After having dismissed anything that might be relevant to judgment by announing you don't care what the man says, you immediately ascribe superficial characteristics you think that you've identified in him to an entire segment of the population – whom you have gathered into your own categorical fabrication. Sounds like racism to me.
You've got your modern celebrity, then you've got your person that reaches their potential and is therefore a good example of what they do for others. It's just that we all had the same stupid channels in our living room for so long, that there's only one place to celebrity. It ought to be that each domain of our lives has its on exemplary individuals, and we all strive to be one of them somewhere.
LOL no but seriously what did they say about the weird policy of social networks to choose to pass judgment on content, therefore making them liable for those decisions?
What did the smart lawyers of this man say about that I ask of you
respond with the best of assumptions repeatedly and see if the behavior continues
Truth social made the proactive decision to use open source code to create the platform.
They then made the proactive decision to change it into a program that no longer works on computers, and no longer works on any phone that isn't an i-phone.
People are almost universally happy about that.
And it feels like gaslighting to anyone who understands technology.
The New York Times is only now done being embroiled in a national security FISC matter that disallowed their telling the truth about this.
Or,
Yup. All agencies are captured. Justice system too. And major media. And it's totally fucked up.
Yup. You might be ok, I hear they want to be like Paramount Streaming too!
Because we can all afford to add more monthly liabilities to our household balance sheets in the form of multiple subscriptions for infotainment.
Finally, We Get To Write A Headline That Begins With Penis In The Sky
If all indictments came today in one fell swoop, a foreign adversary / our deep state / those not loyal to goodness / sovereignty would be able to effectively turn the sheeple into a rabid mass ready to fight to defend the accused while bringing down the full hammer of big tech and infrastructure attacks / cyber / blackouts etc.
Or,
Yup. Our justice system is totally comped. Our three letters are captured. I mean, our school boards are cheered in that they are trannies, so
That leads to individuals rationally choosing to use FOX to reach others, and FOX employees rationally choosing to stay there - if that is the priority. But it doesn't follow that watching it is healthy or the best choice (for me, I find)
That's what we've been talking about. You can't, except with some rigging that I might not be able to figure out if i tried. Something like a 'ios app emulator for windows'
could be worse
Yeah - he was openly disrespectful to people making complaints about the non-functional and deceptive sign-in system. Just slightly, but not in a way that made me feel better about it. Something like, 'cmon people, it's just in beta, signups are like..' excuse … reason … no contrition … blaming the victims.. etc
The website is like, Here's your number, a number that doesnt' mean anything. Oh you tried to sign up? Blank page. We fixed it - now it's a 404. We fixed it, now some people get an email. But not you - and there's no way to contact us. We don't care about your experience or bug reports. And I'm like. Yay awakening let's go
It's funny how bringing up race doesn't seem like a non-sequitir to some people
only if reciprocal services were not rendered
I'm thinking it looks less like this now than 14 months ago, when that was written. But I'd have to think about it.
especially if you threaten to circumcise them again
The real reason is that no one has ever had two to compare scientifically.
I bet he tells everyone he stopped that boat with only his own manpower