Anonymous ID: 07baf2 Feb. 14, 2022, 10:14 a.m. No.15626097   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6126 >>6255 >>6367

>>15625872

>Acuitas therapeutics

lipid nanoparticle thecnology

 

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/11/11/588/htm

 

Advances in Lipid and Metal Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Peptide Delivery

by Marcin Makowski †ORCID,Ítala C. Silva †ORCID,Constança Pais do Amaral †ORCID,Sónia Gonçalves * andNuno C. Santos *ORCID

Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal

*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Pharmaceutics 2019, 11(11), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11110588

 

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been described as excellent candidates to overcome antibiotic resistance. Frequently, AMPs exhibit a wide therapeutic window, with low cytotoxicity and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a variety of pathogens. In addition, some AMPs are also able to modulate the immune response, decreasing potential harmful effects such as sepsis. Despite these benefits, only a few formulations have successfully reached clinics. A common flaw in the druggability of AMPs is their poor pharmacokinetics, common to several peptide drugs, as they may be degraded by a myriad of proteases inside the organism. The combination of AMPs with carrier nanoparticles to improve delivery may enhance their half-life, decreasing the dosage and thus, reducing production costs and eventual toxicity. Here, we present the most recent advances in lipid andmetal nanodevices for AMP delivery, with a special focus onmetal nanoparticles and liposome formulations.

 

  1. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Worrisomely, bacteria evolve faster than we develop new antibiotics [204]. We have a potentially unexploited arsenal of antibiotics in AMPs. Nonetheless, the poor pharmacokinetics of peptide drugs is limiting their use. The combination of AMPs with drug delivery systems such as liposomes and metal nanoparticles can be fundamental for their implementation. At this point, the development of suitable nanoparticles to deliver AMPs is a major bottleneck for the implementation of AMPs in the clinical practice [137]. Indeed, the majority of nanodrugs under clinical trials are anticancer and antimicrobial, revealing the increasing interest in this matter [205].

Since 1995, up to 50 nanopharmaceuticals have received FDA approval. The search of the term ‘nano’ yields 95 active clinical trials in the Clinical Trials website (May 2019) [206]. A large tendency is for micelles and protein-based NPs, while an increased use of metal NPs can also be noticed [207]. Peptides are still one of the major pharmaceutical market targets, but their future as drugs is still fragile. Thus,the upcoming Magic Bullet might well be a nanoparticle conjugated with AMPs.

Despite the great advances in nanomedicine and its rapid growth, there are still several obstacles to their progression to clinics. A large gap between the encouraging in vitro results, the rather disappointing pre-clinical results, and the low impact in clinical settings can often be found. NP-host interactions are difficult to tackle. In pre-clinical studies, it has been pointed out that the need of immunodeficient mice for xenograft tumor transplantation may be leading us to overlook immune interactions that hamper NPs activity. Sound strategies are needed to investigate cytotoxicity, inflammatory response and immune response, not only in cell culture, but also in clinical isolates, as there is a need for further in vivo studies to ensure the safe use of NPs.Long-term toxicity studies are also needed to better understand the implications of silver and gold deposition in the human body. The use of lipids in nanoparticles offers more possibilities of drug encapsulation and increases the possibilities of acceptance as DDSs by the regulatory agencies, due to their biodegradability and common occurrence in biological systems.

Based on the findings reviewed here, research and clinics should come together to improve the potentiality of these DDSs, which may have an important role in human healthcare. It is imperative to overview the approaches of AMP-NP formulations to improve therapeutics and reduce side effects.

Anonymous ID: 07baf2 Feb. 14, 2022, 10:30 a.m. No.15626255   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6265 >>6272 >>6273 >>6298 >>6367 >>6499 >>6527 >>6539 >>6582 >>6634

>>15626097

>>15625872

>Acuitas therapeutics

 

"CANADIAN TAX DOLLARS GETTING INJECTED INTO THE PUBLIC SO TRUDEAU CAN LINE HIS POCKETS!

 

Justin Trudeau has failed to report to the Canadian public that the government is recieving kickbacks for everyone of the Pfizer and Moderna shots.Acuitas & Arbutus pharmaceuticals both out of British Columbia are the ones that invented the lipid nano particle that is licenced to inject the pathogen into everybody. The scumbags running Canada wins everytime there is a shot. That may explain why Justin Trudeau ordered 10 times more vaccines then there are Canadaian’s. Why would we need 10 times more doses then the sum total of all of Canada plus the moose! That is what is known as racketeering, because if you get a kickback for every dollar spent, guess what you get to do? You get to pocket a whole lot of money, from all over the world which is exactly what is happening. "

 

https://thedaily.ca/news/2021/11/03/justin-trudeau-getting-rich-injecting-canadians/

 

https://rumble.com/vohmh1-this-is-for-the-canadians.html

Anonymous ID: 07baf2 Feb. 14, 2022, 10:31 a.m. No.15626265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6286 >>6367 >>6539 >>6634

>>15626255

Why Is Pfizer Teaming Up With Acuitas Therapeutics?

The deal boosts Pfizer's internal mRNA development effort.

 

Keith Speights And Brian Orelli, PhD

(TMFFishBiz)

Jan 22, 2022 at 5:58AM

 

Pfizer is collaborating with Acuitas Therapeutics to use the small company's lipid nanoparticle technology.

 

Keith Speights: The collaboration with Beam (NASDAQ:BEAM) wasn't Pfizer's only announcement of business development this week. The company also said that it's teaming up with Acuitas Therapeutics, which is privately held.

 

What do you think about this deal, Brian? Is it more or less significant than Pfizer's partnership with Beam?

 

Brian Orelli: Acuitas is a lipid nanoparticle technology. It's what Pfizer and BioNTech use right now for their COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty.

 

The lipid nanoparticles are what surrounds the mRNA. It protects the mRNA, but it also helps the mRNA get into the cells. Cell membranes are made of lipids. The lipid nanoparticle basically just fuses with the cell membrane and that gets the mRNA in the cell and then the mRNA are expressing proteins, and then for the COVID vaccine that's a spike protein. Then the immune system recognizes the spike protein as foreign and develops antibodies against it.

 

Pfizer's new deal with Acuitas is an option to license the lipid nanoparticle technology for up to 10 vaccines or therapeutic products. It seems like Pfizer's planning on developing mRNA products on its own. We talked about on Monday about how it had teamed up with BioNTech for a shingles vaccine. We hypothesized that meant that Pfizer maybe wasn't as interested in going it alone on mRNA products like it had previously stated.

 

But this deal definitely implies that it's planning on moving forward on its own with mRNA therapeutics or vaccines. That's maybe my final note would be just that maybe Pfizer's just keeping its options open.

 

But I found it really interesting that the deal notes that the lipid nanoparticles can be used for vaccines or therapeutics. We obviously have proof of concept for vaccines. But I think therapeutics is a wide-open opportunity, but it's unproven at this point.

 

Speights: I'm going to put you on the spot here, Brian. Pfizer has these two deals that it had announced, one with Acuitas, one with the Beam Therapeutics. Which of the two do you predict is going to be the bigger factor for Pfizer over the next 10 years?

 

Orelli: I'm going to go with Acuitas because I think the 10 mRNA vaccines or therapeutics, I think are potentially bigger opportunities and less risky than the three programs for Beam. Although we don't even know what the candidates are, what they are going to target.

 

It's a little hard to guess. In both cases, I guess we don't know what the targets are, but I'm going to guess that the Beam is probably going to go after some rare disease. Because those are most likely going to be an inherited disease because we know that they're trying to fix mutations, and so that will be my guess, is that the 10 mRNA vaccines or therapeutics is probably going to be more valuable to Pfizer than the three rare disease drugs. Assuming that's what they are.

 

https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/22/why-is-pfizer-teaming-up-with-acuitas-therapeutics/

Anonymous ID: 07baf2 Feb. 14, 2022, 10:34 a.m. No.15626286   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6302 >>6367

>>15626265

Acuitas Therapeutics

Ying Tam

Chief Scientific Officer

 

Founders

Thomas Madden

 

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/acuitas-therapeutics

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/acuitas-therapeutics/people

Anonymous ID: 07baf2 Feb. 14, 2022, 10:36 a.m. No.15626302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6318 >>6324 >>6344 >>6367 >>6453

>>15626286

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-enters-agreement-acuitas-therapeutics-lipid

==

Pfizer Enters into Agreement with Acuitas Therapeutics for Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery System for Use in mRNA Vaccines and Therapeutics==

Monday, January 10, 2022

 

Expands Pfizer’s access to lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation technology, offering a strong strategic fit with Pfizer’s mRNA strategy

 

Pfizer gains option to license Acuitas’ LNP technology for up to 10 targets for vaccine or therapeutic development

 

NEW YORK & VANCOUVER, British Columbia(BUSINESS WIRE) Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and Acuitas Therapeutics, a company focused on developing lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems to enable messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapeutics, today announced they have entered into a Development and Option agreement under which Pfizer will have the option to license, on a non-exclusive basis, Acuitas’ LNP technology for up to 10 targets for vaccine or therapeutic development.

 

Acuitas’ clinically-validated LNP technology is used in COMIRNATY®, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

 

“Our swift delivery of the world’s first mRNA-LNP-based vaccine made clear the promise of mRNA-LNP technology,” said Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer and President, Worldwide Research, Development and Medical of Pfizer Inc. “We are making significant investments to harness the power of the mRNA-LNP technology and deliver potential new breakthrough vaccines and therapeutics that address significant unmet needs for patients. This agreement expands our LNP capabilities and allows us to explore more projects within our existing vaccines area and new therapeutic areas where mRNA-LNP technology holds potential for success.”

 

“Acuitas is extremely proud that its LNP technology contributes to the success of COMIRNATY® and is excited to be working with Pfizer to advance new vaccines and therapeutic products,” said Dr. Thomas Madden, President & CEO of Acuitas Therapeutics.