amazon is up here.
TYB
QUESTION -
discussion of TS@Q above
How should we treat TS@Q posts?
Thoughts -
-
acct is interdasting because created early
-
who created it? for what purpose?
-
what kind of messages are posted? (might be worth a thread is someone wants to create, anons could look for patterns)
Probably worth noting, not because it's Q
but to track it
if so, how to do this wo/giving the impression we think it's really Q?
THOUGHTS?
Short and sweet - TY.
>Think we need verification here first. "No outside comms"
Of course.
Idea is not not to imply messages come from Q. Just to make them available as potential intel. May or may not be useful intel but we'll never know unless we look.
>>15813583 what to call TS@Q
>>15813640 "new not Q"
>>15813591 >TS needs to be added because not from this platform
noted.
TS not-Q
how's that, anons?
RRN is different - we don't need to track it, just an edgy pub that often inflates its stories
Somebody is trying to attract our attention with TS@Q
For what purpose?
>no outside comms
That is correct.
Why to call these posts not-Q.
Just because they are not Q does not mean that wouldn't be of interest.
>TS is the anti-anon platform
That is also an interesting question to consider.
TS comes from Trump - but is actually executed by other.
IS TS AN ANTI-ANON PLATFORM?
Strong claim.
It is definitely not a chan.
How will it turn out?
Hard to say.
Most of us can't even get on.
All the more reason to track what we can.
my 2 cents.
>Why not simply TS@q?
Clean and simple.
doesn't imply "Not Q" (disadvantage)
But baker can also use description to do that