Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 9:40 p.m. No.15615427   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5445 >>5639

>>15615417

Anon is acting like counter information wasn't presented in a logical respectful manner; it was. This is what happens, and it's bullshit:

1) A claim/insinuation is made

2) A refutation is made (in this case it's the timeline-Flynn was already well on his way into Trump's world when the testimony took place, therefore if flynn's bad, Trump's bad, and Q's bad).

3)The OP cries attack, states - just asking questions. good to ask questions. pushback is sus.

4-6)Wash rinse repeat.

It gets old.

Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 9:49 p.m. No.15615476   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5495

>>15615451

logical fallacy

there are lots of things we anons make conclusions about every day. Some of them are so concretely incorporated into our core that it takes an extraordinary amount of contradictory evidence to change that. There's a reason you're using your keyboard or phone to respond to me rather than your bong. It'll take a lot to change that, and it may or may not be a good use of your time to go looking for reasons to do so.

Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 9:52 p.m. No.15615482   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5510

>>15615461

 

logical fallacy

there are lots of things we anons make conclusions about every day. Some of them are so concretely incorporated into our core that it takes an extraordinary amount of contradictory evidence to change that. There's a reason you're using your keyboard or phone to respond to me rather than your bong. It'll take a lot to change that, and it may or may not be a good use of your time to go looking for reasons to do so.

Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 10:45 p.m. No.15615648   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5682 >>5771 >>5857 >>5962

this falls into the take it fwiw category, but anon thinks he knows the Dr that did this. Can't even confirm that. Just know said dr came to me awhile back saying, "I can show you what I saw under a microscope, but you can't tell anyone" (I said no)

and now this is on the interwebs.

https://lifeoftheblood.com/nanotech-in-the-shots/

Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 10:57 p.m. No.15615682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5686 >>5857

>>15615648

>On a Friday in December, alone in my office, I took the vials out, thawed, and examined them. I drew up all the contents (just a few drops in each one) from each vial into a 3cc syringe with a 16G needle and put one drop of it on a slide with a cover slip, and another slide with a drop of vaccine mixed with a drop of human blood and put a cover slip on it.

 

The images that follow are from the different slides and were taken immediately after the slides were made.

Anonymous ID: 56a03d Feb. 12, 2022, 11:28 p.m. No.15615776   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5782 >>5787

>>15615769

This opinion doesn't negate the fact that he's shoving that vaccine right your ass and taking every single fucking one of you sick motherfuckers down all at once and what we'll need a new word to describe some day but for now I'm ok settling for usingBIBLICAL