I sort of like the David-Wynn Miller style nonsense, because it is just so out there.
If you want to say that someone (anyone) has no authority over you, it is pretty easy to do:
"I demand proof of your authority over me, and if you provide no proof, the presumption is that I am free of you."
Or, if you want a more Law-sounding variation,
"I demand sight and hearing of the commission by which you claim jurisdiction over me."
That is one view. The other is that jurisdiction, the power jus dicere, to speak law, is inherently martial. Arrest/detention are acts of war, as is "correction," which is medical treatment. Law is a sort of psychological warfare designed to subject a captive individual or population to some normative order. There are no magic words.
One thing I don't get is how when DWM and these guys are doing their lectures, they don't speak in the way they write.
It is pretty well agreed that words symbolize sounds, e.g. "sounds coming out of your mouth."
So, "the cat is on the mat" symbolizes the syllables you would pronounce if you read that. But if that is the case, why does DWM not speak in the quantum grammar?
Also, it is from the Latin, demandare, from de + mando.
The prefix de means of, or from, as in creme de la creme, the cream of the cream.
mando
Etymology 1
From manus (“hand, handwriting, power”) + dō (“I give, I offer or render”).
So, like, etymology is fun. There are all sorts of issues with conjugation, tenses, moods, etc. in language that are often glossed over, but I am not sure this DWM quantum grammar really means anything.
>otherwise your words are subject to the [in]terpretation of the hearer.
>
>Does to + too = Fore? kinda thing.
Well, you are always subject to the interpretation of the hearer or reader, I mean, this depends on how you think symbols work.
Aristotle's view is that spoken sounds are symbols of mental experience, and written marks are symbols of spoken sounds.
Ultimately there is no "grammar" to mental experience, mental experience is a product of neurons, neurotransmitters, oxygen, etc. It is a physiological, not a grammatical, process.
So, I mean, DWM's view isn't that the Judges, etc. all have everything written in this "correct" quantum grammar behind the scenes, he just says that it is a way to avoid being "misinterpretted"?
Contracts do not have to be written, a contract is a speech, which can be spoken, or it can be written, but, again, in Aristotle's sense, that is simply a memorial of the speech, which is a symbol of the mental experience of the parties to the contract, their shared intention.
I mean, how would you write
"I demand sight and hearing of the commission by which you claim jurisdiction over me" or "You have no personal jursidiction over me" in this special quantum grammar?
I know those phrases mean things, I mean, they are very sensible English to me, if I were a Judge I would know exactly what was being asked.
Like, as the guy above posted, the basic question is jurisdiction. There are three types:
Personal
Subject Matter
Territorial
Like, the bizzare thing about DWM, etc. is that all states, e.g. STATRE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, UNITED STTES OF AMERICA, they are fictitious, their borders are not natural borders, you cannot observe them, you can only read about them and perhaps measure them.
But this genre of literature almost always has a nostalgic component, e.g. the idea is not to disprove that the USA exists and to prove it never has existed, but to have this nostalgic rhetoric for the days of "legitimate constitutional government"
http://libgen.is/search.php?req=david+wynn+miller&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def seems to be a copy of his book circa 2021 or so.
It just seems like gibberish—now, I could be wrong, but the idea that "if you are at all educated, that is why you don't agree with DWM, it makes perfect sense," unless the idea is that this is something that is used behind the scenes, I just don't see how a Judge would think this is anything but gibberish.
whoops, circa 2012
For example, on page 4, you get him talking about dates. Well, dates are things in calendars, and a calendar is sort of a shared conceptual entity, because time is incorporeal (see Senchus Mor).
Like, for time to make sense, you have to share an origin of some sort, e.g. 'the beginning' or 'when God made the light" (Anno Lucis), or when the Erath was made (Anno Mundi) or the birth of Christ (Anno Domini) etc. etc. So already within the first page of this stuff he is talking about 'dates' as though dating is a natural system.
Also, life, it is sort of a cultural idea that we are alive but rocks are not alive, in some cultures everything is alive, and, in biology since the 1930s more or less, "vitalism" (the idea that some things are alive qualitatively) is false, life is just a sort of agreed upon state, e.g. spontaneous respiration, beating of the heart. There is no esprit de corps, elan vitale, etc.
>How about [de]struction?
It is a similar pattern, de + struere, struere is to put together, to compose, so de struere is to take away the structure, to decompose, etc.
Words often have multiple meanings, for example, ius sometimes means law in Latin, but sometimes it means soup.
>When criminals run the court your spoken words won't mean what you meant.
Well, they might be criminals, or they might be military occupiers or any number of things—they could be pirates! Some Commonwealth Courts are designed to literally look like you are in the hold of a ship.
>:Correct, and so it is a Corruption of the root word meaning.
>
>BTW are you a Lawyer?… kek.
No, it is just a way of talking about taking apart something that is structured, but that does not mean de always means taking apart.
I am not a lawyer, but I studied philosophy of law and a bunch of other things—I wrote theorem provers, etc. I hhave no idea, for example, how you could call DWM's language "more structured" than English, just looking it over, it doesn't look like one could easily write any sort of program to do automated proofs on his "grammar" it seems, as I said, like gibberish.
>:Your paperwork is the Court &: Fact IS that this Venue is logged in with all the Courts World-Wide.
Well, one defintion of court is a place wherein justice is judicially administered. I just don't see how any of what I am reading in this PDF makes much sense. I mean, it is even senseless compared with lots of sovereign citizen stuff.
Also, if you think the judiciary is illegitimate, why go on about "flags" and "US code title 4"? Why not just reject the whole ball of wax as illegitimate? If anyone wants to give you law, that is an act of war.
>:We-Are-Talking about the Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar-Performance-VENUE.
Of course it is possible everything I learned in studying philosophy of language, linguistics, etc. is nonsense, and DWM's stuff is how everyone smart thinks or talks, but I am skeptical.
I just don't understand how putting things in his idiom makes them more certain. For example, in the PDF I linked, on page 81 he "corrects" the treaty of Versaille.
For example, he rewrites part of it this way:
"THE1 COVENANT2 OF5 THE6 LEAGUE7 OF1 NATION2 = FOR THE FICTION OF THIS CONTRACT-CHARTER-VESSEL-TREATY IS WITH THE UNITY-FICTION FOR THE ILLUSION AS A WORLD-NATION FOR THE CAPTURE OF THIS EARTH FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLAVERY WITHOUT CLAIM."
So, I get the impression that he is saying that
"THE1 COVENANT2 OF5 THE6 LEAGUE7 OF1 NATION2"
is a deceptive way of saying
"FOR THE FICTION OF THIS CONTRACT-CHARTER-VESSEL-TREATY IS WITH THE UNITY-FICTION FOR THE ILLUSION AS A WORLD-NATION FOR THE CAPTURE OF THIS EARTH FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLAVERY WITHOUT CLAIM."
So, basically he is saying that the Treaty of Versaille is a way for the members of the League of Nations to enslave the world, which is sort of true, because Opium Prohibition was a key part of the treaty, and drug prohibition is pretty much the final key to dominating a people, by making them depend on physicians for pain relief. I mean, it is a big one, anyway.
But I get the sense he thinks that if you were "reading correctly" youi would figure that out just by translating the treaty of Versaille into this CSSCPSGPV or whatever you are calling it, which I don't think makes much sense.
Be honest, is this just a way to confuse schizos so that they don't read actual law?
>June 2018
>
>14:17 min-mark
>
>https://youtu.be/uzCHHwPcWM8
Well, whether he died in 2018 or 2019, he is now dead, so then the question becomes, who is the final word on how his language ought to work? It's certainly nothingt hat has a natural community of speakers, or even an artificial one, e.g. Lojban or some other synthetic language.
Like, the guy in this video then goes on about DWM "surrendering" his flag, I have no idea what that means, adn I am certain any US Marshals involved had a good laugh around the water cooler over whatever happened. Like, we have the internet now, and while these govt employees are not as vociferous as freemen/sovereigns, they bnasically have the view that these guys are all mentally ill and pitiable, esp if nonviolent, just protesting a mortgage, etc. They take a certain sort of schaudenfreude in it all tho, and ultimately their argument for state authority is basically lega positivism, that is, "the law is what the courts decide, and what the executive enforces."
It is sort of funny, I get the same treament whether I am asking the govt critters to explainw hy they believe the state has authority (not coercion, a mugger has coercion) or when I am asking sovcits about their curious pleadings. me, I think law is bullshit, we're under mil;itary occupation :-)
He also mentions facebook being registered with the international chambers of commerce, which is horse shit.
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1326801&owner=exclude
Facebook is incorporated in Delaware. So, like, even basic facts are wrong, but if the idea is "everything you read on the SEC website is wrong, I KNOW THE TRUTH," well, like, the sense I get, having been involved in the world of religious schizos is that a lot of them believe the nosnense, very few of them are just charismatic psychopaths who know they are selling garbage. They are charismatic schizos who believe their own garbage in many cases, tho not all.
Well, pic here are about the origin of servitude…like, in nature if someone tries to arrest you, you can fight about it, nature judges by battle. Once you are arrested, you are a captive and a captor can give law to a captive, though, of course, the captive might escape.
And if you were a glowing sort of company, you would probably want a way for your agents to get free if they were captured,.
And another, on the same topic. Of courswe, they're not written in DWM's grammar, so what do they even mean??
Have a Fleta, on Freedom/bondage!
>Never put your pen to [their]-paper-work, [they] can only hold you for 72 hours
In the commonwealth it is more like 6, then they violate a term of the Habeas Corpus Act.
"I demand copy of the warrant of my commitment and detainer."
They're treating you like livestock, not a dead person, just a sort of homo sapien, a piece of game :-)
After 12 hours in the commonwealth they forfeit all office in right of the Crown. Tho, I think that in most countries the judges and ppl who knew this stuff are dying off and now you have legit schizo'/homosexual/treanny trash on the bench in many cases, so, again, it is all martial law.
Law is what victors give to victims.
>RUSSELL-JAY: GOULD
"Now the court has received five new complaints in the above-captioned cases. Gould
has signed two of the complaints and Miller has signed three, in their stated capacity as
“federal judges.” They are all as unintelligible as the cases I have previously dismissed. As
with the earlier cases, the plaintiffs appear to be complaining about mortgage foreclosures,
but the pleadings contain no basis for a cognizable claim
…
Defendant is a follower of David Wynn Miller (a.k.a.: David-Wynn: Miller),
the leader of a subgroup of tax protestors within the Sovereign Citizen
Movement. Fundamentally, Miller and adherents of his philosophy believe
that their income may not be taxed and that federal courts do not have
jurisdiction over them because they are persons without citizenship, sovereign
unto themselves. In most ways, the underlying beliefs of Miller and those who
follow him are not distinguishable from those of other tax protesters, whose
arguments have been well documented elsewhere. See, e.g., Danshera Cords,
Tax Protestors and Penalties: Ensuring Perceived Fairness and Mitigating
Systemic Costs, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 1515, 1537; Francis X. Sullivan, The
Usurping Octopus of Jurisdictional /Authority: The Legal Theories of the
Sovereign Citizen Movement, 1999 Wis. L. Rev. 785."
https://www.wiwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/pdfs/2012/12-C-798-C-12-06-12.PDF
So, it is probably a good idea to read those two articles. Generally judges who cite journals are bad judges, but maybe they contain precedents!
"
Quantum-grammar essentially offers a mathematical way to write contracts in a proper and correct way that cannot be misunderstood, upholds integrity in contracting, and holds all parties duly accountable for whatever they promise to deliver.
On April 6th, 1988, David-Wynn Miller broke the math interface in all 5,000 languages. Can write any sentence in any language, both front and backward, with the same meaning.
Quantum Grammar was registered at the United Nations in 1999 and 250 countries agreed that this was the standard of grammar to be used. It is also the official language used at the Hague – the highest court on the planet, and the International Court of Appeals.
Russell-Jay: Gould, David-Wynn Miller’s partner and the present Postmaster of the World, ended the United States of America Corporation, as a result of the 3rd & Final US Bankruptcy of 1999 where Gould, figured out the secret to legally capturing America based on the very postal codes and flag mechanics they had been running on." (https://forthegodschildren.com/product/the-inventors-of-quantom-grammar/)
lol.
>Why do you think they are violating everyones supposed rights? Because they know it's all fiction.
Probably because rights are fictitious entities, or incorporeal entities, in general.
It is pretty easy to agree about corporeal entities, but incorporeal entities, what even are they?
Yeah, Rook, J. is a retard his Meads v. Meads decision is completely retarded, but what are you going to do? Correcting his order in this weird way isn't going to help. He's just a retard. They have literal retards on the bench.
Like, it used to be the case that a Judge in Canada got a full pension after five years even if disqaulified for incompetence. They're literal retards.
So the whole idea that the Judges know what they are doing is wrong is false—it might have been true in the 19th century, and early 20th century, but after the takeover in the 20th/21st century, the Judges themselves are literal retards.
I did, however, hear from a friend of a guy brought up on cannabis charges that he walked into his court date and said "you're a clown, you're a clown, you're a clown" to the clerk, judge and prosecutor and walked out.
The judge screamed to stop him, the sheriffs wouldn't do anything…
I am not watching the videos, I don't believe they have anything useful to say. Like, you have even posted what the Alberta COurt of queen's bench will do and called it success. How is it success that the retarded clerks will just ditch your filings?
>Why? Because [they] know and use this same construct for themselves while hiding it from the people. Once you know, you know, and they can't touch you. Having said that, if your volition is to do harm well then you'll have to face :Russell-Jay: Gould's Court.
Well, after they reject your filing, if it is a response to, say, a bank trying to forclose on a mortgage, they tend to simply issue the foreclosure order, that is whart htey do in Canada, there are ample cases of this.
How do they use the same construct for themselves? Like, this is teh sort of weird mythology that many sovcits/freemen have, that the Judges, Police, Clerks, Bureaucrats, etc. are all smart ppl involved in some intentional deception.
They are not. Most of them are literally mentally retarded and if you even try to ask them 'does Government issue bonds to fund itself?" they act like this is some wild conspiracy theory, even if you show them documentation.
And then you have their real motivation: most of them are in debt, and/or have wives/children, and if they don't keep paying the wife leaves with hte chjildren. This is especially true for cops. Even in Canada, where cops tend to make a lot more than the avg. US police officer, the cop might be paying alimony to one wife, and hanging on to the current wife by a thread.
They are only human.
So, for example, the thing here is closer to what you would want to abate due to lack of jurisdiction—but as it says you can only make half answer, in yourown proper person. The retarded judge of course will likely not even know what "plea in abatement" means.
He is sort of cottoning on, he is identifying the difference between the territory and the Province or Government.
But still, the borders of that territory, who defines those borders?
The word he is looking for is "political geography" (states, city limits, property holdings, etc.) vs. "physical geography" (mountains, rivers, streams, etc.)
A mountain is there no matter what we call it, because a mountain is a natural geographical feature.
A border, on the other hand, is a political geographical feature, because it exists by policy.
And then you get the question of "well, who defines the policy?" And this is a question that is very difficult to determine, because, people might disagree over the name of a mountain (or the distinction between a hill and a mountain, I think Hugh Grant was in a movie about that, the Englishman who went up a Hill but came Down a mountain or something), but they will not disagree that there is a corporeal thing that is X feet above sea level at its highest point.
Also, he doesnt say he actually got his kids back. I watched to like 6:20 and he seems to be off the topic of Alberta as a territorial entity.
But it's still conceptual, because, for example, there is no natural border between BC and Alberta, and, indeed, waht is a natural border? One might say a river is a natural border, because you need a boat or a bridge to cross it. What if a log falls across it, does that join the two lands together? And, of course, the land under the river and on both sdies is continuous. A river is simply a depression covered in flowing water.
>Why make it so difficult? It's already done!
>
>:Consider that you ARE on a Q-[RE]SEARCH-BOARD.
I have no idea how this Quantum Grammar stuff makes anything any simpler.
We've been in martial law since 2004.
Well, ask the indigenous ppls of North America how long they have been under military occupation :P
LOL, DWM was Clinton's Legal Counsel, this is getting hilarious.
Wow, so if i need a tutor someone will teach me how to write in this way? That's very convenient
Well, "is" is used in at least two ways, the is of predication, "the sky is blue" and the is of identity, "Bob is the man that robbed me."
Also, by hilarious I mean not at all true. DWM was never a lawyer, nor was he Clinton's lawyer. This is just schizononsense.
Contracts must be in writing, that's false, contracts can be verbal, or in writing. It is like listening to a crazy person. Like, "two plus two is four" and he is saying you might be saying "to plus too is fore."
This is like literal psychward babble.
"There's over 900 meanings for each word."
lol. This is so sad, he lost his kids and went insane, or he lost his kids because he is insane. Very sad.
>With Syntaxing for the Fraud 'is' can be an adverb, verb or pronoun [de]pending on where it lands in the fiction-sentence.
Well, English puts verbs in one place, latin another.
For example, in English you would say
Ciceronam nomen est.
In English,
Cicero is my name.
So, the verb goes in a different place depending on the language. But in latin you could say
Ciceronam est nomen, but it is not really how it is done, because in Latin nouns are declined so you figure out what case they are in, where in English you mostly figure out case by position. And this is sort of a bad example, because
My name is Cicero
and
Cicero is my name
Both mean the same thing.
>He said, she said, where's your [e]vidence?
My evidence that contracts can be verbal? Have you ever run a lemonade stand? I did when I was, like, six.
>Where's your sauce? Since you claim to have all the Facts.
You mean to prove DWM wasn't Clinton's lawyer? Are you for real?
>You spelled Genius wrong.
That is possible, like, he sounds like he is of above-average intelligence, but above average intelligence can also lead someone to be very wrong.
For example, it wouldt ake above-average intelligence to memorize everything that happened in Harry Potter, to remember the names of all of the spells, etc. But if you thought Harry Potter was real, that would be a sort of delusional thought disorder.
It's similar to John Nash, a brilliant amthematician,t he usbject for that movie A Beautiful Mind. Schizo as fuck.
>The days of "my (spoken) word" is my bond are pretty much gone now, due to all the corruption.
I just mean that if Bob says to Alice, "Alice, mow my lawn and I will give you ten dollars," and Alice mows the lawn, that is a contract and Bob owe Alice ten dollars, writing it down is jut a memorial of the speech.
And, as it were, writing, a said above, are symbols of spoken sounds, and spoken sounds are symbols of affections in the soul.
>Yes that's exactly what I mean, this claim has been verified by many, Russell [in]cluded.
By verified you mean they said it was true, or they have, like, a picture of DWM with CLinton?
>He did. You may want to give the videos a listen… otherwise there's little point to posting here, unless you're of the [dis]credit-shills.
That is where the commenrt was from. So if titles are all fiction, why did he say Russel is the only postmaster general and you can challenge him on that and you will lose?
I AM POSTMASTER GENERAL COMMANDANT CHIEF LORD JUDGE GENERAL ADMIRAL OF THE UNIVERSE.
FIGHT ME FOR THE TITLE, RUSSEL!
>When you consider that the so-called Elites were/are using this construct for their own benefit to keep the sheep asleep, it's not too hard to imagine they wouldn't allow any evidence of such [in]teraction with DWM.
OK, so the evidence is
(1) These internet schizos said it (they are not always wrong.)
(2) There is no other evidence because the elite all use quantum syntax grammar but dont want you using it.
OK!
>That and it only cost them 26 million/year to pay people to keep this from the public view. Then along came Q and here we are… [de]cide for yourself.
Where does this 26 million dollar figure come from? If this is what is used by all Judges, Politicians, etc. there are, quite a few of them. USA has about 1800 federal judges.
That would only be, like, a 15k/year bribe to "keep quite," that is not much money.
>Media & [Dis]info/[dis]credit-peeps such yourself.
I am not trying to discredit anything, other than the strange assertions about CLinton, etc. But I am not fully ocnvinced that this quantum grammar works.
lol, on 20th august 1999 the UN voted that DWM is a sovereign individual. COme on, this is just nonsense, it's not even good nonsense. I mean, think the state is fairly retarded when it comes to law, but this is like fighting retardation with schizophrenia
>You don't think it's odd that [they] are were never held to account for anything?
WHo, Clinton, or elites in general? My view is, as an indigenous American, that indigenous pples of earth are under military occupation by corporations and their employees, e.g. UN member states.
>Russell and David did and they Claimed the Land of the Courts.
OK. I am watching this video where he talks about the 2000 Election. I get the impression he is a sad sort of man (his eyes are wonky) and that he spends far too much time with his grandmother. He seems like he is prob. a schizo from a rich family.
>:anon born of this soil in the Territory of the Canada.
There is no such thing. Different indigenous peoples have different words for it. Some call it "Turtle Island," that is a 1970s era term.
In Chinook, a Pacific North West Coast language, it is called "Nesika Illahee," our land.
OK, so he says he did some court martials at the obelisk in DC with dozens of cameras. Any footage? Any footage of the marine corps visiting him? I think this is just, like, breathtaking schizophrenia, but he's not homeless.
I've worked with homeless schizos, lots of them have elaborate fantasy lives.
>Tell us what you have done anon?
Well, this is sort of changing the subject. What I have done, or have not done, is not quite relevant to this guy being a raving looney toon.
War is very much based on deception, and in psychological warfare, you would likely want your dissident population to
(1) spin their wheels
(2) send letters to their military occupier so that they could be identified
But given that these guys seem to sell seminars, etc. it is likely that this is closer to a religous grift.
Most people who sell church, etc. are not actually disbelievers, they do believe in what they are doing, and this is what makes it a "good sell," they dont think they are lying every time they say "jesus loves you!"
So far I have watched about 50 minutes and there are just tons of things that sound false, or unlikely, or both. Plus none of it has any confirmation, it is, like, someone can say lots of things.
Also, it is just weird how much he talks about his grandmother. He got down on his hands and knees w/ Grandma on election night? wtf, who spends this much time w/ grandma/
Like he just said he was Chief Judge of the US Supreme COurt. Do you really think that is a credible sort of thing for him to say?
>MSM EXPOSURE HAS ITS EFFECTS ON ONES PERCEPTIONS.
I never really watched TV, I mostly read books and chatted on IRC growing up.
>yes
I have some really nice ocean-front property in Montana, you can have it for a song, are you interested?
>haha, anyway gotta get something to eat… will be back and see if you're still fagging up the board.
He is on to talking about martial law and ambassadors. I think this is good comedy.
Now he is talking about his capacity to deploy troops. He provides no evidence, he just says this while wearing a cheap sports jacket with a flag in the background.
https://www.patreon.com/RussellJayGould
lol.
He has a patreon that makes like 7.7k/month
92k a year for this stuff, that is not bad!
>Over-Target… they's scared!
>
>Thanks for playing ~
Jesus fuck, I watched the whole thing. And in the end it is just a big lead up to his website where you can buy a claim of life contract.
I am not paid to do this, I have just used the internet a long long time, and I remember when ppl who tried stuff like this were sent to psych wards—now they tend to just roll over people and call it a "pseudolegal argument," but I remember when questioniung the jurisdiction of the court (depending where) could result in a psychiatric examination, etc.
I strongly support people's right to defend themselves as they see fit, but I also think it is unfortunbate, because since Google, etc. scanned many old legal books, people now have access to a law library that in, say, 1980, would have cost thousands of dollars. A law library that in 1950, before photo-copiers, would have been difficult to even photocopy from the originals at a university law library.
But instead we get hour and a half long youtube videos about some college dropout who thinks he is the Surgeon General. C'est la vie.
Here is the claim of life contract, or whatever it is called from the PDF from libgen.is
Basically you just state where you were born and that you are alive. I think anyone can do that, but, like, it's not worth much.
Honestly, I think Intrepid Trips Inc and Ken Kesey and the Pranksters did it better :P
Also, on the website:
"[REQUIRED FOR CLAIM:
Two of the following: Identifications: Passport, Birth Certificate or License.
First and most critical benefit of the Claim of the Life is the moving of your vessel out of the birth certificate system or docking yourself as a fact into this corporate world. The first step, is to choose this path for yourself in your heart and your gut. Once you move into position as a Claim of the Life claimant by getting your own claim of the life contract, you may then proceed with making claims in your life -an important new method to your daily life protocols and Quantum constructs away from the fiction realm, as well giving you the ability to claim for your child(ren), or new-born(s). With your own Claim of the Life, you’re now in the position of making a CLAIM, which is a position of authorization for your own sovereignty and for your child(ren).
PLEASE REFERENCE THE FAQ PAGE. NO REFUNDS AFTER PURCHASE.]"
Why would you need to have a passport, birth certificate or license to state that you are alive? Why wouldn't you be able to just name yourself?
So, here is a stab at a better life contract that makes it clear you were born, so you are alive, but does not admit that you were born in any fictitous place like the Faggot States of America.
>No time to waste on others tactics… [they] allow some to succeed but most of them are traps.
I'm at a loss for what "success" this method has had. There are tons of instances of it, like every Freeman/Sovereign Citizen/Guru method, failing.
I mean, consider that people will show up and donate even if all they're told is that it is going to get them into Heaven. So there are always suckers who will buy anything.
I just don't see how it solves any problem to tell the Government 'I am alive!' I mean, you can do that, but this quantum grammar stuff violates one of the basic premises to language.
For example, this quantum grammar still uses nouns and verbs, so what are those?
"
Part 1
First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation', then 'proposition' and 'sentence.'
Spoken words are the symbols of mental experience and written words are the symbols of spoken words. Just as all men have not the same writing, so all men have not the same speech sounds, but the mental experiences, which these directly symbolize, are the same for all, as also are those things of which our experiences are the images. This matter has, however, been discussed in my treatise about the soul, for it belongs to an investigation distinct from that which lies before us.
As there are in the mind thoughts which do not involve truth or falsity, and also those which must be either true or false, so it is in speech. For truth and falsity imply combination and separation. Nouns and verbs, provided nothing is added, are like thoughts without combination or separation; 'man' and 'white', as isolated terms, are not yet either true or false. In proof of this, consider the word 'goat-stag.' It has significance, but there is no truth or falsity about it, unless 'is' or 'is not' is added, either in the present or in some other tense.
Part 2
By a noun we mean a sound significant by convention, which has no reference to time, and of which no part is significant apart from the rest. In the noun 'Fairsteed,' the part 'steed' has no significance in and by itself, as in the phrase 'fair steed.' Yet there is a difference between simple and composite nouns; for in the former the part is in no way significant, in the latter it contributes to the meaning of the whole, although it has not an independent meaning. Thus in the word 'pirate-boat' the word 'boat' has no meaning except as part of the whole word. " (http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/interpretation.1.1.html)
So here is a view of what a noun is. This "quantum grammar" still does not address the following:
sound -noun
How does a sound become a noun?
Well, Aristotle says that it is like this:
mental experience -sound -> noun
And the reason Alice and Bob can both use the noun "man" is because they both have the same mental experience, for which they make the sound "man" (or anthropos in Greek). But absent that shared mental experience, there are no nouns or verbs.
This sounds to me like the problem DWM thinks he has solved, except he has not—that problem has nothing to do with grammar or the symbols or their ordering; it has to do with two people having "the mental experiences, which these directly symbolize."
So syllables directly symbolize mental experience, and if someone is not sharing your mental experience, how you write things down will not change (tho I suppose mental experience can be induced by writing).
So, he seems to have this idea that certain words can be broken into syllables, and these have some "secret meaning." This is just not how language works. I mean, it does sometimes, e.g.
complex
compound
common
the "com" sound in these words all has to do with their being latin words, and in Latin the "com" meant something like "with."
But this is not a secret, and in one of the videos I bothered to watch (it was a slow night) there is the idea that
"declaration of independence" has some secret meaning if you break it apart, which is nutty.
Also, I have the idea that DWM has never heard another person say "parse." It is not par-say, it is parz, as in "I am writing a program to parse C."
"Parsing, syntax analysis, or syntactic analysis is the process of analyzing a string of symbols, either in natural language, computer languages or data structures, conforming to the rules of a formal grammar. The term parsing comes from Latin pars (orationis), meaning part (of speech)." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing)
I get the sense that a lot of this is because USA's educational system is horrible.
>>FNORD
>
>:Spelled F-TARD Wrong.
You cannot claim to be a serious Internet User and not know what the Fnords –→ are.
>Tell us you're not a shill and also which Country are you clocking in from at this time of the day?
This Russel-Jay Gould guy is either a full on schizo or he is a con artist, it is one or the other. His claims of being a Supreme Court Judge, etc. are just too far to be taken seriously.
I mean, I love the free market, if someone wants to send him money on patreon (his patreon says he gets like 7k+ a month) I am all for it, but it is basically like giving money to the Church, except the CHurch wont tell you it makes you exempt from parking tickets.
like, a really easy test for any guy like this is to get any sort of traffic ticket and videotape the proceedings. In USA you are even allowed cameras in courtrooms, unlike Canuckistan.
>For the [pre]ventiion of FRAUD.
But this suggests that the state is the authority that grants people names.
Any name on a Driver License, Birth Certificate or Passport is going to come from a state-issued document, e.g. a Birth Certificate. The State gets to decide on your name on those documents.
It just doesn't make sense, that to have a special live birth claim document from this guy, you're going to have to show paperwork from the state. It suggests that the state is the grantor of names, this document just records a fact about the name.
>which Country are you clocking in from at this time of the day?
Well, this is the whole point—if you were actually wanting to be free from the "illegitimate authoruity of the state" (and not nostalgic for the "constitutional government of Date X") then you would not ever say you were in a country.
You would say you are "on the land" (the land is a natural geographical feature, the earth is one landmass composed of continents, water covers some of it) or "in the atmosphere" (the earth has one atmosphere over the earth and the sea.
So, like, identifying with countries is just a sort of political ideology.
>the topic on this board
The topic of this board is either well-meaning but deluded schizos thinking this guy is actually some sort of Grand Poobah Postmaster, or it is run by him or someone adjacent to him as a grift, to try to pick up suckers.
>There won't be any [pro]ceedings because they have no authority over you as a Live-Life-Claimant.
>
>Step by step the bad actors will be [re]moved and the Courts will be CORRECT… imo
OK, so does this Russel-Jay Gould guy drive in a car w/ no plates and no license? Does he drive?
>:[E]VIDENCE of the NAME-YOUR-PARENTS-GAVE-(YOU).
It's not evidence of that, it is evidence of the name your parents gaved you that the state approved. For example, the recent Elon Musk naming thing:
"“In California, you can only use the 26 characters of the English language in your baby name,” Glass said. “Thus, you can't have numbers, Roman numerals, accents, umlauts or other symbols or emojis. Although an apostrophe, for a name like ‘O’Connor,’ is acceptable.”
A birth certificate filled out with “X Æ A-12” can be submitted to the state but due to “the odd numbers, dashes and symbols, it will be submitted and then rejected and they’ll be asked to submit it again,” he added." (https://english.alarabiya.net/variety/2020/05/07/Elon-Musk-Grimes-baby-name-X-A-12-will-be-rejected-by-California-Reports)
So you can name your baby AE, but not Æ
So it is sort of evidence of the name your parents gave you.
But why do your parents get to name you, why dont you get to name yourself?
>As far as I've been told, yes he uses a passport and a drivers-license.
>
>He would have put in his CLAIM for the BOTH with his Quantum-Syntax-Name-Spelling :Russell-Jay: Gould. MAKING him the POSTMASTER of EACH for his CREDENTIALS.
So why does he do that if he is not legally obligated to do so? Maybe he is just a con artist and knows he would get endless hassle, so he uses them?
>:THIS-[WOULD-HAVE-BEEN]-DONE with the CORRECT-POSTAL-MAILING-MECHANICS.
>
>Tutors can help with this
>
>As well as for the vehicle-[re]gistration(s)
How many of these tutoris drive uninsured, unplated cars w/ no license?
>They don't
>
>''For they CLAIM-THEM with their CLAIM of the LIFE CREDENTIALS and: SURETY-BOND with the POSTAL-MAILING-MECHANICS.
OK, so what does it get you if it doesn't get you exempt from municipal laws, e.g. requirement to have driver license?
>:Drivers-License Becomes Part of your [E]VIDENCE in YOUR-[E]VIDENCE-STACK.
Evidence of what, that you are resident in some political geographical area, e.g. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE?
"The troposphere is the lowest layer of Earth's atmosphere. It extends from Earth's surface to an average height of about 12 km (7.5 mi; 39,000 ft), although this altitude varies from about 9 km (5.6 mi; 30,000 ft) at the geographic poles to 17 km (11 mi; 56,000 ft) at the Equator,[22] with some variation due to weather. The troposphere is bounded above by the tropopause, a boundary marked in most places by a temperature inversion (i.e. a layer of relatively warm air above a colder one), and in others by a zone that is isothermal with height" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth#Troposphere)
That is where you live. It is called Science(tm).
>In case you don't know, YOU LIVE IN YOUR BODY/VESSEL.
>
>WHERE EVER YOU ARE IN YOUR NOW-SPACE
>
>IF YOU HAVE ZERO AUTHORIZATION TO BE WHERE YOU ARE THEN YOU ARE TRESPASSING YOUR VESSEL ONTO ANOTHER'S SPACE
Oh, I see what you mean. Well, this is sort of a mind'/body distinction, as though you are a mind/soul that is in a body, which is sort of silly, IMO, but I get what you mean.
As for be where you are, who is it that controls auythorization to be in the troposphere?
>>as though you are a mind/soul that is in a body, which is sort of silly, IMO
>
>Are you trying to get filtered?
Well, by saying you live in your body/"vessel" then you are implying that the vessel is sort of like a ship that contains a soul—the old "Save our Souls," SOS thing on the boat meant the souls, not the bodies, tho you really have to save the body to save the soul.
Like, if you think you have a soul,t hat is cool, and, legally speaking it is likely that the soul exists, for "rights and virtues are in the soul."
But scientifically, the mind/body problem hjas no solution, and it is typical to err on the side of bodies causing minds, not there being some epiphenomenal link between minds/bodies.
>The rules for this would still stand thou, that if you have zero-authorization to be where you are then you're guilty of trespassing.
Well, we have already established that I am in the troposphere, there is only one.
So, how do we divide it up? Who is the Divider?
>:[DE]PENDS on the CONTEXT for the WORD 'DIVIDER'.
No, I mean like there is one troposphere over the planet earth, and that is a natural thing.
How is it that it is divided up into little plots of land covered by troposphere? The answer is geometry, but even in that case, if you say your lot is 120' x 120' (what is a foot?) and someone else says your lot is only 110' x 110', who divides the land?
>There would have to be rules for the length of ones name for your Credentials but as far as my knowledge goes on the subject, once you have verified who you are, and corrected with the Claim of the Life, you can change your name to whatever you want, using the POSTAL-MAILING-MECHANICS.
>
>:YOU WOULD HAVE TO VERIFY with the Russell-Jay: Gould for the RULES/PARAMETERS.
What do you mean verify who you are? A name is a reference, it is not who you are, you are your body and possibly your mind, so a name simply refers to a body, unless you are an Aristtotelean, then you have "the body of Socrates" for example, with Socrates being a primary substance attached to everything about Socrates.
Again, this POSTAL-mAILING-MECHANICS sounds a lot like "you mail a letter to someone and if they dont respond you can deemi t true."
Thats' not how letters/deeds work. If you send a letter, it holds against you, not the recipient, unless they take some action.
>:3-Day-[Re]cission.
And what is that?
I am watching another one of his videos, and he just jumps from place to place without really saying anything specific. Like, he says he has charges in some state, well, what are they? He never says. He isn't giving specifics.
>>>16066390
Int his one he says he fasted for 70 days. There's no way he went 70 days without water, he would have died. So, why is it that eating the food does something magical that drinking the water does not? The state is providing both.
Now it is up to 100 days without food.
~35 minutes in he says this.
"THE CATHOLIC CHURCH runs the District of Columbia through the National Shrine of the Immaculuate Conception. They run it as a tomb for dead people."
Well, OK!
~41 minutes lol, he didn't have his security team so he didnt arrest a Cardinal.
Judge Donald Hall taught him many secrets!
>DEAD-ENTITY BIRTH-CERTIFICATES
Again, these are the sorts of "lines" that schizos draw between things. He honestly sounds like he is a NEET schizo who lived with his grandmother and ended up grifting this DWM "quantum grammar" stuff to make some money. I mean, I don't mind that, but he did not go for 100 days without food in a jail.
Also, birth certifices are issued for stillbirths and also for live births, depending on the age of the fetus.
A birth certificate simply records an event, it does not do anything more thant hat. But what it records is the expulsion or extraction of a "product of conception," that is teh language used in many vital statistics act.
>Maybe go study a styles-manual and get back… I'll wait.
What do you mean a styles manual? Anyway,
>IF THIS NIGGER IS SOME SPECIAL POSTMASTER THEN HE WILL HAVE SOME CERTIFIED BONAFIDE NIGGER VERSION OF LOW GRADE UNACCEPTABLE NIGGER VERSION OF A CERTIFICATE OF POSTMASTER……