Where actually truly all are welcome to discuss META events. It's not just meaningless words anymore.

Off topic posts are free to exist if they wish, because OP has no powers. If censored, deleted, it is not OP but instead board administration.

I've put meta on Community Run because Community must be allowed to participate, to ACTUALLY record Q&A, and to not control information. Any anon can do this themselves at any time if anon have any issues with the way this board is handled and to seek redress from their governance. OP promises that OP is not tyrannical royalty, unquestionable kings and queens, but us lowly Anon Patriot Americans have a right to speech.

Requesting pin please!

Thank you very much!

Two boards deleted. BO lied about intentions when BO claimed 'the first deletion was a mistake', I should have known the second mistake was coming while I slept. Here's the first two incarnations of this community ran META board. BO, why are you wrecking my threads? Is your lust for information control that bad that the community cannot offer you questions on their own without your totalitarian egregores breathing down our necks?

>>15788944

So this is how it's going to be. Ban me from META, delete my community run META threads, I have no capability to seek redress for my grievances. All for asking questions that never got any answer. Where is it written that your rule is absolute, BO?

>>15781233

Isn't it interesting that doing what's suggested gets your shit banned even when all you're doing is asking pesky questions about the truth?

>>15789072

See, this only works when you leave some place to go. These are words here, and you can't use them flippantly. Because when you act like a two-faced ruler, you'll say things like "go start your own thread" and while deleting what you claimed you wanted, BO don't you think that's a bit too much?

>>15789120

So what you're saying is I'm being gaslit about my thread's existence now. Fucking great. I had it open and it is not there anymore, and I have a PDF of it. Where do you think it went?

>>15789120

Let me ask you another question: Logs show nothing, how are we supposed to know what happened? Right now you're asserting it wasn't you or BO, but if it's not on the logs how is it that YOU have come by the knowledge that it WASN'T BO? Have you considered working in tandem? What is going on with this board when not even moderator logs can be expected to TELL THE TRUTH ANYMORE?

Are you starting to understand what my issue is with administration yet?

>>15789181

So I should blame Jim for this one right? Or maybe Jim got emailed by BO? Fuckery.

The only thing I can assume is that the logs were deleted or the site is so shit that it does not infact log every time. I cannot assume identity of whoever clearly did delete the board. I reject that you know who didn't do it because clearly anyone could have and then deleted evidence.

>>15789203

If only administration would just be honest and tell the truth, then there wouldn't be any need to question shady shit is happening.

>>15789269

How do you KNOW that? THE LOG IS GONE. You assert it but how do you PROVE IT?

>>15789289

>honey pot to catch belligerent forces and that is a place I would not want to be, just sayin

A community ran copy of META thread? On -YOUR BOARD-? This WHOLE BOARD is a honey pot, then. You may as well turn META into a honey pot.

>>15789289

Whose side am I on? THE TRUTH!

Hell, even my existence is showing you there are problems that need addressing.

>So today anon set up a honey pot and caught Jim red handed. Best honey pot I ever seen't. All he did was post on Jim's board and his prediction that BO <-> Jim had a fundamental honesty problem came true just like that.

Are you sure my IP wasn't on the action log as deleted all posts by IP?

>>15789847

>>15789883

So no questions allowed? Got it, Nazi.

>>15789847

>>15789883

You realize BO wanted this to happen, right? Look.

>>15789094

Then in the middle of the night changes mind? No redress at all allowed? And you're helping, browncoat.

>>15790056

>claims I benefit

That must be why I made a clone, because all that benefitting that was going on not having a META thread. Never tie BO's actions to BO. That is verboten.

>>15790056

I've told you exactly who I am and that I do not use VPNs. You have a fuzzy definition of identity, like an identitarian. Actions speak louder than words, and I've told you what my actions are.

The fact that you do not wish to have a META thread is more telling than you think. Thought control.

>>15790256

>"you tell mistruths" the lackey of the censor banning the critical questioner from speaking says.

>Your threads cannot exist

>No one can question

Have you ever thought of making one yourself? You like truth, right? Why did this thought never occur to you? Anyone can do it as I said from the beginning. Is it really hard for you to understand?

>>15790256

Also, is the only way to discuss meta only through accepted mouthpieces the administration approves of? You're failing to logic out your position here. Do you know what that makes you? A lefttard.

>>15790318

The fact that you refuse to tell the truth and refuse to accept that what I'm telling you is true about the fact that I am banned from META for asking questions about META is not due to any fault of mine. It's a significant stain on your perceived ability to rationalize events for me, though. I'll say it as many times as necessary, even if I'm alone, because that's why righteousness is. You still do not know who I am, and you still blurrily ascribe events to me that I have not done. Because NARRATIVE matters MORE TO YOU than the TRUTH.

>>15790318

>ignore evidence proffered to allow identity to be established, because he prefers a lie.

>>15790708

deca85

My one and only IP hash.

Please learn to read. You're gonna need that skill one day.

>>15790708

>Doesn't philosophically mean 'What is truth?' but instead answers with another lie.

>>15790747

Before that bread was my 'high iq' anon moniker. Just for the sake of identifying. You sure are taking a long time in identifying, you know that? Almost like you prefer a fabricated story than actually looking and seeing.

>>15791138

MSM Meta is open now, your very own walled garden of opium flowers manicured by censors. I'm sure there would never be a need for a truly free place to express meta concerns now that big brother has CRIMESTOP'd your brain.

>>15791138

The reason it's you and me right now is because you aren't a man of your word who initially promised to bring friends, and I have not advertised this place any more than I needed to to get my concerns the opportunity to be heard. You think it's some game, when just existing banned or not is winning. That you're in here acting like an asshole is just par for the course, and it's what one who preaches openness actually has to love. Seriously! It brings me joy.

>>15791344

That's just how it goes. Brain suckers have taken over rational thought.

>>15791495

I get that you're disappointed in life. There there.

>>15796881

Welcome!

There ya go. I've got an early morning, keep it bumped for me. Got stuff to do tomorrow and the next day. Thanks.

>>15801812

>honeypot for info GV has access to.

Gee I know if a lowly anon can access info or if a GV or Administration can. Logic, mah nigger.

Remember the last time a GV started thinking of a honeypot? They posted on Q's board as B. The fact that now a GV is accusing anon of what GV is probably doing since GV is the one who has the power to do it is laughable. You remember qresearch, don't you? Q said no moderator involvement, and his tripcode is still secure even if he's locked out, by not using it is a sign of the hash not being broken no matter if he can log in or not by a compromised administration that defied the operational rules of engagement on this platform.

But nah, logic must be too difficult to understand. Compromising GV likes to think in these games because GV is working alongside or is one who does those things. Proof is on /projectDcomms/

>>15801969

Is that your only argument? You can't even manage a refutation?

Lets do a bit of math. How many GV's don't know how to delete boards by deleting by IP? A new one. Now what would a new GV have to motivate them to ask about honeypots for despite being primely positioned themselves to instigate that behavior? Likely one who has it on their mind.

>>15801991

>Yes

Yes that's your only argument and yes you cannot make a refutation. Got it!

>>15802051

Now what would a GV have to gain by convincing watchers that they would be better off not participating? Certainly doesn't address anyone who knows how to operate VPNs. Board administration has already chosen when Jim gave the go ahead to exchange ownership. Now why would a GV lie about the fact that a honeypot is under operation ON JIM'S OWN SITE ON JIM'S OWN BOARD? How compromised would Jim need to be to make this narrative true?

>>15802085

So when I tell you I am a lowly anon, There is no benefit to my claim when I would MUCH RATHER say 'oh yes, I'm running a honeypot with Jim's help! I'm undercover Jim!' but you see, that isn't the truth. But what the idea conjured by GV is only one of two things. An attempt to craft a narrative to discourage participation, but not smartly selected because the alternative possibility is that there IS a honeypot under operation which would cast a negative light on global staff and administration. Now why would GV either lie or accidentally infoleak?

>>15802148

Can't even debate. What a dumb faggot.

>>15802194

>>15871226

https://rumble.com/embedJS/u41acd.vuvt33)+

Got your embed working for ya duder