Board Admin Central
Off-topic posts in this thread may be deleted at BO/BV discretion.
Admin Email:
F4AL@protonmail.com.
Meta saves on Wayback Machine
took meta off cycling bc of change in admin to record q&A, changes over time.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13699736.html may 19 2021
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15472645.html jan 27 2022
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15570311.html feb 7 2022
YT Iwo Jima
https://youtu.be/UTYUwt5rV5s
YT Iwo Jim 2
https://youtu.be/LEZBNqg5Weg
>>15761970 PB
>red text spamming and raiding all the time, OSS posting "muh graphics."
doesnt sound like grouds for deletion and banning to me
im my opinion, and historically the position of the board generally is that deletion and banning is an EXTREME last resort
and only to be used in the case of potential legal liability to the board
as in, you would delete material that is defined as illegal in the countries our servers operate in (in our case, the Unites Statesโฆโฆ right?)
and it would stand to reason, that a repeat offender, posting illegal content, would be banned
and thus
you would have an affirmitive defense in the case law enforcement asks "what you did about it"
the ban wont prevent the user from circumventing it
and you cant prevent illegal content from being posted before it happens
but at least you have an affirmative defense
any deletions or bannings beyond that are capricious and have no defensible reason for being applied
to be very clear
I am not instructing management as to how to run their ship
I am merely making a statement of opinion and historical context
feel free to ignore these as you wish
>>15763260 PB
>Even their claims should make it obvious what the problem is to (you)
one thing I have learned here is patience
I dont have enough exposure to the current context to make an absolute claim
but
yes, anon
the laguage being used to support this position of deleting and banning based on SOURCE and not on CONTENT is dubious at best
at this point, I will say I think it is well intentioned
I still think it is dubious
time will tell weather the intentions are pure or not
I would hope that new management would give us the benefit of TIME to make our assesments of their qualities, be they good or bad
and it wont work in the long term
attempting to insulate the board from a particular subset of anons I mean
again
just an opinion
ignore at your own will
o7
>>15763407 PB
>Oss censored anyone that he wanted to, didn't agree with and was pretty arbitrary about it, gave them perma bans and cut a lot of anons off the board because of it
literally no one in this conversation is defending this
>New admin censors oss because he chooses to disrupt the flow of information and vibe of the board
that is not even remotely close to a good reason
>he thinks he us unique and special
pretty fucking irrelevent to the principles being disucssed
>censorship argument just lost a lot of ground with me
it is not my intention to "make ground" with you
my intention is to articulate a position of principle
and to support that principle with reason and logic
and further, to point out the violation of principles when they occur
becuase when you violate your own principles, the whole house of cards falls down
again, simply an opinion
ignore at will
o7
>>15763511 PB
>What I want you to do, is to consider what it means when a person comes back to this board and finds this shit going on. You think your hatred of OSS grants you the right to act as you please in retaliation.
>>15764043 PB
>doge.ong
>give it a rest
wow
that is informative
very interesting
I am a good example of somone coming back to find this shit going on
I have already been accused of being /hivemind/ as I -FIRST- dip my toes back into digging
somone thinks they smell /hivemind/ and a fucking five alarm emergency alert goes off followed by a deletion/ banning spree
I havent even been here a week and this is obviously happening
do you think this is going to have a POSITIVE effect on digging/ memeing/ and praying?
in the past, BO simply made decisions
Didn't like it? Too bad - and that was that.
There is more discussion now, all sincere opinions are welcome.
But some anons are more vocal than others - simply posting more does not give your opinion more weight
As BO, try to take into acct the silent opinions unexpressed but still there
With due respect, you have not been here for a long time
I have - we have.
The bakers and anons that hung in over the last year plus, despite grossly deteriorating conditions. Glad to have returning anons and bakers, as well. Just please give some thought for those who remained.
Time will tell what works and what doesn't.
I am a patient man - willing to watch and wait.
Hope you are as well.
o7
Agree 100%.
There seem to be about 4 bakers who are doing a lot of heavy lifting. Working together well. ty, baker.
>Time will tell what works and what doesn't.
>I am a patient man - willing to watch and wait.
>Hope you are as well.
as you have accepted my sincereity I am compelled to accept yours
I am willing to have patience
things have a tendency to sort themselves out โฆover timeโฆ in this place
o7
Red October
Red Ak Tubal
Easu
That whole area in Akkadian would've been Tubal more or lessโฆ.
i as well.
is me
In all the time you have been here not an ounce of anon spirit has rubbed off on you? You know what anons have to say to that? They would say lurk more but that means the subversion was deeper than I had thought because there is no ground base culture left to glean. How long are you claiming exactly?
So, an event happened at the end of 2020
I am not bringing up the event to accuse anyone of anything
but it was the context of posts that have been deleted in bread #19937, so I will be referencing it here
the event in question:
the deliberate "salting" of a benign news story that was notable at the time with an overt bomb threat
as in
the copypasta of a news story that woud likely be considered notable at the time was editied in the middle of the body
a bomb threat on a specific location at a specific time was typed in the middle of a paragraph where it would have been difficult to notice
this "story" was then posted in a /qresearch/ bread, and was nominated as notable
this was an attempt to get the baker on duty to bake this bomb threat into the notables
the baker on duty DID in fact bake it into the notables, as they did not notice the bomb threat it had been "salted" with
in the end, it was OSS that in fact noticed the bomb threat, and informed the baker, who immediately removed it
OSS did in fact have the screenshots of the conversation where this was planned
the conversation did in fact happen in the /comms/ board
I am not making a value judgement on the above entities
I am not implying either should be revered or derided
I am merely making a statement of fact, based on an event I witnessed
I am not going to make any claim as to the motives
but this event did happen
it came up today
I made a post stating that I had witnessed the event
see something
say something
I went back to the bread to review the conversaion when I got to 8kun this eveningโฆ
and those posts of mine have been deleted?
not all my posts in that bread
just the ones about having witnessed this event
interstingly, there are still posts referencing this event existent in the bread, specifically:
one of them is a direct reply to one of my deleted posts
this would be an anon who claims to to be the baker who baked the bomb threat (obviously un-intentionally -they were tricked)
I suppose this "anon" could just be another sock puppet of disgruntled anon in that bread, but disgruntled anon was IP hopping every other post
and "bomb threat baker" anon has 31 posts in that bread
not exactly conclusive, but its a data point
now, the bread was mostly spam from disgruntled anon (OSS? I -assume- soโฆ)
I get that this is something you feel you should remove from the board
I disagree
but that is just my opinion, again not telling you how to run your ship
I absolutely understand if the posts of mine I am referencing were deleted in error
shit happens
I feel the intentions are in the right place, so I can absolutely understand some friendly fire
I am however curious if these posts were deleted BECAUSE they referenced the event I have described above?
If only so that I know not to reference the event in the future if it is considered "not allowed" on /qresearch/
thank you in advance for your direction in this matter
what do?
>How long are you claiming exactly?
to be fair anon
when BO says "(you) have not been here for a long time"
he is referring directly to (me) and the fact that I have been 100% absent from the board for a full year
and thus, I have -no idea- what has happened over that year
and
they are absolutely right about that
so I take no offense
and where was that spirit while oss was tirading on 8 kun?
Tirading, yea he posted that graphic way to many times, but for one second can we ignore the OSS aspect and get an answer as to why notables that were obviously Q related were being deleting late at night. Stay with me, forget OSS and let's get an answer to what actually matters for once.
>Tirading, yea he posted that graphic way to many times, but for one second can we ignore the OSS aspect and get an answer as to why notables that were obviously Q related were being deleting late at night. Stay with me, forget OSS and let's get an answer to what actually matters for once.
Seconded
Are you saying that current actions are all OSS fault? Because that's the party line. Refuse to address issues, bring up OSS, smirk cause you think you cleverly got out of any responsibility. Are you seriously expecting me to answer your question now that you have refused mine? It's not a get out of jail free card.
I have noticed that recently every "issue" in QR now seems to be blamed on OSS, who has become a convenient whipping boy for anything the BO, or Jim for that matter, considers a transgression
Is it a case of don't look here, look over there ?
There are plenty of shills in QR who constantly get a free pass and post constant levels of spam
Probably because OSS left his own reputation in pieces when he was collaborating w/ FastJack and constantly trying to reshape the narrative of Q
>because OSS left his own reputation in pieces
so
your saying
every issue IS being blamed on OSS
in a "look here, not there" fasion
and that is okay
because what OSS did wasthat bad
OSS defined the new moral standard?
as long as it notas bad as OSSthen its totally okay?
trying to follow the logic
in an attempt to illustrate the "logic" I am following
please correct me where I am in error
>I have recently observed "X"
>Is "X" a case of don't look here, look over there?
>there are plenty of other shills who do the same thing, but do not get "X"
>"X" is probably because OSS has a bad reputaion
am I reading this wrong?
This is a new thread for META.
New beginning.
All anons arewelcome as long as they respect other posters and want to discuss board stuff. Started getting shilly last bread. One baker said, let's make the next thread different. I agree.
The following users are not welcome on META, all subsequent posts will be deleted -
deca85, 1af180
Next up - ae4455, cd30dd
This ain't a notables board and you don't really seem like diggers. Keep it up and you're out.
It doesn't need much logic applied to understand what I said.
I certainly wasn't saying it's right, simply that past acts have made him an easy target for blame, for anything.
How do you not get that!
Might be wise to address the concerns instead of threatening to ban. I see anon is asking reasonable questions/concerns yet all you can do is tell them they are not welcome. Does not look good for you B.O. Many anons have been through this type of thing many times and the way it is looking smells an awful lot like it always has.
>>15761830 TYB
Fren wanted me to ask
Is Ukraine our war?
Or will we be bogged down with propaganda. Wasn't our battle to save children?
>(1) ae4455
>Tirading, yea he posted that graphic way to many times, but for one second can we ignore the OSS aspect and get an answer as to why notables that were obviously Q related were being deleting late at night. Stay with me, forget OSS and let's get an answer to what actually matters for once.
>Next up -
Wow, just fucking wow.
Board Owner really doesn't want to answer questions about her deleting info related to Q at night. Your rage is a tell.
hurr durrr friendly fire
False consensus building (wrap up smear)
What a bunch of fucking psychos.
back in my day AFLB got banned as he/she was tweekin on ip addresses and subnets
also,
kikemind niggers do drop regular posts as they come across the twatter
learn from the ONE notable deletion and make sure it doesnt happen again, modify the deletion policy. this board is meant for chaos. OSS burned his castle down. there's no getting it back. no matter how much he seethes and reeees. but you mess with that ban hammer too much and you will burn down your castle next
-V
Kek, oss was such a dick for banning spammers post 66million and loli hundreds of times a bread.
If only OSS had done it right and made posting about jews "illegal content" then they would have been ok.
>I certainly wasn't saying it's right, simply that past acts have made him an easy target for blame, for anything.
I can certainly understand that
not sure what that particular deletion is about, so cannot respond
re CHAOS -
there was maximum chaos when oss was active and fj let that happen. It is much less chaotic now because of restoration of global announcements, standardized notable formatting, use of handoff protocols, cleaner catalog, and deletion of illegal spam from main board and side boards (pedo bear) - so we don't get deplatformed for "harboring" such content.
DOAR and later HM/OSS have been attacking this board. The Q is: how to deal with those attacks?
If anyone had dared posted their entire notables from another board in QR as spam, OSS would have done a PERMABAN in a second. He permabanned at least 1000 anons for NO REASON. Anons had NO WAY to appeal those bans with 8kun admin. Now they do.
When a hostile group (often but not always OSS) posts attack messages as spam, should admins sit back and allow it? Is that what anons really want? It is certainly an option. But is it the best option?
Spam is not free speech. Have no problems deleting it. But only to the extent it is wanted by anons as a whole.
However, most anons are silent - do not reeeee much about anything. Just do the work.
Shills are loud, always complaining. Not seeking solutions.
There are also anons who speak up with legit concerns - those are the voices that should be heard. Even so, they may or may not represent most anons (who tend to say their piece when the louder voices are quiet).
Admins are trying to find the balance between too much deleting/banning and none at all.
Previously, the spam posted was by those who had nothing to do with QR (muh masons, muh joos, others). Mostly ignored by admins, who also ignored requests for catalog cleanup, renumbering of breads, and locking of dup baker.
Much of the current spam is from OSS and minions. Completely new scenario.
There have been many other Q boards besides this one - HM is the only board that has ever done a full frontal attack on Q Research. Before that, FJ and OSS was hostile to 8kun admin - FJ doxxed JW convo a long time ago. They are a generally hostile group who never cleaned up QR.
So we are listening to the feedback and are seeking CONSTRUCTIVE solutions.I have outlined the problem above.
IMO, letting chaos reign (completely) will not work. OSS showed us that. Discovering the balance between chaos and order is where we are at.
Right now, board admins have backed off completely - just watching. Still deleting illegal content but not much else. Where do we go from here?
There is no policy written in stone at this point, just efforts to deal with a new kind of problem. Appreciate your concern and that of other anons genuinely seeking solutions.
Thoughts?
You are right.
OSS deleted zero spam - just substantive posts from anons he didn't like.
OSS is not getting blamed for "anything" - but for very specific actions in the past (mass bans of QR anons WITHOUT REASON) and present (mass spamming of QR).
>When a hostile group (often but not always OSS) posts attack messages as spam, should admins sit back and allow it? Is that what anons really want?
that is what this anon wants
if I were to vote
>Spam is not free speech.
that is debatable
so is the defintion of spam
one anons spam is another anons critical message
>However, most anons are silent
would their voices change your opinion?
>those are the voices that should be heard
"should" is a sticky wicket, philosophically
who decides what SHOULD be heard?
>Admins are trying to find the balance between too much deleting/banning and none at all.
I commend their efforts
and will offer my insight as I am inspired to do so
>Much of the current spam is from OSS and minions. Completely new scenario.
this disinction is irrelevent
>They are a generally hostile group who never cleaned up QR.
being nice has never been a requirement on /qresearch/
have you read the welcome page?
https://8kun.top/qresearch/welcome.html
>HM is the only board that has ever done a full frontal attack on Q Research
wrong
/comms/
/mnr/
/QRB/
I am not making any kind of a value judgment about these boards, but the fact remains, "raids of conquest" were conducted againsts the /qresearch/ board from the boards I listed above
the point being
its not the first time
and it wont be the last
>Thoughts?
I have them from time to time :D
counter-thoughts?
>HM is the only board that has ever done a full frontal attack on Q Research
wrong
/comms/
/mnr/
/QRB/
comms is a board that no one inhabits, or posts regularly in
mnr is comprised of how many posters?
qrb is compromised of how many posters?
halfchins used to raid 8 chan
loli used to raid 8chan
gore raids 8kun
gay pron raids 8 kun
this is not new and if you don't know this then you need to go,back and look
MNR is basically one guy
QRB is basically 4 people
oss has brainwashed you
>comparing current state of failed boards to what has happened before in the past when these boards were much more active
come on now, not even Biden can be this disingenuous
Big ole bees. Spring has sprung.
Whoops, that was meant for another board.
>comms is a board that no one inhabits, or posts regularly in
>mnr is comprised of how many posters?
>qrb is compromised of how many posters?
correct, those boards are NOW dead
I wonder why
what is occuring in those board RIGHT NOW AT THIS MOMENT has no bearing on what I witnessed coming from those boards 1-2 years ago
>oss has brainwashed you
Hey, there BO, we see you
GYB - GraveYard Baker
FB - FreeBaker or Freebie
GV SF - Swampfox, her handle when Jim gave her a GV gig
CK - CommsKaren: the meme series that BTFO'd them back in late 2020
F - Flint or the letter grade of her performance as BO
F
I like that last one
Agree with this poster as to the scenarios described and how they have played out.
>Much of the current spam is from OSS and minions. Completely new scenario.
At no point (except ebot) has it been spammed over and over with meaningless drivel than it has since QR was taken over in Oct of 2020
This assessment is 100% totally ACCURATE.
>He permabanned at least 1000 anons for NO REASON.
and yet screams about getting deleted for continuing to post illegible absolute jibberish graphics with arrows and red text that point out NOTHING-but let's use some red text and try to convince anons that whatever scenario they are trying to present (i.e. make up) is totally legitimate because they have the ability to overwhelm anyone who says otherwise with constant barrage of literally repeating the same thing.
They have even manufactured an
"I was Q'd for calling out the /comms board" and that has been show as fake too.
It is then attempted to be legitimized or 'backed up' with people like barkeep (id 5a07c7 in here) now -yes I know it's you-who do nothing but make statements with no proof-see below.
>If anyone had dared posted their entire notables from another board in QR as spam, OSS would have done a PERMABAN in a second.
Agree I think the BO from MNR tried to do that a few times and was met with the banhammer instantly.
I do not think anyone from qrb has done a notables list in QR
>- HM is the only board that has ever done a full frontal attack on Q Research. Before that, FJ and OSS was hostile to 8kun admin -
100% accurate
also 8bit has already been shown to have had the same hostility
You are leaving out one other personality hereโฆ.these personas all come from 8bit.
Why do you think fj was so silent and did nothing-it is/was just another 8bit production
so is oss and likely several other 'anons' who rush in to 'support' anything that one or moar of these personas post
They can't even make it it look legit as it's usually within a minute-no patience whatsoever
No proof just statements
You have ZERO proof of attacks on QR of those three groups.
Provide proof or shut the fuck up.
again here are more statements.
Gonna have to try harder
Who are "they"
and once again no proof provided-literally just a parrot
you have none so you can also GFY
this is barkeep "baker"
hard to call what you did baking but for the sake of calling you out there is not a better description
Barkeep is so full of shit doesn't know which end to wipe
You think no one knows who you are
This is just moar of the same bullshit that you do and have done for the entire time in QR
>what I witnessed coming from those boards 1-2 years ago
THen you must have proof then..
I'll wait
I know you don't
> "raids of conquest" were conducted againsts the /qresearch/ board from the boards I listed above
And just exactly what was that? as you continue to provide ZERO proof
WHERE IS THE PROOF
You have been asked consistently to provide this proof and yet when the rubber meets the road you have submitted NONE.
you have nothing but statements which is all you do is QR
"but trust me I seen't it"
GFY
They asked for a board and then got it but yet continually raid QR with spam
Proving that barkeep is not neutral or trying to be constructive as it is totally obvious who does the raiding-and the level it has always been at can only come from the same group of people.
Barkeep you have not included /hivemind on your list of "raiders"
Just an oversight I'm sure.
>correct, those boards are NOW dead
just like the thought that you had any credibility before or now.
Can't answer how to solve this but id 0fa900 is totally correct in what they have presented.
A solution was offered to them with the creation of the board for them-that was not good enough and changed nothing regarding the raids that they conduct (and continue to do) on qr.
You'll have to ask a higher power on what the solution is because unless these obvious shills wake up one day and somehow obtain a moral compass there is little to do.
The attacks on JW are just priceless too
If he can't solve this technically-speaking I'm afraid we are stuck with this staying the way it is.
Banning VPNs is only thing that would work.
That anyone thinks they protect you is quite comical
and right on cue here is yet another apologist bringing nothing but muh opinion
>BTFO'd them back in late 2020
did your mom make those?
because I wouldn't admit to have making those.
Especially putting the same one in 5x at a time too.
Insecure much?
Good luck with this BO as all I see here is the same thing that these asswipes do on QR-make statements without providing any sauce and the rare times they do provide "sauce" it is some unreadable POS that says nothing.
>They are a generally hostile group who never cleaned up QR.
>being nice has never been a requirement on /qresearch/
key phrase is "never cleaned up QR."
Meaning hostile to the purpose of this board.
Uncooperative, unresponsive to anons while claiming to speak up for them. "hostile" in giving anons permabans and not locking breads, etc.
> "raids of conquest" were conducted against the /qresearch/ board from the boards I listed above
sauce it (real sauce - not OSS claims)
you are making claims you cannot prove against other Q boards. If you have sauce, produce it.
Easy to show what HM is trying to do - see what they write on their own board and what they post here - their spam notables, ads for HM, muh joos spam & attacks on admins, including 8kun admins. We get this space for free, 8kun admins protect it from continuous daily - not periodic - attacks. Wo/that protection, 8kun would have been TOAST long ago.
Divisive gibberish
Thanks, been looking for that meme
Unfortunately, this is Doge
And Gerbil was cool, last I chekt
So if you would like to continue this argument
please do so in the general bread, I'm currently baking
as it seems you have nothing to offer besides
divisionfaggotry
>THen you must have proof then..
If you want to belabor the point, yes
it was not my intention to drag this back up
but, if you demand
I shall provide
Well basically, soon as DOAR realized they were actually losing traffic we had all it all, gore, gay porn, fake Q, glow bakes.
If you're bored go check the catalog for the bread with a black banner, that's the one they tried to bake for us, kek
>THen you must have proof then..
and here is:
FB / FreeBaker / Freebie / Frebe
getting caught being the moldybread.png bread spammer
he used his namefag "frebe" in the /comms/ board
and did so using the same UserID as he had when he posted his unique image caption style with the yellow text blocks and specific text font
he posted this exact same cap in a /qresearch/ general bread
using the same UserID as a post with the text:
what do you suggest, then? moldy bread campaign unsuccessful, kek.
which proves, unequivocably, that the namefag 'Frebe' from the /comms/ board was ABSO-FUCKING-LITELY running "raids of conquest" on the /qresearch/ board
fucking
chek'm
always have the sauce if your going to make a claim
I will let anons decide weather they remember breads being spammed FULL (like 80% of the bread) of moldy bread pics
>the rare times they do provide "sauce" it is some unreadable POS that says nothing.
(you): "whatever they say its not true!"
right
okay
think for youselves anons
or dont
up to you
free will and all
o7
and you can never answer the question or provide proof
> this is Doge
thanks gerbil
you are the same.
Ta-ta
>provides the same stale shit spammed relentlessly in QR
made up shit is NOT proof
This is your fantasy and been proven bullshit many times
If this was actually true then why were they not banned?
and here ya go again getting triggered
So easy
Love this one bro
Stale as it ever was
i agree with the sentiment that division is useless. We need to work together if we want to see this place go. and to focus on the present and the future.
Thanks to all of you for your hard work. 100% support.
Godspeed.
dfsg
video pic girl :
http://alturl.com/22nod
Here are a few moar of yer "gems" since most of what you say is a total fantasy, lacks any backup-muh Graphics don't count breh-and is just the mental gyrations of a 7year old told that no 'mo candy after dinner until you eat yer peas
Your statements set against the backdrop of one of doze "kick-ass" reaper memes-doze are so cool
I wish I was as cool and edgy as you brosephโฆ.You are muh hero!!!
BTW here is yer boss fucking up just after Christmas 2020-sure you remember that cause he doesโฆand wished they din't.
You still refuse to answer this:
If this was actually true then why were they not banned?
You and yer comped-ass boss had the ban hammer yet it was never used -why is that??-on what you present as a "bomb threat"-which is nothing more than posts taken from 2 different boards and 'arranged' to tell the story you desire.
And the best part?โฆwish I had saved it was that you told us we should be "lawyering up"
What ever habbened to all that???
FBI, DOJ and all thatโฆ.guess you din't want an internal investigation on that now would ya
You were told when you started all that I counted on you to continue to do this and you have not disappointed at all.
Continue to do that in QR cause it works so well!!!
Then you all spent the better part of yesterday spamming the same tired graphics-the ip hops were cute tooโฆLOVE that you and yer comped ass crew do that as anyone can see what kind of resources and ability you "anons" really have.
You also tried to blame the Nashville incident on /comms as well.
But see they actually arrested someone for that so you couldn't keep trying to make up anything other than the standard line with you-statementsโฆ.
18 posts out of 71 tells me (and anyone else ftm) what your agenda is and always has been.
Did you think that spamming all that so quickly and hopping IPS every 4-5 posts wouldn't be seen as someone who obviously has more resources available to them then any real anon would reasonably have?
Slowing down just a little wouldn't make you stand out as the comped fedbois you all are. I rarely responded to you prior because you do the work for me by continuing to post the garbage you make up.
Nah that would be to simple and actually require thought-that is why you work for the feds cause no real thought is needed you just follow orders.
You think no one asks "gee how can anyone respond and debunk such an obvious fabrication?"
add water it makes it's own sauce broman
You have no credibility and continue to play the not gonna answer real question game.
But go ahead and continue to post those KICK ASS graphics and I wish you would post those reaper mems too breh
MISS DOZE ALOT!!
> "whatever they say its not true!"
>you have nothing but statements which is all you do is QR
>"but trust me I seen't it"
back to the parrot routine already pointed out to you-have you no original thought of own?
what is this supposed to show? no bread number, date, context, nothing. Don't know who is making the post, who the posters referred to are, and how the remarks referred to by the poster are supposed to add up to a bomb threat. i'm guessing this is from OSS, since that's his usual approach - juxtapose a bunch of remarks and then tell you what to think about them.
what is this? again, no context. the only thing i see is "dough was changed without notice or discussion by unresponsive baker". looks like the unresponsive baker was OSS. Can't read anything else, it's too small.
Most anons on this board are doing dig-meme-pray stuff most of the time, some are noting and baking as well. mebbe you're baking, i don't know.
Not interested in halfbaked theories with crap sauce that wouldn't make notables in generals. Focused on the future - how we can make this board work. Not dissect it.
Hope you want that too. Said i was patient and i am. But don't have time to go thru stuff that has been posted b4 by OSS - how many times? There is too much to do. Up to you what you want to do. Either help us win the fight or find another place to make a contribution.
Accidentally included you in post encouraging no division fagging. But i hope you are able to receive that message as well. Because setting aside our differences is the only way we'll be able to defeat the enemy that deserves all our attention right now.
o7
The media knows who and "what" I exposed nearly four years ago. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming
>what is this supposed to show?
exactly what is stated to be shown
I made a witness statement
sauce was demanded
sauce was provided
'nuff said
the original context was my wondering if specific posts of mine had been deleted from a specific bread in error, or if it was intentional
this post here >>15769124
bread #19937
dated 03/02/2022
post number that was deleted: >>15767411
context: witness statement as to events that occured over a year ago
specific question:
Should I refrain from ever referecing this event ever again as would be implied by its deletion
or
Was it merely friendly fire in a bread that was "full of spam" and was receiving a pruning by new administration
I agree the bread in question (#19937) was absolutely full of spam -by any definition
Much of it was deleted
It is absolutely logical to assume my posts were deleted in error
I
am
wondering
which
it
was
intentional, or un-intentional
thats it
that was my orriginal question
o7
You still whining? Why? Let it go. Move forward. OSS baked, spammed and caused the bread to be deleted when the spam was deleted. Was it intentional? Yes OSS did it once before and got 2 breads the last time.
It's a trick that people attacking the board have used before.
Let's move on. This is just crying over spilt milk at this point.
As far as that specific post, yes I saw it get deleted when OSS was hammering the board with posts every 10 seconds. All the posts discussing what he was spamming about got wiped out.
Again, event was 2 years ago. We all paid dearly at the hands of OSS. We have to move forward. We cant let that chump's ghost continue to dictate the direction of the board.
There's something bigger going on here. The worst thing OSS did to the board is that he destroyed the elements of trust between all the major players and created a creeping contempt that caused fractures in working relationships. That's what needs to be repaired and it will be a lot easier if we can all acknowledge that we're not the same people we were 2 years ago when we all got hoodwinked by one of the best propagandists I've ever seen. I firmly believe of the core players, nobody is trying to put anything over on each other. We're all trying in our own imperfect ways to get past an obvious low spot in the board history and propel it to new heights in service to saving America and the world. The faster we get past the fractures and wedges that caused the fractures the better off we'll all be. Unity Unity Unity That's the name of this game.
> Unity Unity Unity That's the name of this game.
As long as it's not from Hivemind tho right even if the information is good and checks out you would rather have everyone waste time on a dig for hours on end when the fucking answer could be found next door.
Grow up bitchtits this is a warzone.
How the fuck do you even pretend to know all the โmajor playersโ on an anonymous board? You really just go with your suspicions every time? You think that highly of yourself that you deem your perspective as objective? Half the time you people think every anon is OSS. Youโve deluded yourselves into accepting top level fuckery on this board/site. Youโve deluded yourselves into thinking youโre always right and OSS is always wrong. Youโre hitting at least 10 logical fallacies every time another board war breaks out. Itโs a fucking mess to watch. Did it ever occur to you that maybe youโre wrong? Can you accept or even entertain that possibility or is the cognitive dissonance too much for you? Until you play devils advocate with yourself and take that to the logical conclusion that maybe youโve misinterpreted at least part of the situation because youโre a fallible meat sack and not omniscient, donโt pretend to have any idea what is going on here.
>elements of trust
Again, how the fuck do you have elements of trust on an anonymous board? Are you that naive? Or new? The biggest challenge of being in this community is that you canโt tell who is who, friend or foe. You can trust within the limits of 750 posts. Trust doesnโt carry over to anyone across breads, weeks, months, and years. If thereโs any trust it should be between anons COLLECTIVELY and board staff. That trust eroded with fast jack, not OSS. When he took over the board, anons fractured. OSS at least was present to do the job FJ should have done, regardless of whether or not you agreed with his methods. There was never a universal consensus that he was the bad guy here. You created that consensus in your mind because confirmation bias and now youโre basing every single judgment on that false assumption.
>qrd: false premise, argument discarded
One last thing Iโll say because this board is fucking cancer and I canโt tolerate being here anymore.
>major players
>major
>players
In your deluded egotistical mind do you see yourself as a main character in some online House of Cards-type drama? Do you understand how even having that mindset might color how you view what goes on here? How that might lead you to dramaticize every word thatโs said here, assume intentions based on your faulty premise, and plot and scheme like the jew you probably are? You turned this place into cancer. Into politics, gossiping, infighting, cliques, and cancer. Congrats, enjoy it.
>trust between all the major players
who are these people ?
are they highest ranking anons ?
or are the major players the shills and contemptible current BV's and BO ?
>We all paid dearly at the hands of OSS
sauce ?
you cannot just make broad statements like that, it's pure delusion and paranoia
it's called collusion
>All the posts discussing what he was spamming about got wiped out.
roger that anon
thank you
just wanted an answer to that point
o7
this is the most triggered post I have seen in a long while
lots of baseless claims that cannot be sauced or proven
it sounds like you hate everyone !
>It's a trick that people attacking the board have used before.
a trick that has more opportunity to work when the qualification for a bannable offence becomes to broad
but I have belabored the point long enough
carry on
o7
I trust your intentions are in the right place
and I commend your effort to make headway in this name of unity
I dont think its the right way to go about it
but I dont hold it against you
free will and all
o7
>Youโre hitting at least 10 logical fallacies
you are NOT wrong
like pulling teeth to walk through a logical syllogism around here
logic is absolutely a first principle this board claims to adhere too
just keep banging home the points on PURELY logical grounds
try to leave out any kind of ad-hominem (no matter how true it may be) or straw men
just the facts jack
as of course, you do you
one day at a time
o7
>There was never a universal consensus that he was the bad guy here.
I certainly wont be caught defending everythig OSS has ever done
he sperged on me plenty
but he is a valuable anon
and the best baker I have ever seen
period
o7.
>>15778121
>>15778125
>>15778219
>>15778292
>>15778335
>>15778383
>>15778401
>>15778407
014e6f is right right. It's a warzone. GTFO and don't come back.
Here's your posts in case you forgot what you said.
Jan 6 committee In Trump's indictment
asked to look into the fraud case
Who knows what I mean?
Their feet unintentionally slipped
So we can used against them
>sauce was demanded
>sauce was provided
Statements and made up graphics are not sauce.
The sauce you provided was nothing more than a made up graphic-the same one that you still refuse to answer this question-the validity of what you call "witness statement" is just thatโฆa statement and means nothing.
You have made many of those in the past.
A few of them were posted for your (and others) viewing.
you've seen these but continue to ignore it.
The question still remains:
If this was actually true then why were they not banned?
>I trust your intentions are in the right place
yours are not and never have been so no one (other than the sock puppets in here) is buying the neutral game you are attempting to play here.
You are completely disingenuous because you have failed to provide an answer to the question above.
Until you doโฆkeep making those statements bro.
>just wanted an answer to that point
the same answer that needs to be given regarding the "proof" you have submitted here: >>15775703
>I certainly wont be caught defending everythig OSS has ever done
But you continue to do so
yet when asked for proof all you have provided was the graphic made by oss with the same made up rhetoric.
One more time: If this was true as that poorly constructed graphic tries to imply then why were they not banned-by the current BO at the time, a BV, GV or JW ftm
If this "proves what it implies then those anons would have been reported and banned instantly'''-they were not.
>just the facts jack
Yes please provide some, not just banter that supports the narrative you have tried, and failed, to push.
The "i am neutral" and "muh intentions are all about unity" push is quite amusing because you waste no time defending the very person who continues to sow dissent and discourse everywhere they appear.
totalFAIL
Statements are not facts.
you now have 25 posts (out of 91) of nothing moar than trying to play both sides-the wind changes direction and you waste no time in doing the same.
Someone with the pedigree that you have been proven to posses-based on the statement games-is not about unity or anything other than
continuing a failed narrative.
Failure for you on all of the above points
Ignoring when real sauce is provided of what your intentions have always beenโฆ.making statements.
Misses no opportunity to drop trow, bend over and take it from behind regarding anything that oss does or says.
Nothing more than a yes man.
All dredging up the past does is causes more instability and mistrust. That is not what we are here for. We are here to save America and save the world.
you have spoken nothing but statements
nice try though
FAIL
talk to this ijit
>sauce asked for
>sauce provided
Submitted as your "proof'
Still refuses to address the question
If this was actually true then why were they not banned?'
Keep bringing it up and avoiding this is the response you are going to get
You brought it up and can't answer it
Until ya doโฆ
Ta-ta
>If this was actually true then why were they not banned?'
what management does as a result of a specific event has no bearing on whether that event occured or not
you logical possition is:
not banned = innocent party
I disagree with this logical sylogism
again, I have stated all I cate to state on this subject
I am perfectly happy to let anons make up their own minds based on what has been presented thus far
I have no intent to continue this "divisive conversation" (as defined by our monitors) any longer
My -only- question was about my posts that had been deleted
were they deleted by mistake
or
were they deleted because they were verbotten
I ALREADY GOT THE ANSWER
they were deleted because they were verbotten
>All the posts discussing what he was spamming about got wiped out.
discussing ANYTHING "OSS" 'spams about' is verbotten and will be deleted
got it
thats all I wanted to know
thank you
o7
Anons, please break off. Both of you.
I have asked everyone in this forum to have constructive discussions, not to endlessly argue about issues that cannot be resolved. If you can't do that, start your own thread to continue the discussion.
>>15781264
>>15781289
this is not ok
deleting your post and asking you not to post here again for the time being.
I was instructed to check meta.
I'm an anon that bakes sometimes. Do I need to be more?
It's been a while. I only came back to the board when shit started happening.
Try to understand my position, please.
I was involved in clean up scenarios after breads were sabotaged 3 times in 3 days last week.
Just trying to exercise due dilligence.
don't take it personal. Not that big of a deal. Would just rather be proactive.
Since when do people have to go through a security check to bake a bread. Wtf is this. Fuck it, I don't want to bake anymore.
Your Ego may be Inflated a Tad Bit.
hes a sneaky fucking rat and you are doing a great job and we appreciate the due diligence.
TYBO
Think about the stupidity it takes to ask an ANON "who are you" - "When was the last time you bake?" after offering a handoff.
I will hand off to any baker that BV says it's ok to hand off to if I don't recognize said baker by style.
Don't like it, take it up with bo/bv.
I've tried to be as nice as I can here.
If you'll excuse me I have work to do.
>I've tried to be as nice as I can here.
So because you don't know who I am I am not allowed to bakeโฆ on an anonymous message board. Are you stupid?
you keep ignoring my points while trying to plea with me to understand yours.
Why is that?
So, ah ic, Baking is a club now?
Mighty fine high horse you got there
So newfags can't bake anymore, is that what your saying?
What points are those. That you don't know who I am? That's the fucking point. Seriously are you fucking braindead. I have to be a namefag to bake now?
> I am I am not allowed to bake
never said thatโฆ said clearly my position.
starting to think you're sliding me here.
VERY CLEAR POSITION:
BO/BV
Please lmk in in general if handoff is ok.
To the butthurt:
try not to take it personal.
Suggestion: Bake more so I can get to know you.
fwiw:new bakers are always welcome
>Offers hand off
>I polite accept
>tells me to meet them in meta
>asks me who I am
>Doesn't accept I'm just an anon
>refuses previously offered handoff
>deflects on bullshit supposition that he needs to know who I am
>Deflects by saying he is too busy
>ask indignant.
>Suggestion: Bake more so I can get to know you.
>Refuses handoff
>Tells me to bake more.
I found the answer, you are definitely stupid as fuck.
you politely accepted a statement that's identical to the one above that you're now not ok with, or did you forget that?
>>15781870 OB
Who is "allowed to bake"
I know who's NOT allowed to bake if that helps
Anyone who doesn't tell you their name and phone number, obviously. You want my blood type too?
>Who is "allowed to bake"
Are you gonna keep crying and calling people names?
Or are you actually gonna fucking bake?
This will determine whether we want your services or not
Let me make sure I understand for future reference. anyone that you(baker) doesn't know is no longer allowed to bake?
Oh no guy, that ship has sailed. I'm not allowed to bake. Baker said so. This should go real well.
>Anyone who doesn't tell you their name and phone number, obviously. You want my blood type too?
>Let me make sure I understand for future reference. anyone that you(baker) doesn't know is no longer allowed to bake?
Why don't you sit this one out chief
Wrong pic
please refresh
OSS is the baker who is banned, both from baking and posting due to repeated efforts to subvert the board.
Other baker is daily baker trying to protect the board bc it has been under attack. Earlier today, some baker posted incomplete dough that had to be reconstructed. When irresponsible or shill bakers are in charge, bakers or admins have to repair the damage.
The question is: What is the best way to protect the work while at the same time being as open as possible to bakers?
Admins cannot be here 24/7 to "vet" bakers. And if they were, it would not work for occasional bakers. We appreciate all bakers. Sorry you had a bad experience but it is not personal.
Thoughts?
u mean oss?
Because the retards in this meta claim everyone is. OSS lives rent free in your heads, and you are ruining Q research because of it. Move on or anons are going to end up hating all of you. Maybe you don't care.
You IP hopped just to say this?
Is changing VPNs against the rules now too? Why not respond to what I said, it was good advice, you are going overboard. Pull it back or anons will hate you.
>I only came back to the board when shit started happening.
I have a feeling new management is going to hear this a lot
kek
I am absolutely glad to have a place to discuss META issues
>Since when do people have to go through a security check to bake a bread. Wtf is this. Fuck it, I don't want to bake anymore.
so this is like
exactly what happens when you try to install baker verifications
handoff procedure is absoutely essential
but I have not found any way to effectively use a verification step for the baker offering to take
the only thing that worked for me was first come first serve
it is the only position that has a moral and logical defense on a "free speech" board that claims to be "open for all"
if this is not longer a free speech board
or
if this is no longer a place that is open for all
then please disregard my comments
>I will hand off to any baker that BV says it's ok to hand off to
holy fuck anon
THINK FOR YOURSELF
is the BASIC tennent of /qresearch/
offloading your RESPONSIBILITY for PERSONAL DISCERMENT onto someone else
no matter what their position is
does not you of this moral responsibility YOU have for your own decisions
You can SAY you just let the BV decide who gets a handoff and who doesnt
but that is a decision itself, you are refusing to make it yourself, and you are offloading it to the BV
that doesnt actually remove you from the decision
you have decided to all someone elses will to dictate your actions
if it turns out that persons will was tainted, you have NO defense for the actions you took because of their influence
TO BE VERY CLEAR
I am articulation a position in logic
I am NOT accusing you of acting in malice
or having bad intentions
but fuck anon
think for yourself
this
>does notabsolveyou of this moral responsibility
>So newfags can't bake anymore, is that what your saying?
baker verification is a sticky subject
I saved these from a time before
when anons were confronted with a verification requirement in order to be allowed to bake
>I saved these from a time before
Quote:
"โฆ
I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker subversion
this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the breadsaturday 10/03/2020
the bread was split for the reason of:
Violation of First Principles
First Principle Violated:
-anons not allowed to bake as anon
Example 1 of Ongoing Issue
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)
pic related includes 3 of these bakers
would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest
Bread #13946
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
anon wasfirst to offerto take bake
/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification
/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers
/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake
since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?
pic very related
thank you for (you)r consideration
o7
โฆ"
sic. -Barkeep Circa Oct 2020
>I saved these from a time before
>The question is: What is the best way to protect the work while at the same time being as open as possible to bakers?
keep a backup of your pastebin in a text file on your local machine
you know
archive offline
apparently that is a new concept around here?
Baker's choice how they handoff, unless otherwise determined by the board
/discussion
>I'm done
never done
you can't help yourself
now with 38 posts doing exactly the same shit attempting to deflect and define the narrative
second
pick a side gerbil and try to stay on it for more than 24 hours
tripsconfirm you have a short memory.
Newfag101 lesson for you
There used to be a moar cumbersome process that required a BV to verify ANY handoffโฆI did not see you complaining about that at the time.
But now a less involved process that requires a simple interaction for the hand off process is NOT ok.
Run along kid
>doesn't check id's and jumps on anything "agreeable" because the wind blew in that direction for you
Nice try gerbil
>5a07c7
>ecc36e
>Baker's choice how they handoff
every bker has free will
thus
it will always be bakers choice
even if the baker chooses to let management tell them how to do it
that is still a choice
the baker chooses to follow managements rules
the baker could always choose to ignore them
ther is no force involved
only influence
>determined by the board
sincerely curious
how does one asses the collective "determination" of "the board"
/discuss
Here we go again: muh evil /comms/
The solid dependable that made bakers available 24/7, that kept the muh joo shit like the Protocols out of the notables.
"muh gatekeeper"
muh JQ notable"
"Reeee Baker's Union"
Ouright subversion to get anons to turn on the dedicated ones keeping things going. It worked, the experienced and capable ones left, the subversives came in and the quality went to shit. JQ this, muh joo that, all kinds of garbage to give msm ammo for hit pieces.
/comms/ so evil, everything in the open to aid with coordination but "oh know, they plot in secret"
Saw the baddies coming in to take over, tried to defend by using tripcodes, more screams of baker's union
Oss and crew got the board, and while total garbage was notabled any anon that spoke out against it was permabanned.
Now I'm reading through this meta and see attempts to try the same subversion.
Idea: Don't like how QR General is run?, leave and go to /hivemind/ then.
Don't like how garbage from haaretz, southfront, jpost, or any other shit site does not get included in notables?, fine, once again go to /hivemind/ or 4chan, or wherever else
I know the attacks and spam will continue, anons are stepping on nerves and the bad guys hate that. I see it, bitching about bakers and sometimes calling for ebakes and anon notes and nothing else ala Fastjack
I see the claims MR and QRB made attacks on General, never saw those and I'm around a lot. I have seen bread after bread spammed and attacked by oss and hivemind
Keep your silly graphics and tangle of colored lines and go somewhere else
>Bomb threats
>Delete Human trafficking notables
>Doesn't let anons bake
Yes, /Comms/ is was and will always be literally full of kikes(you)
SPAM
Just can't help yourself can you, kike am I?
Once again, enlarging image these alleged Human Trafficking notables had NO SAUCE. No sauce means interesting but not notable so they got edited out, scream about it all you want, but that's it.
Again with the "won't let anons bake" which is another repeated whine. "Anons" that baked would put JQ muh joo and other garbage in the notables that msm would use for hit pieces so an effort was made to keep in bakers that would be looking after the quality.
>deflection
No, not for you
Same tactic as used before, expecting old screenshots to show the fuckery. Some anons kept it, more than likely not.
Doesn't work anymore, you are transparent.
How about coming up with sauce of the claims made by your side? Yes, your side, the ones doing everything they can all day and all night to disrupt and destroy the QR boards.
Not deflection, simple Truth, and you know it
Remember when the BO lied in general saying it wasn't an inquisition in here of baker but was instead 'letting baker know ty for baking"? Why is telling the TRUTH so hard? Is your narrative more important than just saying a criticism is well founded? Ban me from here. I'm sick of watching BO lie to my face. My criticism: BO LIES TO EVERYONE.
gonna open this up again BO?
Spent an hour deleting spam from this board.
Each post used a different ip to make it harder to remove.
Doubt it was that many different posters, prolly very few.
Spam like this is the work of shills. Do not have a great solution to this problem because META is an open thread - an important thread because it allows anons, bakers, and admins to talk with one another. Ironic that the same spammers that reeee constantly about free speech actively seek to destroy the free speech of others with spam.
Will try to maintain an open thread. If this becomes impossible, BO can always be contacted directly (see OP) or in a convo on Generals. I am there every day, usually several times. But better to have an open Meta thread if we can maintain.
If anons see any SPAM here, please report it immediately on General thread so we can take care of it.
just did.
Anons have asked about board deletions and bans -
On Feb 15, I sent this out to all BVs for QR -
Bans are for 3 to 7 days for spam, make sure to specify or else they are forever. [They can also be for less time but not more.]
On Mar 6, after a bread was accidentally deleted, sent another email out encouraging BVs to be careful about deleting spam so that accidents like this do not happen.
bottom line -
It's more important to have the support and confidence of anon than to eliminate spam.
This morning I sent BVs a reminder of these policies. Along with this -
USE PERMABANS ONLY FOR ILLEGAL CONTENT - NEVER FOR SPAM OR "JUST BECAUSE".
Am in the process of a more thorough guide for deletions and bans. Meanwhile, this is the policy. It is CRITICAL that we have a consistent and conservative policy regarding BANS and that all of us follow it.
-
It takes time to develop policies because it's first necessary to see what works and what doesn't. Have been watching a lot to answer these questions.
Deletions can be useful for intensive spamming or for spam or other content that is reported by anons. Bans are used for illegal content as a matter of 8kun policy and may also be used for persistent spamming but only for a limited time. The problems caused by bans are now mitigated by the existence of a ban appeal process addressed to 8kun admins but it is existing policy to use them conservatively. BVs have just been reminded of this so things should smooth out in the future.
Questions are not spam. Stop making erroneous judgements. I have no VPNs, I just started asking questions that you did not like. From my very first post attempting to find out where the morality is in this administration, the target was painted on my back. You lump me in and think that's a sound thought. Awaiting answers to questions in Community Ran meta, where truly all are welcome. You did collate questions right? After you deleted them all of course.
>>15790488
Did not delete that thead, busy deleting spam here.
You were banned from this board only when it became obvious your "questions" were not real questions. You have zero interest in working with current admin, end of convo.
All future posts will be deleted.
1981
It seems like OSS is more famous than his/her crimes. I come here occasionally to see if anything catches my interest and comment where I think I might be able to add to the conversation.
Noobs aren't shills, and not everyone is clued in on everything here. After Q predictions seemed to fall out of the bottom at the end of 2020, I like many others lost interest in this chan site. However, Durham is still keepin' on, and recent events made me raise my eyebrows and take another look. Now, I'm trying to figure out how real Q is and whether the plan is still progressing along or the deep state won.
It's pretty difficult to discern the truth when intelligent agencies are fighting each other and I have 0.000017% of the real actual truth.
For the rogue agents and bad players reading thisโฆwhat's driving you to do this whole thing? What's your motive? Is it money? Evil? Do you think you are on the right side?
If war is the art of deception, then perhaps peace is the art of transparent truth. Maybe there is a way to make everyone happy. Wellโฆeveryone except Hillary. Or Soros. Or Obamaโฆtell ya what. If you didn't rape or eat any babies, we'll talk about it.
Thanks BO. Meta is a very important thread to use for dissemination of need to know info about the board. I'm glad you took the great effort to get it sorted out and back online. This anon is very grateful.
OSS's actions are well-known to those who are around a lot and they go back almost two years now. He is not being unfairly accused.
>Do you think you are on the right side?
Don't ask q's like that, do ask Am I in the right
place? I cannot know all the answers about Q. Can only follow my instincts, and my instincts say "stay here, help organize the place, get out alt-news that not available elsewhere."
Q said many times "we are the news."
yw, small crew but we do what we can.
some of your comments above are really on point.
OSS is a superb propagandist. Even now, would not write him off as an adversary. Can exploit a minor mistake to make it look like "fuckery." Or even create a completely fake charge and push it in a way that creates doubt. Doesn't take much on a board like this.
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND MILITARY INTELLIGENCE IS Q~ WE HAVE EVERYTHING AND NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING. I DOWNLOADED THE DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND I HAVE ALL OF THE FILES. THE MEDIA KNOWS WHO AND "WHAT" I EXPOSED NEARLY FOUR YEARS AGO. . I WAS TOLD TO TRUST THE PLAN AND THAT I WAS THE PLAN. THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES WHY I HAVE EVERYTHING. THE TRUTH HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH PRECIOUS BLOOD AND THE DRUG ANDRENOCHROME. I WAS TOLD JUSTICE WAS COMING.
I HAVE EVERYTHING FOR REASON~ I WAS TOLD TO TRUST THE PLAN AND JUSTICE WAS COMING~. Q
dfhdh
video pic girl :
https://ohbox.uk/3hmhxn
DONE
hgkgk
video pic girl :
https://iota.ws/3949829
Motives legit.
https://youtu.be/8b2WTnTjzVs
USA Michigan genocidal neo nazi governor Gretchen Whitmer overpays by 666 million to GM to send message of support for the devil.
https://www.crainsdetroit.com/government/governor-candidate-kevin-rinke-whitmer-overpaid-tax-incentive-deal-gm
I think we should bring back other dedicated research threads to the Dough:
>>15795216, >>15215639 Clockwork Qrange #15 / #14
>>15534546 Q Research Germany #93: Raus auf die Straรen
>>15592235 Q Research AUSTRALIA #21: MIL-CIV ALLIANCE Edition
>>15744684 Q Research FRANCE #6: La Chute de la Cabale
>>15547330 Q Research UK #43: "Boatfagging" Edition
Not sure why they disappeared.
There are no coincidences why I've exposed everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. God wins this holy war of good vs evil.
Manifesto's do not belong in this catalog.
Please delete.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
tx, looks like a bv already caught it.
>>15800350
SMD
>>15800350
this thread for discussion of board issues, not insults.
Canada has moved up to #30
International Q Research Threads
>>15592235 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Australia #21
>>14841879 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Balkan #9
>>15801702 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Canada #30
>>15534546 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Germany #93
>>15198192 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Italia #2
>>14586201 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Nederland #7
>>15422355 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Japan #4
>>14475779 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ New Zealand #9
>>14493540 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Scotland #5
>>15493933 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ South Africa #7
>>15547330 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ UK #43
This Meta banner is kinda creepy like something only Tranime would love.
Would one of you admins please edit it out and replace it with something moar Q like?
TY in advance for your consideration.
good point looking at it closely - just like that it's eye catching. tx.
</end>
>>15775528 Kek, how to blow a gerbil
could u drop me a line @ f4AL@protonmail.com? Wanted to ask your advice.
Any status updates on the image server or is it ddos? Word from Jim?
>>15801924 (me)
France is back with us!
Italy is still locked to keep out pedo bear shill
International Q Research Threads
>>15592235 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Australia #21
>>14841879 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Balkan #9
>>15801702 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Canada #30
>>15744684 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ France #6
>>15534546 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Germany #93
>>15198192 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Italia #2
>>14586201 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Nederland #7
>>15422355 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Japan #4
>>14475779 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ New Zealand #9
>>14493540 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Scotland #5
>>15493933 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ South Africa #7
>>15547330 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ UK #43
then where do I go to get insulted, or give them?
There's a clown version of the meta thread if you look in the catalog.
Big gay illuminatti triangle
Can't miss it
France added.
Also if you like pimp slapping low iq shills for practice the fake meta thread is a great target range. Just sayin'โฆ
Emailed -o7
This Truth Social Q maneuver was telegraphed by OSS in November and December. Highly suspect it's him pushing the TSQ proof shit, and he's taking over the bake to get it into NOTABLES as we speak
>>15820004
>this is NOT NOTABLE baker
>>15820004
>this is NOT NOTABLE baker
<NOTABLE WE HAVE A TSQ PROOF FOR THE NORMIES
shill bake in the catalog, please clear
yeah would be cool, but baker g has the bake atm.
>This Truth Social Q maneuver was telegraphed by OSS in November and December. Highly suspect it's him pushing the TSQ proof shit, and he's taking over the bake to get it into NOTABLES as we speak
Holy fuck you people are fucking retarded. I haven't posted on Jew Research in 2 days. Literally kill yourself.
Also, are you sure you want to push the angle that I have "insider access" to truth social? Can't see how that would backfire on you all.
Truth Social Q is outside Comms
and Fake.
Needs to be not Notable until proven relevant.
it's a division tactic
you're a retard
Post some of your fake Q posts from March of last year, that will convince everyone.
well you are in luck anon, baker just created a whole thread for anons to discuss this matter, Lots of Qproofs for TS dropping too atm.
>>15820154 Q Research General #20005: Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS?
Does the board staff realize the Q on TS literally said 'I am not Q'?
Marketing 101 people - 'Not Q'
Read between the lines. We're waking up severely brainwashed individuals and seeking to trigger them. We need 'controversy' not 'bed time snuggles'.
Q also said no outsider mod interaction on /projectdcomms/ and yet that happened. Has anyone brought that up with Jim or asked if it's even still possible? No, because you don't care about the truth.
There is PLENTY of proof this is from the Q team. Now, the question becomes, HOW to market it and use it to expand outreach? We are the news now. This is OUR narrative on 'Not Q'.
>Now, the question becomes, HOW to market it and use it to expand outreach?
read that sentence a few times over
and then read it again
kek
>This is OUR narrative
It sure isโฆ
You're not telling me anything with that. Sorry. You have to be more expressive. Treat me like a 5th grader.
And I'm sure it's Just a coincidence OSS appears after the bullshit TSQ fake proofs were notabled and then called out as fake by anons.
BV dart deleting the proof after siding with the shill baker
> and deleting anon's posts for calling out BV Dart
Same thing he did last bread
>>15821521
>And I'm sure it's Just a coincidence OSS appears after the bullshit TSQ fake proofs were notabled and then called out as fake by anons.
I appeared after being absent for 2 days because you niggers are again trying blame shit on me. Run your gay OPs, destroy Q research, I don't give a fuck. Just don't blame me for your faggotry.
You come on here calling people names which is uncalled for. The media all know I have everything and nothing can stop what is coming.
Please add to top of CALL TO MEMES LIST
Vote Rinos Out
Vote Dems Out
Run for Political Position
Storm the School Boards
Call for Closed Borders
Demand All Mandates Be Dropped
Stop Paying taxes unless representation
Flood your congressman with calls 24/7
Push 8Kun Notables to the World
Gather moar pepes into 8kun
Back the Blue
Bring to light all corruption
Pray for Patriots WW
Create Memes to circumvent 'his' algorithm
Help others understand this is Biblical
Hold the Media Accountable
Flood the Vote
Call for VoterID
This has everything to do with the truth. The media all know, I exposed all the names in the flight log of government swamp and Hollywood. They also know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms caught on the security cameras. I exposed the swamp guilty of crimes on Epstein Island. The media are covering up everything exposed nearly four years ago. I downloaded the declassified documents and files from Q-research. There are no coincidences why I've exposed everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. The truth has everything to do with precious blood and child sacrifice.
Banning anons for questioning the notables now
if "hiv" is supposed to mean Hivemind, BVs are way off.
>>15821538
>>15821538
ob
>>15822347
>>15822069
>>15822090
>>15822147
>>15822280
Shill Baker baking.
Shill BV supporting
This is not a division tactic.
Truth Social Q is fake Q.
TRUE.
That is what we must assume, given NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
But TS@Q is still newsworthy .
Because it is ABOUT Q. Thus, relevant and therefore notable. Just like anti-Q articles are relevant: not because they are true but because we need to know what is being said.
Plz see global.
>This Truth Social Q maneuver was telegraphed by OSS in November and December
Second
I also might add: it's weak as fuck
>Truth Social Q is outside Comms
>and Fake.
>Needs to be not Notable until proven relevant.
>it's a division tactic
agreed
>Truth Social Q is fake Q.
>TRUE.
>That is what we must assume, given NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
>But TS@Q is still newsworthy .
agree with all of this
<This is not a division tactic.
Disagree with this.
It's being used by the shills. We now have Q proofs in the notables and "new Q". It's disinformation, and therefore a divisionn tactic.
Just read the shill baker's bread title.
Shill baker took the ghosted bake after posting Truth Social Q "Proofs" and then Notabled them.
Guess it's difficult to follow if you weren't wathcing it happen.
20005:Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS? Edition
well said
>20005:Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS? Edition
>Plz see global.
I think your global was nuked
I was in bread for your discussion, and I appreciated you trying to get ahead of it, but I saw this coming. OSS was shit posting about Truth Social replacing 8kun for months before he was un-assed. This was the plan all along.
btw BV dart didn't even bother to try and figure out what was happening. Just sided with the shill baker and proceeded to delete notables he didn't like for some reason.
If it were me baking and there were this much opposition to a notable,I would take it out. Simple as that. No problems.
If it were me baking and there were this much opposition to a notablethat I posted and self nommed,I would unquestionably take it out.
Of course, I wouldn't have self-nommed my own __fake proof __to be notable and supported that fake proof with sock puppets, like what happened in this case.
anyway. I'm done for the day. Thanks again for making it comfy here Board Owner. Appreciate it.
President Trump Is Q+ . I Know This Because I Downloaded All Of The Declassified Documents And I Have All The Files. He Told Me To Trust The Plan And Justice Was Coming.
It Is Obvious You Don't Realize President Donald J Trump Is Q+. Not Every Anon Is Legit. I Was Told To Be Careful Who I Follow In This Movement. Some Have An Agenda And Are Spreading False Narratives. The News Media Knows I Exposed All The Names In The Flightlog Of Government Swamp And Hollywood. They Also Know I Exposed Nancy Pelosi In The Underground Rooms, Caught On The Security Cameras. I've Written To Every News Personality And Every News Channel. They Are Knowingly Ignoring Me. They Know I Exposed This Pedophile/Trafficking Ring And Those Guilty Of Crimes On Epstein Island. I Can Confirm He Is Q Because I Followed The Breadcrumbs. I Downloaded All The Declassified Documents And I Have All The Files. I Exposing Everything Nearly Four Years Ago. I Was Told To Trust The Plan And Justice Was Coming.
>This is not a division tactic.
> OSS was shit posting about Truth Social replacing 8kun for months
>This Truth Social Q maneuver was telegraphed by OSS in November and December. Highly suspect it's him pushing the TSQ proof shit,
"So glad Q has returned, shills on suicide watch"
Looks like anon was correct.
ban ban ban delete delete delete
that seems to be the tune that BV's and BO dance to these days
the deletions and bans in QR are getting more ridiculous every day
if 2 anons Notable a post, the Baker must log it as such, end of story
and certainly anons should not be banned for trivial reasons that trigger a crybaby BV
Q also said no outsider mod interaction on /projectdcomms/ and yet that happened. Has anyone brought that up with Jim or asked if it's even still possible? No, because you don't care about the truth. How does it feel being compromised from the top down?
So
interested in all input on TS@Q, just can't keep up, busy IRL too
will try to address issues below
generally - tempest in a teapot imo
Global should help clarify
shills will shill, always happen for a new wedge issue (there will be moar)
>division tactic
well, by shills yes
not by admins or bakers (not talking about "shill bakers')
shill activity here is constant
so we counter
countered w/discussion and just restoring global discussing board position based on discussion:
NUTSHELL
it's not Q wo/proof (which we don't think will happen) but newsworthy because it's relevant to Q. Want to be aware of it, track it, examine it.
>shill baker
which bread #? will ck it out
haven't cked with all bakers, some.
might be bakers who think TS@Q is real deal - even if not shills. but if so, gotta hash it out coz that's not going to sit well with most anons on this board.
>Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS
that's an article title if i recall
from PM?
disagree with the premise, wouldn't have named a bread after it, but i didn't bake
global prolly wasn't nuked
i baked and there was some confusion about whether latest notables were in the dough
baker may have grabbed dif dough wo/new global, not overly concerned re fuckery
dart is trusted and that trust was hard earned
i need bred # to see which baker is "shill"
all bakers have been called shill
mostly due to mistakes, comm problems and other "shit that happens in the gulch"
Admins have been trying to get to know bakers, have a sense of 'sup and pretty broad view of the territory.
Remember that main issue (from my pov) is not whether TS@Q is real - NO WAY at this point. Bunch of important people with a new social media site set up an acct and call it @Q and then say things like WWG1WGA.
That's supposed to be proof?
I know what Praying Medic says - entitled to his opinion. Got proof? No.
I'll chime in,
Just because I find it funny how ASS and discord groomer cabalists spent all this time complaining about LARPS and fake Q,
to suddenly pushing this shit every day. To the degree that we're here having this discussion now.
"See you on Truth social" was the first thing little ASS said when he got removed as BV
After hyping TS up for months, day in and day out since it was even announced.
WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED IF IT WAS DOAR FAGS RUNNING THE ACCOUNT
Anons have screeenshots. All of [their] tactics are well documented, and we see the patterns.
That shit looks, sounds and smells like the same shit we saw with il Papi Trumpo's sensational crumb nonsense
Are we hitting REAL RAW levels of faggotry here?
Do they really think we follow the letter Q like sheep on their plantation follow the stars?
>spoiler alert
TLDR; I literally do not care what's being posted on TS, GETTR or any other platform,
by any "anonymous" affiliated namefag/famefag/grifter/larp shitposter account
If what they're talking about it notable, that is what this baker will notable
As for timestamp schizo nonsense, [you] can keep that shit in /HIV/
>DOAR fags running @Q
how would DOAR fags get on TS?
Hard to imagine them as hobnobbing with capital hill types.
(just sayin)
But shills sure know how to take advantage of any issue that might cause division, no matter how trivial.
>other platforms
are all unique, all have good and bad stuff about em, most want too much user info imo.
Iage boards more my speed. Always.
tx for the ideas - and for the bakes.
o7
*image boards
Last Q drop notable - event marker.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/01/entertainment/dee-snider-ukrainians-hit-song-cec/index.html
That moment when you realize that the entire point of this META is a kayfabe show to convince everyone the BO & crew are not actual FEDS, which they are.
>>15825394
Pain is what I suffer with 24/7. I have the most painful disease known to mankind RSD/CRPS. There isn't any cure and I'm in constant fight or flight. I've suffered twenty years of trauma surgeries requiring many units of blood. The very reason I exposed the drug andrenochrome derived from adrenalized blood. I don't know what a day feels like without burning and stabbing pain. I'm still not getting my pain addressed, due to the fear "I might become addicted to pain medication" My new doctor's reply . Most drug addicts get better medical care than a chronic pain patient. I've had many traumatic outcomes and infections from the implanted parts, mostly likely they were produced in China. My hips and my total knee replacement came with complications. A fall in my living room spiral fractured my femur in my RSD afflicted limb. "Pantifa"? I'm am starting to feel really insecure for exposing the truth and it took courage to do. I've been viciously attacked and persecuted in my private messenger and on my face book page. I've had to deal with restrictions from posting, including my birthday Oct 11th I couldn't even wish my twin sister a Happy Birthday, All for sharing a news article on Dr Fauci. I've been bullied, mocked, viciously attacked. My face book page was deactivated by whomever is in control. All for exposing the names in the flight log of government swamp and Hollywood. All for exposing Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms caught on security cameras. All for exposing this demonic pedophile ring of those who are guilty of crimes on Epstein Island. This truly is a holy war of good vs evil. I haven't had any emotional support since I fell down this rabbit hole. The fake news media still won't acknowledge that I exposed everything. It's been nearly four years since I've exposed the swamp and I was told to trust the plan. I'm really not sure what the plan is, or when justice is coming. I have pretty much balled my eyes out every day and I barely sleep. The movie Alice in wonderland storyline, has some coincidental things pertaining to my life. I'm not even kidding. This Includes the chubby twins who bully Alice. I sometime wish I never exposed the evil in this world. The swamp got caught and we have everything. I'm still waiting for the biblical ending. The picture with Hillary Clinton and Putin with Russia Russia Russia gave me the chills. The Lions and 3 pink roses, the dolls with big blue eyes, look like a painting I did as a young girl. I gifted the painting to my daughter last Christmas.I just got this lion tattoo done on my birthday. I have a lion tatt on my leg with my brothers names "Donnie" in the mane. Everything seems so very strange. Coincidences? I don't know. I was just told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
Ukraine is going to reveal very much along with Myanmar. Stay strong Patriot. DoS is who is being revealed currently.
You were also told to stop posting copypasta
I'm Praying for America to be Great Again. The news media have done a disservice. I feel like they even care I exposed Nancy Pelosi in those underground rooms, the names in the flight log or those children sitting naked on buckets. These people are sick and evil. What was the point in being entrusted to expose everything if the news media refuse to acknowledge the truth?
I'm praying truth and justice prevail. The swamp was exposed a long time ago. They are guilty of treason and sadistic crimes. What do you mean by "So"? The total disregard and lack of empathy is what bothers me the most. Predators who traffic and harm children are the most evil in this world.
Dart is gold
ASS is in the rear view. As BO says - always treat ASS as a dangerous animal. NEVER let your guard down, but anons by and large know the deal.
We have a HUGE responsibility with Q Research. Doesn't matter about who is on TS or what moves they're making. Q Research (and the chans) will always have their niche for the long appreciable future. If we focus on our success everything will take care of itself.
Truth Q? Not Q? TS@Q? Not TS@Q? - Let's keep the conversation going and the energy high around 'What and who is TS@Q'. Outreach will draw many to Truth Social if we here at Q Research can link Q to Truth Social. Again, we have our niche. It won't change what we do. Good BO and BV's are bringing Q Research together. Dedicated bakers are keeping the news digs ,memes and prayers fresh. It's all coming together.
Why did a GV invade and interfere with Q's board? Because Q cared very much that it did not happen. He holds it to be even more important than the existence of the follow-up board /qresearch/ currently. What this means is 1. CM had set it up, Jim did not or was unaware and REMOVED this protection. Why? Ever the question, stupidity or malice. I dare you to try and refute that. Find out for yourselves! Illuminating questions when after the truth.
Q would NOT like the invasion, and I would think they would not like those sitting idly by without protest. Something to think about when you're wondering why he hasn't posted in a while.
You'd need to be a fool to not recognize that this post specifically makes /projectdcomms/ into a massive value target to defy the wishes of the /projectdcomms/ BO. Shouldn't you be wondering WHY they did that? It wasn't your best interest in mind, I can tell you that.
Cricket choir continues, but it's more deafening that you realize because it means volumes in complicity.
anon has a point
why are you trying to diminish and mock his concerns ?
ad hominem fail on your part
I must note that you seem to make many posts here
Do you hold special sway here? Are you more important than other anons?
I thought the Meta was for constructive discussion but in your case you appear to use it mostly to attack other anons
Please take a step back and analyse if your contributions to Meta are positive and constructive or purely negative attacks on anons
Thank you
>>15826848
>anon has a point
no he doesnt
>why are you trying to diminish and mock his concerns ?
because they are pointless
>ad hominem fail on your part
don't care, didnt ask
>>15826861
>I must note that you seem to make many posts here
I must note you had nothing to say this entire thread
until it came time to criticizing my latest reply
Case dismissed
ck email in 5.
for context since u replied.
>>15822158 ty bo
This is direct link to the memes request post
add this one too please
Calm The Masses
>an oldie but a goodie
Shill Baker G reporting in sirs. -o7
seems no one liked me making a discussion of the TS@Q (Shills Triggered Biggly)
TS@Q
as far as a shill account - has not proven so.
as far as a patriot account - seems to have Proofs aligning
We do not know if it is or not.
Q said no outside comms from THIS PLATFORM
'this platform' is a free speech board
TS is also a Free Speech Board
Just as 4chan is and 8chan was
there is also another Free speech board, BO knows of and yes again who are the Advisors to that board. Have we all forgotten our training and teachings?
You were there BO.
If you think Q is only locking himself down to 8kun you would be wrong frens, severely wrong. THERE IS MOAR GOING ON THAN YOU KNOW OR I CAN SAY.
Ask /x/ about Q, they know
Ask /ats/ about Q, they know
Who is Alice and What is the Wonderland?
I just dropped a taste of what is to come.
Hope you guys are ready
*SOME TSQ PROOFS FOR YA ANONS
This is not a game or a popularity contest. It's easy to attack the messenger stuck at home in a wheelchair. There is no "QAnon" . There is "Q" and there are "anons". Not all "anons" are legit . Those who can't confirm who Q really is, are creating their own narrative. There are no coincidences why I was entrusted to expose everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. Q=Alice in wonderland.
We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming. I downloaded the declassified documents and I have all the files. The media knows I exposed all the names in the flight log to Epstein Island. They also know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms, caught on the security cameras. I exposed the drug andrenochrome exported from China.There no coincidences why I've exposed everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
Nothing can stop what is coming~MAGA
I've been downloading everything for nearly four years. It took courage exposing this worldwide trafficking ring from the Vatican to the royal family. This was never about democrat vs republican. The truth has everything to do with crimes against humanity. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. God Bless~Godspeed~MAGA!
chekt
>busy IRL too
understood, will try and streamline a response to hopefully save you some time.
>dart is trusted and that trust was hard earned
I trust you Board owner, so will give Dart the benefit of the doubt. Dart may want to study bread 20004 some though. Trendy came in late and probably wouldn't have had required info to know what had happened, and was probably just supporting BV dart.
>not by admins or bakers (not talking about "shill bakers')
>it's not Q wo/proof
The shill baker an his "proofs" yesterday were the issue.
Kitchen was ghosted. Shill Baker most likely Ass posted "Q proofs", then claimed the bake and added his fake proofs to notables. Anons called it out. Shill Baker ignored. Pic related at >>15822711 and >>15822788
>>15822727 < -pic rel Fake "Proofs" Pic 1 and 2
>>15822839 < -what a non shill baker would do. Just take them out is the non shill baker solution. There was moar than enough opposition from anons
>shill baker
>which bread #? will ck it out
Breads 20004 and 20005
Re-reading the bread and it's pretty stinkin obvious
20004
>>15819382 Bred is Ghost
<(fdddc4)
>>15819583 Shill posts TSQ Fake "Proofs"
>>15819826 Same shill Claiming bake
>>15819989 Same Shill adding fake proofs and sockpuppet (70393e) to the notables.
>>15819636 sock puppet notable call (70393e)
>Anons objecting
>>15819591, >>15819620, >>15819788, >>15819807, >>15820098, >>15819645, >>15819703, >>15819748, >>15819804, >>15819836 There are plenty moar objections. Including anon's posts that were deleted.
<(fdddc4)
>>15820089 Shill Baker Projecting. try harder OSS
>>15819700, >>15820092, >>15819833, >>15819792, >>15819769, >>15819755, >>15819677, >>15819634,
>>15820020, >>15820089 shill baker lobbying for his fake proof notable bun
>>15819686 Self nom
Not sure how newfag the BVs are but we aren't dealing with a single user id. Ass runs multiple sock puppets to give him the illusion of support. He also probably has the support of other real life retardfags. He will regularly call out Anons as Ass or some other namefag scapegoat, eg Try harder OSS. Newfag BVs would do well to study bread 20004 as it was a shill taking over the bake.
Anon tried to prevent it.
>Looks like anon was correct.
Of course anon was correct. Anon has been calling out that absolute retard for years.
>I'll chime in,
>LARPS and fake Q, to suddenly pushing this shit every day.
kek
>"See you on Truth social" was the first thing little ASS said when he got removed as BV
>After hyping TS up for months, day in and day out
>Anons have screeenshots. All of [their]tactics are well documented, and we see the patterns.
nailed it
except for the timestamp schizo nonsense.
I like that.
Check this out.
Let me stop u right there anon
ur shill baker is me - Baker G. please read postings above.
funny how i bake for almost 4-5 years and np, but the moment i mention a possible new q account away from kun, shit goes south
AGAIN U CAN NOT SPLAIN
4CHAN POSTING
8CHAN POSTING
your argument is moot and your logic is limited.
no u tried to steal the bake and split the dough, thats not how we work around here
ANONS DONT STEAL
so guess this means u aint an anon.
NO OUTSIDE COMES BEYOND THIS PLATFORM
THIS PLATFORM IS FREE SPEECH
JUST LIKE 4CHAN
JUST LIKE 8CHAN
JUST LIKE TS
Selectively ignoring Q posts defines this one compromised place for Q must go and yet cannot go. This silences Q because you're being selective with the posts.
>>15826617
>Cricket choir continues, but it's more deafening that you realize because it means volumes in complicity
Silence does not mean inaction
Hi, first poster to address this issue directly. Have you heard of honesty in communications between administration staff and us lowly plebian anons? You hint at the possibility of action, but action so far has been to ban me and call me OSS. What action are you actually aware of? Because hints at 'maybes' are not inline with previous dishonesty. I appreciate your attempt, but no one gives a shit about just being honest about what's actually going on. Are you going to change that?
Let's go over what the possibility of action might be given what we CAN see, which is to have Jim help administrate along side BO. Why would he need to keep it a secret wrt Q post requests for no mod interation of his board? I don't think that WOULD be a secret UNLESS he doesn't seek to fulfill that wish. What action could possibly be done along that track that requires secrecy? Oh, I know, you're hinting at other action and lying here and now. Incoming removal of post demand open adherence with Q's wish coming in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..
Weird, wonder why my post last night calling out that this entire bread is kayfabe to make anons that read it not realize the Admins are all federal agents got deleted. I guess my 1 single post in this bread was "spam"
Anons know, you federal faggots.
>THIS PLATFORM IS FREE SPEECH
>Shill Baker G reportingโฆ
KEK
All bakers are called shills, especially if they bake a lot.
That said, when baking, you represent all anons, not just yourself.
If your views diverge too much from those of most anons, and your notables reflect this, they will object.
NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
That's a VERY clear statement.
Biggest reason imo to remain skeptical of claims made to the contrary.
More reasons:
we need actual proof - so far, . just claims.
why wouldn't Q inform us? Two ways (2 boards). Nobody has trip except Q.
Most anons don't have access to TS.
Those wo/Apple won't have access for even longer.
Argument about poor security at 8: chans are chans, always kind of wild, but that's one reason Q came here - wild and free.
Q has never objected to conditions on chans, just adapted.
Chans are where the autists are, not TS (will prolly remain true even w/access - many don't want a "sign in" experience).
the idea that because TS is a "platform" it is the same platform as QR is hard to defend.
always better to be conservative - wait and see - than jump to conclusions too early.
Your views are your own.
But when baking, wise to avoid taking a position that squarely differs from what most anons think. Especially over an issue that will eventually be resolved, one way or another.
>>15827882
>>15827944
>>15827964
>>15828039
this belongs in General, not here. Sorry.
Tx for the documentation.
Understand the bottom line -
objection to baker going against a basic premise of this board (no outside comms).
Baker is this poster -
Not OSS.
I do not agree with his conclusions but they are his.
Baker role is not about personal opinions. Outlook does influence notables but shouldn't do so to the point where there are wholesale objections - that just doesn't work, see
Even if baker is right (NOT saying he is), the TIMING is wrong. Truth always reveals itself in time, we don't have to push the river.
Won't get anywhere arguing.
Anons not supporting you on this.
Stealing is not encouraged - but if it's anons (not shills), means they think baker is a shill.
''[just saw BV says there were several bakes, including one by OSS - taking advantage of chaos. Generally, BVs support signed in baker (preserving the chain of custody). If there's a problem, needs to be discussed.]
BV will stick with signed in baker, not allow an OSS steal. This is not an endorsement of a course that puts you squarely in opposition to anons with a solid argument to back their position: NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
Thoughts?
Do you remember what Q did the last time the security of his tripcode came under question? He went silent to verify by being silent that he still had his tripcode. Would you consider mod intervention on his private board a security problem for his tripcode? I would. Ergo, silence. Not only that but it is ongoing.
If there is a perceived shill in the bakery and there's no BV around and the shill is causing mass chaos I'll try to steal the bake (mainly to get eyes on), but let me emphasize - it is LAST RESORT ONLY. I've done it once since the new board staff appeared and it cleared up some baking rules that some were bending to benefit them greatly but anons benefitted very little.
Bread steals should basically NEVER happen and when they do it always points to some other problem (like ASS or a baker not following protocol).
>>15829592 link is in this post >>15827670
>>15829958 NO OUTSIDE COMMS. [BEYOND THIS PLATFORM] a platform is not a websote, less u count free speech platform. u cant splain 4chan unless this is the truth. btw not saying its q, but its q. carry on.
>>15830228 NO OUTSIDE COMMS. See above
TBC A PLATFORM IS NOT A WEBSITE
wordpress is a platform
joomla is a platform
bulletin board is a platform
free speech is a platform
4chan, 8chan, 8kun are all WEBSITES, they use a free speech image based PLATFORM
Just like TS is a free speech image based PLATFORM
PLEASE RESEARCH WHAT A PLATFORM IS AND LEARN TO $_CODE
List of low-code development platforms
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_low-code_development_platforms
/end
please refresh
META was just attacked again
same approach as b4 - separate IPs w/accusations, other bs
NOW CLEAN.
Open for business.
>That said, when baking, you represent all anons, not just yourself.
Ah. So can we talk about the baker who seems to be absolutely OBSESSED with biolabs, their locations, and muddies the waters with some pretty obvious propaganda? And is using multiple IPs to create the appearance of a consensus!
Itโs not totally unlike the Project Pelican days, when anyone who mentioned shipping containers was harassed into silence by a team of harpies.
Bakers who repost the same thing againandagainandagain for so very many breads are absolutely shills.
Thatโs not autism, weaponized or otherwise. Thatโs an agenda.
No we cannot talk about bakers who post on biolabs. Bakers work hard. What u do, anon? Take notes? Baker? Dig? Got memes to post? Mebbe a prayer? Share it in Generals.
Why is that situation off the table for discussion?
Some bakers have quite the martyr complex for engaging in a hobby of their own free will.
I posted a query here a few days back and it has been deleted
I don't understand why
It wasn't abusive or shilling, I asked a genuine question and Meta scrubbed it
I give up, what's the point
>Truth always reveals itself in time, we don't have to push the river
very well said anon
coz i fuggen said so.
did i say this was a thread for talking about bakers? No. Get a life.
if it was a real query, you gave up too easy. Even for a shill.
>He went silent to verify by being silent that he still had his tripcode.
I mean, this is one possible explanation
but, it IS a good explanationโฆ
>Would you consider mod intervention on his private board a security problem for his tripcode?
Yes
I would
>I would.
>Ergo, silence.
>Not only that but it is ongoing.
thank you for sharing, anon
this seems to be a highly plausible explanation for our current predicament
re: where's Q?
'''Germany has moved up to #94
International Q Research Threads
>>15592235 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Australia #21
>>14841879 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Balkan #9
>>15801702 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Canada #30
>>15744684 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ France #6
>>15830234 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Germany #94
>>15198192 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Italia #2
>>14586201 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Nederland #7
>>15422355 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Japan #4
>>14475779 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ New Zealand #9
>>14493540 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Scotland #5
>>15493933 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ South Africa #7
>>15547330 โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ UK #43
Coz youโre who, exactly?
just tried to ebake, catalog borked?
noted - tx.
nobody special but maintain this thread so bakers can ask about board status, admins can answer questions, and anons can see what's happening on the board.
What's your interest, anon?
Famous Fan
Can't make conspiracy theories or memes
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and Rhona McKhann She graduated from Choate Rosemary Hall in 1979. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brown University in 1983, where she studied Russian literature, political science, and history.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and Rhona McKhann She graduated from Choate Rosemary Hall in 1979. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brown University in 1983, where she studied Russian literature, political science, and history.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
AT SOME POINT the streets (((for them))) will not be safe.
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
SCHIFF - UKRAINIAN JEW
NULAND - UKRAINIAN JEW
VINDMAN - UKRAINIAN JEW
AND ON AND ON AND ON
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
TO DISCOVER WHO CAUSES
ALL THE TROUBLE & STRIFE
SIMPLY GO TO WIKIPEDIA
AND CHECK EARLY LIFE
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
SCHIFF - UKRAINIAN JEW
NULAND - UKRAINIAN JEW
VINDMAN - UKRAINIAN JEW
AND ON AND ON AND ON
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
TO DISCOVER WHO CAUSES
ALL THE TROUBLE & STRIFE
SIMPLY GO TO WIKIPEDIA
AND CHECK EARLY LIFE
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Why is Nuland panicking?
Victoria Nuland was born in 1961 to Sherwin B. Nuland, a surgeon born to Eastern European Jewish immigrants
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHY ARE THEY ALL UKRAINIAN JEWS?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHERE WAS THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE LOCATED?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
WHY WOULD THE KHAZARS WANT GENETICALLY TARGETTED BIOWEAPONS?
SCHIFF - UKRAINIAN JEW
NULAND - UKRAINIAN JEW
VINDMAN - UKRAINIAN JEW
AND ON AND ON AND ON
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
TO DISCOVER WHO CAUSES
ALL THE TROUBLE & STRIFE
SIMPLY GO TO WIKIPEDIA
AND CHECK EARLY LIFE
Happy Friday
Happy Friday >>15835183
We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming
The President Donald J Trump is Q. Only those who downloaded the declassified documents and files can confirm who Q really is. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
There are no coincidences why I've downloaded the declassified documents and I have all the files. The media knows who and "what" I exposed nearly four years ago. The swamp got caught and you're watching the biggest coverup in US history. I was told to be careful who I follow. Some are spreading false narratives for fame and notoriety. The media knows I exposed all the names in the flight log to Epstein Island. They also know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms caught on the security cameras. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. God wins this holy war of good vs evil.
Q 4ch -Q 8ch announced beforehand?
Q 8ch -Q 8kun announced? (Why?)
Define pattern.
Q 8kun -Q TS?
[Truth]
8kun admin leaves immediately following 2020 election. Coincidence?
Maybe Ron Watkins was Q.
Maybe Jim Watkins was Q.
Maybe Steve Bannon was Q.
Maybe several were parts of Q posting drops when told.
Value of NDA to a Patriot defending his country?
Common sense is good.
One thing is for sureโฆ
@Q on TS knows Kash Patel, Dan Scavino, and Devin Nunes.
Guilt by association.
Art of War.
Socrates.
@Q knows Q+. Do you really think Q is not aware of @Q?
Given the circle of people surrounding @Q, what are the chances that @Q is nothing but a troll job?
"Isn't trolling the media fun?" -Q
Six sigma.
Remember what Q said.
About Fake Q
What matters most is not who posted it, but what they posted.
As a valid response to qresearch
What is important to you in determining if something is valid?
If Q posts tits.
Are those tits Q?
Wouldn't it require a number of proofs to make it a Q?
And above all
What is it that Q is trying to convey?
I think that a globally valid Word deserves attention!
To the world and to us.
whatever one calls oneself
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃคโ ถโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโ โก
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ ธโ โขทโขคโขโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโ โขโฃคโ พโขโก โ
โ โ โ โ โ โขโกโ โ โข โฃพโฃงโฃกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโฃพโฃทโฃโฃฟโ ฅโกโ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โขปโฃฟโฃทโฃโฃโฃฟโกฟโฃฟโฃทโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃพโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกโฃโขกโ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃโฃโฃฟโฃโขโ โขถโฃถโฃโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃโกโกโ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โฃธโกโฃ โกฟโ โ โ โ โ โ โ ปโฃโ ฟโฃฟโกงโฃโ โ โ โ โ โขโ คโขโฃฝโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกโขโฃโ ซโ โ โ โ
โ โ โฃฐโกโ โฃดโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃงโ โขทโฃโ โฃโฃฌโฃฆโฃดโฃขโฃพโฃฟโฃฟโกฟโ โ โ ธโ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โขโฃฟโ โขโฃฟโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขธโกโ โขปโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกโ โ โขโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ ธโกโ โขจโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃโ โขโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโฃฟโกฟโ โ โฃโกโ คโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โขโฃพโกโ โขธโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃฟโ โ ผโ ฟโ โ โขโกโ คโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โขพโฃฟโฃโ โ โฃทโ โ โ โ โ โข โฃโ โ โ โขโกงโ โ โ โฃโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ ปโ ฟโฃฆโ โขนโกโ โ โ โ โขธโกโขทโฃโขโกพโ โฃฐโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โขทโกโ นโฃฆโกโ โ โ โขงโกโ โ โ โขฐโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โขปโฃทโฃฌโฃโฃปโฃถโฃถโฃพโฃโ โ โ โขธโฃโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ จโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃโ โ ฐโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขธโกโ โขธโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โข โ โฃฐโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโขโฃถโฃโกกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
Glowing hard much anon? So sus
BO
Can you fix #20039 at the bottom of my notes please and TY
>>15847504 #2003 s/b
>>15847504 #20039
My interest in who says โbecause I said soโ isnโt an interest in the actual anon. Thatโs not my business. Itโs an interest in why a baker or whatever would even SAY โbecause I said soโ. Bakers, note takers, BV, BO, etc. donโt own the narrative, do they? Itโs very easy to create a false consensus. Shutting down inquiry wrt to certain board behaviors with โbecause I said soโ is some authoritarian bs.
done.
no one owns the narrative. i'm not creating false consensus. i'm dealing with shills who attack this thread regularly, also infiltrate with inappropriate questions. Especially when it comes to critiquing bakers for discussing things like biolab locations, which is exactly the kind of thing we cover.
As for multiple IPs, many anons including me have multiple unwanted IPs hops bc of the way some VPN service operate. Nothing is perfect here but we still manage an all-volunteer 24 hour alt-news service with stuff that cannot be found elsewhere. Despite all the glitches.
>that @Q is nothing but a troll job?
possible thinking
has the account turned to trolling?
is the account for public use?
is it time for Q to go Public?
Nunes, scavino and the rest are involved.
dont mistake the obvious.
this person is main personnel.
proofs are aligning.
what is a platform?
what is a free speech platform?
not saying its Q but its q
"Less than 10 have the full picture." - Q
Think logically.
Do you need the full picture to post a Q drop?
Can someone <higher uptell someone to make a post as Q?
Q drop #1234 = person A
Q drop #3456 = person B
Full knowledge = neither person A nor person B
= <PLAN protected>?
Of COURSE there are shills and I get that. I also agree that discussing bio labs makes complete sense on QR. The โdiscussionโ, unfortunately, has been more of a monologue. With the exception of Maloneโs and Atkinssonโs articles, that were notabled in a few breads vs. dozens of breads. 99% of the articles noted abt bio labs has been in context of weapons/weaponization.
not sure what kind of discussion you would like to see. Anons can discuss anything that is dug on. But sometimes the same stuff gets rehashed because there's a lot of interest in the topic and it's the only info available atm. Similar stories will show up in notables. Once more news becomes available, the stories get fresher and the discussions more productive.
๐๐
Is it possible for youtube to work automatically play once
It keeps replaying and I don't know which one
I heard something about Tor getting back to work
Or is it just a rumour?
March Madness is full of rumours
Name fags GTFO
>4chan, 8chan, 8kun are all WEBSITES, they use a free speech image based PLATFORM
8chan/kun does not use the same TECHNOLOGY as 4chan.
8chan/kun is its own platform.
4chan is another platform.
Fuck, it's all the way down on every single webpage here.
infinity Copyright ยฉ 2013-2022 N.T. Technology, Inc. based on sources from Fredrick Brennan's "Infinity Development Group"
OpenIB by Code Monkey
>proofs are aligning.
Could simply post another one of this sequence.
Doesn't.
Why?
Because fake + ghey
>but but these timestamps
So difficult to do, yeah.
OUTSIDE OF THIS PLATFORM
stop spreading fake bullshit.
ty
>what is a platform?
8ch/8kun.
Same as twitter is a platform. And facebook is a platform. And TS is a platform.
8ch/8kun is not the same platform as TS.
>TS
is also not even open for everyone.
afaik it's also not even open for all Americans either.
afaik it's also not anonymous
Can you EVEN access TS without smartphone?
I don't see a way to even access it via web browser.
>same platform
BS
not only from a software perspective, but also from a usability perspective, and from a user interface perspective and and and
wtf is "an inappropriate question"?
are you some sort of gatekeeping antifa faggot ?
anons can ask any fucking question they fucking want to you fucking retarded fucking mong-troon
fucking idiot
Mama told me be nice with all women
And
You have to learn how to use weapon
So
punish them tyrants and their chicken
Then
Do not think about what will happen
Say
Where We Go One We Go All As One
beside
Nothing Can Stop What Is Come Son
Facebook Meta logo.
Meta Medical logo.
Same symbol?
Meta in Hebrew = ?
Death is eternal.
We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming. The media knows I exposed the government swamp and Hollywood elite guilty of crimes on Epstein Island. I downloaded the declassified documents and I have all the files. They know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms and the names in the flight log. I've been researching and downloading everything for nearly four years. There are no coincidences why I have everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
There are no coincidences why I have all the declassified documents and files. The President Donald J Trump is Q+ and not all anons' are legit. This is not a game or a popularity contest. The media knows I exposed the swamp nearly four years ago. The news articles written about
"Q-anon" are misinformation. There are people creating their own narratives and spreading false information. The media knows I exposed all the names in the flight log of government swamp and Hollywood. They also know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms caught on the security cameras. The fake news media knows I have everything and so does POTUS. I've been researching and downloading everything for nearly four years. He told me to trust the plan and justice was coming.
I have everything and there are no coincidences. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. We have everything and nothing can stop what is coming.
Everyone knows I have everything and there are no coincidences. This includes POTUS and the fake news media. They know who and "what" I exposed nearly four years ago. He entrusted me to expose everything due to corruption in the CIA, FBI and government. The truth has everything to do with crimes against humanity and precious blood. It has become rather apparent no one wants me to be a hero. I've been persecuted and viciously attacked every single day for exposing all the demons. I suffer with the most painful disease known to mankind RSD/CRPS. I've endured twenty years of trauma surgeries requiring many units of blood. I'm in constant fight or flight, my pain signals never shut off. The disease has no cure and I suffer 24/7. I've endured this painful progressive disease for twenty two years. It is of fire & ice and hasn't any cure. I exposed the swamps dirty little secret drug andrenochrome exported from China. The drug is derived from adrenalized blood of victims experiencing painful trauma/torture/sacrifice. The drug fetches more cash than the purest heroin. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. It took courage exposing this worldwide trafficking ring of demonic pedophiles.
still don't have a working address for TOR
if you do, post it here.
Re YT or other vids - see CAP
it doesn't work
what i posted works for mp's
tried it on this one >>15855424
to play YT vids over and over, right click on vid and select Loop
if not selected, will only play once.
Works for me.
>Can you EVEN access TS without smartphone?
I access it ok via a Linux browser on a rooted Pinephone
What do the Baker Strike posts in QR mean ?
are bakers planning a strike? boycott?
Shill spam flavor of the week
>no one owns the narrative. i'm not creating false consensus
>inappropriate questions
there can not be an inappropriate QUESTION on a free speech board
asking questions can never be construed as a call to action, or a statement of intent
inciting violence is unlawful
posting illegal content (e.q. child porn) is unlawful
announcing your intention to commit illegal acts is (I am assuming) unlawful
asking a question is NEVER unlawful
therofore it does not qualify as illegal content
ergo, there is no such thing as an "inappropriate" question on a free speech board
beyond the context of unlawful activity which it could be argued you (as moderators/ administrators) have some level of legal liability to monitor and remove as it is found;
what argument do you have for the censorship of anything outside those boundries?
>Fuck, it's all the way down on every single webpage here.
the tennets of observation are ignored by many today
the Religion of Scientism allows one to outsource their own responsibility to observe and reason about the world around them to someone else
someone in a white lab coat usually
its mildly shocking how many who claim to be "administrators" around here have never read the "Welcome Page" to this place
its linked at the top of every page, in very much the same ubiquitous way thay the PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY of this board is stamped on the bottom of every page
and yet
almost no one notices
>https://8kun.top/qresearch/welcome.html
>are bakers planning a strike? boycott?
not planning
why would any oldfag baker play this game of baker verification?
by anons
for anons
at least thats how it was
just for your edification
that stuff is picked up by another board and goes out on notables site
not quite we are the news but similar
also a reminder you and other bakers are ebaking, without notables collected so there is that
not sure which time bubble you live in but there is a war for your soul and the soul of the board and it's not like it used to be, this isn't about a shill bake here or there, this is about power and breaking the rhythm of board dynamics, think they are winning? Not if we can help it.
>there is a war for your soul and the soul of the board
>it's not like it used to be
not an argument
there has been a war for the souls of men for over 3 thousand years
this is not a "new" condition
we win the war with Logos
True Speech
no one man knows what the Truth is
and thus we must allow for all kinds of "wrong speech" to compete in an OPEN FORUM, where only the best speech wins
the best speech wins because it is true
not because of the person who speaks it
not becuase of the tone of their voice when they speak it
not because of the eloquence of their vocabulary when they speak it
the TRUTH contained in their words (if it exists) is the sword that wins the battle
you have no idea which "shill" carries with them a sword of Truth within their message
you have no idea which "spam" contains within it that mere grain of Truth which we need to conquer the Father of Lies
this is why censorship is bad
not because your intentions are bad
but becuase you know not what you do
its okay though
no one can stop the plan
ifonlyyouknewhowbaditreallyis.png
>think they are winning?
who is "they"?
in my world; "they" is anyone who openly participates in lying
a person who speaks things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they speak it anyway
a person who does things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they do it anyway
a person who agrees to things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they agree to it anyway
>Not if we can help it.
who is "we"?
in my world; "we" is everyone who struggles to speak, do, and agree to:
"the Good, the True, and the Beutiful"
o7
you got it
they is anyone who wants to poison qr
we is everyone working to keep that from happening
simple concept, in practice can be tricky but it is being done by anons of all ranks, shit posters right on up to BO
o7
bakers have gone through a few rounds of verifying, rejecting verifying, etc. since the move to 8chan.
That's still a smartphone.
Also a tip: there is more than 1 OS on smartphones.
You think you have control, but you don't.
Did you know that Jim has moved all image hosting to cloudflare? Gee I wonder if Thesseus's ship is why Q hasn't posted. Is it not a platform worth using when compromised from the top down? Notice: I'm not querying whether it is, because it's a fact now that it is. Cloudflare deleted Jim before. Remember that?
sauce it
As far as I can see it is still 128ducks
https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/4072f17095dc09ed63e91b660ae47b0de726877479d1986777e70344e0e6349a.jpeg
Check the SSL certificate. Remember the problems during the SOTU? The malformed SSL certificate was why.
A little hint: Cloudflare inserts itself as a caching layer when using Cloudflare SSL certs. Not only that, but the cert was broken which was why I looked at what was going on. The standard advice staff gave was to blindly accept a broken certificate with cloudflare backing. Ask Jim if you don't believe me. The only reason he got it working now was switching to letsencrypt. But now you know why that happened at least mechanically.
The fake news media knows I exposed the swamp nearly four years ago. I downloaded the declassified documents and I have all the files. They know I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms of Epstein Island caught on the security cameras. They know I exposed the names in the flight log of government swamp and Hollywood. They are knowingly ignoring me because I'm not a public figure or a celebrity. The swamp got caught and we have everything. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming. There are no coincidences why I was entrusted.
There is no longer any immunity for any politician
They are the ones who opened this door
When they tried to bring down Trump
As you can see, Trump has no diplomatic immunity
Panic makes them not think well, they make traps and then fall into them
But where is the evidence
This is Killary people think she will go to jail for pizza and ate babies
As you see it's a different issue Not what people thinking
>letsencrypt
It has always been letsencryptโฆ even in 2017 when I was snooping around the trusted credentials it wasโฆ
I cant see any cloudfare connections.
sauce it
The real reason Putin failed to take control of Ukraine
is
Trump Javelin missile
Javelin has changed the equation
Trump Javelin VS Z battalions
It is the most important scene in this Movie
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-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-END CERTIFICATE-
There are supposed to be 5 dashes on the begin and end certificate lines preceding and following. This is the certificate that was in use during the SOTU. name it anything.cert and take a look. I'll pastebin a better example unless BO thinks this isn't a meta discussion worth having and the truth shall be suppressed yet again, just blindly accept whatever certificate without question.
OR do what this anon does and lie about it having always been letsencrypt when the proof is signed cryptographically. https://pastebin.com/raw/7kUbqHwT
Here's the relevant place to look.
interesting posts in the baking resources thread
>>15560391 ob
>Bakers Union: Oldfag Baker's Recollection
>>15566161 ob
>"8chan-style" baking vs "WWG1WGA-style" baking
and baking tips
>Baker tips: Real Life Baking Case Studies
>links to /comms/threads i.e. >>>/comms/8829
>Hard & Fast Rules vs Rules of Thumb
>Archives of Baking Classes:
good thread BO or whoever compiled it
worth skimming esp if youre newfag
[#2] :hide
โถAnonymous03/05/18 (Mon) 17:48:11 c6f4c7 No.156>>169 >>5528
re-posted from
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/556880.html#q557323
>>>/qresearch/557323
>I see the BAKER as part cheerleader and part editor.
Somewhat. Almost anyone except a clown can bake.
re: editing: Aside from chronicling Q posts, The baker's main job is to use discernment to take note of posts with actual relevant digs, findings, or connections, and making sure they go in the dough so they don't get lost amongst the bullshit (and as you know, there is a LOT of that).
This does NOT mean add any old cutesy post you like.
This does NOT mean adding stuff you happen to agree with, without checking for sauce.
This does NOT mean adding stuff people suggest, without first reviewing the information.
This DOES mean discerning real info from shill bait on the move. As you know, the bread doesn't rest. Neither can you, when you bake.
This DOES mean leaving your ego at the door; you may have to chronicle evidence that contradicts your current worldview..
Even if you've been insulted or had a bad day.
Baking is easy. Baking great bread takes practice and patience. God bless.
Reminder from Rusty
S-O-A-B
I didn't lie.
That was my direct experience and current knowledge.
Accusing Anon of being a liar, is the quickest way to shut down a conversation.
F
>I didn't lie.
>That was my direct experience and current knowledge.
Then you shouldn't have said 'It has always been letsencrypt' because clearly it wasn't. What you're saying is 'I didn't know' which is much different from 'it has always been letsenccrypt'. It's ok, I understand because I hadn't provided sauce yet. If I wanted to end the conversation choose a more inflammatory response than "Here's proof and this is clearly a lie told by a liar."
>Did you know that Jim has moved all image hosting to cloudflare?
And?
>why Q hasn't posted
There has been no reason for Q to post.
>compromised
Are you now pretending to be retarded or are you retarded?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET
>oh noes, this is on the internet, so it's compromised!!!
>but my precious TOR network
>but 8kun supports TOR, this means it's compromised
Let's say this "Q thing" is actually realsies and not a larp, what are the odds that the military controls it all already?
>but but da images
Images mean jack+shit anyway.
We got ASCII art.
It's more important that this PLATFORM stays up, and this PLATFORM is primarily about COMMUNICATION, something that Q already posted about.
2168:
"It will serveAS THE MAIN HUB OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS"
When shit hits the fan and some asshats are filling everything up with cp and other crap, you can simply switch it off, it's an optional part of 8kun now, which is a good thing. Plus think of the load when there are way more eyes than ever on here before.
Buckle up, buttercup.
>And?
You clearly don't remember history of 8kun. Do you remember before the start? When cloudflare kicked Jim off? Clearly you don't remember when he tried to get hosted and every company kicked him off repeatedly. Not only that but what it means when a certificate whitelists a cloudflare domain so they can cache every image hit. Your so what is the kind of attitude that leads to staff saying "just accept the certificate and no asking questions about it."
It's called a willful MITM attack put in place by the site administrator, AND it's not secure.
Furthermore, what the ship of Thesseus has to do with this is when an administrator ignores directives of moderator intervention which no one has asked whether that's still a possibility, other than I have, that even when the admin implements a compromised part of the /projectdcomms/ or the followup board which is for now /qresearch/. When the replacement if you look at the ship fuzzily, it appears to be the same, but a big enough hole in the bottom of the boat will sink it assuredly.
That's an odd reaction. Be careful what you say and you'll find you're not refuted.
When the Kun lost its image capability, I outsourced it.
This system works well.
The cookie policy is updated, and there aren't any trackers in the cookies.
Do your own research, and don't listen to numskells, knuckleheads, and thugs.
Thus proving my point. He has changed the nature of what "the hub" or "it" is, ship of Thesseus style. It's really easy to track when you're by nature hitting cloudflare FIRST for every image. Server side, and not client cookie side. Misdirection. As if you need cookies to get tracked. Fingerprinting? Tiny image trackers? The internet is far beyond the 90's. Not only that but they're misinterpreting the actual point I'm making, which is that what makes everyone certain that they're not going to get sold out further down the line since he's already shown willingness to use cloudflare even when cloudflare has already shown willingness to fuck around with our connections previously, and especially with brilliantly dumb advice like work around the malformed certificate and just accept it which allows cloudflare to receive any hits in the future on your device should Jim wish it to.
He's telling you to not listen to me but you'll not there is not a single point that he has refuted, but instead he claims it's ok as an attempted misdirection on my part. You see a lot of word stuffing into my mouth but I remain here the only one who is willing to take heat for talking about the reality, telling the truth no matter how undesireable some find it. It's not whether or not tracking is happening now, because I guarantee you that Jim has no earthly idea what cloudflare does, and the attempted foolery has allowed him to play games with image deletion that is far more serious, for whatever motivations he had. Go look back at a week old thread and see.
Iโm not here to argue with you. Your opinion
is worth what you are paid for it. Consider your
current position in the world. There is nowhere
but up to go to.
Do you need a hand up?
It is concerning to consider giving you a hand.
That hand may be bitten.
Rabid dogs are shot. Rabid humans must suffer until the bitter end. The reality of rabies is the sufferer doesnโt suffer. The loved ones suffer observing him.
I am sad when I see what you say and do. You donโt make me angry. I feel sorry for you.
You allude to my identity because you cannot refute what I say logically. That I have told the truth matters nothing to you because you have shut your eyes and ears to the truth because you're certain you have estimated my intentions clearly. Do you not understand any of the points I have raised and why they are serious breaches of security the likes of which would drive Q away but also imperil Jim's entire userbase, and for what? Exoteric reasoning: Save a few dollars. Esoteric reasoning: gain control over an increasingly fluid past allowing the introduction of control over the future as well.
dude answered you fair and square
go back to your honey pot or face deletion
have you had your meds today btw?
It's not a refutation for BO to tell me that they feel sorry because they feel like I'm a rabid dog. It's a response, but it's not addressing any points. Much like your allusion to my medical status to cast aspersions on what I have said, which is another emotional response, but lacking of direct addressing or refutation. Noted your opinion is casual, along with others. Am I right that staff told users to accept a malformed ssl certificate? Similar lack of caring if so.
BO is the mole. (Rest is to BO)
Take that you money grubbing POS, SOB was created because of you. El, Lord, whatever you wish to call yourself. God fights for Humanity, you trap anons. I see you. I know your every move. Enjoy the boat because I will drain the seas and you will thirst forever.
This is not a violent movement, but judgement is not violent. It is simply TRUTH.
OD
The news media all know, I exposed Nancy Pelosi in the underground rooms of Epstein Island, caught on the security cameras. They also knows I exposed the names in the flight log of government swamp and Hollywood. I exposed a demonic pedophile ring from the Vatican to the royal family. I have been viciously attacked and persecuted every day on face book. I was restricted for months at a time, and my original face book account deactivated. I exposed their dirty little secret drug andrenochrome exported from China. The drug is derived from adrenalized blood of victims experiencing painful trauma/torture/sacrifice. The truth has everything to do with crimes against humanity/children and precious blood. Many in Hollywood and the government swamp are guilty of crimes on Epstein Island. This secret society worshipped the pagan god Moloch (satan). They're guilty of human trafficking and sadistic rituals involving child sacrifice. This was never about democrat vs republican. This is a holy war of good vs evil. I've cried enough tears to fill an ocean. I suffer with the most painful disease known to mankind RSD/CRPS. I've endured twenty years of trauma surgeries requiring many units of blood. The picture of the nail pounded in Jesus wrist, also shows the artery that was severed in my wrist during a simple cyst removal surgery. I've woken up in surgery recovery screaming in agony. My hip replacement was dislocated and It took quite some time before they slid an x-ray screen under me. Imagine coming out of general anesthesia screaming in tremendous pain. I had to be put back under, to manipulate my hip back into socket. I've suffered pain and trauma that would make a grown man crumble. I'm still suffering with untreated chronic pain due to fear of addiction. I'm in constant fight or flight, my pain signals are constant. I've suffered severe infections from every implanted joint replacement. While lying in a hospital receiving four units of blood after removal of my femur plates and total knee replacement, the hospital internet was being held for ransom. The lawyers directly across the street denied me legal representation. Someone posted a billboard picture of the lawyers Celino & Barnes in this back channel. The billboard picture has the quote : "Injured? Good!" . There is many coincidental and personal information pertaining to me in these documents and the very reason I was entrusted to expose everything. The one lawyer died in a helicopter crash years ago. I've downloaded the declassified documents and all the files from Q-research for nearly four years, I have more than anyone knows. It took courage exposing everything and I'm praying justice prevails. The swamp got caught and nothing can stop what is coming. The President Donald J Trump is Q+ and he knows I have everything. He knew one day would come that I would finally follow the breadcrumbs. It was my choice to know and there are no coincidences. Some come on here to create their own narrative. This is the truth and not all anons are legit. I was told to trust the plan and justice was coming.
WTF are you on about?
I didn't reply to you, looks like Jim W did.
The reason no one answers questions from SHILLS is that they aren't really questions.
You were BANNED for your endless questions that have no answers, only leaving your shit here bc of GTFO replies from anons and site owner.
You are still BANNED, you eat bread and post shit. Go eat bread in fake Meta next time.
>>15873288
You got an answer from site owner. Dissatisfied? Take it up with him.
temporary bread lock
shill city in here
time for a break.