Someone tried to dog 4 chan, on twitter, he got an education.Two part post on the discussion on 4 chan on POSO, congrats to all anons that are infamously famous.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1493757926825152513?s=20&t=Bso2Vm68pKYgs6YTd8lM6g
“They” really dont understand that we take God’s commandment of free will and free thought. The deep analysis and inner sight of anons cannot be manipulated by lesser creatures!
Praise to all true and noble autists and anons!
Hell hath no fury like intelligence agencies scorned by anons! And damn it so much fun!
Happy Monday Anons, continuing to never, ever, ever give up!
>>15640571 The Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford has just blown up Justin Trudeau’s house of cards
I didnt see the video downloaded and posted, so here it is
>>15640533 Biden Campaign Also Had Internet Company Allegedly Connected to Durham Probe on the Payroll
The article
We reported earlier on some of the Biden connections to the Durham probe, including DNI John Ratcliffe confirming that Joe Biden had been told about the plan from the Clinton campaign to smear Donald Trump.
But, there’s another intriguing piece of information that the Free Beacon just dropped —that in 2020, the Biden campaign also paid the same internet company being talked about concerning the Durham probe.
The Biden campaign paid nearly $20,000 to a cybersecurity firm at the center of Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.
The campaign paid Neustar Information Services in 2020 for accounting and compliance work, according to Federal Election Commission records. According to Durham, Neustar’s chief technology officer, Rodney Joffe, accessed sensitive web traffic data that the company maintained on behalf of the White House executive office to collect “derogatory” information about Donald Trump. Joffe allegedly provided the information to Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who in turn gave it to the CIA during a meeting in February 2017. Durham charged Sussmann in September with lying to the FBI about his investigation of Trump.
That raises the question: was the same action going on against Trump in 2020?
The Biden and Clinton campaigns are the only two presidential committees to have ever paid Neustar, according to Federal Election Commission records. Biden’s campaign paid Neustar $18,819 on Sept. 29, 2020, the records show. The Clinton campaign paid the firm $3,000 in May 2015 for mobile phone services. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee paid $3,000 to Neustar in 2017. Neustar executives and staffers contributed $17,906 to Biden’s campaign, FEC records show.
Now, it should be noted that Durham hasn’t accused Neustar or Joffe of having done anything illegal. What has been alleged is that Joffe collected the data to find derogatory information to provide to the Clinton team that could then be used against Trump to please people in the campaign, and that he thought he might get a job in a Clinton Administration. While Neustar and Joffe were not named in the Durham filing, Joffe’s attorney has confirmed his involvement.
The Free Beacon queried the White House about this information and what was going on with this payment.The White House referred them to the DNC — and that says a lot right there.
Why can’t the White House simply answer the question, and if it’s an innocent campaign use, no problem? But given what allegedly went on with the Clinton campaign, it raises all kinds of flags as to what was going on here. The “derogatory information” – such as the debunked Alfa Bank smear – was then allegedly fed to media and to the FBI by the Clinton people. So, it wasn’t just the surveillance, it was the alleged effort to spread that information to hurt Trump, even using the power of the government against him by giving information to the FBI. Sussman is charged with lying to FBI general counsel James Baker by denying he was looking into Trump at the behest of the Clinton campaign.
So, here’s another question that media needs to be put to Biden himself — and they should not let him dodge it.
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/02/15/biden-campaign-also-had-internet-company-allegedly-connected-to-durham-probe-on-the-payroll-n522606
Bakers, BV, Notetakers I’d like to request a simple request for choosing notables. Is it possible for anons that post the title and link of an article, to also post a portion or all of the article. Reading a headline is just a teaser to get to the article, headlines dont answer the questions who, what, where, when and how. So anons are forced to go off the board in multiple posts to get the understanding of why it matters.
Do anons agree that a small part or the article will make our time be used efficiently?And a title and link is not necessarily notable for obvious reasons?
Just a simple request to keep the flow of the board going, can this be done bakers, etc?
Also videos are easily converted to mp4 now from all platforms it would be great for anons to convert them before posting the subject and link.
I love this board and honor all anons hard work, lets make 8kun great again, again!
>>15640528 Desperation Sets in After Revelation That Durham Investigation Is 'Accelerating,' Targeting 'Other Matters
Article
More disturbing, though, was the revelation that those who were passing her information were exploiting a prior Pentagon contract to actually monitor the Executive Office of the President after Trump’s inauguration (click here for my take on why that happened). All of that was funneled through Perkins Coie, the now-infamous law firm which employed the currently indicted Michael Sussman.
Now, a new report from Fox News says thatDurham’s investigation is “accelerating,” and that it is also targeting “other matters” outside of just Sussman (and Igor Danchenko). As an aside, the article offers a very in-depth, long-form breakdown of what has transpired with Durham.
Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation has “accelerated,” and more people are “cooperating” and coming before the federal grand jury than has previously been reported, a source familiar with the probe told Fox News…
…But a source familiar with federal investigations told Fox News that federal prosecutors cannot indict an individual and then use a grand jury to investigate matters in an existing indictment.
The source, though, said a prosecutor can indict an individual for a specific crime, and continue to use the grand jury to explore other crimes related to that individual, and beyond.
“They are looking at more than Sussmann,” the source said.
“The Government also maintains an active, ongoing criminal investigation of the defendant’s [Sussmann’s] conduct and other matters,” Durham wrote.
In other words, they wouldn’t be using the grand jury for investigation purposesif it wasn’t in order to investigate and charge other crimes, and the people involved in those crimes. It’s simply hard to believe that this all stops with Sussman and Danchenko, and Durham’s has been methodical so far. He’s not going to jump the gun until he’s got the goods.
Of course, with all this bouncing around in public now, the desperate attempt to quash the story has begun. After three days of not reporting on it at all, the New York Times and the Washington Post finally put out “explainers” on the situation that are filled with bias and omissions, including quoting the lawyers of some of the people possibly being targeted. Those stories were published at almost the same time, but I’m assured there was no coordination.
These attempts to spin away the magnitude of what Durham has found are reminiscent of the Times’ attempt to whitewash the news that Michael Sussman was going to be indicted. They ran to his lawyers and other “experts” to essentially claim that Durham had nothing. Yet, once the indictment dropped, it was loaded with evidence not previously mentioned.
In my opinion, that’s what the mainstream media is doing again. They are doing their best to get out in front of this story before more evidence drops. False narratives are already spreading like wildfire, including the idea that a tech firm exploiting a government contract to spy on a president for his political opponents is somehow “normal.”
There’s also theclaim Hillary Clinton isn’t directly linked to what happened. That’s not true either. There are FEC filings that show that the Clinton campaign and the DNC made payments to Neustar, the company in question. Further, we know she paid Michael Sussman to get the data from Rodney Joffe (Neustar’s Chief Technology Officer). So, even if Joffe was promised something else (no one works for free), the fact that Sussman was paid to get the information completes the chain back to Hillary Clinton.
Because of how damning all this evidence is, the press has nowhere to go. Instead of addressing the facts as we know them, they are bringing on hacks like Jeremy Bash to spin conspiracies about Durham.
It makes perfect sense for Hillary Clinton to be spying on Trump after What that tells us is that Clinton was reaching for a way to try to overturn the election. Clearly, in my view, based on her actions and her public statements at the time, she wanted to find a way to prove Trump had been illegitimately elected. Once she did that, anything was on the table to “fix” the situation. Such a dismissal of Durham’s filing on the grounds it doesn’t make sense is a total farce. Everything lines up.
In short, don’t let anyone downplay what has been revealed here. It’s a really big deal, and it should be treated as such. The fact that the media are having so much trouble handwaving it all away only bolsters how serious it is. Durham is playing for keeps, and all the press spin in the world isn’t going to save those he indicts.
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/02/15/desperation-sets-in-after-revelation-that-durham-investigation-is-accelerating-targeting-other-matters-n522488
Link to article even though in notable
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/02/15/desperation-sets-in-after-revelation-that-durham-investigation-is-accelerating-targeting-other-matters-n522488
Agreed and bakers used to require some portion of the linked article to make sure it was notable. I spend 1/4 of my time jumping off the board to find answers if interesting
Titles NEVER ever tell the whole story if meaningful info
Good job anon, very interesting
There is no such thing of “hate speech”, its a made up term used by 1984 totalitarians,free speech is free speech, it can be as offensive as anything but unless it breaks a law of threatening life, etc it it not illegal. I doubt seriously 80% of Canadians want online interference by a government that is biased.
#FreeSpeechIsFree
Yes there are, and of all things the agencies Durham is using can track amything down
The only thing they cant do is infect the minds and will of anons
They are and it pisses me off the amount of wasted time to find out the real content.
I hope BO, Bakers, BV’s And Notetakers stop making them notable. This has been mentioned and requested by anons and myself gor at least two years.
This kind of thing only makes 8kun a news aggregator with no research being done. Its not research to find a headline, any bot can do it, but its not needed, unless the article is posted that has researchable info included , its laziness
Post the sauce and date and time
Thanks and very true. When I got here in Jan 2018, (I didnt lurk long), bakers or anons would say, post the sauce, it got hammered into me and I never forgot. It had to be relevant and got be used for our research purposes.
Another thing, if anon posted something off topic,anons would call it a slide over and over, never hear that now
Ps: anons and I have put up “call to dig” on significant projects, but rarely if ever are anons jumping into dig. This is disheartening, the only time it seems “call to dig” gets action is nightshift
If we go back to the premise of our charter we will be effective and influence the world
“We are the news now”, doesnt mean we collect headlines only
Diversion tactics
The evil of this world needs the death penalty NOW
You shill are pathetic and full of shit
The funny thing is they are trying to normalize the complete destruction of the Presidentcy & government and The Hill is on Durhams list
True and GWP is notorious for writing three paragraphs from another media but filling the page with crap, that has nothing to do with how they title it
Anon everyone that was chosen bent the knee and/or were chosen for full exposure
Notable
Baker please notable all posts that anons spoke about how to post and what is and is note notable.
Important topic
Yes
Notablefor bun on acceptable posting for board and notables
notable
I dont want my post notabled,but I think all anon comments are notable
Please bakers anons need training on how to post
Thx, when they are long and important they should be split up, as an anon did on the epoch times article
Thank you for the offer, but unfortunately I’m technically incapable and I would never be as quick as current bakers.
Just some reminders that are good to teach new anons
Plus I like the job bakers are doing its been great here for close to a month.
Thank you bakers
Not telling, asking and yes, I come on early am, and post. Whoever made the rule you cant post and comment past a certain number, i think they made it (if it exists) for shills and spam.
If you dont want to read my comments, pass by or hide my posts. Free will is great