some approved areas for research it actually zeros anons in to the topic of research they are interested in, and maybe most learned in.
This would be the most efficient way of cutting through the shill chatter which, we must agree in, is designed to bury your good research, discussion and feedback.
Separate topics makes us more efficient and lean when researching. No wading through posts in the off chance if accidentally finding someone who posted on something you have been researching. It helps good communication and thwarts shills distracting.
Create some threads for research on things Q has told us to research, but maybe get forgotten with the latest Q news.