>>>/qrb/130683

Anon thanks for the vote of confidence.

I haven't had a chance to look into that issue itself as I have been trying to wrap up the current installment of my decode, but your post gives me a good entry point as it turns out that I discovered a very curious set of comms involving Lisa Page (who I believe is part Iranian).

The actual decode of this appears in the bottom right of the final graphic I will post today, but the graphic got so big that I wasn't able to fit some relevant historical background.

Anons recall that Lisa Page tried to take down the legitimate government with her "boyfriend" Peter Strzok (despite the fact that both were married to other people).

Now contrast her with the Roman beauty Lucretia (pictured).

(I am glad I get to use this picture as I had two picked out but I put the other one in the graphic, and there is an amusing twist to that choice… see the graphic.)

Anyway, the king of Rome had a very dissolute son.

One day he heard Lucretia's husband praise her great beauty and he had to see for himself.

It turned out she was even more beautiful than words had conveyed.

So Tarquin (the son) snuck into her bed at night and raped her.

Lucretia was greatly distraught and revealed the malefactor to her husband, just before she plunged the knife into her breast.

That's a far cry from Lisa Page!

But if you view the graphic below (Purple Rain) you will see that they both appear in an amazing set of comms…

But there is some good news, in that the outrage over Lucretia's unjust death led the Romans to oust their king and reject kings altogether.

They instituted a republican form of government.

It lasted for centuries…

But now I must jump ahead to fill in some extra background that didn't fit.

In the first century BC the Roman republic faced many trials.

The power of Rome had expanded and wealth undermined virtue.

But one man sought to bring order from the chaos and his name was Julius Caesar.

The corrupt politicians in Rome told him not to enter Italy with his troops and they set the boundary at the Rubicon.

But Caesar chose to roll the dice and play to win.

>>15931065

The current set of posts is the most recent installment of an extended dig/decode on DOJ related topics (especially Comey) in the light of "what we now know" (or think we know) regarding Q-stuff.

(Previous installments were posted on QRB due to the corrupt management here, now ousted I think.)

Here is a guide to prior installments.

In most cases there are also subsequent posts attached sequentially.

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/115742.html#115813 1: Opener, Analysis of Pence and Flynn

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116081.html#116087 2: More Pence and Flynn with Q-style "decode" graphics (featuring Ben Hur)

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116971.html#117057 3: Comey as possible white hat, Analysis of initial HRC "exoneration"

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118116.html#118140 4: Comey's role in the 2020 election

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118597.html#118638 5: Some topics from Comey's books

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/119330.html#119352 6: Comey as Q (?), BIG decode graphic with Battle of Midway, "Ramsey Rapist" and more

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/120083.html#120196 7: Small decode graphic re possible Comey tweet reply to prior post

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/121286.html#121494 8: Comey Jan 11 tweet decode

Undoubtedly, most anons will take a look at my current posts before deciding whether it is worth the effort to look into the earlier stuff.

That said, I think that if you decide this could be worth your time, then it is best to read from the start.

This investigation has taken some quite surprising turns, but each "level" builds on the previous levels.

Also, I am aiming not to repeat myself, and continually aim to focus on finding and developing new material.

So if you want to see where I am coming from, go to the start and read through from there.

As I have said before, I will watch for any comments, critiques, etc., and will be glad to read them and will most likely include replies somewhere.

(Shills excluded… unless really amusing shills, kek.)

I will keep working on the decode.

>>15931072

If you read through the prior installments, you will see that I have argued that James Comey is a whitehat, and that he is very likely Q.

No doubt someone will immediately jump in and say that this cannot possibly be so and so on, but if you carefully examine what I have already posted, I suspect you will be surprised. Many "impossible" things aren't.

That said, I deem it important to carefully consider counterevidence, and Comey's recent Washington Post opinion piece must surely count as a big piece of counterevidence.

He seems to be calling for the DOJ to bring down the hammer on countless citizens who went to DC on Jan 6 to peacably exercise their rights to speak and to assemble.

He could hardly be a whitehat, right? (And much less Q…)

But appearances can be deceiving.

The entire WaPo piece is included in the graphic, which I modeled on my prior decode of his initial HRC "exoneration".

I didn't initially intend to include "Q decode" style stuff, but once I noticed a few things I didn't want to leave them out.

I admit I was feeling a bit nervous at times, as most of my readings are merely plausible and hardly knockdown decodes.

But once I caught the business about the "matters" my mood improved.

In any case, the main purpose of this graphic is not to provide positive evidence that Comey is a whitehat, but rather to undermine the article as counterevidence.

It is my rebuttal of a hostile witness, so to speak, but I think I come close to flipping the witness.

Anyway, judge for yourself.

WaPo piece by Comey:

https://archive.ph/Fv37c

>>15931083

This graphic was mostly constructed as an afterthought to the forthcoming one.

That one got a bit large, and I was frustrated, but I noticed the team dropped some Comey comms, and figured a nice, clean graphic was in order.

But I found some surprises even here. (For the Gold graphic, see Part 6 above.)

I suppose a skeptical anon could omit the part about George Washington, dance king, and the rest would still work.

I would like to offer a personal reflection though….

The reason I know that aspect of GW's life was because in a doldrumy part of my own life, I forced myself to learn to dance.

I viewed it as quite literally the most difficult thing I could possibly strive to do.

But I felt very, very lost and concluded that that is what I must do.

(I had actually tried and failed many times before.)

But I did it.

There is a very steep learning curve if you are the man learning to dance, but once you get over that it is as if a whole new world opens up.

A few years after I saw that world I remember being utterly astounded one moment.

I was dancing in a crowded bar with some scantily-clad Brazilian girl I had never seen before and was spontaneously producing sixteen measures of complex moves that meshed with the music and I wasn't "thinking" at all, and the whole thing just struck me as amazing… how was I even the same person?

I suppose there's a story to that, but I'm getting off track.

My point is that dancing is way better than you might imagine.

And perhaps even more important is striving to do things that are very difficult, but which might make a difference for you.

My 2¢ so to speak…

And fuck George Michael, I aim to dance again but we must win the Q war.

>>15931090

Mostly this graphic speaks for itself (but also see especially my first post today).

That said, it got so large that I had innumerable technical problems, including multiple data losses and great difficulty performing even basic alterations.

Also, I kept discovering new comms as I went along, and ultimately they don't all fit.

I was aiming to develop a fuller analogy between the WW2 and ancient Rome themes, and you can likely see that if you try to dissect what I've got.

But all in all, I don't think anyone who carefully reads this can conclude anything other than that Comey has been working with Q team, and might well be Q.

I included some entire decode graphics by other anons, and I thank them even though I don't have links.

I must say that a big decode like this is totally reliant on the work of many other anons and I thank them all.

If you think I put some of your work into this graphic I probably did…. thanks!

The one interpretive "move" that might seem a bit questionable is the jump to the Prince Halftime Show.

But I think there is a deeper point here.

Decodes aren't simply about doing tricks with numbers and so on.

That is all well and good, but we need to think and understand.

I think the Prince decode in the end just works.

But I think even the initial move makes sense.

What is Trump's main slogan?

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

I think that Prince puts this idea into action and strives to be the BEST right then and there.

But more than the best, ONE OF A KIND.

Not everyone put into the same situation does that.

People whine and make excuses and say that conditions aren't ideal so it is OK to not put in the top effort.

But Prince goes on stage and thinks: "I'm muthafucking Prince! I've prepared my whole life for this and I CAN be the best RIGHT NOW and that's WHAT I'M GONNA DO!"

NO EXCUSES!

It may sound a bit egotistcal, but NOT to do so would be MORALLY WRONG, I think.

If you are given the chance to be the best, then others can see that, and if you slack off then others can see that too.

And then they might emulate you negatively in areas of life that might seem to "matter" more than a onetime performance.

But if you strive to be the best, then maybe others will follow too.

And even if they don't, you still better strive to be the best.

That's what I think.

Enjoy the show:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WYYlRArn3g