>Truth always reveals itself in time, we don't have to push the river
very well said anon
>He went silent to verify by being silent that he still had his tripcode.
I mean, this is one possible explanation
but, it IS a good explanation…
>Would you consider mod intervention on his private board a security problem for his tripcode?
Yes
I would
>I would.
>Ergo, silence.
>Not only that but it is ongoing.
thank you for sharing, anon
this seems to be a highly plausible explanation for our current predicament
re: where's Q?
>no one owns the narrative. i'm not creating false consensus
>inappropriate questions
there can not be an inappropriate QUESTION on a free speech board
asking questions can never be construed as a call to action, or a statement of intent
inciting violence is unlawful
posting illegal content (e.q. child porn) is unlawful
announcing your intention to commit illegal acts is (I am assuming) unlawful
asking a question is NEVER unlawful
therofore it does not qualify as illegal content
ergo, there is no such thing as an "inappropriate" question on a free speech board
beyond the context of unlawful activity which it could be argued you (as moderators/ administrators) have some level of legal liability to monitor and remove as it is found;
what argument do you have for the censorship of anything outside those boundries?
>Fuck, it's all the way down on every single webpage here.
the tennets of observation are ignored by many today
the Religion of Scientism allows one to outsource their own responsibility to observe and reason about the world around them to someone else
someone in a white lab coat usually
its mildly shocking how many who claim to be "administrators" around here have never read the "Welcome Page" to this place
its linked at the top of every page, in very much the same ubiquitous way thay the PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY of this board is stamped on the bottom of every page
and yet
almost no one notices
>https://8kun.top/qresearch/welcome.html
>are bakers planning a strike? boycott?
not planning
why would any oldfag baker play this game of baker verification?
by anons
for anons
at least thats how it was
>there is a war for your soul and the soul of the board
>it's not like it used to be
not an argument
there has been a war for the souls of men for over 3 thousand years
this is not a "new" condition
we win the war with Logos
True Speech
no one man knows what the Truth is
and thus we must allow for all kinds of "wrong speech" to compete in an OPEN FORUM, where only the best speech wins
the best speech wins because it is true
not because of the person who speaks it
not becuase of the tone of their voice when they speak it
not because of the eloquence of their vocabulary when they speak it
the TRUTH contained in their words (if it exists) is the sword that wins the battle
you have no idea which "shill" carries with them a sword of Truth within their message
you have no idea which "spam" contains within it that mere grain of Truth which we need to conquer the Father of Lies
this is why censorship is bad
not because your intentions are bad
but becuase you know not what you do
its okay though
no one can stop the plan
ifonlyyouknewhowbaditreallyis.png
>think they are winning?
who is "they"?
in my world; "they" is anyone who openly participates in lying
a person who speaks things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they speak it anyway
a person who does things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they do it anyway
a person who agrees to things that they conciously believe are wrong
based on their own internal definiton; they believe it is wrong, and yet they agree to it anyway
>Not if we can help it.
who is "we"?
in my world; "we" is everyone who struggles to speak, do, and agree to:
"the Good, the True, and the Beutiful"
o7