In all the time you have been here not an ounce of anon spirit has rubbed off on you? You know what anons have to say to that? They would say lurk more but that means the subversion was deeper than I had thought because there is no ground base culture left to glean. How long are you claiming exactly?
Are you saying that current actions are all OSS fault? Because that's the party line. Refuse to address issues, bring up OSS, smirk cause you think you cleverly got out of any responsibility. Are you seriously expecting me to answer your question now that you have refused mine? It's not a get out of jail free card.
Big ole bees. Spring has sprung.
Whoops, that was meant for another board.
Remember when the BO lied in general saying it wasn't an inquisition in here of baker but was instead 'letting baker know ty for baking"? Why is telling the TRUTH so hard? Is your narrative more important than just saying a criticism is well founded? Ban me from here. I'm sick of watching BO lie to my face. My criticism: BO LIES TO EVERYONE.
Questions are not spam. Stop making erroneous judgements. I have no VPNs, I just started asking questions that you did not like. From my very first post attempting to find out where the morality is in this administration, the target was painted on my back. You lump me in and think that's a sound thought. Awaiting answers to questions in Community Ran meta, where truly all are welcome. You did collate questions right? After you deleted them all of course.
Q also said no outsider mod interaction on /projectdcomms/ and yet that happened. Has anyone brought that up with Jim or asked if it's even still possible? No, because you don't care about the truth.
Q also said no outsider mod interaction on /projectdcomms/ and yet that happened. Has anyone brought that up with Jim or asked if it's even still possible? No, because you don't care about the truth. How does it feel being compromised from the top down?
Ukraine is going to reveal very much along with Myanmar. Stay strong Patriot. DoS is who is being revealed currently.
Why did a GV invade and interfere with Q's board? Because Q cared very much that it did not happen. He holds it to be even more important than the existence of the follow-up board /qresearch/ currently. What this means is 1. CM had set it up, Jim did not or was unaware and REMOVED this protection. Why? Ever the question, stupidity or malice. I dare you to try and refute that. Find out for yourselves! Illuminating questions when after the truth.
-
Q would NOT like the invasion, and I would think they would not like those sitting idly by without protest. Something to think about when you're wondering why he hasn't posted in a while.
-
You'd need to be a fool to not recognize that this post specifically makes /projectdcomms/ into a massive value target to defy the wishes of the /projectdcomms/ BO. Shouldn't you be wondering WHY they did that? It wasn't your best interest in mind, I can tell you that.
Cricket choir continues, but it's more deafening that you realize because it means volumes in complicity.
Check this out.
Selectively ignoring Q posts defines this one compromised place for Q must go and yet cannot go. This silences Q because you're being selective with the posts.
Hi, first poster to address this issue directly. Have you heard of honesty in communications between administration staff and us lowly plebian anons? You hint at the possibility of action, but action so far has been to ban me and call me OSS. What action are you actually aware of? Because hints at 'maybes' are not inline with previous dishonesty. I appreciate your attempt, but no one gives a shit about just being honest about what's actually going on. Are you going to change that?
Let's go over what the possibility of action might be given what we CAN see, which is to have Jim help administrate along side BO. Why would he need to keep it a secret wrt Q post requests for no mod interation of his board? I don't think that WOULD be a secret UNLESS he doesn't seek to fulfill that wish. What action could possibly be done along that track that requires secrecy? Oh, I know, you're hinting at other action and lying here and now. Incoming removal of post demand open adherence with Q's wish coming in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..
Do you remember what Q did the last time the security of his tripcode came under question? He went silent to verify by being silent that he still had his tripcode. Would you consider mod intervention on his private board a security problem for his tripcode? I would. Ergo, silence. Not only that but it is ongoing.
Did you know that Jim has moved all image hosting to cloudflare? Gee I wonder if Thesseus's ship is why Q hasn't posted. Is it not a platform worth using when compromised from the top down? Notice: I'm not querying whether it is, because it's a fact now that it is. Cloudflare deleted Jim before. Remember that?
Check the SSL certificate. Remember the problems during the SOTU? The malformed SSL certificate was why.
A little hint: Cloudflare inserts itself as a caching layer when using Cloudflare SSL certs. Not only that, but the cert was broken which was why I looked at what was going on. The standard advice staff gave was to blindly accept a broken certificate with cloudflare backing. Ask Jim if you don't believe me. The only reason he got it working now was switching to letsencrypt. But now you know why that happened at least mechanically.
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-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-END CERTIFICATE-
There are supposed to be 5 dashes on the begin and end certificate lines preceding and following. This is the certificate that was in use during the SOTU. name it anything.cert and take a look. I'll pastebin a better example unless BO thinks this isn't a meta discussion worth having and the truth shall be suppressed yet again, just blindly accept whatever certificate without question.
OR do what this anon does and lie about it having always been letsencrypt when the proof is signed cryptographically. https://pastebin.com/raw/7kUbqHwT
Here's the relevant place to look.
>I didn't lie.
>That was my direct experience and current knowledge.
Then you shouldn't have said 'It has always been letsencrypt' because clearly it wasn't. What you're saying is 'I didn't know' which is much different from 'it has always been letsenccrypt'. It's ok, I understand because I hadn't provided sauce yet. If I wanted to end the conversation choose a more inflammatory response than "Here's proof and this is clearly a lie told by a liar."
>And?
You clearly don't remember history of 8kun. Do you remember before the start? When cloudflare kicked Jim off? Clearly you don't remember when he tried to get hosted and every company kicked him off repeatedly. Not only that but what it means when a certificate whitelists a cloudflare domain so they can cache every image hit. Your so what is the kind of attitude that leads to staff saying "just accept the certificate and no asking questions about it."
It's called a willful MITM attack put in place by the site administrator, AND it's not secure.
Furthermore, what the ship of Thesseus has to do with this is when an administrator ignores directives of moderator intervention which no one has asked whether that's still a possibility, other than I have, that even when the admin implements a compromised part of the /projectdcomms/ or the followup board which is for now /qresearch/. When the replacement if you look at the ship fuzzily, it appears to be the same, but a big enough hole in the bottom of the boat will sink it assuredly.
That's an odd reaction. Be careful what you say and you'll find you're not refuted.
Thus proving my point. He has changed the nature of what "the hub" or "it" is, ship of Thesseus style. It's really easy to track when you're by nature hitting cloudflare FIRST for every image. Server side, and not client cookie side. Misdirection. As if you need cookies to get tracked. Fingerprinting? Tiny image trackers? The internet is far beyond the 90's. Not only that but they're misinterpreting the actual point I'm making, which is that what makes everyone certain that they're not going to get sold out further down the line since he's already shown willingness to use cloudflare even when cloudflare has already shown willingness to fuck around with our connections previously, and especially with brilliantly dumb advice like work around the malformed certificate and just accept it which allows cloudflare to receive any hits in the future on your device should Jim wish it to.
He's telling you to not listen to me but you'll not there is not a single point that he has refuted, but instead he claims it's ok as an attempted misdirection on my part. You see a lot of word stuffing into my mouth but I remain here the only one who is willing to take heat for talking about the reality, telling the truth no matter how undesireable some find it. It's not whether or not tracking is happening now, because I guarantee you that Jim has no earthly idea what cloudflare does, and the attempted foolery has allowed him to play games with image deletion that is far more serious, for whatever motivations he had. Go look back at a week old thread and see.
You allude to my identity because you cannot refute what I say logically. That I have told the truth matters nothing to you because you have shut your eyes and ears to the truth because you're certain you have estimated my intentions clearly. Do you not understand any of the points I have raised and why they are serious breaches of security the likes of which would drive Q away but also imperil Jim's entire userbase, and for what? Exoteric reasoning: Save a few dollars. Esoteric reasoning: gain control over an increasingly fluid past allowing the introduction of control over the future as well.
It's not a refutation for BO to tell me that they feel sorry because they feel like I'm a rabid dog. It's a response, but it's not addressing any points. Much like your allusion to my medical status to cast aspersions on what I have said, which is another emotional response, but lacking of direct addressing or refutation. Noted your opinion is casual, along with others. Am I right that staff told users to accept a malformed ssl certificate? Similar lack of caring if so.