Anonymous ID: f70566 March 5, 2022, 5:59 p.m. No.15793844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3897

>>15793809

>I am extraordinarily careful whom I follow.

I don't follow anyone.

>but sometimes you have to engage not sit on the sidelines anon

I act on my own accord, according to my morality and understanding.

I take what I can use from those around me, and try to return the favor to the best of my ability (and no I don't mean stealing, in a philosophical sense). But no one is "good" enough to "follow".

Anonymous ID: f70566 March 5, 2022, 6:11 p.m. No.15793943   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3952 >>3982

>>15793897

>Either way at this point in time WWG1WGA is a needed rallying cry in this anon's opinion.

Indeed. Don't need to be Christian to be behind that. I've been here from the start.

If we could just agree that we don't all agree on a God but that the Luciferian baby eaters need to die. Not because of their religion, but because of the atrocities against humanity that religion has led to.

o7

Anonymous ID: f70566 March 5, 2022, 6:29 p.m. No.15794065   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4092 >>4197 >>4214

>>15794045

>it is not about religion but a relationship with God.

I see no difference?

I only know about God from religions. Can't have God without a religion.

The religion is just the mental framework in which the God resides.

Even if I make up my own God here on the spot, it would still need to be part of a religion. In that case it would be my mental framework and what attributes I ascribe to that God that would be the religion.

Anonymous ID: f70566 March 5, 2022, 6:50 p.m. No.15794249   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4296

>>15794230

>you're halfway to Satanism

Satanist (in popular culture) is just Atheists who think they're cool because they use makeup, not realizing how self-contradictory that isโ€ฆ

Real Satanism is something completely different entirely.