The posts below from Bread 19792 seem to imply Durham is at a "precipice." As a recovering nowfag, may I stretch that interpretation even further to mean "soon?"
Durham
In light of the above, there is no basis to strike any portion of the Government’s
Motion. Indeed, the Government intends to file motions IN LIMINE in which it will further discuss
these and other pertinent facts to
== explain why they constitute relevant and admissible evidence at
trial. ==
Pursuant to caselaw and common practice in this and other districts, the filing of documents
containing reference to such evidence on the public docket is appropriate and proper, even in highprofile cases where the potential exists that such facts could garner media attention.
>In U.S. law, a motion IN LIMINE (Latin: [ɪn ˈliːmɪnɛ]; "at the start", literally, "on the threshold") is a motion, discussed outside the presence of the jury, to request that certain testimony be excluded. A motion in limine can also be used to get a ruling to allow for the inclusion of evidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_in_limine#:~:text=In%20U.S.%20law%2C%20a%20motion,for%20the%20inclusion%20of%20evidence.