Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 6:50 a.m. No.15910557   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0585 >>0599 >>0752 >>1194

>>15910307 pb

>>15910252 pb

>>15910262 pb

 

got distracted; had to walk away.

sorry guyz

 

this is what I know.

this aircraft (see attached)

we are told crashed onto a little suburban house at the end of a cul de sac.

Being a 9/11 researcher, since the lady was known as a widow who met with Obama and gave him a "dossier"…

when she died unexpectedly directly after meeting with him (Barry), we looked at it.

There was zero plane wreckage in the cul de sac.

 

We knew it was "faked" simulated at the time we studied it then. Or suspected.

Naturally murder came to mind.

That when I knew Barry was comped

Up til them I might've imagined he just didn't know.

 

So I figured out "they all know" about 9/11 attack being a deliberate attack on NYC , etc., and went along with it ; at the very least.

At the very beginning of the study there was a dispute between

MIHOP

vs

LIHOP

Let it happen vs. Make it happen.

by '09 everybody was in the "make it happen" camp

But I still could've imagined Obama was innocent and it was done by parties who compartmentalized their action.

sorry for so much text.

 

This is what I figured out today, looking back at it.

No way that aircraft crashed where they said it did.

If it stalled out, by the time it hit ground there would still be forward momentum.

We'd already looked at all the fake crash sites from Sept 11 attack, so I was fairly damned convinced at the time, that it was not a plane crash site that they showed us (for whatever reason)

Because AGAINS there was no sign of an aircraft crash, i.e. no plane parts anyway.

They claimed again that everything was burnt up..

But thinking now I realize even more how impossible it was..

It was a teeny house … no other houses were hurt.

Some craziness (drama soap opera) around the alleged vidtim(s); they couldnt' get that straight at first, and the story kept changing (typical)

As far as the Q research on this board goes

Back in the day anons here connected the aircraft accident with a patent HRC allegedly has to remotely take out an aircraft.

(maybe it exploded in the air?)

It's some kind of switch she allegedly has.

And they traced it to phone calls she was initiated on her way to her place in Westchester County, that day, some time right before crash.

 

That's what I remember. I'm trying to get into archives, might have to wait to upgrade linux machine…. windows is a hassle to open some archive files..

Maybe someone else can retrieve the conversations back then?

Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 7:24 a.m. No.15910716   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0752

>>15910585

>https://qalerts.app/?q=HRC+2

oh wow thanks

they are bringing it up again.

 

anons started discussing it after that, a few days ago?;

but I didn't study the q! drops closely yet

 

but in the conversations that followed again a few days ago, the patents were brought up.

HRC got the patent(s) years ago at Rose Law Firm; while working there?

 

Remote Control / built in back end access..

I saved some info on it but can't remember file names.

We do know that was mentioned in the March 7th "Vault 7" release by Wikileaks?

And that was connected to the killing of the Journalist who 'd been working on corruption around Brennan.

His card exploded in southern Cali.

?

 

I'll keep looking

anyone wants to call a dig

HRC patents on remote control aircraft?

Vault 7 / remote control connect to "Internet of Things?"

Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 7:36 a.m. No.15910791   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15910732

maybe focus on what you are doing?

I get ya, though

That's what they are after.

Therefore, anon attempts to stymie their attempts;

Remember, "they are stupid"

We have the edge, after all.

 

Also, realize, on a free speech situation, that's their only tool. And we have, our strenght, is that we can type here..

And others can read it.

That's BIG

Thanks you Watkins, Jim and Ron.

Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 7:44 a.m. No.15910842   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0859 >>0862 >>0908 >>0951

>>15910674

it was a remote control aircraft.

One could see that from the very fist moment

G forces.

I'm not even a pilot and I knew that.

But I'm not even a doctor and I know the injection is a death shot. so WTH

 

The dude is still alive.

He's a crisis actor. That's why it / he's funny.

The people who worship him are in the same class as those who always write "She's Pretty" about the CGI trannie who allegedly shot up YouTube offices?

 

I finally figured out that they wanted to cover the fact it was a remote controlled aircraft,, and that why they kept shouting aobut what a hero he was / is.

 

Here he is portraying the pilot of a chemtrails jet?

Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 8:36 a.m. No.15911194   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1224

>>15910557

maybe they held back from destroying the aircraft ($$$$)

and just flew it somewhere where they could dispose of the passengers..

Maybe some of them worked for them, and they needed to be 'sheep dipped'

the passenger list was very spoopy.

 

forgot to mention

the houses were all close to each other; the one destroyed was one of a few around the cul de sac,, or at least one other.

Only that site was destroyed.

a fireball.

where the aircraft supposedly crashed?

Looked like the houses and residents (one that was hit was allegedly empty?) was all staged

Lame soap opera'

 

following QRS-11 lead found info on 'the wives' pedo network

Anonymous ID: 68ad70 March 21, 2022, 8:41 a.m. No.15911224   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15911194

here's an article I saved from three days ago; guess from when the @q! brought it up

3 days ago?

 

this is only first part of the article

see ya next bread, if I have moar