>>15909818

Use this for the time being.

tick the boxes

https://qagg.news

>>15909999

Which one 1962 or 2004 version?

>>15910052

Baker will be here soon, thank you Notetaker.

o7

>>15910056

https://www.actvid.com/search/manchurian-candidate-

>>15909957

sam

>>15910066

?

I dont think it was a blockbuster or even nommed for an oscar.

All three of you are wrong it is to the simple Gematria of 'as you should' = 160

160 was 4y, 4m, 1d, 3h, 2m ago

The real issue is the use of 2:44 as the q reference.

So, no it is NOT notable.

>>15910098

ahh maybe it is notable?

>>15910098

I think it is notable.

the seconds count!

Changed my mind,

NOTABLE

>>15910098

The gematria part looks to be a bit bullshit