Banning anons for questioning the notables now
if "hiv" is supposed to mean Hivemind, BVs are way off.
>>15821538
>>15821538
ob
>>15822347
>>15822069
>>15822090
>>15822147
>>15822280
Shill Baker baking.
Shill BV supporting
>Truth Social Q is fake Q.
>TRUE.
>That is what we must assume, given NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
>But TS@Q is still newsworthy .
agree with all of this
<This is not a division tactic.
Disagree with this.
It's being used by the shills. We now have Q proofs in the notables and "new Q". It's disinformation, and therefore a divisionn tactic.
Just read the shill baker's bread title.
Shill baker took the ghosted bake after posting Truth Social Q "Proofs" and then Notabled them.
Guess it's difficult to follow if you weren't wathcing it happen.
20005:Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS? Edition
>20005:Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS? Edition
>Plz see global.
I think your global was nuked
I was in bread for your discussion, and I appreciated you trying to get ahead of it, but I saw this coming. OSS was shit posting about Truth Social replacing 8kun for months before he was un-assed. This was the plan all along.
btw BV dart didn't even bother to try and figure out what was happening. Just sided with the shill baker and proceeded to delete notables he didn't like for some reason.
If it were me baking and there were this much opposition to a notable,I would take it out. Simple as that. No problems.
If it were me baking and there were this much opposition to a notablethat I posted and self nommed,I would unquestionably take it out.
Of course, I wouldn't have self-nommed my own __fake proof __to be notable and supported that fake proof with sock puppets, like what happened in this case.
anyway. I'm done for the day. Thanks again for making it comfy here Board Owner. Appreciate it.