Thanks Baker
Steady hand on the till through the Storm
Re: Virginia
All these monsters understand is greed. Think about the payout. Think how many other victims. Did Virginia set a precedent? Can Virginia and the other victims send a message? Is it a message the other wealthy abusers can understand? The Virginia settlement is just the first. Trust the plan anons.
And now you see who's attacking the Virginia settlement. They don't fear courts. They fear financial catastrophe that is surely coming. Civil lawsuits can be very effective.
Old Crow (Kentucky Liquor Industry) is in deep shit. Besides his domestic crimes, his wife is part of one of the richest Chinese families in the Chinese Shipping Industry (trafficking).
Old Crow is about to step on a hot power line.
chk'd
Jim Jordan: Dem’s Number One Election Lawyer Marc Elias ‘Was Involved in Spying’ on Trump
Monday on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) continued to sound the alarm on special counsel John Durham filing a motion in federal court alleging that Hillary Clinton’s political allies paid a contractor to spy on Donald Trump as a sitting president and candidate. Jordan, who said the day before that the spying was “worse than we thought,” highlighted that Durham’s filing also shows the Democrats’ “number one election lawyer” was involved in spying on Trump.
“What I do think is interesting is in that filing it talks about [Michael] Sussman who has been indicted and tech executive one speaking with another lawyer at Perkins Coie, which everyone believes is Marc Elias,” Jordan outlined. “Now, we all know Marc Elias is the Democrats’ go-to election guy. He worked at Perkins Coie. They’re the ones who helped finance and put together the now-famous dossier that they used on President Trump, but he is also the guy out there filing the actions against Republican redistricting efforts, and he’s part of the operation in North Carolina to try to keep one of my colleagues off the ballot.”
“So, this guy is involved in all those things, and now we learn he was involved in spying on the President of the United States,” he added. “I think that is a key takeaway. The Democrats’ key lawyer, their number one election lawyer, was involved in spying on the sitting President of the United States.”
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/02/14/jim-jordan-dems-number-one-election-lawyer-marc-elias-was-involved-in-spying-on-trump/
NC Board Can’t Disqualify Rep. Cawthorn From 2022 Election on 14th Amendment: Attorney
North Carolina officials have no authority to block the reelection bid of U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) on Fourteenth Amendment grounds over his actions in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol building, his lawyer told The Epoch Times in an interview. Cawthorn’s mere advocacy of a pro-Trump position during the aftermath of the hotly contested 2020 presidential election does not constitute participating in an insurrection, something that can trigger a constitutional bar that prevents the insurrectionist from seeking elective office, Cawthorn attorney James Bopp Jr. told The Epoch Times in an interview Feb. 14. Cawthorn, who had been sworn in as a federal lawmaker only days before, was already present in the U.S. House of Representatives fulfilling his constitutional duties before the disturbance broke out on that day 13 months ago, and his activities there did not contribute to the hours-long delay of the congressional certification of the election.
Cawthorn, 26, who was elected in November 2020, describes himself as a Christian and constitutional conservative, and is considered to be a rising star in the conservative movement. The North Carolina State Board of Elections is not currently preventing the incumbent first-term congressman from running again, but claimed in a Feb. 7 filing in federal court that it has the power to do so under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The relevant part of that constitutional provision states: “No person shall be a … Representative in Congress … who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same …”
The board’s claim appears in a filing in Madison v. Cawthorn, court file 5:22-cv-50. The legal complaint was filed Jan. 31 (pdf) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The lead defendant, Damon Circosta, chairman of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, is being sued in his official capacity. Cawthorn sued in response to several challenges that had filed against his candidacy. In the document, called the State Board Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the board stated that it “polices candidate qualifications prior to the elections” and that states “have long enforced age and residency requirements, without question and with very few if any legal challenges.” The state also “has the same authority to police which candidates should, or should not, be disqualified per Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Bopp disputed this claim and added that those state residents who are challenging Cawthorn’s reelection bid have no credible evidence that he engaged in insurrection.
In North Carolina, the next statewide primary election is scheduled for May 17. The deadline for candidates to file to run is March 4.
Attorney Marc Elias, who has a long history of successfully challenging electoral integrity laws in court, began laying out a blueprint for using the Fourteenth Amendment to boot Republicans off the ballot in a provocative Twitter post on Dec. 20, 2021.Eliasis also a major figure in the “Russiagate” conspiracy. He represented the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign in the 2016 presidential election cycle, hiring Fusion GPS in April 2016 to conduct opposition research against then-candidate Donald Trump. That research effort culminated in the salacious, now-discredited 35-page dossier written by former British spy Christopher Steele that purported to tie Trump to the Russian government.
“My prediction for 2022: Before the midterm election, we will have a serious discussion about whether individual Republican House Members are disqualified by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment from serving in Congress[,]” Elias tweeted. “We may even see litigation.” “It seems quite likely that one or more Republican members of Congress will be subject to this disqualification, and it is important that we start to identify them now,” Elias added three weeks later at his Democracy Docket website.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220214235213/https://www.theepochtimes.com/nc-board-cannot-disqualify-rep-cawthorn-from-2022-election-on-14th-amendment-lawyer_4276396.html
First arrest:
-
Hillary
or
-
Marc Elias
Levi's President Publicly Quits Over Company's Attempt to Silence Her Views on COVID Restrictions
Former Levi’s president Jennifer Sey has announced that she was forced out of her post because of her views on COVID-19 and says she rejected a severance package that would have forced her to remain quiet about the internal controversy that led to her resignation. Sey announced her departure in a Monday post on writer Bari Weiss’ Substack, Common Sense, in which she proclaimed, “I quit so I could be free.” She said that she and the San Francisco-based company were in harmony until COVID-19 struck. “Early on in the pandemic, I publicly questioned whether schools had to be shut down. This didn’t seem at all controversial to me. I felt — and still do — that the draconian policies would cause the most harm to those least at risk, and the burden would fall heaviest on disadvantaged kids in public schools, who need the safety and routine of school the most,” she wrote, noting that her comments stirred anger. “In the summer of 2020,” Sey said, “I finally got the call. ‘You know when you speak, you speak on behalf of the company,’ our head of corporate communications told me, urging me to pipe down. I responded: ‘My title is not in my Twitter bio. I’m speaking as a public school mom of four kids.’
“But the calls kept coming. From legal. From HR. From a board member. And finally, from my boss, the CEO of the company. I explained why I felt so strongly about the issue, citing data on the safety of schools and the harms caused by virtual learning. While they didn’t try to muzzle me outright, I was told repeatedly to ‘think about what I was saying.'” Although she said her liberal activism brought no objections from the company, she got a far different reaction when she wanted Levi Strauss to take a stand against school closures in San Francisco — closures that drove her to move to Colorado, where her kindergartener could attend school in person. Sey said an appearance on the Fox News show “The Ingraham Angle” in March 2021 about her move to Denver was “the last straw.”
Former Levi’s president Jennifer Sey has announced that she was forced out of her post because of her views on COVID-19 and says she rejected a severance package that would have forced her to remain quiet about the internal controversy that led to her resignation. Sey announced her departure in a Monday post on writer Bari Weiss’ Substack, Common Sense, in which she proclaimed, “I quit so I could be free.” She said that she and the San Francisco-based company were in harmony until COVID-19 struck. “Early on in the pandemic, I publicly questioned whether schools had to be shut down. This didn’t seem at all controversial to me. I felt — and still do — that the draconian policies would cause the most harm to those least at risk, and the burden would fall heaviest on disadvantaged kids in public schools, who need the safety and routine of school the most,” she wrote, noting that her comments stirred anger. “In the summer of 2020,” Sey said, “I finally got the call. ‘You know when you speak, you speak on behalf of the company,’ our head of corporate communications told me, urging me to pipe down. I responded: ‘My title is not in my Twitter bio. I’m speaking as a public school mom of four kids.’ “But the calls kept coming. From legal. From HR. From a board member. And finally, from my boss, the CEO of the company. I explained why I felt so strongly about the issue, citing data on the safety of schools and the harms caused by virtual learning. While they didn’t try to muzzle me outright, I was told repeatedly to ‘think about what I was saying.'”
Although she said her liberal activism brought no objections from the company, she got a far different reaction when she wanted Levi Strauss to take a stand against school closures in San Francisco — closures that drove her to move to Colorado, where her kindergartener could attend school in person.
Sey said the company she loved is “trapped trying to please the mob — and silencing any dissent within the organization. In this it is like so many other American companies: held hostage by intolerant ideologues who do not believe in genuine inclusion or diversity.” And the price was that as she was hounded, “no one stood with me,” Sey said. “Not one person publicly said they agreed with me, or even that they didn’t agree with me, but supported my right to say what I believe anyway.” “I like to think that many of my now-former colleagues know that this is wrong,” she wrote. “I like to think that they stayed silent because they feared losing their standing at work or incurring the wrath of the mob. I hope, in time, they’ll acknowledge as much.
“I’ll always wear my old 501s. But today I’m trading in my job at Levi’s. In return, I get to keep my voice.”
https://www.westernjournal.com/levis-president-publicly-quits-companys-attempt-silence-views-covid-restrictions/
Trudeau Invokes the Emergencies Act - Viva Frei Live
https://rumble.com/vv0mtl-trudeau-invokes-the-emergencies-act-viva-frei-live.html