>>15821035
Anons - this is spam to create distrust and divide anons.
Ignore
Not Q will be trending on Twitter by the end of the week. I love it when a plan comes together.
I'm not sure what that means.
Do anons remember the 'There is Q' 'There is anon' 'There is no QAnon' Britney Spears dustup? Do you know how much outreach grew from that? It was pure Platinum 'Q's greatest hits.
Not we have that marketing opportunity again. 'There is Q' 'There is Not Q' - it's marketing GOLD anons.
Not Q literally said - I am not Q.
Explain your thinking like I'm and 8th grader. Are you trying to say because of Q drops that don't say anything about Q moving to a social media network that Q said the Q drops are moving to a social media network? I'm having difficulty understanding how you got to the word 'truth' meaning that Q is moving platforms and that we should further call it TS@Q when the entity on Truth Social said 'I am not Q'. Help an anon out here.
Probably because nobody reads it.
Good catch by you anon for sure.
Anons are united. Debating issues of the day and having disagreements do not equal division.
Creating a new set of notables and calling the baker a shill DO equal division. That anon is faggot.
Yes, you do, because I'm calling it 'Not Q' as in the words 'I am Not Q'
Remember Feinstein after the Kavanaugh hearings? Yep… Events are reaching critical.
McConnell Ups Pelosi’s $10 Billion for Ukraine to $14 Billion – Where’s It All Going?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/mcconnell-ups-pelosis-10-billion-ukraine-14-billion-going/
You're not a very good debater. Mocking your opponent is 'how to lose a debate 101'.
It's not the content or the author. It's the marketing. We all KNOW it's the Q team. It's how to market it. TS@Q is shilly shally.
Not Q is controversial and marketable. I'm sticking with 'Not Q'. We want eyes on, not yawns and turn the page.
This debate will continue because that's how good marketing ideas are formed. Just the fact that there is a debate is pulling more anons into it. See the good in controversy, debate and exchange of ideas.
BTW - I like 'Truth Q' much more than TS@Q.
Truth Q is a good marketing name. Succinct and contains a lot of marketable notions.
Blow up Truth Social with new users looking for Q. That's the objective.
It's what I've been saying the whole time too. That's where we totally agree and now how to expose that and get anons/citizen journos to expost that. I'm liking the 'Truth Q' more and more.
What about the DOD Bioweapons Lab in Ukraine that is named 'Chyna'?
I'm sure the Chinese are in on it, but did the release come from a bioweapon designed at the 'Chyna' Ukraine facility?
Where the virus was created and the fact that the CCP released it are two different baskets anon imho.
There are two times every year that China can invade Taiwan. They are April to July and October (because of Monsoon seasons).
The April window is about to open. April showers?
You mean Truth Q?
Yes I think so. Anons convince me on 'Truth Q' instead of 'Not Q'.
Keep at it anons - except for playground bully anon. Grow up.