My interest in who says “because I said so” isn’t an interest in the actual anon. That’s not my business. It’s an interest in why a baker or whatever would even SAY “because I said so”. Bakers, note takers, BV, BO, etc. don’t own the narrative, do they? It’s very easy to create a false consensus. Shutting down inquiry wrt to certain board behaviors with “because I said so” is some authoritarian bs.
Of COURSE there are shills and I get that. I also agree that discussing bio labs makes complete sense on QR. The “discussion”, unfortunately, has been more of a monologue. With the exception of Malone’s and Atkinsson’s articles, that were notabled in a few breads vs. dozens of breads. 99% of the articles noted abt bio labs has been in context of weapons/weaponization.