Board Admin Central
Off-topic posts in this thread may be deleted at BO/BV discretion.
Admin Email:
F4AL@protonmail.com.
Meta saves on Wayback Machine
took meta off cycling bc of change in admin to record q&A, changes over time.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13699736.html may 19 2021
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15472645.html jan 27 2022
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15570311.html feb 7 2022
YT Iwo Jima
https://youtu.be/UTYUwt5rV5s
YT Iwo Jim 2
https://youtu.be/LEZBNqg5Weg
This is not a division tactic.
Truth Social Q is fake Q.
TRUE.
That is what we must assume, given NO OUTSIDE COMMS.
But TS@Q is still newsworthy .
Because it is ABOUT Q. Thus, relevant and therefore notable. Just like anti-Q articles are relevant: not because they are true but because we need to know what is being said.
Plz see global.
interested in all input on TS@Q, just can't keep up, busy IRL too
will try to address issues below
generally - tempest in a teapot imo
Global should help clarify
shills will shill, always happen for a new wedge issue (there will be moar)
>division tactic
well, by shills yes
not by admins or bakers (not talking about "shill bakers')
shill activity here is constant
so we counter
countered w/discussion and just restoring global discussing board position based on discussion:
NUTSHELL
it's not Q wo/proof (which we don't think will happen) but newsworthy because it's relevant to Q. Want to be aware of it, track it, examine it.
>shill baker
which bread #? will ck it out
haven't cked with all bakers, some.
might be bakers who think TS@Q is real deal - even if not shills. but if so, gotta hash it out coz that's not going to sit well with most anons on this board.
>Has Q Finally Gone Public with TS
that's an article title if i recall
from PM?
disagree with the premise, wouldn't have named a bread after it, but i didn't bake
global prolly wasn't nuked
i baked and there was some confusion about whether latest notables were in the dough
baker may have grabbed dif dough wo/new global, not overly concerned re fuckery
dart is trusted and that trust was hard earned
i need bred # to see which baker is "shill"
all bakers have been called shill
mostly due to mistakes, comm problems and other "shit that happens in the gulch"
Admins have been trying to get to know bakers, have a sense of 'sup and pretty broad view of the territory.
Remember that main issue (from my pov) is not whether TS@Q is real - NO WAY at this point. Bunch of important people with a new social media site set up an acct and call it @Q and then say things like WWG1WGA.
That's supposed to be proof?
I know what Praying Medic says - entitled to his opinion. Got proof? No.
>DOAR fags running @Q
how would DOAR fags get on TS?
Hard to imagine them as hobnobbing with capital hill types.
(just sayin)
But shills sure know how to take advantage of any issue that might cause division, no matter how trivial.
>other platforms
are all unique, all have good and bad stuff about em, most want too much user info imo.
Iage boards more my speed. Always.
tx for the ideas - and for the bakes.
o7
*image boards