tyb
Note taker has a massive news for all anons.
Will post soon About Q posts from the start, Ukraine, Clinton Foundation and the Sean Penn links, will post soon when post in constructed for all to see without a wall of text.
STAY TUNED COS THIS IS WHERE THE BIG PANICK IS COMING FROM, IT IS ABOUT AS BIG AS THE BIGGEST BOOM OF BOOMS WHICH WILL THE BOOMEST BOOM, THE REASON BEHIND WHY THEY ARE LOSING THEIR MINDS
>About Q posts from the start, Ukraine, Clinton Foundation and the Sean Penn links
We have it all, anon has given you the topics
It needs to be put in a easy format with easy to follow instructions including sources so anon can check and verify for themselves how it connects.
Q drops Clinton Foundation > Wikileaks > Ukraine (main hub) > Sean Penn docu visit there > panic ==BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM!!
Feel free to put the pieces together yourself
anon is the man who does the summarys and the heavy lifting for free.
right now anons has multiple screens open, about a how many tabs on different search engines open, a word page open where anon is collecting links and sources and all sorts of old posts to go through to put in a single post, in fact this image meme is the best over view of what it looks like and this is how anons can follow it. (in anons mind it is clear but showing it is another thing. autist anons can relate.
it is like having the puzzle done without putting the pieces in place or finishing a chess game without moving the pieces, you just have to show your work. of course when anons see it and the msm see it, then the panic begins, Q had it all and obviously the game changed as they countered their moves until penn decided to step up.
That image of Penn says it all, does he look like he wants to be there?
Q drops Clinton Foundation > Wikileaks > Ukraine (main hub) > Sean Penn docu visit there > panic ==BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM!!
anon thinks he can get it done by tonight. but already laid out the trail below.
==Q drops Clinton Foundation > Wikileaks > Ukraine (main hub) > Sean Penn docu visit there > panic BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM!!
28 post(s) found containing "ukraine".
https://operationq.pub/?q=ukraine
22 post(s) found containing "clinton foundation".
https://operationq.pub/?q=clinton+foundation&sortasc=1
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52561
Agree with Jen. Also tend to agree with her going before him. Anything other than her taking quid pro quo of the table, included what would say first, won't take questions about her actions off the table. Joel Benenson Benenson Strategy Group On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>wrote: Why do you think she needs to do this before WJC? Mandy Grunwald Grunwald Communications 202 973-9400 On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:re47@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote: Ditto with John. Would need to be prepared for more…but would be fantastic to limit to one. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:11 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com>> wrote: Fine with the proposed way of handling what she says, but hard setting to take only one question. On Apr 29, 2015 8:02 PM, "Jennifer Palmieri" <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote: First, thanks to all for the marathon session today, I thought we got a lot of good work done. Second, I wanted to follow up on HRC idea of doing the video. Having thought about it and talked to Craig and Maura about it - I don't think it is good idea for her to do. There aren't great answers and in many cases not her place to answer them. But I think it does make sense for her to publicly state that she never did anything at state to help a donor. Philippe has been a proponent of this. She could frame it this way: 1) very proud of Clinton foundation work. 2) think people donate to it bc they want to support good works. 3) if anyone did ever give money in hopes of influencing something State did - they are foolish bc she never did that and never would. SOS makes life and death decisions and those kinds of political considerations don't come into play. At least this way she will have taken off the table any notion that there was a quid pro quo - even if some donors may have had bad intentions. If we did this, think we should do before WJC interview airs on Monday. Which may mean that tomorrow is the last chance we have will she will be in front of the press (they wont be at fundraisers but will prob be outside them so she could take a q). What do others think? Sent from my iPhone
feel free to do the same,
this and moar is what anon has for now.